Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (4390)
- Natural Resources Law (3497)
- Constitutional Law (2987)
- Agency (2569)
- Environmental Law (2071)
-
- Legislation (1887)
- Courts (1840)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1816)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1785)
- Criminal Law (1734)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1595)
- Agriculture Law (1495)
- Civil Law (1395)
- Business Organizations Law (1379)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1330)
- Internet Law (1272)
- Water Law (1272)
- Human Rights Law (1242)
- International Trade Law (1204)
- Criminal Procedure (1203)
- Land Use Law (1163)
- Rule of Law (1139)
- Conflict of Laws (1114)
- Health Law and Policy (1062)
- Legal Education (1032)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1026)
- Air and Space Law (982)
- Election Law (957)
- Institution
-
- University of San Diego (2117)
- Universitas Indonesia (1379)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (910)
- University of Colorado Law School (852)
- University of Michigan Law School (793)
-
- Pepperdine University (674)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (579)
- Seattle University School of Law (376)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (343)
- Columbia Law School (248)
- University of Montana (245)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (204)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (198)
- William & Mary Law School (194)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (176)
- American University Washington College of Law (168)
- Fordham Law School (165)
- Florida State University College of Law (161)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (159)
- New York Law School (153)
- University of Washington School of Law (152)
- University of Georgia School of Law (143)
- Brooklyn Law School (138)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (135)
- University of Kentucky (125)
- University of Richmond (114)
- Georgetown University Law Center (113)
- Duke Law (112)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (112)
- West Virginia University (111)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (876)
- Ohio (875)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- Administrative Law (551)
- Regulation (480)
-
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
- Judicial review (292)
- United States (269)
- Federal agencies (204)
- Administrative Procedure Act (200)
- Administrative procedure (183)
- Congress (178)
- Colorado (177)
- Chevron (151)
- Federal Communications Commission (151)
- Rulemaking (147)
- Legislation (143)
- Administrative agencies (142)
- Climate change (142)
- Separation of powers (138)
- EPA (134)
- Environmental Protection Agency (133)
- California (129)
- FCC (123)
- Regulations (123)
- Constitutional Law (122)
- Due process (119)
- Environmental law (119)
- Statutory interpretation (117)
- Supreme Court (116)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (2106)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (1075)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- Faculty Scholarship (645)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (604)
-
- Michigan Law Review (404)
- Articles (274)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (256)
- Seattle University Law Review (256)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (242)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (237)
- Publications (218)
- Faculty Publications (169)
- Buffalo Law Review (160)
- Indiana Law Journal (158)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (127)
- Translated Opinions (123)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (111)
- West Virginia Law Review (104)
- Scholarly Publications (99)
- ExpressO (95)
- Scholarly Works (94)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (90)
- Washington Law Review (88)
- Fordham Law Review (87)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (86)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (80)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (76)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (76)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (74)
- Publication Type
Articles 11671 - 11700 of 14168
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
There May Be Cracks In The Foundation: An Analysis Of Pennsylvania's Current Approach To Legislative Review Of Agency Rulemaking , Nicholas J. Johnson
There May Be Cracks In The Foundation: An Analysis Of Pennsylvania's Current Approach To Legislative Review Of Agency Rulemaking , Nicholas J. Johnson
Faculty Scholarship
As the legislative delegation of power to administrative agencies has grown over recent decades, so have calls for controls on agencies exercise of that power and particularly for controls on agency rulemaking. In response, various state legislatures have introduced a myriad of designs introducing legislative oversight and control over administrative regulations. Pennsylvania has joined these states by offering a means of legislative review of agency rulemaking in the form of the Regulatory Review Act of 1989 (Act 19). Pursuant to the Act, the Pennsylvania Legislature created an entity called the Independent Regulatory Review Commission and assigned to the Commission the …
What's Current In Asbestos Regulations, Janis L. Kirkland
What's Current In Asbestos Regulations, Janis L. Kirkland
University of Richmond Law Review
Asbestos, once valued as a superb insulator, is now recognized as a deadly carcinogen. The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimates that 733,000 public and commercial buildings in the United States contain friable asbestos or asbestos-containing materials. Thus, it is not surprising that an avalanche of litigation has resulted from concerns over exposure to asbestos.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Administrative Procedure, James E. Ryan Jr., Renata Manzo Scruggs
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Administrative Procedure, James E. Ryan Jr., Renata Manzo Scruggs
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1989, the Virginia General Assembly made several relatively minor, but significant, changes to the Virginia Administrative Process Act (VAPA). These amendments modified the manner in which agencies may promulgate regulations and conduct informal fact finding hearings. Two new exemptions to the VAPA were created: one for rules for the conduct of specific lottery games; and a second for orders condemning shellfish growing areas. In other changes, rulemaking proceedings conducted by the State Water Control Board (SWCB), certain decisions of the Board of Social Services, and amendments to standards for asbestos inspections became subject to different provisions of the VAPA.
Structure And Process, Politics And Policy: Administrative Arrangements And The Political Control Of Agencies, Mathew D. Mccubbins, Roger D. Noll, Barry R. Weingast
Structure And Process, Politics And Policy: Administrative Arrangements And The Political Control Of Agencies, Mathew D. Mccubbins, Roger D. Noll, Barry R. Weingast
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Federal Oil Price Controls In Bankruptcy Cases: Government Claims For Repayment Of Illegal Overcharges Should Not Be Subordinated And “Penalties” Under 11 Usc §726(A)(4), Thomas A. Schweitzer
Federal Oil Price Controls In Bankruptcy Cases: Government Claims For Repayment Of Illegal Overcharges Should Not Be Subordinated And “Penalties” Under 11 Usc §726(A)(4), Thomas A. Schweitzer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Focus: Clean Water Act’S Section 404, David H. Getches
Foreword, Focus: Clean Water Act’S Section 404, David H. Getches
Publications
No abstract provided.
Integrated Pollution Control: The Way Forward, Lakshman Guruswamy
Integrated Pollution Control: The Way Forward, Lakshman Guruswamy
Publications
No abstract provided.
Integrating Thoughtways: Re-Opening Of The Environmental Mind?, Lakshman Guruswamy
Integrating Thoughtways: Re-Opening Of The Environmental Mind?, Lakshman Guruswamy
Publications
The implementation of environmental law and policy has assumed that pollution could be contained, corralled and interdicted within the medium (air, land, or water) in which unpleasant effects are encountered. Sweeping, but piecemeal, federal legislation in the 1970s aspired to create healthy air, together with fishable, swimmable and drinkable waters. Despite impressive gains, these goals have not been achieved. There have been painful failures, compounded by the mounting costs of environmental protection. While the need for environmental protection is generally accepted, the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation based on the legislation of the 1970s has been questioned in the 1980s. …
Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0298: Petro Drilling Corp. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-156
Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0281: Pentawood, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-374
Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0227: Buckeye Petroleum Corp. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-549
Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0200: Will Of Carl J. Heltzel, V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-33
Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0283: Dallas Bond V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-395
Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0223: Rexplore Drilling, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 86-368
Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0314: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0313: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0312: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0311: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0317: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0318: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0310: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0315: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0316: H.A.D., Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 88-836, 88-837, 88-838, 88-839, 88-840, 88-841, 88-842, 88-843, and 88-844
Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg
Tax Avoidance And Income Measurement, Joshua D. Rosenberg
Michigan Law Review
This article first will explain our system of "transaction taxation" and will further explore the problems caused by the transactional focus of our tax system. It then will consider the current judicial responses to these problems and examine their inadequacies. Finally, it will set forth and explore the alternative responses suggested above in more detail.
Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0251: M B Operations Co., V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order No. 87-182
Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0293: Quadrant Exploration, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-446
Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0291: Robert Wells V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-432
Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0290: Leslie Oil & Gas Co. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-375
Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0299: M B Operations Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Well Permit No. 4352
Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0328: Sparta Energy Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-1490