Law Commons^™

One Duty To All: The Fiduciary Duty Of Impartiality And Stockholders’ Conflict Of Interest, Shachar Nir

UC Law Business Journal

Delaware precedent, primarily Trados and ODN, holds that corporate boards of directors owe fiduciary duties to holders of corporation common stock and not to holders of preferred stock. This precedent, however, fails to address a broad range of complex but commonly occurring potential conflicts between and among holders of common stock and multiple classes of preferred stock.

Rarely analyzed or applied in an intra-corporate context, the fiduciary duty of impartiality allows a fiduciary to exercise discretion while having a duty to act bona fide in the best interests of the beneficiaries as a whole. Mostly derived from U.S. common law …

Policy Analysis: The Ndrc’S Reg. No. 11, China’S New Capital Control, Yumeng Xu

UC Law Business Journal

Trade disputes between the United States and China have caught momentary worldwide attention. However, because the world’s two largest economies are interlocked in various aspects, it is hard to cut these connections, despite Washington and Beijing’s constant effort to dwindle each other’s impact. As one of the major sources of foreign investment for the U.S., China has been adjusting its capital control policies for years in response to development needs and in order to address the changing investment environment in foreign countries. This Note spotlights China’s latest outbound capital control regulation, NDRC Regulation No. 11 (“Reg. No. 11”), and how …

The Janus Decision And The Future Of Private- Sector Unionism, Michelle Quach

UC Law Business Journal

In order for a union to represent a group of workers, a petition to start the election process must first be filed with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and it must receive support from 30% of the employees. Once the NLRB determines that the 30% threshold is met, the NLRB will conduct an election to determine if a majority of employees want union representation. If the union is certified by the NLRB, through a majority vote, the union becomes the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees. That is, the union becomes the sole representative of the employees and may …

California Cannabis Regulations And The Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act: A Product Liability Perspective Of Edible Cannabis, Alexis Lazzeri

UC Law Business Journal

From the passage of Proposition 215 to present day, California’s cannabis industry has transformed from access solely for medical patients to a nearly three billion dollar a year industry with legal medicinal and adult-use consumption. With this rise in accessibility, edible cannabis products are being consumed more than ever. “Edibles” are food and drink products infused with cannabis, a mix of THC (i.e., delta 9 - tetrahydrocannabinol) and CBD (i.e., cannabidiol)—with varying levels of each, depending on the desired effect. CBD is a non-intoxicating compound often used to treat physical ailments and chronic conditions, while THC delivers a euphoric high. …

Dispossessing Resident Voice: Municipal Receiverships And The Public Trust, Juliet M. Moringiello

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The residents of struggling cities suffer property dispossessions both as individual owners and as municipal residents. Their individual dispossessions are part of a cycle that often begins with industrial decline. In Detroit, for example, more than 100,000 residents have lost their homes to tax foreclosure over a four-year period that bracketed the city’s bankruptcy filing. Falling property values, job losses, and foreclosures affect municipal budgets by reducing tax revenues. As individual dispossessions exacerbate municipal financial crises, residents can also face the loss of municipal property. Struggling cities and towns often sell publicly owned property—from parks to parking systems—to balance municipal …

“I Do Not Feel I Am A Piece Of Property To Be Bought And Sold Irrespective Of My Wishes:” Athlete Activism And The Sociocultural Impact Of Curt Flood’S Lawsuit Against Major League Baseball, Luka Green

Pomona Senior Theses

In January 1970, St. Louis Cardinals outfielder Curt Flood filed a suit against MLB Commissioner Bowie Kuhn, protesting the Reserve Clause in Major League Baseball that did not allow players the right to negotiate contract terms with any team but their current one. In doing so, he cemented his status as a divisive figure in baseball, the media, and with the general public. One of the primary reasons for such an extreme reaction was Flood’s rhetoric surrounding the case, as he repeatedly invoked slavery and other forms of peonage when describing the working conditions of professional baseball players. This sparked …

Fighting Back From The Brink: International Efforts To Prevent Illegal Trafficking In Endangered Species, Kara Consalo

Journal Publications

This article advances the argument for sustainable harvesting as a broad supplement, even replacement, to the prevailing no-trade policies currently used in many countries and international organizations. It is the author’s premise that the no-trade conservation paradigm is failing to adequately prevent illegal trafficking and endangered wildlife populations are suffering catastrophic losses as a result. This article will explain the current state of prevailing no-trade regulations and efforts to stem the onslaught of illegal wildlife trafficking. The article will then explore two examples of successful sustainable farming and harvesting programs, the American alligator and the Peruvian vicuñas. After a comparison …

“Dreamers” Versus The Labels Used In Government Documents And Judicial Opinions In Department Of Homeland Security V. Regents Of The University Of California, Maritza I. Reyes

Journal Publications

Regretfully, the debate over immigration reform has been fueled and railroaded by rhetoric that is counter-productive, divisive, and dangerous . It is one thingfor people who are not knowledgeable of the law and its history to use the pejorative terms “illegal alien” and “illegal immigrant;” however, it should become unacceptable for government officials and judges to use labels like “illegal alien” and “illegal immigrant.” When placed in the historical and current context of the United States, these terms carry racial animus. They have developed to attach an identity as inferior human beings to a group of people who are not …

Predictive Scheduling Is Trending: Is Milwaukee Next?, Kelly J. Lyden

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

No abstract provided.

Title Iii Of The Libertad Act: Proceeding In The Absence Of True Liberty, Luis D. Gutierrez

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Twenty-First Century Technology Affects Inmates' Access To Prison Law Libraries In The United States Prison System, Kelsey Brown

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

In today’s generation America is open 24 hours, 7 days a week. Americans live in an open-all-night society, where with one click, one can buy groceries, watch a 3D movie, bowl a perfect game, and eat pizza all at two in the morning without ever leaving his or her living room. Therefore, is not a stretch to imagine a single digital device, such as a computer or phone, that could hold thousand, if not, millions of books with topics ranging from comedy, fiction, nonfiction, business, cooking, fitness, etc. But most importantly, and one of the focuses of this Comment, are …

Advancing A Feasible Solution To Cross-Border Employment Enforcement Mechanisms, Alina Veneziano

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

This study analyzes the prior and current practice of the judiciary in deciding cases of extraterritorial applications of U.S. anti-discrimination statutes, such as Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA. Specifically, it analyzes when and to what extent courts have applied the protections of these Acts to foreign elements. In 1991, Aramco held that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent is shown, is meant to apply only within the territorial borders of the United States. Because of the congressional silence in Title VII, the Supreme Court in Aramco dismissed the case even though it involved a claim of discriminatory …

The Perils Of Self-Directed Iras, Kathryn Kennedy

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

Individual retirement accounts were created in 1974 as tax-sheltered retirement savings for employees whose employer did not offer an employer-provided retirement vehicle. Since then, they have been used primarily as rollover vehicles, such that amounts accumulated under employer-provided retirement plans can be rolled over into an individual retirement account. This Article examines the perils involved with a rollover IRA owner decides to invest his IRA assets in non-traditional assets.

From The Legal Literature: Criminalizing Propaganda: J. Remy Green’S Argument To Digitize Brandenburg, Francesca Laguardia

Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works

No abstract provided.

From The Legal Literature: The Threat And Promise Of Police Use Of Dna Databases, Francesca Laguardia

Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works

No abstract provided.

Considering A Domestic Terror Statute And Its Alternatives, Francesca Laguardia

Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works

Recent years have seen an increase in right-wing extremist violence within the United States, which has highlighted the disparities in law enforcement’s handling of “international” as opposed to “domestic” terrorism. Public, legal, and law enforcement commenters have begun calling for a “domestic terrorism statute,” arguing that the lack of such a statute is the largest hurdle in prosecuting domestic terrorists. This Essay explains that the primary cause of the disparity in prosecutions between domestic and international terrorists is not a lack of a domestic terrorism statute but rather the lack of a generalized terrorism statute and the failure to designate …

Education Is Liberation: The Power Of Alternative Education Spaces, Matthew Amani Glover

City University of New York Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cuny School Of Law Dilley Delegation Foia Request, Cuny Dilley Delegation

City University of New York Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why Matter Of Devera Matters: Universal Pre-K, Quality, Oversight, And The Need To Restore Public Values In New York Statutory Interpretation, Natalie Gomez-Velez

City University of New York Law Review

New York City is at the vanguard in introducing free, high-quality universal pre-kindergarten as a strategy to address educational inequity and significant opportunity gaps by improving early school readiness. New York State law authorizing universal pre-kindergarten (“UPK”), accompanied by robust quality standards, paved the way for New York City’s impressive UPK initiative. A separate New York State law authorizes charter schools and limits regulatory oversight of such schools. Matter of DeVera v. Elia, a recent decision by New York State’s highest court, dealt a blow to New York City and State efforts to require a powerful charter entity to abide …

The Fight For Nycha: Rad And The Erosion Of Public Housing In New York, Kyle Giller

City University of New York Law Review

The government-funded creation of permanent, affordable housing for millions of middle- and low-income people was one of the greatest social welfare projects of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1970s, however, many Public Housing Authorities (“PHA”) saw decades of funding cuts, neglect, and mismanagement, and many PHAs have been demolished or seriously neglected. New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”), with a population larger than many mid-size American cities, is the last remaining large-scale public housing program in the country and one of the last bastions of true affordability in one of the most unaffordable cities in the world. Now, NYCHA, …

Ethical Mediation In An Unjust World: Claiming Bias And Negotiating Fairness, Jessica Halperin

City University of New York Law Review

Mediation is continuing to emerge as a highly adaptable and effective method for resolving legal conflicts in the United States. Though unique in the myriad benefits it affords participants, mediation has been critiqued by practitioners and legal realist theoreticians, in part for its uncompromising requirement of neutrality in the mediator. Many mediators pursue neutrality because they believe it is the only measure of the fairness of a mediator or mediation. In the context of multidimensional race- and sex-based inequalities in society, however, neutrality is an impossible ideal and notions of “fairness” are complex. This Note inquires whether and how mediators …

Liberty In The Things Of God: The Christian Origins Of Religious Freedom, Gerard V. Bradley

Journal Articles

Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom. By Robert Louis Wilken. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019. 191 pp. $26.00.

Yet the myth persists that secular philosophy rescued religious freedom from the unmerciful hands of the religious. The central ambition of Robert Wilken’s magisterial new book is to expose the myth as a false creation narrative. He shows brilliantly that religious liberty for persons and for communities has its origins in Christianity and not in the Enlightenment’s triumph over it. It might be hard to say what would constitute definitive proof of a proposition …

Wills Speak, Katheleen Guzman

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Rising Up Without Pushing Down: Lessons Learned From The Suffragettes' Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric, Kit Johnson

Faculty Articles

American suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton famously wrote: “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal.” Yet when suffragettes spoke of “all” men and women, they were clear about exceptions. Immigrants did not qualify. Indeed, in her own address at the First Women’s Rights Convention, held in Seneca Falls, New York, in July 1848, Stanton said that “to have . . . ignorant foreigners . . . fully recognized, while we ourselves are thrust out from all the rights that belong to citizens, it is too grossly insulting to the dignity of woman to …

Incivility As Identity, Melissa Mortazavi

Faculty Articles

Incivility can undermine the legal profession’s work and effectiveness. However, existing scholarship, focused on explaining lawyer incivility as an overextension of zealous advocacy, poor training, or a business-driven model of lawyering, has misconceived a key facet of incivility. Prevailing wisdom largely neglects that lawyers use incivility to react and position themselves within the sociopolitical norms of society in which they live. Civility (or the lack thereof) in the legal profession, may be less about clients and economic pressures than about lawyers affirming their political, class, and gender identities. Once the legal profession recognizes that civility is significantly about lawyers affirming …

Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Paul R. Mchugh, Gerard V. Bradley

Journal Articles

Paul R. McHugh and Gerard V. Bradley expose the flawed reasoning of Bostock.

Certification Comes Of Age: Reflections On The Past, Present And Future Of Cooperative Judicial Federalism, Kenneth F. Ripple

Journal Articles

In 1995, the American Judicature Society (AJS) undertook a comprehensive survey of certification. This Article uses the AJS’s survey as a starting point to examine the development of certification over the past twenty-five years. Were the fears of its critics well founded, or have the federal and state judiciaries adapted to mitigate the shortcomings of certification? Has certification been a useful tool in allowing for development of state law by the state judiciary, or has it been an imposition on the judiciary of a coequal sovereign?

Beyond these questions, this Article also will look at how certification has expanded beyond …

Is Barrios The Death Knell Of Bosh Claims? The Sovereign Immunity Battle Between The Oklahoma Supreme Court And Legislature Over Constitutional Torts, Hayley Stillwell

Faculty Articles

The State of Oklahoma has explicitly adopted sovereign immunity for a broad array of tort claims, including constitutional torts—legal wrongs by government actors in violation of duties imposed by the Oklahoma Constitution. In the years before and after this explicit invocation of sovereign immunity for constitutional torts, however, the question in Oklahoma was whether the Oklahoma Legislature had the authority to do this. Even though the Oklahoma Legislature enacted a statute that invoked sovereign immunity as to certain torts, utilizing a seemingly all-encompassing definition of “tort,” the Oklahoma Supreme Court nevertheless found that private rights of action—commonly referred to as …

Politicians As Fiduciaries: Public Law V. Private Law When Altering The Date Of An Election, Steven Cleveland

Faculty Articles

In the 2019 decision Rucho v. Common Cause, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that federal challenges to partisan gerrymandering-a practice yielding election results that "reasonably seem unjust"-were non-justiciable. If partisan gerrymandering claims are not federally justiciable, and if that conclusion emboldens politicians, how else might incumbents manipulate election mechanics to preserve their political advantage? This Article explores one possibility that was briefly mentioned by the Rucho majority: the strategic advancement or delay of the date of a federal election. The strategic shift of election day is not simply a theoretical problem. Foreign politicians have strategically altered their election days for …

Misaligned Lawmaking, Timothy Meyer

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Article makes three contributions. First, it introduces the Misalignment Thesis in the context of U.S. trade policy. The Misalignment Thesis is a descriptive claim about how the structure of a legislative bargain influences the long-term stability and effectiveness of that bargain. Second, the Article introduces the normative corollary to the Misalignment Thesis: if political stability hinges on respecting the legislative bargain, interdependent policies should be subject to renegotiation on the same timeline and implementation on the same terms. In light of this prescription, I offer three concrete proposals for aligning trade liberalization and trade adjustment assistance in order to …