Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Evidence (1365)
- Criminal Law (465)
- Criminal Procedure (351)
- Constitutional Law (260)
- Courts (168)
-
- Litigation (159)
- Civil Procedure (90)
- Law and Society (85)
- State and Local Government Law (82)
- Jurisprudence (80)
- Judges (77)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (75)
- Science and Technology Law (71)
- Fourth Amendment (69)
- Torts (69)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (67)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (62)
- Supreme Court of the United States (62)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (56)
- Legal Profession (54)
- Legal Education (50)
- Legal History (47)
- Civil Law (43)
- International Law (43)
- Legislation (40)
- Administrative Law (39)
- Health Law and Policy (37)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (36)
- Labor and Employment Law (36)
- Institution
-
- West Virginia University (118)
- University of South Carolina (112)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (109)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (108)
- Fordham Law School (103)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (98)
- William & Mary Law School (78)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (76)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (74)
- Duke Law (71)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (63)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (56)
- Pepperdine University (54)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (51)
- BLR (44)
- University of Kentucky (41)
- University of Michigan Law School (41)
- American University Washington College of Law (39)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (36)
- University of Georgia School of Law (33)
- University of Miami Law School (30)
- University of Richmond (30)
- Boston University School of Law (28)
- University of Baltimore Law (28)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (27)
- Roger Williams University (27)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (27)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (26)
- St. Mary's University (26)
- The University of Akron (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (128)
- West Virginia Law Review (116)
- South Carolina Law Review (110)
- Touro Law Review (93)
- Fordham Law Review (88)
-
- Vanderbilt Law Review (84)
- Cardozo Law Review (82)
- Faculty Scholarship (82)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (51)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (49)
- Indiana Law Journal (44)
- Articles (41)
- ExpressO (41)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (40)
- Maryland Law Review (37)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (33)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (29)
- William & Mary Law Review (27)
- Louisiana Law Review (26)
- All Faculty Scholarship (24)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (22)
- Akron Law Review (21)
- Georgia State University Law Review (20)
- Kentucky Law Journal (20)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (20)
- University of Miami Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Publications (18)
- University of Richmond Law Review (18)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (17)
- Publication Type
Articles 1441 - 1470 of 2259
Full-Text Articles in Law
Louisiana Code Of Evidence Article 703: Is It A Hidden Exception To The Hearsay Rule?, Laura Owen Wingate
Louisiana Code Of Evidence Article 703: Is It A Hidden Exception To The Hearsay Rule?, Laura Owen Wingate
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Choices In Regulatory Science, Sheila Jasanoff
Procedural Choices In Regulatory Science, Sheila Jasanoff
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
This paper compares four approaches to using science in regulatory decision making - one very similar to the Science Court proposal. Professor Jasanoff argues generally that that proposal would be less useful than procedures more sensitive to the distinctive characteristics of regulatory science.
The Unanswered Questions Of Christophersen V. Allied-Signal Corp., Richard O. Faulk
The Unanswered Questions Of Christophersen V. Allied-Signal Corp., Richard O. Faulk
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Deposing Expert Witnesses In Environmental Litigation, James B. Burns
Deposing Expert Witnesses In Environmental Litigation, James B. Burns
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Employee Misconduct And The Affirmative Defense Of After-Acquired Evidence, Gian Brown
Employee Misconduct And The Affirmative Defense Of After-Acquired Evidence, Gian Brown
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Against The Tyranny Of Paraphrase: Talking Back To Texts , Elizabeth Fajans, Mary R. Falk
Against The Tyranny Of Paraphrase: Talking Back To Texts , Elizabeth Fajans, Mary R. Falk
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rape Trauma Syndrome & Child Sexual Abuse Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Rape Trauma Syndrome & Child Sexual Abuse Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About Nothing - The Supreme Court Still Fails To Solve The General Acceptance Problem Regarding Expert Testimony And Scientific Evidence , Joseph B. Spero
Much Ado About Nothing - The Supreme Court Still Fails To Solve The General Acceptance Problem Regarding Expert Testimony And Scientific Evidence , Joseph B. Spero
Journal of Law and Health
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Frye v. United States to the new grounds for admissibility established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This note will specifically focus on some of the changes made by the courts to the common law rule and follow its transformation to a more liberal standard within the federal court system. The paper will conclude that the courts have not really changed their position on the admissibility of scientific evidence and that their current criteria still are …
The Common Law Theory Of Experts: Deference Or Education?, Joseph S. Miller, Ronald J. Allen
The Common Law Theory Of Experts: Deference Or Education?, Joseph S. Miller, Ronald J. Allen
Scholarly Works
What if witness testimony emerges from, or can only be understood by reference to, an experience that the fact finder lacks? Or what if the connection between what a witness says and the full import of what the witness means is so arcane that the chances are virtually zero that the jury will understand what the spoken words are intended to convey? Both cases arise surprisingly frequently in the trial of disputes. For example, the problem arises whenever a witness is not fluent in English, as it often does when the common practice of a business or trade plays a …
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation: The Jury's Role In Resolving The Battle Of The Experts, Joseph C. Kohn
In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation: The Jury's Role In Resolving The Battle Of The Experts, Joseph C. Kohn
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of A Constitutional Theory Of Experts, Ronald L. Carlson
In Defense Of A Constitutional Theory Of Experts, Ronald L. Carlson
Scholarly Works
Professor Ronald Allen honors the memory of John Henry Wigmore on virtually every occasion in which he targets an aspect of evidence law for scholarly study. As Wigmore Professor of Law, Allen has consistently afforded modern evidence specialists some of the best in provocative theory as grist for review and discussion. He now places experts in his sights, and the results are no less stimulating.
Two Sherman Act Section 1 Dilemmas: Parallel Pricing, The Oligopoly Problem, And Contemporary Economic Theory, Jonathan Baker
Two Sherman Act Section 1 Dilemmas: Parallel Pricing, The Oligopoly Problem, And Contemporary Economic Theory, Jonathan Baker
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
New York Evidentiary Foundations, Randolph N. Jonakait, H. Baer, E. S. Jones, E. Imwinkelried
New York Evidentiary Foundations, Randolph N. Jonakait, H. Baer, E. S. Jones, E. Imwinkelried
Books
This textbook illustrates how to apply New York Evidence law teaching the reader how to lay out the foundations for the introduction of items of evidence. This book adds to the abstract evidentiary doctrines that many law students study. It is designed to teach the reader both the doctrines of evidence as well as how to present the evidentiary foundations necessary for trying a case.
This edition is the first edition where Professor Randolph N. Jonakait was asked to revise the text to make it more useful to New Yorkers. New York attorneys especially need tailored evidence materials because New …
Admissibility Of Expert Testimony On Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome In Kentucky, Michele Meyer Mccarthy
Admissibility Of Expert Testimony On Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome In Kentucky, Michele Meyer Mccarthy
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Remaking Confrontation Clause And Hearsay Doctrine Under The Challenge Of Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions, Robert P. Mosteller
Remaking Confrontation Clause And Hearsay Doctrine Under The Challenge Of Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions, Robert P. Mosteller
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Credulous Courts And The Tortured Trilogy: The Improper Use Of Summary Judgment In Title Vii And Adea Cases, Ann C. Mcginley
Credulous Courts And The Tortured Trilogy: The Improper Use Of Summary Judgment In Title Vii And Adea Cases, Ann C. Mcginley
Scholarly Works
Civil rights are under siege. In mid-1989, the United States Supreme Court decided several cases that severely limit the civil rights claims and remedies available to a plaintiff claiming employment discrimination. This Article examines the gradual and continuing erosion of the factfinder's role in federal employment discrimination cases and its replacement by an increasing use of summary judgment through which the courts make pretrial determinations formerly reserved for the factfinder at trial. This trend not only represents a major shift in court procedure and, in the case of age discrimination claims, a transfer of power from juries to judges, but …
Alaska’S Medical Malpractice Expert Advisory Panel: Assessing The Prognosis, Jonathan Scott Aronie
Alaska’S Medical Malpractice Expert Advisory Panel: Assessing The Prognosis, Jonathan Scott Aronie
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.