Law Commons^™

Taxing Local Energy Externalities, Hannah J. Wiseman

Notre Dame Law Review

There is a fundamental problem of scale in the governance of industrial development. For some of the fastest-growing U.S. industries, the negative impacts of development fall primarily at the local level, and the benefits tend to accrue more broadly to states and the federal government. These governments accordingly have inadequate incentives to address the very localized negative externalities of development. Yet states also increasingly preempt most local control over some forms of development. This creates a regulatory void, in which state and federal regulations are inadequate, and local governments lack the power to use traditional Pigouvian tools such as regulation, …

The Problem Of Foreign Convictions In U.S. Immigration Law, Geoff Cebula

Notre Dame Law Review

Part I argues that the definition of “conviction” in the INA implicitly leaves room for courts to inquire into the procedural fairness underlying a foreign conviction. Part II surveys the traditional standards for evaluating the sufficiency of foreign convictions in the contexts of extradition and international comity, two areas where U.S. courts have had to decide when to honor foreign judgments for centuries. These longstanding criteria formed the background against which the INA definition was adopted and may provide guidance on how to apply this definition. Accordingly, Part III derives from this analysis suggestions for how the Department of State …

Constitutional Law's Conflicting Premises, Maxwell L. Stearns

Notre Dame Law Review

Doctrinal inconsistency is constitutional law’s special feature and bug. Virtually every salient doctrinal domain presents major precedents operating in tension. Bodies of precedent are rarely abandoned simply because a newer strand makes an older one appear out of place. And when an earlier strand is redeployed or substituted, the once-newer strand likewise persists. This dynamic process tasks law students, often for the first time, with reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable.

These doctrinal phenomena share as their root cause dual persistent conflicting premises. Some examples: Standing protects congressional power to monitor the executive branch, or it limits congressional monitoring when the selected …

Forgotten Federal-Missionary Partnerships: New Light On The Establishment Clause, Nathan S. Chapman

Notre Dame Law Review

Americans have long debated whether the Establishment Clause permits the government to support education that includes religious instruction. Current doctrine permits states to do so by providing vouchers for private schools on a religiously neutral basis. Unlike most Establishment Clause doctrines, however, the Supreme Court did not build this one on a historical foundation. Rather, in cases from Everson v. Board of Education (1947) to Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020), opponents of religious-school funding have claimed American history supports a strict rule of no-aid.

Yet the Court and scholars have largely ignored a practice that casts light on …

A Case For Zoning, Christopher Serkin

Notre Dame Law Review

Due to a remarkable convergence of criticisms from both the right and the left, zoning is under more sustained attack than at any time in the last seventy-five years. A consensus is building that zoning is what ails America. Simultaneously, the traditional justifications for zoning, like separating incompatible uses, have become increasingly anachronistic in an age of mixed-use development and a desire for vibrant, dynamic places. This Article offers an updated defense of zoning, and in particular density regulations. Today, local governments deploy zoning not primarily to keep industry (or apartment buildings) out of residential neighborhoods, but to preserve community …

Fraudulently Induced Confessions, Michael J. Zydney Mannheimer

Notre Dame Law Review

The jurisprudence on the use of police deception during interrogations is singularly unhelpful. Police may deceive in order to induce a suspect to confess, the courts tell us, unless they go too far. Police are permitted, for example, to feign sympathy for the suspect, lie about the existence of incriminating evidence, and falsely downplay the seriousness of the offense under investigation. But when police engage in other forms of deception, such as by offering false promises of leniency or misrepresenting the suspect’s Miranda rights, courts will balk and declare the resulting confession coerced. Yet neither courts nor commentators have successfully …

Substantive Remedies, Hanoch Dagan, Avihay Dorfman

Notre Dame Law Review

Often, private law remedies enforce or vindicate infringed underlying rights. Substantive remedies are different. Substantive remedies do not aim at restoring these rights; nor do they seek to change them. Instead, substantive remedies adjust the remedial response for a right violation so as to ensure post-wrong justice. They require the law of remedies not merely to look back, but rather to take a second look at the parties’ post-wrong situation. At times, such a second look affects the type of remedy awarded (damages in lieu of injunctive relief); in other cases—for instance, the tort doctrine of crushing liability—it imposes a …

Chevron Abroad, Kent Barnett, Lindsey Vinson

Notre Dame Law Review

This Article presents our comparative findings of how courts in five other countries review agency statutory interpretation. These comparisons permit us to understand and participate better in current debates about the increasingly controversial Chevron doctrine in American law, whereby courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations of statutes that an agency administers. Those debates concern, among other things, Chevron’s purported inevitability, functioning, and normative propriety. Our inquiry into judicial review in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia provides useful and unexpected findings. Chevron, contrary to some scholars’ views, is not inevitable because only one of these countries …

Enforcing A Wall Of Separation Between Big Business And State: Protection From Monopolies In State Constitutions, Alexandra K. Howell

Notre Dame Law Review

The goal of this Note is not to convince the reader to care more about regulatory monopolies than private ones. In fact, it is not to talk about private antitrust law at all. Instead, the goal is to put today’s concern with monopolies in historical perspective. Part I traces the history of the antimonopoly spirit in the United States starting with the English tradition that was highly influential on the Founders. This Note then demonstrates that today’s concern with private monopolies comes from a shift that took place during the progressive era. In Part II, this Note highlights the role …

One Ring To Rule Them All: Individual Judgments, Nationwide Injunctions, And Universal Handcuffs, Paul J. Larkin Jr., Giancarlo Canaparo

Notre Dame Law Review Reflection

A large and growing body of literature criticizes nationwide injunctions, although a handful of scholars have come to their qualified defense. The literature has focused on whether universal injunctions comport with the historic scope of federal courts’ equitable powers and are good policy to boot. Largely missing from the debate is a fulsome analysis of whether the Constitution or the Judicial Code authorizes federal courts to issue such injunctions and whether they are permissible under existing Supreme Court precedent. We argue that the answer to each question is “no.”

Parts I and II explain that no positive law authorizes universal …

Mmu: 11/16/20–11/22/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• Free Coffee from the SBA until noon
• CDO Announcements
• Hamburg Honors Scholars Video
• Note from Kresge Law Library
• Spring Semester Externships Information
• SBA Store
• Mass Schedule
• South Reading Room Study Snacks
• Advocating for Workplace Justice
• Free Coffee Fridays by the CDO
• Mindfulness
• The Fighting Irish have a bi-week [sic]
• CDO Winter Programing Information

Resources and Updates

• Legal Writing Center
• The Current Students Section of the NDLS Website
• Health & Wellness Information
• Free Professional Headshots
• NDLS News Recommendations
• SBA Dropbox
• COVID Corner

A Message from the Editor

Class Action Squared: Multistate Actions And Agency Dilemmas, Elysa M. Dishman

Notre Dame Law Review

As the Supreme Court continues to restrict the reach of private class actions, numerous commentators have championed public enforcement actions by state attorneys general (AGs) as a superior alternative to hold corporations accountable for misconduct. While AG actions fill some of the void left by the forced retreat of the private class action, few scholars have seriously considered whether the agency problems that exist in private class actions also occur in AG actions. And, until now, no scholar has recognized the unique agency problems that arise when AGs act together in multistate actions.

Multistate actions are made up of two …

Is The Federal Reserve Constitutional? An Originalist Argument For Independent Agencies, Christine Kexel Chabot

Notre Dame Law Review

Originalists have written off the Federal Reserve’s independent monetary policy decisions as an unconstitutional novelty. This Article demonstrates that the independent structure of the Federal Reserve dates back to a Founding-era agency known as the Sinking Fund Commission. Like the Federal Reserve, the Commission conducted open market purchases of U.S. securities with substantial independence from the President. The Commission’s independent structure was proposed by Alexander Hamilton, passed by the First Congress, and signed into law by President George Washington. Their decisions to create an independent Commission with multiple members to check the President and one another—and to include the Vice …

From Humphrey's Executor To Seila Law: Ending Dual Federal Antitrust Authority, Alyson M. Cox

Notre Dame Law Review

This Note catalogues and proposes solutions to both the traditional concerns of efficiency and fairness and the modern constitutional problems posed by the current dual enforcement structure. Part I will compare the two antitrust agencies on the basis of their structures, accountability, statutory authority, and enforcement procedures, as well as evaluate potential concerns with vesting either agency with the sole authority to enforce civil antitrust laws. Part II will evaluate the perils of the current dual enforcement structure, exploring both the traditional arguments about efficiency and fairness and the modern constitutional challenges. Part III will evaluate potential legislative solutions to …

The Historical Origins Of Judicial Religious Exemptions, Stephanie H. Barclay

Notre Dame Law Review

The Supreme Court has recently expressed a renewed interest in the question of when the Free Exercise Clause requires exemptions from generally applicable laws. While scholars have vigorously debated what the historical evidence has to say about this question, the conventional wisdom holds that judicially created exemptions would have been a new or extraordinary means of protecting religious exercise—a sea change in the American approach to judicial review when compared to the English common law.

This Article, however, questions that assumption and looks at this question from a broader perspective. When one views judicial decisions through the lens of equitable …

Irreconcilable Differences: The Thresholds For Armed Attack And International Armed Conflict, Laurie R. Blank

Notre Dame Law Review

This Article explores the gap between the definition of armed attack and the threshold for international armed conflict to identify such possible consequences of the different definitions for the application of either or both bodies of law and to consider whether efforts to reconcile the different meanings are feasible and, more importantly, desirable or problematic. The first Part briefly presents the definition of armed attack and the threshold for international armed conflict, with a focus on the purpose of the particular thresholds and definitions for the two terms in order to provide a foundation for the main comparisons and discussion …

The Double Standard For Third-Party Standing: June Medical And The Continuation Of Disparate Standing Doctrine, Brandon L. Winchel

Notre Dame Law Review

No jurisdictional principle is more fundamental to the federal judiciary than the doctrine of standing. Before litigants may avail themselves of the tremendous power vested in the federal judiciary, plaintiffs must first establish that they are appropriately situated to assert a legal claim before a court. In analyzing whether a plaintiff possesses the requisite standing to maintain a legal challenge, the Supreme Court has stressed that a court’s analysis must be blind to the underlying dispute: “The fundamental aspect of standing is that it focuses on the party seeking to get his complaint before a federal court and not on …

The Remand Power And The Supreme Court's Role, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl

Notre Dame Law Review

“Reversed and remanded.” Or “vacated and remanded.” These familiar words, often found at the end of an appellate decision, emphasize that an appellate court’s conclusion that the lower court erred generally does not end the litigation. The power to remand for further proceedings rather than wrap up a case is useful for appellate courts because they may lack the institutional competence to bring the case to a final resolution (as when new factual findings are necessary) or lack an interest in the fact-specific work of applying a newly announced legal standard to the particular circumstances at hand. The modern Supreme …

Distinguishing Permissible Preemption From Unconstitutional Commandeering, Edward A. Hartnett

Notre Dame Law Review

For years, the preemption doctrine and the anticommandeering doctrine lived in an uneasy tension, with each threatening to consume the other. On the one hand, preemption permits Congress to insist that state law give way to congressional demands. On the other hand, the anticommandeering doctrine prohibits Congress from commandeering state legislatures or state executives. Without some way to establish a boundary between the two, preemption could swallow the anticommandeering doctrine by allowing Congress to control state law. Alternatively, absent some boundary, anticommandeering could swallow preemption by empowering states to refuse to be governed by the commands of federal law. Either …

The Role Of "Commercial Morality" In Trade Secret Doctrine, Lynda J. Oswald

Notre Dame Law Review

The approaching anniversary of E.I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Christopher is the impetus for this exploration and evaluation of the role of “commercial morality” in trade secret misappropriation doctrine. Christopher is the well-known industrial espionage case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that flying an airplane over an under-construction manufacturing facility to take photos of briefly-but-inevitably exposed trade secrets was an “improper means” of accessing a trade secret and was contrary to standards of “commercial morality.”

Commercial morality has played a significant but shifting role in trade secret law over the past seven …

Mmu: 11/09/20–11/15/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• Free Coffee from the SBA until noon
• CDO Announcements
• Note from Kresge Law Library
• Spring Semester Externships Information
• SBA Store
• Mass Schedule
• Paws and Take a Break with Dogs
• Free Coffee Fridays by the CDO
• Mindfulness Mythbusters
• The Fighting Irish versus Boston College--Go Irish!

Resources and Updates

• Legal Writing Center
• The Current Students Section of the NDLS Website
• Health & Wellness Information
• Free Professional Headshots
• NDLS News Recommendations
• SBA Dropbox
• COVID Corner

A Message from the Editor

1L of the Week: AJ Stautz

3LOL: …

Mmu: 11/02/20–11/08/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• Free Coffee from the SBA until noon
• CDO Announcements
• London Law Program Town Hall
• Note from Kresge Law Library
• SBA Store
• Parliament and the Brexit Process: the battle for constitutional supremacy in the United Kingdom
• Catholics and the 2020 Election
• LexisNexis 1L Quick Tips Series: Statutory Research Tips
• Election Day
• Mass Schedule
• LexisNexis 2L/3L Quick Tips Series: Practical Guidance Tools for Transactional Practice
• Just Global Health: Integrating Human Right and Common Goods
• Representing Jacob Blake: A Conversation with Patrick Salvi II, ‘07 J.D. & Sunny Hostin, ‘94 J.D. …

Mmu: 10/26/20–11/01/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• CDO Announcements
• Note from Kresge Law Library
• SBA Store
• LexisNexis Office Hours
• IP Lecture Series: Professor Anjali Vats
• Religious Freedom in Flux: A Conversation about Recent U.S. Supreme Court Ruling and its Upcoming Term
• Mass Schedule
• Clinic Information Session
• Advocating for Ethics in Government
• London Town Hall
• Going to Court as a Survivor
• A Conversation with Judge Amul Thapar
• International Law and Diplomacy
• Catholic Education, the Supreme Court, and School Choice
• Wrongfully Convicted: The Story of Patrick Pursley
• NEED TO TALK? Mike Urbaniak is …

How Congress Can Help Raise Vaccine Rates, Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, Y. Tony Yang

Notre Dame Law Review Reflection

2019 saw an unusually high number of measles cases, and other preventable disease outbreaks, at least in part linked to vaccines refusal. States are considering legislative responses. This Essay examines what role the federal government can fill in increasing vaccines rates. The Essay suggests that the federal government has an important role to fill in funding research, coordination, and local efforts. It also suggests that a federal school vaccine mandate is likely not the solution: first, such mandates can run into plausible constitutional challenges, and second, there are policy arguments against it. The policy contentions include the unfairness of imposing …

Mmu: 10/19/20–10/25/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• CDO Announcements
• Note from Kresge Library
• Pure Barre @ NDLS
• Koru Mindfulness for Law Students
• International Pronouns Day
• SBA Store
• LexisNexis Office Hours
• IP Lecture Series: Professor K.J. Greene
• Daily Mass Schedule
• Book Discussion: White Fragility
• LexisNexis 2L/3L Quick Tips Series: State Law Research
• ADR Careers in the US Panel
• School Vouchers in the Age of COVID-19
• Virtual Tailgate: Buffalo
• 1,000 Days, 1,000 Homes
• Successful Negotiations: Best Practices and Pitfalls to Avoid
• Higher Education Law Panel
• 1L Exam Information Session
• Virtual Tailgate: New York …

Mmu: 10/12/20–10/18/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials.
• CDO Announcements
• Restoration Week
• Koru Mindfulness for Law Students
• SBA Store
• LexisNexis Office Hours
• RBG and the Environment: A Talk with Professor Huber
• Debunking 1L Myths
• IP Lecture Series: Professor Robert Brauneis
• Mentorship Program Introduction
• Dress for Success
• Daily Mass Schedule
• Working In-House at a Hospital System - NDLS Alum Katy Baum
• Environmental Justice
• LexisNexis 1L Quick Tips Series: Terms & Connectors Searching
• The Excessive Use of Force at Home and Abroad
• IP Lecture Series: Professor K.J. Greene
• Virtual Tailgate: Louisville and Nashville
• Free …

Mmu: 10/05/20–10/11/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is open Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00 with daily specials
• CDO Announcements
• Graduate Student Appreciation Week
• Koru Mindfulness for Law Students
• NDLS Running Group: Race to the Court
• Message from the Notre Dame Environmental Law Society
• Last Chance to Purchase WLF T-Shirts
• SBA Store
• LexisNexis Office Hours
• Coronavirus and the Curtailment of Religious Liberty: A Global Review
• Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Opportunities: 1L Scholars & Mentoring Programs
• Daily Mass Schedule
• IP in Practice Series: Fashion and Counterfeits with Jacqueline Brosseau, Greenberg Taurig, LLP
• The Battle for Barrett: The Supreme Court …

2020–2021 Bulletin Of Information, Notre Dame Law School

Bulletins of Information

CONTENTS

• Admissions Information
• Academic Calendar
• Tuition and Fees
• Academic Requirements
• Off Campus Programs
• Senior Administrative Leadership
• Hoynes Code

Mmu: 09/28/20–10/04/20, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

General Announcements and Reminders

• Crossings is opening Thursday, October 1 for coffee and grab and go food.
• CDO Announcements
• Free Professional Headshots
• Employment Opportunity: Research Assistant
• Wanted: High School Mock Trial Coach
• SBA Store
• LexisNexis Office Hours
• Public Interest Month: Litigating for Liberty
• Advice to the Next President on Addressing Racial Justice: Notre Dame Students Speak Out
• Daily Mass Schedule
• LexisNexis: Wish I Knew When I Was A 1L: A Panel of 2Ls and 3Ls Imparting Valuable Advice
• Schooling in the Pandemic: Perspectives from Across America
• Free Speech and Social Media: A Conversation with Professors Volokh …

Fruit Of The Poisonous Lemon Tree: How The Supreme Court Created Offended-Observer Standing, And Why It's Time For It To Go, Joseph C. Davis, Nicholas R. Reaves

Notre Dame Law Review Reflection

Can individuals who observe what they consider to be offensive government speech or conduct sue to stop it? Typically not—absent additional evidence of a direct and particularized injury. Yet in one area of the law, the fundamental requirements of Article III (limiting federal standing to actual “cases” or “controversies”) are relaxed: the Establishment Clause. At least ten circuits have held that the mere observation of a display containing religious content (the Ten Commandments, a cross, a menorah, and the like) on public property suffices to create an injury-in-fact that opens the doors to federal court.

This Essay addresses the continued …