Administrative Law Commons^™

Board Of Chiropractic Examiners, J. Polgrean

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Bureau Of Home Furnishings And Thermal Insulation, J. Geraci

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Chadha, Abner J. Mikva

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Chadha by Barbara Hinkson Craig

American Broadcasting And The First Amendment, René L. Todd

Michigan Law Review

A Review of American Broadcasting and the First Amendment by Lucas A. Powe, Jr.

Administrative Procedure And The Internal Revenue Service: Delimiting The Substantial Understatement Penalty, Peter A. Appel

Scholarly Works

In the early 1980's, Congress faced the mounting problems of tax shelters and other forms of tax avoidance. It responded by passing a series of laws.1 One of these provisions, section 6661 of the Internal Revenue Code, penalizes "substantial understatement" of tax liability.2 While section 6661 may appear to be a typical, innocuous tax code provision, close examination reveals that the substantial understatement penalty threatens to expand quietly the power of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over taxpayers, violating the spirit of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in the process.

Section I of this Note explores the background of section …

Appeal No. 0337: Belden & Blake Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1659

Petitions For Modification Of Msha Safety Standards: Process, Problems And A Proposal For Reform, Timothy M. Biddle, Thomas C. Means, Susan E. Chetlin

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law—Rescuing Creditor Claims From The "Black Hole." Coit Independence Joint Venture V. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation, J. Michael Pickens

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Statutes Limiting Mental Health Professional's Liability For The Violent Acts Of Their Patients, Michael R. Geske

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

How Separation Of Powers Protects Individual Liberties, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0323: Dusty Drilling And Producing Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-874

Appeal No. 0334: Jonsu Oil Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1268

Appeal No. 0338: D & L Energy, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-2027

Electronic Acquisition And Release Of Federal Agency Information: Analysis Of Recommendations Adopted By The Administrative Conference Of The United States, Henry H. Perritt Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

National Trends In Court Review Of Agency Action: Some Reflections On The Model State Administrative Procedure Act And New Utah Administrative Procedure Act, Dave Frohnmayer

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0258: Harry A. Holtem V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-05

Appeal No. 0330: Bob Lane Dba Bethel Oil & Gas V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1564

Appeal No. 0324: William E. Kidd V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1227

Appeal No. 0292: Southern Ohio Petr. Co., Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-438

Appeal No. 0295: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-443

Appeal No. 0296: Bkk Prospecting, Ltd. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-444

Appeal No. 0308: Progressive Oil & Gas, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-651

Appeal No. 0226: Berresford Enterprises, Inc. V. Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 86-551

Appeal No. 0284: Ellysons, Inc. V. Ted Ford, Acting Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas,, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 87-381

Appeal No. 0322: Cannan Oil Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-936

Schnitzer V. Chief Military Censor, Aharon Barak, Yaakov Malz, Shulamit Wallenstein

Translated Opinions

The Petitioners sought to publish a newspaper article that was critical of the outgoing head of the Mossad, the Agency for Intelligence and Special Duties, on the occasion of the forthcoming appointment of a new Mossad head. The article did not mention his name or otherwise identify him. After several versions of the article were submitted for approval to the first Respondent, the Chief Military Censor, and after the Petitioners agreed not to publish certain parts of the article, the Censor forbade the publication of two matters: criticism of the head of the Mossad's effectiveness, on the ground that such …

Shnitzer V. Chief Military Censor, Aharon Barak, Yaakov Melitz, Shulamit Wallenstein

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.] 

This petition concerns the decision by the First Respondent to prohibit, under its authority according to Regulation 87(1) of the Defense Regulations (State of Emergency) 1945, the publication of a newspaper article criticizing the functioning of the Director of the Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations (the “Mossad”,) while noting the upcoming change in Mossad directors. After submitting to the First Respondent different versions …

Appeal No. 0332: Portage Resources, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 88-1281

Aids And Government: A Plan Of Action, Taunya L. Banks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.