Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (4381)
- Natural Resources Law (3485)
- Constitutional Law (2965)
- Agency (2569)
- Environmental Law (2067)
-
- Legislation (1885)
- Courts (1823)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1816)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1772)
- Criminal Law (1720)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1571)
- Agriculture Law (1482)
- Civil Law (1381)
- Business Organizations Law (1366)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1318)
- Water Law (1272)
- Internet Law (1259)
- Human Rights Law (1229)
- International Trade Law (1192)
- Criminal Procedure (1189)
- Land Use Law (1162)
- Rule of Law (1116)
- Conflict of Laws (1101)
- Health Law and Policy (1059)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1025)
- Legal Education (1020)
- Air and Space Law (970)
- International Law (945)
- Institution
-
- University of San Diego (2117)
- Universitas Indonesia (1367)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (910)
- University of Colorado Law School (852)
- University of Michigan Law School (791)
-
- Pepperdine University (674)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (579)
- Seattle University School of Law (376)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (340)
- Columbia Law School (247)
- University of Montana (245)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (204)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (198)
- William & Mary Law School (194)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (176)
- American University Washington College of Law (168)
- Fordham Law School (163)
- Florida State University College of Law (161)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (157)
- New York Law School (153)
- University of Washington School of Law (152)
- University of Georgia School of Law (143)
- Brooklyn Law School (138)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (135)
- University of Kentucky (125)
- Georgetown University Law Center (113)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (112)
- Duke Law (111)
- West Virginia University (111)
- University of Richmond (110)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (875)
- Administrative law (874)
- Administrative Law (567)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- Regulation (480)
-
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
- Judicial review (290)
- United States (269)
- Federal agencies (203)
- Administrative Procedure Act (200)
- Administrative procedure (183)
- Congress (179)
- Colorado (177)
- Chevron (151)
- Federal Communications Commission (151)
- Rulemaking (149)
- Legislation (145)
- Administrative agencies (142)
- Climate change (142)
- Separation of powers (138)
- EPA (134)
- Environmental Protection Agency (133)
- California (129)
- Constitutional Law (126)
- FCC (123)
- Regulations (123)
- Environmental law (119)
- Due process (118)
- Statutory interpretation (117)
- Supreme Court (116)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (2106)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (1063)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- Faculty Scholarship (638)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (604)
-
- Michigan Law Review (404)
- Articles (271)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (256)
- Seattle University Law Review (256)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (242)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (237)
- Publications (218)
- Faculty Publications (169)
- Buffalo Law Review (160)
- Indiana Law Journal (158)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (127)
- Translated Opinions (123)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (111)
- West Virginia Law Review (104)
- Scholarly Publications (99)
- ExpressO (95)
- Scholarly Works (93)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (90)
- Washington Law Review (88)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (86)
- Fordham Law Review (85)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (80)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (76)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (76)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (74)
- Publication Type
Articles 10291 - 10320 of 14109
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Takings Law, Lucas, And The Growth Management Act, John M. Groen, Richard M. Stephens
Takings Law, Lucas, And The Growth Management Act, John M. Groen, Richard M. Stephens
Seattle University Law Review
In light of Lucas and the recent constitutionally questionable Washington decisions, government entities charged with implementing the GMA may have a more difficult time avoiding takings liability than previously thought. Accordingly, this Article first seeks to clarify the modern takings analysis as refined by Lucas. Second, Washington takings precedent is contrasted with the federal approach and several key changes are suggested to make state law consistent with controlling federal precedent. Third, key aspects of the GMA are identified that can be expected to raise takings implications. By identifying potential trouble spots in the GMA now, hopefully some takings will …
Issue Preclusion - Recognizing Foreign Judgments In United States Patent Infringement Suits: A New Approach, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 627 (1993), James P. Muraff
Issue Preclusion - Recognizing Foreign Judgments In United States Patent Infringement Suits: A New Approach, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 627 (1993), James P. Muraff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Public Opinion, Public Interest Groups, And Political Parties In Creating And Implementing Environmental Policy., Irma S. Russell
The Role Of Public Opinion, Public Interest Groups, And Political Parties In Creating And Implementing Environmental Policy., Irma S. Russell
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
New Motor Vehicle Board, T. L. Archer
New Motor Vehicle Board, T. L. Archer
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Auctioneer Commission, J. D'Angelo
Auctioneer Commission, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Athletic Commission, C. Mckinnon
Athletic Commission, C. Mckinnon
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Cemetery Board, J. Buffone
Fish And Game Commission, T. L. Archer, C. A. Coyle
Fish And Game Commission, T. L. Archer, C. A. Coyle
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
General Legislation, S. Barrow, E. D'Angelo
General Legislation, S. Barrow, E. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Is The Growth Management Act Working? A Survey Of Resource Lands And Critical Areas Development Regulations, Gary Pivo
Seattle University Law Review
Section II of this Article begins with a summary of Washington's statutory requirements for both local resource land and critical area development regulations. Section II then reviews the circumstances under which those regulations have been adopted. Section III describes the methods used by the research team to collect and evaluate those regulations. Section IV examines whether Washington counties and cities have met their adoption deadlines. Section V describes the general approaches being taken for meeting those requirements. Section VI compares the regulations to one another in order to judge their consistency and relative restrictiveness throughout Washington. Section VII looks at …
Practice And Procedure Before The Growth Planning Hearings Boards, Wm. H. Nielsen, M. Peter Philley, Chris Smith Towne
Practice And Procedure Before The Growth Planning Hearings Boards, Wm. H. Nielsen, M. Peter Philley, Chris Smith Towne
Seattle University Law Review
In 1990, the Washington State Legislature took the first significant step toward growth management when it enacted the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA directs cities and counties to protect natural features and to begin planning to accommodate anticipated population increases. The legislature examined the recommendation of the Growth Strategies Commission' to create an independent dispute resolution system to resolve conflicts under the GMA. The Commission recommended the use of a panel of independent arbitrators with mediation and binding arbitration. Appeals would be limited to the Washington State Court of Appeals only on constitutional and procedural issues. The legislature …
Executive Branch Civil Justice Reform, Carl Tobias
Executive Branch Civil Justice Reform, Carl Tobias
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Fairness And Incentive Programs: Reflections On The Environmental Choice Program, David S. Cohen
Procedural Fairness And Incentive Programs: Reflections On The Environmental Choice Program, David S. Cohen
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This paper explores the application of procedural fairness to the federal government’s Environmental Choice Program’s decision-making processes. While Canadian courts have traditionally required public bureaucrats to act “fairly” when implementing command models of regulation, they have only recently been confronted with demands that regulators implementing economic incentive programs also act in accordance with procedural fairness norms.
California Horse Racing Board, B. Renner, V. Shalkevich
California Horse Racing Board, B. Renner, V. Shalkevich
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Planner's Panacea Or Pandora's Box: A Realistic Assessment Of The Role Of Urban Growth Areas In Achieving Growth Management Goals, Keith W. Dearborn, Ann M. Gygi
Planner's Panacea Or Pandora's Box: A Realistic Assessment Of The Role Of Urban Growth Areas In Achieving Growth Management Goals, Keith W. Dearborn, Ann M. Gygi
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past twenty years, Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) have become a tool of choice to manage growth. Numerous states and local jurisdictions have mandated UGAs in hope of confining urbanization, reducing sprawl, protecting open space and resource lands, and minimizing infrastructure investment. Washington State joined the trend in 1990 when it adopted the Growth Management Act (GMA), which requires certain counties to establish UGAs as a central component of its "bottom up" growth management strategy. Nonetheless, thoughtful criticisms have been offered regarding the utility of UGAs to accomplish intended growth management goals, and concerns have emerged regarding unintended consequences …
Public Interest Organizations
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Office Of Administrative Law, D. Levinson
Office Of Administrative Law, D. Levinson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registration For Geologists And Geophysicists, C. S. Trunzo
Board Of Registration For Geologists And Geophysicists, C. S. Trunzo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, D. Lewin
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, D. Lewin
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Rule-Making And Policy Formulation In South African Administrative-Law Reform, Lawrence G. Baxter
Rule-Making And Policy Formulation In South African Administrative-Law Reform, Lawrence G. Baxter
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Growth Management Act Implementation That Avoids Takings And Substantive Due Process Limitations, Jeffrey M. Eustis
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Growth Management Act Implementation That Avoids Takings And Substantive Due Process Limitations, Jeffrey M. Eustis
Seattle University Law Review
This Article begins with an overview of the GMA. It then proceeds with a summary of recent case law under the Takings Clause and substantive due process doctrine. After laying this groundwork, this Article focuses on four particular areas of growth management control and explores how local legislation implementing these areas of control would be analyzed under the Takings Clause and substantive due process. These four areas of land use regulation include: critical area protections, resource land designations, development phasing requirements for concurrency and urban growth areas, and impact fees for public facilities and services. This Article then concludes with …
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Deference To Administrative Agencies' Legal Interpretations After Lechmere, Inc. V. Nlrb, Susan K. Goplen
Judicial Deference To Administrative Agencies' Legal Interpretations After Lechmere, Inc. V. Nlrb, Susan K. Goplen
Washington Law Review
In Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, the Supreme Court held that when interpreting administrative statutes, the Court will defer to its own previous interpretations rather than defer to administrative agencies' interpretations of statutes. Thus, the Court determined that stare decisis is dominant over judicial deference to administrative agencies. The Court decided Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB wrongly. The rationales for deference to agencies exist whether or not the courts have addressed the statute in question. Therefore, courts should apply the doctrine of judicial deference even when courts have previously interpreted a statute.
The Pebble In The Shoe: Making The Case For The Government Employee, Joan R. Bullock
The Pebble In The Shoe: Making The Case For The Government Employee, Joan R. Bullock
Journal Publications
This Article addresses the issue of whether federal government employees should be able to use the False Claims Act, also known as the "federal whistleblower statute," to personally benefit from uncovering fraud against the government during the course of their employment. The Article addresses, therefore, the apparent collision between two policies: on the one hand, the federal government has a compelling interest in vigorously pursuing those contractors who defraud it; on the other hand, the government has an interest in not encouraging its own investigators to enrich themselves by bringing personal suits for damages against the target of their investigations.
Putting The Correct "Spin" On Lucas, Richard J. Lazarus
Putting The Correct "Spin" On Lucas, Richard J. Lazarus
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Part I describes and discusses the significance of the Lucas majority's desire to draft an opinion making environmental regulations more susceptible to takings challenges. Part II identifies the majority's antiquated notions of the physical and social function of real property as the source of the majority's misguided efforts. Finally, Part III describes how the majority's analytical framework may ultimately make it easier, rather than harder, for environmental protection measures to survive takings challenges.
The Concurrency Requirement Of The Washington State Growth Management Act, Thomas M. Walsh, Roger A. Pearce
The Concurrency Requirement Of The Washington State Growth Management Act, Thomas M. Walsh, Roger A. Pearce
Seattle University Law Review
When the Washington State Legislature enacted the Growth Management Act (GMA) in 1990, it established a concurrency requirement in the transportation area and authorized local governments to establish concurrency requirements in other areas such as schools, parks, and public services. This Article seeks to inform the debate as to the GMA's requirements for concurrency regulations, the key issues in implementing concurrency regulations, and statutory and constitutional limits on the implementation of regulations. After detailing the GMA's transportation concurrency requirement, the Article will discuss whether the GMA requires concurrency for public facilities other than transportation, will highlight the key issues in …
There Must Be Fifty Ways To Lose Your (Driver's) License, H. Patrick Furman
There Must Be Fifty Ways To Lose Your (Driver's) License, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Dashed "Investment-Backed" Expectations: Will The Constitution Protect Property Owners From Excesses In Implementation Of The Growth Management Act?, Elaine Spencer
Seattle University Law Review
Section I briefly discusses the basic principles of takings law as enunciated by prior cases, as well as the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, and the Washington Supreme Court's recent decisions in Sintra, Inc. v. Seattle and Robinson v. Seattle. Although the Lucas decision has received considerable publicity, it advanced the state of the law rather little. The real guidance for future decisions arising out of the GMA will come from earlier United States Supreme Court decisions and the Washington Supreme Court's decisions in Sintra, Robinson, and Lutheran …
Regulatory Cooperation With Counterpart Agencies Abroad: The Faa's Aircraft Certification Experience, George A. Bermann
Regulatory Cooperation With Counterpart Agencies Abroad: The Faa's Aircraft Certification Experience, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines in some detail the practice and experience of one agency, the Federal Aviation Administration, and more particularly its Aircraft Certification Service, that has of recent years consciously engaged in forms of concerted activity with certain counterpart agencies abroad. This "case study" is of particular interest because the FAA's practice of intergovernmentalism includes, but also goes beyond, cooperation in rulemaking to embrace a certain amount of cooperation in more routine aspects of administration. The study may also be of interest because the intergovernmentalism engaged in largely involves cooperation with a body – the European Joint Aviation Authorities – …
Pluralism, The Prisoner's Dilemma, And The Behavior Of The Independent Judiciary, Thomas W. Merrill
Pluralism, The Prisoner's Dilemma, And The Behavior Of The Independent Judiciary, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Discussions of Thayer's conception of judicial review, as this symposium amply demonstrates, tend to be normative. Professor Nick Zeppos's paper, which offers more of a positive analysis, is therefore a welcome addition. Zeppos's paper includes three especially valuable insights. First, he demonstrates the close parallel between Thayer's theory of judicial review and the Supreme Court's Chevron doctrine. The former would have the judiciary enforce clear constitutional commands but otherwise defer to legislative understandings of constitutional meaning; the latter would have courts enforce clear legislative commands but otherwise defer to administrative interpretations of statutes. Second, he offers evidence that in both …