Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (345)
- Agency (257)
- Natural Resources Law (109)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (67)
- Health Law and Policy (41)
-
- Legislation (33)
- Environmental Law (26)
- Litigation (25)
- Environmental Health and Protection (22)
- Environmental Policy (22)
- Environmental Sciences (22)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (22)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (22)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (22)
- Water Law (22)
- Water Resource Management (22)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (21)
- Property Law and Real Estate (20)
- Agriculture Law (17)
- Environmental Monitoring (15)
- Jurisdiction (14)
- President/Executive Department (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (12)
- Animal Law (10)
- Animal Sciences (10)
- Aquaculture and Fisheries (10)
- Life Sciences (10)
- Accounting Law (9)
- Institution
-
- University of San Diego (257)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (67)
- University of Colorado Law School (23)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- UIC School of Law (5)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (67)
- State law; State administrative decision; (66)
- SB 1552 (14)
- United States (12)
- AB 4007 (11)
-
- SB 315 (10)
- AB 2714 (8)
- SB 269 (8)
- AB 1913 (7)
- AB 271 (7)
- Clean Water Act (7)
- SB 1335 (7)
- SB 2297 (7)
- SB 645 (7)
- SB 91 (7)
- AB 1177 (6)
- AB 1860 (6)
- AB 1990 (6)
- SB 1737 (6)
- SB 1997 (6)
- SB 2565 (6)
- AB 1028 (5)
- AB 1250 (5)
- AB 2030 (5)
- AB 2999 (5)
- AB 3766 (5)
- California Chapter of the American Physical Therapy Association v. California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (5)
- EPA (5)
- Environmental Protection Agency (5)
- Federal agencies (5)
- Publication
-
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (257)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (67)
- Water Quality Control: Integrating Beneficial Use and Environmental Protection (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (22)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (4)
-
- Florida State University Law Review (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Translated Opinions (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Dianne Pothier Collection (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011) (1)
- Publications (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 386
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-156
Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-374
Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-549
Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-33
Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-395
Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-368
Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg
Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg
Michigan Law Review
This article first will explain our system of "transaction taxation" and will further explore the problems caused by the transactional focus of our tax system. It then will consider the current judicial responses to these problems and examine their inadequacies. Finally, it will set forth and explore the alternative responses suggested above in more detail.
Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-432
Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-375
Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-446
Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Well Permit No. 4352
Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-1490
Appeal No. 0333: D. Freshley Well No. 01 V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0333: D. Freshley Well No. 01 V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-1556
Appeal No. 0173: Nacelle Land & Management V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil Ad Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0173: Nacelle Land & Management V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil Ad Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 86-81 and 86-82
Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order No. 87-182
Appeal No. 0267: K-B Oil Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0267: K-B Oil Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-226
Appeal No. 0270: Harold Pfleiderer V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0270: Harold Pfleiderer V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-280
Appeal No. 0286: Explo Oil, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0286: Explo Oil, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-393
Kach V. Central Election Committee For The Twelfth Knesset, Meir Shamgar, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski, Dov Levin, Shlomo Levin
Kach V. Central Election Committee For The Twelfth Knesset, Meir Shamgar, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski, Dov Levin, Shlomo Levin
Translated Opinions
The Appeal revolved around the decision of the Central Election Committee for the Twelfth Knesset, under its authority according to section 63 of the Knesset Elections Act [Consolidated Version] 1969, that the “Kach” List be barred from participating in elections to the Knesset, under section 7A of Basic Law: The Knesset. The Appellant’s argue that section 7A, which was added to Basic Law: The Knesset is invalid for the following reasons: it is inconsistent with the principle of equality as established by section 4 of Basic Law: The Knesset; it is an extreme divergence from the principles of democracy and …
The Fragility Of Good Ideas: A Case For Abolishing Sunset Review Of Florida's Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Licensing Statute, Barbara Balzer
The Fragility Of Good Ideas: A Case For Abolishing Sunset Review Of Florida's Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Licensing Statute, Barbara Balzer
Florida State University Law Review
"How did I get here? Somebody pushed me. Somebody must have set me off in this direction and clusters of other hands must have touched themselves to the controls at various times, for I would not have picked this way for the world."1
New Regulations For Motor Vehicle Manufacturers And New Protections For Their Franchisees, Mary E. Haskins, Walter E. Forehand
New Regulations For Motor Vehicle Manufacturers And New Protections For Their Franchisees, Mary E. Haskins, Walter E. Forehand
Florida State University Law Review
Sections 320.60 and 320.70, Florida Statutes, regulate the business relationships between motor vehicle manufacturers and their dealers. In this Article, the authors discuss the 1988 Florida Legislature's reenactment and comprehensive revision of the franchise protection scheme. While some scholars have advocated discontinuing the statutory regulation of motor vehicle manufacturers and their franchisees, Ms. Haskins and Dr. Forehand take a contrary position: that extension of the regulatory scheme will provide franchisees with more protections from unfair business practices than otherwise would be available, and may have the salutary effect of injecting a degree of certainty into an area which has heretofore …