Law Commons^™

Market Structure And Political Law: A Taxonomy Of Power, Zephyr Teachout, Lina M. Khan

Faculty Scholarship

The goal of this Article is to create a way of seeing how market structure is innately political. It provides a taxonomy of ways in which large companies frequently exercise powers that possess the character of governance. Broadly, these exercises of power map onto three bodies of activity we generally assign to government: to set policy, to regulate markets, and to tax. We add a fourth category – which we call "dominance," after Brandeis – as a kind of catchall describing the other political impacts. The activities we outline will not always fit neatly into these categories, nor do all …

The Right To Digital Privacy: Advancing The Jeffersonian Vision Of Adaptive Change, Kerry Moller

CMC Senior Theses

The relationship between privacy, technology, and law is complex. Thomas Jefferson’s prescient nineteenth century observation that laws and institutions must keep pace with the times offers a vision for change. Statutory law and court precedents help to define our right to privacy, however, the development of new technologies has complicated the application of old precedents and statutes. Third party organizations, such as Google, facilitate new methods of communication, and the government can often collect the information that third parties receive with a subpoena or court order, rather than a Fourth Amendment-mandated warrant. Privacy promotes fundamental democratic freedoms, however, under current …

Reading Between The Blurred Lines Of Fisher V. University Of Texas, Eboni S. Nelson

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The End Of Indeterminacy In Affirmative Action, Carla D. Pratt

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mismatch And The Empirical Scholars Brief, Richard Sander

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reasonable Accommodations On The Bar Exam: Leveling The Playing Field Or Providing An Unfair Advantage?, Amanda M. Foster

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preliminary Thoughts On An Attorney-Client Privilege For Law Firms: When A Current Client Threatens To Sue The Firm For Malpractice, Does The Privilege Apply To The Firm's Consultation With In-House Counsel About The Potential Claim?, Edward J. Imwinkelried

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Law And The Structure Of Power In Colonial Virginia, William E. Nelson

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Walk & Turn, Finger To Nose, One Leg Stand: Oh My - How Florida Courts Have Defined Field Sobriety Exercises, Amar V. Patel, Krysten A. Pogue

St. Thomas Law Review

If you drink alcohol and get behind the wheel of a vehicle, you dramatically increase your chance of being in a car accident. You also run the risk of being stopped by law enforcement and subjected to arrest and DUI charges. When law enforcement stops a vehicle based on a reasonable suspicion of DUI, probable cause must be established before making an arrest. Field sobriety exercises ("FSEs") are commonly used police procedures to establish that probable cause. Developing probable cause is of critical importance, not only because it is a prerequisite to a lawful arrest, but also because citizens who …

The Admissibility Of Weapons Not Used In The Crime Charged, Melynda Melear

St. Thomas Law Review

In many prosecutions in which weapons have been used to commit charged offenses, the State seeks to introduce into evidence weapons not actually used in the crime but purportedly related either to the charged crime or to the credibility of a witness. For years, courts have struggled with the issue of whether the State has established the relevancy of a weapon not used in the crime underlying the case at hand as well as whether the admission of a weapon under those circumstances would cause unfair prejudice to the defendant. Case law on the relevancy of weapon evidence presents a …

Why Does Florida Have Public Defender Elections, Zachary Phillips

St. Thomas Law Review

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees that anyone within the borders of the United States who is accused of a crime will have effective assistance of counsel. The Supreme Court of the United States has deemed this principle as so fundamental to our society that it is mandated in all criminal trials. The public defender system was implemented by every state to accomplish this noble goal. The state of Florida is different from all other states, with the exception of Nebraska, Tennessee, and parts of California, in its implementations of this mandate. Florida uses an election process to determine …

Front Matter

St. Thomas Law Review

Front Matter includes Masthead and Table of Contents for St. Thomas Law Review Volume 26, Issue 4, Summer 2014.

Contracts: An Introduction To A Symposium And A Few Additional Thoughts, Jennifer S. Martin

St. Thomas Law Review

On February 21, 2014, the St. Thomas University School of Law opened a symposium entitled simply "Contracts" in conjunction with the Ninth Annual International Conference on Contracts hosted by the School of Law. The decision of the St. Thomas Law Review to sponsor and conduct a symposium on the simple broad reaching topic of contract law with this esteemed group was a natural decision and exciting opportunity. Contract law has long been a foundation study for students and scholars with a rich history and significance to individuals and businesses alike. Significantly, as reflected by Dr. Roni Rosenberg in his essay …

Donee Beneficiaries And The Parol Evidence Rule, Joseph M. Perillo

St. Thomas Law Review

Donee beneficiaries are pretty peculiar. They own the rights created by a contract created by others. Their rights have primacy over the promisee's rights' but the promisees have enforceable rights as well. The donee beneficiaries may be totally unaware of these enforceable rights for which they have not given consideration. For purposes of this essay, "donee beneficiary" means any intended beneficiary other than a creditor beneficiary. A creditor beneficiary is a promisor who assumes a debt that "will satisfy an obligation of the promisee to pay money to the beneficiary . ... " Thus defined, third party donee beneficiaries are …

Emergence On Contract Standards And Its Future Impact On Legal Education, Kingsley Martin

St. Thomas Law Review

Let me start with a story. It was almost thirty years ago that I graduated from Harvard Law School and joined my first law firm. I distinctly remember my first assignment, which was to draft a credit agreement. Despite my education, I had no clue how to perform the assignment. I had to do it the same way as everyone else, which was to go around the corridors, bang on some doors, get some examples, sit down and start to read them. I have no doubt that my first few attempts and, in all likelihood, years' worth of drafts, were …

Defining A Vessel In Admiralty: I Know It When I See It, Daniel Faessler

St. Thomas Law Review

Defining the term "vessel," while seemingly inconsequential at first blush, is an essential preliminary inquiry in almost any maritime law dispute. In Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida. the Supreme Court's latest pronouncement on what it means to be a vessel, the Court inserts a "reasonable observer" standard and a "designed to a practical degree" element into the vessel inquiry, which may upset long-settled law in admiralty. Part I explains through various examples why status as a vessel is important in admiralty jurisdiction. Part II discusses the Supreme Court's latest cases defining a vessel including Stewart v. Dutra Construction …

Front Matter

St. Thomas Law Review

Front Matter includes Masthead, advisors, Table of Contents and Preface for St. Thomas Law Review Volume 26, Issue 3, Spring 2014.

The Contract: Between Contract Law And Criminal Jurisprudence, Roni Rosenberg

St. Thomas Law Review

The structure of the essay is as follows: Part I presents the general legal premise that enables the conviction of one who has caused harm by an omission in cases where the duty to act originates in a contractual obligation and highlights U.S. case law on this topic. Part II distinguishes between the duty to act that originates in a contract and a similar duty that is mentioned in case law and literature: the actual assumption of responsibility for a potential victim. Part III introduces various scenarios to assist in examining which contracts can serve as a source of a …

Designing And Constructing Commercial Agreements In The 21st Century, Jeffrey Ritter

St. Thomas Law Review

In the 21s century, commercial agreements crafted by attorneys structure relationships in which the administration and execution of those relationships is largely, if not exclusively, governed through the use of digital technologies. These technologies communicate information, record and report activities taken by the parties in furtherance of their relationship, make payments of monies and other compensation, and provide the evidence with which disputes among the parties will be resolved. All of these functions are designed and executed through technology systems that monitor and record activities that are the basis for determining compliance with the requirements of those agreements at a …

Introducing The New Handshake To Expand Remedies And Revive Responsibility In Ecommerce, Amy J. Schmitz

St. Thomas Law Review

Accordingly, this essay discusses how use of ODR [online dispute resolution] systems may help address the problematic results of the SWS [squeaky wheel system] in B2C [business to consumer] exchanges. Part II of the essay discusses possible reasons why the SWS has flourished in the consumer marketplace and provides some of the applicable behavioral, social, and empirical research." Part III then uncovers problematic consequences of the SWS in B2C exchanges, and Part IV proposes the "New Handshake" through tailored ODR systems that offer consumers efficient and fair means for accessing remedies with respect to their purchases." Part V concludes with …

Plastic Injuries, Anne Bloom

Hofstra Law Review

Perceptions of injuries are culturally mediated, mutable, plastic. In tort litigation, however, the cultural plasticity with which we perceive and experience injuries is often ignored. This Article explores the cultural plasticity with which we perceive injuries through the lens of plastic surgery litigation. It argues that determinations of injury in plastic surgery litigation turn on the culturally biased — and highly mutable — perceptions of medical professionals. More broadly, the Article argues that culture shapes perceptions of injuries in tort litigation as a whole. To make these points, the Article examines a prototypical plastic surgery case and surveys a range …

Talking Rights, Talking Politics : The Development Of Abortion Policy In New York And New Jersey, 1970-2010, Jonathan Parent

Legacy Theses & Dissertations (2009 - 2024)

Policy can be made by all three branches of government, and the institutional location of change will have an impact on the shape of policy outputs. This dissertation examines the question of what factors will make courts more or less likely to undertake and continue policymaking in a given issue area. In particular, the study presented here considers the development of abortion policy in New York and New Jersey over a forty-year period beginning in 1970. Using both quantitative and qualitative research methods, this work proposes a theoretical framework whereby issue framing, coupled with institutional first movement, will greatly influence …

The Transgender Student-Athlete: Is There A Fourteenth Amendment Right To Participate On The Gender-Specific Team Of Your Choice?, Krista D. Brown

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Your Coach Is Watching: Can A High School Regulate Its Student-Athletes' Use Of Social Media?, Lauren E. Rosenbaum

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trading Away Human Rights, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Olivier De Schutter

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Trade negotiators in Singapore recently failed to finalize a deal on the long-awaited Trans-Pacific Partnership; they will soon have another chance to complete what would be the world’s largest regional free-trade agreement. But, given serious concerns that the TPP will fail to consider important human-rights implications, that is no cause for celebration.

Managing The Public Trust: How To Make Natural Resource Funds Work For Citizens, Andrew Bauer, Perrine Toledano, Malan Rietveld

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Given their collective size – approximately $3.5 trillion in assets as of end-2013 and growing – and concerns about the motivations of their government owners, much has been written on natural resource funds (NRFs), their investments and global influence. However their impacts on governance and public financial accountability at home have received far less attention.

On the one hand, these funds can be used to serve the public interest, for example by covering budget deficits when resource revenues decline, saving for future generations, or helping to mitigate Dutch Disease through fiscal sterilization. On the other hand, they can undermine public …

Exposing The Institutions That Mask Us, Christine Zuni Cruz

Faculty Scholarship

I am going to stand in tribute to Professor Montoya and her family and to the Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review, which brings us to this point where we are considering and celebrating Professor Montoyas Mascaras, Trenzas, Y Grenas: Un/Masking the Self While Un/Braiding Latina Stories and Legal Discourse, twenty years after its initial publication. Professor Montoya's article is timeless.

2014 Survey Of Juvenile Law, Michael J. Dale

Nova Law Review

The Florida Legislature enacted a statute providing counsel to children

in certain categories in dependency cases, and also passed a statute removing

the nexus requirement to prove grounds for termination of parental rights

Was The First Justice Harlan Anti-Chinese?, James W. Gordon

Faculty Scholarship

The first Justice John Marshall Harlan has long been recognized as a defender of Black civil rights. Yet some scholars challenge Harlan’s egalitarian reputation by arguing that he was anti-Chinese. In this Article, the Author discusses the evidence which has been offered to support the claim that Harlan was anti-Chinese and offers additional evidence never before presented to argue against this hypothesis. Harlan’s critics have assembled some evidence in a way that suggests Harlan had an anti-Chinese bias. The Author suggests that the evidence is ambiguous and that it can be assembled to produce a different picture from the one …

Horton Hears A Twerp: Myth, Law, And Children’S Rights In Horton Hears A Who!, Anne Mcgillivray

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.