Law Commons^™

Kukin Program Newsletter – Fall 2022, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution

Kukin Program Newsletters

The Kukin Program Newsletter – Fall 2022 celebrates leadership transitions, achievements, and initiatives at Cardozo Law School's Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution. Andrea Kupfer Schneider joins as Director, succeeding founding director Lela Love, with Robyn Weinstein taking on key roles in the Mediation Clinic. Faculty aided Ukrainian law students with skills training, and ADR Competition Honor Society members achieved international and domestic victories. The program awarded Boskey Restorative Justice Fellowships to students working on impactful community projects. Events like the Melnick Symposium explored critical topics, while William Ury received the International Advocate for Peace Award for his global conflict resolution …

Recent Developments: Harris V. State, Kaitlyn Lyons

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: In Re D.D., Donald Waldron

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Constitutionality Of Baltimore City's Local Hiring Ordinance, R. Stark Merrifield Iv

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Time To Define The Objectively Reasonable Officer: How Maryland's Use Of Force Statute Supplies Measureable Standards To Protect Fourth Amendment Rights, Chelsea Roberts

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Law School Announcements 2022-2023, Law School Announcements Editors

Announcements

• Officers and Faculty
• The Law School - History
• Programs of Instruction
• Curriculum
• Student Activities and Organizations
• Funds and Endowments

An Algorithmic Assessment Of Parole Decisions, Hannah Lacqueur, Ryan W. Copus

Faculty Works

Objectives: Parole is an important mechanism for alleviating the extraordinary social and financial costs of mass incarceration. Yet parole boards can also present a major obstacle, denying parole to low-risk inmates who could safely be released from prison. We evaluate a major parole institution, the New York State Parole Board, quantifying the costs of suboptimal decision-making.

Methods: Using ensemble Machine Learning, we predict any arrest and any violent felony arrest within three years to generate criminal risk predictions for individuals released on parole in New York from 2012–2015. We quantify the social welfare loss of the Board’s suboptimal decisions by …

Applying Universal Design In The Legal Academy, Matthew L. Timko

College of Law Faculty Publications

Too often barriers to access in the form of physical, technological, and cognitive environments play a large role in keeping many people out of law school. While federal and state laws address these barriers, universal design provides the clearest policy change for law schools to remedy these issues.

Research Exceptions In Comparative Copyright, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru, Michael Palmedo, Andrés Izquierdo

Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series

This Article categorizes the world’s copyright laws according to the degree to which they provide exceptions to copyright exclusivity for research uses. We classify countries based on the degree to which they have a research exception in their law that is sufficiently open to be able to permit reproduction and communications of copyrighted work needed for academic (i.e. non-commercial) text and data mining (TDM) research. We show that nearly every copyright law has at least one exception that promotes uses for research purposes. We find six different approaches to the provision of research exceptions that implicate application to TDM. Notably, …

Solving The Procedural Puzzles Of The Texas Heartbeat Act And Its Imitators: New York Times V. Sullivan As Historical Analogue, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes, Howard M. Wasserman

Faculty Publications

The Texas Heartbeat Act (S.B. 8) prohibits abortions following detection of a fetal heartbeat while delegating exclusive enforcement through private civil actions brought by “any person,” regardless of injury, for statutory damages of a minimum of $10,000 per prohibited abortion. Texas sought to impose costly litigation and potentially crippling liability on reproductive health providers and rights advocates, with the hope of stopping abortion in the state. Prior to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overruling Roe v. Wade and eliminating constitutional protection for abortion, the law represented a unique threat to reproductive freedom. But states are spreading S.B. 8’s exclusive …

Colorblind Capture, Jonathan Feingold

Faculty Scholarship

We are facing two converging waves of racial retrenchment. The first, which arose following the Civil Rights Movement, is nearing a legal milestone. This term or the next, the Supreme Court will prohibit affirmative action in higher education. When it does, the Court will cement decades of conservative jurisprudence that has systematically eroded the right to remedy racial inequality.

The second wave is more recent but no less significant. Following 2020’s global uprising for racial justice, rightwing forces launched a coordinated assault on antiracism itself. The campaign has enjoyed early success. As one measure, GOP officials have passed, proposed or …

The Role Of Law And Myth In Creating A Workplace That 'Looks Like America', Susan Bisom-Rapp

Faculty Scholarship

Equal employment opportunity (EEO) law has played a poor role in incentivizing effective diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and harassment prevention programming. In litigation and investigation, too many judges and regulators credit employers for maintaining policies and programs rather than requiring employers to embrace efforts that work. Likewise, many employers and consultants fail to consider the organizational effects created by DEI and harassment programming. Willful ignorance prevents the admission that some policies and programming harm those most in need of protection.

This approach has resulted in two problems. One is a doctrinal dilemma because important presumptions embedded in antidiscrimination law …

Confronting State Violence: Lessons From India's Farmer Protests, Smita Narula

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

In December 2021, following a year of sustained mass protests, farmers in India forced the repeal of three controversial Farm Laws that attempted to deregulate India’s agricultural sector in service of corporate interests. Farmers feared that the laws would dismantle price supports for key crops, jeopardize their livelihoods, and facilitate a corporate takeover of India’s agrarian economy. This Article situates India’s historic farmer protests in the context of the country’s longstanding agrarian crisis and the corporate capture of agriculture worldwide. I argue that the protests arose in response not only to the Farm Laws, but also to decades of state-sponsored …

Separate And Still Unequal: How Neighborhood Zoning Laws Keep U.S. Schools Segregated, Glynnis Hagins

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Parent, Child And State: Regulation In A New Era Of Homeschooling, Lawson B. Hamilton

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Mahanoy V. B.L. Ex Rel. Levy And The Virtual School Environment: A Framework For Regulating Online, Off-Campus Student Speech, W. Christopher Schwartz

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

For Their Own Good: Girls, Sexuality, And State Violence In The Name Of Safety, Madalyn K. Wasilczuk

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Equal Dignity, Colorblindness, And The Future Of Affirmative Action Beyond Grutter V. Bollinger, Thomas P. Crocker

Faculty Publications

In Grutter v. Bollinger the Supreme Court held that diversity was a compelling interest for equal protection purposes that justifies limited consideration of race through affirmative action programs. But there was a catch. The Court predicted that diversity would cease to be a compelling interest within twenty-five years. This Article examines the surprising doctrinal and conceptual implications that would follow if, having both the motive and means, the Court were to overturn Grutter before its predicted 2028 sunset. Exploring internal tensions within existing doctrine, this Article argues that even if the Court were to overturn Grutter, a form of race-conscious …

Uncovering Lies With Family Ties: The Use And Legal Implications Of Investigative Genetic Genealogy In The United States And United Kingdom, Rebecca James

The International Law Review Association Student Forum

Investigative genetic genealogy is a fascinating, yet controversial, forensic technique that began to gather recognition around 2018. Investigative genetic genealogy takes identification through familial matches to a new level by comparing unidentified DNA samples to the samples submitted to increasingly popular direct-to-consumer databases, like AncestryDNA, 23andME, and FamilyTreeDNA. Because of the technique’s ability to supply significant leads in new and old cases, countries around the world have begun to consider the use of investigative genetic genealogy. However, some countries have been slower than others to adopt the technique due to privacy concerns and countries’ existing privacy laws. Using the United …

All Is Fair In Love And War: But What About War Trials?, Bronwyn Tuff

The International Law Review Association Student Forum

The right to a fair trial is not just protected by a state’s domestic statute but also by international law under the 1949 Geneva Convention. In the most basic sense, a fair trial theoretically requires competent courts, penalty proportionality, proper notification, right of defense, right of appeal, and restrictions on the issuance of the death penalty. However, the requirements set by international law often fail to account for the desire of justice that may diminish the true fairness of a trial even though all requirements are present. This note examines the recent domestic war crime trials conducted by Ukraine during …

Academic Freedom And Misgendered Honorifics In The Classroom, Gabrielle Dohmen

University of Chicago Law Review

In recent years, public universities have promulgated pronoun policies designed to encourage professors and students to respect the pronouns that others use to identify themselves. A professor who does not follow the pronoun policy and instead misgenders a student—or uses gendered words or pronouns that do not match that student’s gender identity—may be disciplined by their university for violating the pronoun policy.

This Comment argues that professorial speech misgendering students in the classroom should not be protected by a professor’s First Amendment right to academic freedom, which traditionally covers teaching and scholarship. The First Amendment protects some exercises of academic …

Adjunct List

MC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Adjunct List

MC Law Review

No abstract provided.

University Of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 52, Issue 1, Fall 2022

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Effect Of Defendant Gender On Jurors’ Decision-Making, Yu Du

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Review Of Maryland’S Juvenile Justice System: Are The Adjudicative Competency Standards And Procedures Incompetent?, Kaitlin O'Dowd

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Finality, Fairness, And The Problem Of Innocence In Maryland, Michele Nethercott

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Bail Reform Act Of 1984: A Cause Of And Solution To The Federal Pretrial Detention Crisis, Daryl J. Olszewski

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Collateral Consequences Of An Incarcerated Beneficiary: Preserving Testamentary Intent And Protecting A Testator’S Estate From Falling Victim To A Beneficiary’S Unreasonable Criminal Justice Debt, Torra Hausmann

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beyond Window Dressing: Public Participation For Marginalized Communities In The Datafied Society, Michele E. Gilman

All Faculty Scholarship

We live in a datafied society in which our personal data is being constantly harvested, analyzed, and sold by public and private entities, and yet we have little control over our data and little voice in how it is used. In light of the impacts of algorithmic decision-making systems—including those that run on machine learning and artificial intelligence—there are increasing calls to integrate public participation into the adoption, design, and oversight of these tech tools. Stakeholder input is particularly crucial for members of marginalized groups, who bear the disproportionate harms of data-centric technologies. Yet, recent calls for public participation have …