Law Commons^™

Implicit Racial Attitudes And Self-Defense, Stephen P. Garvey

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Protecting Church Autonomy In The Twenty-First Century: A Defense Of The Compulsory Deference Approach For Church Property Litigation, Matthew R. Goldammer

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Children Sentenced As Adults, Vanessa F. Hernandez Levin

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Tripartite Model Of Facial Recognition: Bridging The Gap Between Privacy, Public Safety, Technology And The Fourth And First Amendments, Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid, Kyle Fleming

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Neurological Imprint Of Incarceration And Its Effects On Recidivism, Malcolm Coffman

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Tackling The Intangible: Why The Supreme Court Needs To Define Intellectual Property And What Facebook Stands To Lose (Or Win), John Paul A. Galgano

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Wading In Murky Waters: The Good-Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule & Title Iii Wiretaps, Joseph W. Gergel

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Lessons From Vietnam: Informing Refugee Policy In Haiti And Afghanistan From Post-Vietnam United States Policy, Davis Lovvorn

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Environmental, Social, And Governance (Esg) Matters: Can The Sec Mandate Disclosure? Should The Sec Mandate Disclosure?, Samantha M. Mariani

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Establishment Clause Eulogy: The Rise And Fall Of The Status/Use Distinction, Leo O'Malley

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Defending The Fundamental Rights Of Parents: A Response To Recent Attacks, Melissa Moschella

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

A Right Defined By A Duty: The Original Understanding Of Parental Rights, Luray Buckner

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Law School Rankings And Political Ideology: Measuring The Conservative Penalty And Liberal Bonus With Updated 2023 Rankings Data, Michael Conklin

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Ecological Approach To Data Governance, Jasmine Mcnealy

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Errors And Omissions: Applying Lessons From History To Decide The Future Of Administrative Deference With Respect To The National Labor Relations Board, Nicholas M. Ohanesian

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Smith To Smithereens? If So, What’S Next?, Joshua Lacoste

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

De-Nazifying By De-Cartelizing, Daniel A. Crane

Book Chapters

In 1945, a group of zealous American trustbusters, freshly groomed in the Brandeisian tradition of “anti- Bigness,” descended on the smoldering ruins of Germany, eager to identify and then nullify the culprits behind Hitler’s rise to power. Their eyes were fixed on the enormous industrial combines and cartel organizations that had sprung up in the German economy since the time of Bismarck, grown exponentially during the Weimar era, and then served as the economic infrastructure of the Third Reich. To the trustbusters in the Office of Military Government US (“OMGUS”) Decartelization Branch, the monopolies and trusts were the prime culprits …

Humanizing Corporate Governance, Caleb N. Griffin

Faculty Publications

American corporate governance evolved in a different era, for a type of investor who is no longer typical today. Roughly half of Americans own investment funds, but legal and structural impediments prevent these “human investors” from fully participating in corporate democracy.

One response—“so what?”—is based on the assumption that investors are rationally apathetic. Most investors have so little at stake, the argument goes, that it is economically irrational for them to vote in corporate elections. What this argument misses is that investors’ rational apathy is not fixed. Instead, it is a function of the costs and benefits of voting. If …

The Trump Impeachments: Lessons For The Constitution, Presidents, Congress, Justice, Lawyers, And The Public, Michael J. Gerhardt

Faculty Publications

The conventional wisdom is that the two impeachments of Donald Trump demonstrated the ineffectiveness of impeachment as a remedy for serious presidential misconduct. Meeting the constitutional threshold for conviction and removal requiring at least two-thirds approval of the Senate is practically impossible so long as the members of the President’s party in Congress control at least a third of the seats in the Senate and are united in opposition to his impeachment and conviction. This Article challenges this conventional wisdom and argues instead that the two Trump impeachments have enduring effects on Trump’s political future and legacy, especially in light …

The Private Law Of Stablecoins, Kara J. Bruce, Christopher K. Odinet, Andrea Tosato

Faculty Publications

Stablecoins are one of the cornerstones of the crypto world. They’ve attracted significant attention from major players over the past few years, ranging from Wall Street to kitchen-table investors, and even the White House. As a less volatile alternative to crypto-assets like bitcoin, stablecoins have the potential to change the way we make payments, unlock the groundwork needed for more blockchain-based applications, and even reorient the economy toward private money. But how stable are these stablecoins, really? Can they be relied upon in the way their many proponents claim? And how much of the popular beliefs about stablecoins match their …

Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. V. Goldsmith, A Narrow Ruling Or A Transformational Decision? An Essay, Caroline L. Osborne, Stephen Wolfson

Faculty Publications

The 2023 United States Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith is the first copyright decision in decades to visit the concept of fair use and transformative use. In a fiery majority decision with an even fiercer dissent, the court restricts the concept of fair use creating a lasting impact on derivative works, licensing, and appropriation art. Arguably restoring balance to factor one, purpose and character of the use, it questionably conflates the analysis of factor four, market effect, in favor of affirming factor one’s analysis as the justification premise as originally posed …

Automated Agencies, Joshua D. Blank, Leigh Osofsky

Faculty Publications

This article presents the first comprehensive study of how federal agencies use automated legal guidance tools—such as chatbots, virtual assistants, and decision-tree systems—to explain complex law to the public. The authors show that while automation offers administrative efficiency and wider reach, it often simplifies or distorts underlying legal rules. Through detailed analysis of agency tools and ten semi-structured interviews with officials, the article demonstrates that automated systems can portray unsettled or complex law as clear, omit exceptions, and answer too narrowly, thereby influencing user behavior in ways agencies neither fully appreciate nor monitor.

The study further finds that agencies lack …

The Prosecutor Lobby, Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ronald F. Wright, Jessica Pishko

Faculty Publications

Prosecutors shape the use of the criminal law at many points during criminal proceedings but there is an earlier point in the process where prosecutors have influence: during the legislative process. The conventional wisdom in legal scholarship is that prosecutors are powerful and successful lobbyists who routinely support laws that make the criminal law more punitive and oppose criminal justice reform. In this Article, we test that narrative with an empirical assessment of prosecutor lobbying in America. Using an original dataset of four years of legislative activity from all fifty states, we analyze how frequently prosecutors lobbied, the issues on …

Singling Out Single-Family Zoning, John Infranca

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

Single-family zoning is increasingly under attack in both the popular press and scholarly journals. Critics highlight how zoning districts that allow only detached, single-family homes exacerbate racial and economic segregation and perpetuate wealth disparities. Although a few local and state legislatures have eased regulations to permit denser development in existing single-family neighborhoods, such neighborhoods remain the dominant component of American zoning. The power of local governments to impose zoning derives from the police power—traditionally understood as the power to legislate in furtherance of health, safety, and the public welfare. These traditional concerns seem to provide little justification for prohibiting duplexes …

The Death Of The Legal Subject, Katrina Geddes

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The law is often engaged in prediction. In the calculation of tort damages, for example, a judge will consider what the tort victim’s likely future earnings would have been, but for their particular injury. Similarly, when considering injunctive relief, a judge will assess whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not granted. And for the purposes of a child custody evaluation, a judge will consider which parent will provide an environment that is in the best interests of the child.

Relative to other areas of law, criminal law is oversaturated with prediction. Almost …

Unenforceable Waivers, Edward K. Cheng, Ehud Guttel, Yuval Procaccia

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Textbook tort law establishes that waivers of liability-—especially those involving physical harm-—are often unenforceable. This Essay demonstrates through an extensive survey of the case law that despite being unenforceable, such waivers remain in widespread use. Indeed, defendants frequently use waivers even when a court has previously declared their specific waivers to be void. So why do such waivers persist? Often the simple answer is to hoodwink would-be plaintiffs. Waivers serve as costless deterrents to tort claims: Either they dupe naïve victims into believing that their claims are barred, or if not, the defendant is no worse off than before. Such …

Spac Mergers, Ipos, And The Pslra's Safe Harbor: Unpacking Claims Of Regulatory Arbitrage, Amanda M. Rose

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Communications in connection with an initial public offering (IPO) are excluded from the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). Unsurprisingly, IPO issuers do not share projections publicly-—the liability risk is too great. By contrast, communications in connection with a merger are not excluded from the safe harbor, and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) routinely share their merger targets’ projections publicly. Does the divergent application of the PSLRA’s safe harbor in traditional IPOs and SPAC mergers create an opportunity for “regulatory arbitrage” and, if so, what should be done about it? …

Time To Slapp Back: Advocating Against The Adverse Civil Liberties Implications Of Litigation That Undermines Public Participation, Jennifer Safstrom

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Defamation law is a catchall term encompassing civil claims for reputational harm to an individual, including slander and libel. Defamation claims originated in English common law and have since evolved within the American legal system. Scholars have characterized the law of defamation as “a forest of complexities, overgrown with anomalies, inconsistencies, and perverse rigidities” and as a “‘fog of fictions, inferences, and presumptions.’” Amid these inherent variations and complexities of defamation law and litigation — including the largely state-specific nature of tort law development — emerges a disturbing trend across jurisdictions. In the modern era, defamation claims have been used …

Growth ≠ Density: Zoning Deregulation And The Enduring Problem Of Sprawl, Christopher Serkin, Kelsea Best

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

According to its many critics, zoning bears significant responsi- bility for the housing crisis in America andfor promoting unsustain- able development patterns. Reformers argue that zoning reduces the supply of new housing and therefore drives up prices in thriving communities. Zoning also increases carbon emissions by restricting density in the urban core and promoting carbon-intensive, land- consuming, automobile-dependent sprawl in single-family suburbs. A growing chorus calls for relaxing zoning limits in order to pro- mote growth in the urban core as a response to the twin crises of housing costs and climate change. Relaxing zoning limits will al- most certainly …

Surveillance Technologies And Constitutional Law, Christopher Slobogin, Sarah Brayne

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

This review focuses on government use of technology to observe, collect, or record potential criminal activity in real-time, as contrasted with “transaction surveillance” that involves government efforts to access already-existing records and exploit Big Data, topics that have been the focus of previous reviews (Brayne 2018, Ridgeway 2018). Even so limited, surveillance technologies come in many guises, including closed-circuit television, automated license plate and facial readers, aerial cameras, and GPS tracking. Also classifiable as surveillance technology are devices such as thermal and electromagnetic imagers that can “see” through walls and clothing. Finally, surveillance includes wiretapping and other forms of communication …