Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Evidence (1365)
- Criminal Law (465)
- Criminal Procedure (351)
- Constitutional Law (260)
- Courts (168)
-
- Litigation (159)
- Civil Procedure (90)
- Law and Society (85)
- State and Local Government Law (82)
- Jurisprudence (80)
- Judges (77)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (75)
- Science and Technology Law (71)
- Fourth Amendment (69)
- Torts (69)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (67)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (62)
- Supreme Court of the United States (62)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (56)
- Legal Profession (54)
- Legal Education (50)
- Legal History (47)
- Civil Law (43)
- International Law (43)
- Legislation (40)
- Administrative Law (39)
- Health Law and Policy (37)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (36)
- Labor and Employment Law (36)
- Institution
-
- West Virginia University (118)
- University of South Carolina (112)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (109)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (108)
- Fordham Law School (103)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (98)
- William & Mary Law School (78)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (76)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (74)
- Duke Law (71)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (63)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (56)
- Pepperdine University (54)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (51)
- BLR (44)
- University of Kentucky (41)
- University of Michigan Law School (41)
- American University Washington College of Law (39)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (36)
- University of Georgia School of Law (33)
- University of Miami Law School (30)
- University of Richmond (30)
- Boston University School of Law (28)
- University of Baltimore Law (28)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (27)
- Roger Williams University (27)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (27)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (26)
- St. Mary's University (26)
- The University of Akron (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (128)
- West Virginia Law Review (116)
- South Carolina Law Review (110)
- Touro Law Review (93)
- Fordham Law Review (88)
-
- Vanderbilt Law Review (84)
- Cardozo Law Review (82)
- Faculty Scholarship (82)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (51)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (49)
- Indiana Law Journal (44)
- Articles (41)
- ExpressO (41)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (40)
- Maryland Law Review (37)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (33)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (29)
- William & Mary Law Review (27)
- Louisiana Law Review (26)
- All Faculty Scholarship (24)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (22)
- Akron Law Review (21)
- Georgia State University Law Review (20)
- Kentucky Law Journal (20)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (20)
- University of Miami Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Publications (18)
- University of Richmond Law Review (18)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (17)
- Publication Type
Articles 1411 - 1440 of 2259
Full-Text Articles in Law
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Unconvinced, Unreconstructed, And Unrepentant: A Reply To Professor Friedman’S Response, H. Richard Uviller
Unconvinced, Unreconstructed, And Unrepentant: A Reply To Professor Friedman’S Response, H. Richard Uviller
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Poor Fit Of Traditional Evidentiary Doctrine And Sophisticated Crime: An Empirical Analysis Of Health Care Fraud Prosecutions, Pamela H. Bucy
The Poor Fit Of Traditional Evidentiary Doctrine And Sophisticated Crime: An Empirical Analysis Of Health Care Fraud Prosecutions, Pamela H. Bucy
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Employee Dishonesty And The After-Acquired Evidence Doctrine: Why Honesty Is The Best Policy, Georgia Stanaitis
Employee Dishonesty And The After-Acquired Evidence Doctrine: Why Honesty Is The Best Policy, Georgia Stanaitis
Cleveland State Law Review
The Eleventh Circuit has stated that application of the after-acquired evidence doctrine as a complete defense is too rigid and that it produces harsh, inequitable results. At the same time, the Eleventh Circuit has voted to rehear the case setting forth this view. Until the rehearing, the Eleventh Circuit's principles are sound.13 Specifically, the Eleventh Circuit has criticized Summers as being antithetical to the principal purposes of Title VII which are to achieve equality of employment opportunity and make whole, so far as is possible, the individual or class affected by the discrimination. The Eleventh Circuit and arbitral forums, such …
Balancing The Scales: Limiting The Prejudicial Effect Of Evidence Rule 404(B) Through Stipulation, Daniel J. Buzzetta
Balancing The Scales: Limiting The Prejudicial Effect Of Evidence Rule 404(B) Through Stipulation, Daniel J. Buzzetta
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note argues that, in a prosecution for a violation of a specific intent criminal statute, the government must accept a defendant’s clear and unambiguous stipulation to possessing the requisite intent for the crime charged. The trial court must ensure that the proffered stipulation is voluntarily given, unambiguous, and comprehensive, so as not to deprive the prosecution from presenting forceful, significant, and probative evidence. Once a defendant offers such an acceptable stipulation, however, the government’s introduction of prior bad acts to prove intent becomes extremely prejudicial, while any probative value the evidence may have is dissipated entirely. Part II of …
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In The Courtroom: The Death Of The Frye Rule, George J. Annas
Scientific Evidence In The Courtroom: The Death Of The Frye Rule, George J. Annas
Faculty Scholarship
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of its 1992-1993 term that federal judges should admit all relevant scientific testimony and evidence that is “reliable”. The result was so uncontroversial that both sides in the case said they were satisfied; because the result was also so vague, it will probably be years before its effect can be accurately ascertained. The facts of the case, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., are somewhat more interesting than its prosaic legal conclusion.
The Hague Evidence Convention: The Need For Guidance On Procedures And Resolution Of Conflicts In Transnational Discovery, John C. Plaster
The Hague Evidence Convention: The Need For Guidance On Procedures And Resolution Of Conflicts In Transnational Discovery, John C. Plaster
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
As international commercial disputes become more common, United States courts increasingly face difficult issues involved in transnational discovery. Two frequently encountered issues are choosing whether to use the discovery procedures of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Hague Evidence Convention and whether to enforce a discovery order when the order conflicts with a law of the state in which discovery is to occur. Although the Supreme Court has addressed both of these issues, it has left lower courts considerable discretion to deal with these issues case by case. Lower courts, therefore, have not been uniform in their approaches …
Foreword Evidence Symposium: A Comparative Study Of Federal And New York Evidence Practice, Honorable Frank X. Altimari
Foreword Evidence Symposium: A Comparative Study Of Federal And New York Evidence Practice, Honorable Frank X. Altimari
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony, Barry C. Scheck
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Distinctions Between The Public Records Exception To The Hearsay Rule In Federal And New York Practice, Randi M. Simanoff
Distinctions Between The Public Records Exception To The Hearsay Rule In Federal And New York Practice, Randi M. Simanoff
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employees' Admissions In New York: Time For A Change, David J. Wallman
Employees' Admissions In New York: Time For A Change, David J. Wallman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Character Evidence, James L. Kainen
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel: In Re Jamie Tt.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel: In Re Jamie Tt.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Puntive Damages -- Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Martin A. Schwartz, Eileen Kaufman
Puntive Damages -- Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Martin A. Schwartz, Eileen Kaufman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punitive Damages--Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Punitive Damages--Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Proper Role Of After-Acquired Evidence In Employment Discrimination Litigation, Rebecca White, Robert D. Brussack
The Proper Role Of After-Acquired Evidence In Employment Discrimination Litigation, Rebecca White, Robert D. Brussack
Scholarly Works
A new defense to employment discrimination claims has gained acceptance in the lower courts. Employers who allegedly have discriminated against their employees because of race, sex or age are winning judgments on the basis of after-acquired evidence of employee misconduct. The evidence is “after-acquired” in the sense that the misconduct was unknown to the employer at the time the alleged discrimination occurred but was acquired later, often through the use of discovery devices in the employee's discrimination action. Lower courts have accepted the proposition that if the employer would have discharged the plaintiff on the basis of the after-acquired evidence, …
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of "Bad Faith" Under The Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Peter F. Valori
The Meaning Of "Bad Faith" Under The Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Peter F. Valori
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Inadequate Interpreting Services In Courts And The Rules Of Admissibility Of Testimony On Extrajudicial Interpretations, Beth G. Lindie
Inadequate Interpreting Services In Courts And The Rules Of Admissibility Of Testimony On Extrajudicial Interpretations, Beth G. Lindie
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Salerno: An Examination Of Rule 804(B)(1), Judith M. Mercier
United States V. Salerno: An Examination Of Rule 804(B)(1), Judith M. Mercier
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Psychiatric Evidence Of Sexual Assault Victims: The Need For Fundamental Change In The Determination Of Relevance, Sadie Bond
Dalhousie Law Journal
What follows is a discussion of the use of evidence of the complainant's psychiatric history in sexual assault trials. I will argue that the introduction of this evidence is sought mainly for the purpose of discrediting the complainant's testimony, as part of an "attack the victim" strategy. The admissibility of this evidence as relevant is the product of unfounded myths and sex-biased, if not misogynist, views about women. This evidence is rarely, if ever, relevant and its minimal probative value is, in most cases, far outweighed by its potential for exacerbating or perpetuating sex bias in the sexual assault trial. …
Just The Facts, Ma'am: Lying And The Omission Of Exculpatory Evidence In Police Reports,, Stanley Z. Fisher
Just The Facts, Ma'am: Lying And The Omission Of Exculpatory Evidence In Police Reports,, Stanley Z. Fisher
Faculty Scholarship
George Jones's ordeal was the product of, and in turn sheds light upon, police practices of investigating crimes and writing reports. Written police reports of criminal incidents and arrests give details such as the time, place, and nature of criminal conduct; the names and addresses of victims and witnesses; physical characteristics of the perpetrator(s) or arrestee(s); weapons used; property taken, recovered, or seized from the arrestee; and injuries to persons and property. Through their reports, the police "have fundamental control over the construction of [the] 'facts' for a case, and all other actors (the prosecutor, the judge, the defense lawyer) …
In Appreciation Of Jack Burns, Frank J. Macchiarola
In Appreciation Of Jack Burns, Frank J. Macchiarola
Cardozo Law Review
Jacob Burns was a good and gentle man. He did many fine and generous things in his lifetime, but the qualities that best describe him are the personal ones-good and gentle. The gentleness did not mean that he was unable to handle difficult matters or to exert the kind of strength that gave others solace. It meant that through these situations there was a contentment that always reassured the rest of us. The gentleness came from his concern for others and in the way he approached people. It was always thrilling for me to see Jack Burns in the company …
White V. Illinois And The "Hearsay Clause" Of The Sixth Amendment, Hansel M. Harlan
White V. Illinois And The "Hearsay Clause" Of The Sixth Amendment, Hansel M. Harlan
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribe V. Weatherwax, 93-Ap-13 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 1993), Blackfeet Appellate Court
Tribe V. Weatherwax, 93-Ap-13 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 1993), Blackfeet Appellate Court
Court Decisions
In the Blackfeet Tribal Court of Appeals, the Court dismissed a DUI charge because the trial judge erred in the admission of evidence offered by the prosecution. The error occurred when proper foundation was not established to warrant admission of the evidence in accordance with the Rules of Evidence.