Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Administrative Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1988

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 386

Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law

Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Dec 1988

Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-156


Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-374


Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 86-549


Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 86-33


Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-395


Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 86-368


Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Nov 1988

Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844


Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg Nov 1988

Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg

Michigan Law Review

This article first will explain our system of "transaction taxation" and will further explore the problems caused by the transactional focus of our tax system. It then will consider the current judicial responses to these problems and examine their inadequacies. Finally, it will set forth and explore the alternative responses suggested above in more detail.


Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-432


Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-375


Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-446


Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Well Permit No. 4352


Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1490


Appeal No. 0333: D. Freshley Well No. 01 V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0333: D. Freshley Well No. 01 V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1556


Appeal No. 0173: Nacelle Land & Management V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil Ad Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0173: Nacelle Land & Management V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil Ad Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 86-81 and 86-82


Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 87-182


Appeal No. 0267: K-B Oil Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0267: K-B Oil Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-226


Appeal No. 0270: Harold Pfleiderer V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0270: Harold Pfleiderer V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-280


Appeal No. 0286: Explo Oil, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1988

Appeal No. 0286: Explo Oil, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-393


Kach V. Central Election Committee For The Twelfth Knesset, Meir Shamgar, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski, Dov Levin, Shlomo Levin Oct 1988

Kach V. Central Election Committee For The Twelfth Knesset, Meir Shamgar, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski, Dov Levin, Shlomo Levin

Translated Opinions

The Appeal revolved around the decision of the Central Election Committee for the Twelfth Knesset, under its authority according to section 63 of the Knesset Elections Act [Consolidated Version] 1969, that the “Kach” List be barred from participating in elections to the Knesset, under section 7A of Basic Law: The Knesset. The Appellant’s argue that section 7A, which was added to Basic Law: The Knesset is invalid for the following reasons: it is inconsistent with the principle of equality as established by section 4 of Basic Law: The Knesset; it is an extreme divergence from the principles of democracy and …


The Fragility Of Good Ideas: A Case For Abolishing Sunset Review Of Florida's Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Licensing Statute, Barbara Balzer Oct 1988

The Fragility Of Good Ideas: A Case For Abolishing Sunset Review Of Florida's Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Licensing Statute, Barbara Balzer

Florida State University Law Review

"How did I get here? Somebody pushed me. Somebody must have set me off in this direction and clusters of other hands must have touched themselves to the controls at various times, for I would not have picked this way for the world."1


New Regulations For Motor Vehicle Manufacturers And New Protections For Their Franchisees, Mary E. Haskins, Walter E. Forehand Oct 1988

New Regulations For Motor Vehicle Manufacturers And New Protections For Their Franchisees, Mary E. Haskins, Walter E. Forehand

Florida State University Law Review

Sections 320.60 and 320.70, Florida Statutes, regulate the business relationships between motor vehicle manufacturers and their dealers. In this Article, the authors discuss the 1988 Florida Legislature's reenactment and comprehensive revision of the franchise protection scheme. While some scholars have advocated discontinuing the statutory regulation of motor vehicle manufacturers and their franchisees, Ms. Haskins and Dr. Forehand take a contrary position: that extension of the regulatory scheme will provide franchisees with more protections from unfair business practices than otherwise would be available, and may have the salutary effect of injecting a degree of certainty into an area which has heretofore …