Administrative Law Commons^™

A Broad View Of Broadview Solar: How Ferc’S Whiplash-Inducing Orders Expand The Scope Of Purpa, Christopher Cerny

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

No abstract provided.

Department Of Insurance, Allison Plette, Jackson Sullivan, Julia Zeigler, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Key

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Pharmacy, Sarah Dahm, Steven Funk, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Veterinary Medical Board, Stella Gerson, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Board Of Accountancy, Frannie Winters, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Public Utilities Commission, Justin Dalton, Andrew D. Kent, Riley Minkoff, Benjamin L. Sheinman, R. C. Fellmeth, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Mackenzie Mccoy, R. C. Fellmeth, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Masthead

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Dental Board Of California, Dimitri Davis, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Department Of Managed Health Care, William Espinosa, Hunter W. Collins, Yusra Serhan, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Medical Board Of California, Tala Hughes, Divya Sriharan, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Registered Nursing, Hamdy M. Masri, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Contractors State License Board, Thomas A.T. Ferrari, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

State Bar Of California, Andrea Lavelle, Ian Ross, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Committee Of Bar Examiners, James Lanham, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Department Of Financial Protection And Innovation, Summer M. Bosse, Alexandra Loyo, Bridget Fogarty Gramme, Karen Thomas Stefano

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Qualified Sovereignty, Kate Sablosky Elengold, Jonathan D. Glater

Washington Law Review

Sometimes acts of the federal government cause harm; sometimes acts of contractors hired by the federal government cause harm. In cases involving the latter, federal contractors often invoke the sovereign’s constitutionally granted and doctrinally expanded supremacy to restrict avenues for the injured to recover even from private actors. In prior work, we analyzed how federal contractors exploit three “sovereign shield” defenses—preemption, derivative sovereign immunity, and derivative intergovernmental immunity—to evade liability, accountability, and oversight.

This Article considers whether, when, and how private federal contractors should be held accountable in a court of law. We argue that a contractor should be required …

Let Us Not Be Intimidated: Past And Present Applications Of Section 11(B) Of The Voting Rights Act, Carly E. Zipper

Washington Law Review

As John Lewis said, “[the] vote is precious. Almost sacred. It is the most powerful non-violent tool we have to create a more perfect union.” The Voting Rights Act (VRA), likewise, is a powerful tool. This Comment seeks to empower voters and embolden their advocates to better use that tool with an improved understanding of its little-known protection against voter intimidation, section 11(b).

Although the term “voter intimidation” may connote armed confrontations at polling places, some forms of intimidation are much more subtle and insidious—dissuading voters from heading to the polls on election day rather than confronting them outright when …

The Politics Of Deference, Gregory A. Elinson, Jonathan S. Gould

Vanderbilt Law Review

Like so much else in our politics, the administrative state is fiercely contested. Conservatives decry its legitimacy and seek to limit its power; liberals defend its necessity and legality. Debates have increasingly centered on the doctrine of Chevron deference, under which courts defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutory language. Given both sides’ increasingly entrenched positions, it is easy to think that conservatives have always warned of the dangers of deference, while liberals have always defended its virtues. Not so. This Article tells the political history of deference for the first time, using previously untapped primary sources including presidential …

Stress Testing Governance, Rory Van Loo

Vanderbilt Law Review

In their efforts to guard against the world's greatest threats, administrative agencies and businesses have in recent years increasingly used stress tests. Stress tests simulate doomsday scenarios to ensure that the organization is prepared to respond. For example, agencies role-played a deadly pandemic spreading from China to the United States the year before COVID- 19, acted out responses to a hypothetical hurricane striking New Orleans months before Hurricane Katrina devastated the city, and required banks to model their ability to withstand a recession prior to the economic downturn of 2020. But too often these exercises have failed to significantly improve …

Under-Enforcement Of Federal Animal Protection Laws: Agencies Abdicating Enforcement Authority, And An Outlier Eleventh Circuit ‘Serious Harm’ Rule, Rebekah Green

Catholic University Law Review

Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act, Animal Welfare Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act to protect and preserve endangered and threatened fish and wildlife, animals, and marine mammals. The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) is the primary administrative agency in charge of regulating zoos, wildlife centers, and aquariums, yet fails to consistently enforce the Animal Welfare Act, which this Comment reviews. This means that private animal advocacy agencies are left suing zoos, wildlife centers, and aquariums under the “taking” clause of the Endangered Species Act in order to ensure animal safety and care. While most circuits agree upon …

All The Sovereign's Agents: The Constitutional Credentials Of Administration, Kate Jackson

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

[...] This Article suggests that agency institutions should be measured against the notion that popular sovereignty demands not consensus and consent, but instead institutions that permit citizens to understand themselves as coequal participants in the collective decision-making process.

Part I situates administrative agencies in an understanding of liberal democratic constitutionalism that eschews outmoded notions of popular sovereignty and natural law. It will then explain how adequately conceived notions of the separation of powers and the rule of law cannot serve as indefeasible objections to administration. Part II makes a positive case for agency authority by drawing from the insights gained …

Stress Testing Governance, Rory Van Loo

Faculty Scholarship

In their efforts to guard against the world’s greatest threats, administrative agencies and businesses have in recent years increasingly used stress tests. Stress tests simulate doomsday scenarios to ensure that the organization is prepared to respond. For example, agencies role-played a deadly pandemic spreading from China to the United States the year before COVID-19, acted out responses to a hypothetical hurricane striking New Orleans months before Hurricane Katrina devastated the city, and required banks to model their ability to withstand a recession prior to the economic downturn of 2020. But too often these exercises have failed to significantly improve readiness …

Administrative Sabotage, David L. Noll

Michigan Law Review

Government can sabotage itself. From the president’s choice of agency heads to agency budgets, regulations, and litigating positions, presidents and their appointees have undermined the very programs they administer. But why would an agency try to put itself out of business? And how can agencies that are subject to an array of political and legal checks sabotage statutory programs?

This Article offers an account of the “what, why, and how” of administrative sabotage that answers those questions. It contends that sabotage reflects a distinct mode of agency action that is more permanent, more destructive, and more democratically illegitimate than more-studied …

Revisiting Remedies And The Legality-Merits Distinction In Singapore Administrative Law: Cbb V Law Society Of Singapore [2021] Sgca 6, Kenny Chng, Wen Qi Andrea Soon

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

It is a general principle of administrative law that the courts will not compel a decision-maker to perform a public duty in a particular manner by way of a mandatory order. Notably, in CBB v Law Society of Singapore [2021] SGCA 6, the Singapore Court of Appeal accepted that an exception could be made to this general principle where there was only one reasonable way to perform the public duty in question. Beyond the decision’s obvious ramifications for the law relating to public law remedies in Singapore, this note argues that the Court of Appeal’s reasoning bears significant implications for …

Mencari Solusi Atas Masalah Pemidanaan Suatu Kebijakan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia, Muhammad Tanziel Aziezi

Indonesia Criminal Law Review

Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 states that the word “dapat” in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 on Anti-Corruption Law has no binding legal force. This decision departs from the argument that the word "dapat" creates fear and anxiety from state officials about the practice of criminalizing policies with corruption because the word "dapat" causes state losses that do not have to occur in real terms. With this decision, a person can only be said to have violated Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the …

The Force Of Law After Kisor, Beau J. Baumann

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preview — Denezpi V. United States (2022). Double Jeopardy In Indian Country, Paul A. Hutton Iii

Public Land & Resources Law Review

On February 22, the Supreme Court of the United States will decide the single issue of whether a Court of Indian Offenses constitutes a federal entity and, therefore, separate prosecutions in federal district court and a Court of Indian Offenses for the same act violates the Double Jeopardy Clause as prosecutions for the same offense.

Code Harassment Needs A Texas-Sized Solution, David Seth Morrison

Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

Municipal Code Enforcement exists to abate nuisances and resolve conflicts between neighbors. Code enforcement often discovers nuisances through citizen complaints. Cities and code enforcement departments have taken great lengths to protect complainants from retaliation, but these protections have extended too far and created a problem in reverse. Code harassment occurs when people make excessive or false reports to code enforcement departments to harass neighbors. Code enforcement officers do their jobs and investigate the complaints leading to visits and fines. Many people are shocked to find they can do nothing to stop the harassment save leaving their residence because the law …