Law Commons^™

An 'I Do' I Choose: How The Fight For Marriage Access Supports A Per Se Finding Of Persecution For Asylum Cases Based On Forced Marriage, Natalie Nanasi

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

There is something special about marriage. The U.S. Supreme Court, in striking down anti-miscegenation laws, restrictions on the right to marry for disadvantaged groups, and most recently, the Defense of Marriage Act, has long recognized the marital union to be "sacred" and "fundamental to…existence." Yet this analysis is dramatically different when courts consider asylum law, where a woman who is seeking refuge in the United States to protect her from a forced marriage abroad will likely be denied protection because the harm she fears is not considered to be a "persecutory" act. She may therefore be forced to spend a …

Pleading Securities Fraud Claims - Only Part Of The Story, Marc I. Steinberg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The failure to survive a motion to dismiss based on deficient pleading of claims alleged in a federal securities class action results in the end of the litigation (when such motion is granted with prejudice). This obstacle, however, presents only part of the story. Today, due to developments that are addressed in this Article, plaintiffs institute federal securities class actions against fewer types of defendants as contrasted with the situation two decades ago.

Limits On The Search For Truth In Criminal Procedure: A Comparative View, Jenia I. Turner

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Across diverse legal traditions, the search for truth is a basic function of the criminal process. Uncovering the truth about the charged crime is regarded as an essential precondition to achieving justice, enforcing criminal law, and legitimating the verdict. Yet while truthseeking is a broadly accepted goal in the criminal process, no system seeks the truth at all costs. The search for truth must on occasion yield to considerations related to efficiency, democratic participation, and protection of individual rights.

Different jurisdictions around the world show different preferences with respect to the tradeoffs between these values and the search for truth …

Accountability Of International Prosecutors, Jenia I. Turner

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The dilemma of holding prosecutors accountable while ensuring their independence was at the center of the debates surrounding the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The drafters of the Rome Statute for the ICC understood that the Court would be handling cases with significant political implications and yet working with limited resources and no independent enforcement capacity. To enhance prosecutors’ ability to operate successfully in this environment, the drafters enshrined prosecutorial independence into the Statute and gave prosecutors significant discretion over charging and investigation decisions. At the same time, drafters worried that ICC prosecutors were not sufficiently accountable to …

The Law Is A Causeway: Metaphor And The Rule Of Law In Russia, Jeffrey D. Kahn

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The chapter explores how a metaphor for the rule of law created by the playwright Robert Bolt captures the difficulty that Russia has experienced in its self-proclaimed pursuit of a rule-of-law state: "The law is not a 'light' for you or any man to see by; the law is n instrument of any kind. The law is a causeway upon which, so long as he keeps to it, a citizen may walk safely." In Russia, the failure to build a rule-of-law state has been, among other things, a failure to create what this metaphor describes as the essence of that …

The Freedom To Marry: Politics And Law In 2014 And Beyond, Ari Ezra Waldman

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

Everything Must Stay In Place - President Business, The Lego Movie, Tamara Belinfanti

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

Better Late Than Never?, Arthur S. Leonard

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

Amidst Developments Unfolding In Courtrooms Across Colorado, Same-Sex Couples Marry In Boulder, Denver, Pueblo, Arthur S. Leonard

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

The Dignity Of The Human Person: Catholic Social Teaching And The Practice Of Criminal Punishment, Dora W. Klein

Faculty Articles

The moral foundation that supports the Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty is wide and deep. This Article proposes that despite the oft-repeated maxim that "death is different," the same foundation that supports efforts to abolish the death penalty can also support those who seek to achieve other reforms in the practice of criminal punishment.

The Agony Of Modern Legal Ethics, 1970–1985, Michael S. Ariens

Faculty Articles

When the American Bar Association (ABA) adopted its Code of Professional Responsibility at its annual meeting in August 1969, the American legal profession was a publicly respected and economically vibrant body. Lawyers, though always more feared than loved, became increasingly important in post-World War II America. The demand for their services exploded for a quarter-century, and lawyers assumed an increased role in the economic and political life of the United States. During the 1950s and early 1960s, the Cold War led American lawyers and other public figures to re-emphasize the rule of law as defining the difference between the United …

Finality And Rehabilitation, Meghan J. Ryan

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

New science and evolving societal views have led commentators to question the doctrine of finality. This parallels commentators’ embrace of rehabilitation during the middle of the last century. Today, casting off the strictures of finality and embracing rehabilitation are considered complementary positions, but finality has historically been understood as promoting rehabilitation. This shift stems from our changing understandings of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation focuses on offender change — on whether an offender is a final product or, rather, whether he is capable of transformation. Offender change, though, could be either change in character or change in behavior, or a combination of these …

Juries And The Criminal Constitution, Meghan J. Ryan

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Judges are regularly deciding criminal constitutional issues based on changing societal values. For example, they are determining whether police officer conduct has violated society’s "reasonable expectations of privacy" under the Fourth Amendment and whether a criminal punishment fails to comport with the "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" under the Eighth Amendment. Yet judges are not trained to assess societal values, nor do they, in assessing them, ordinarily consult data to determine what those values are. Instead, judges turn inward, to their own intuitions, morals, and values, to determine these matters. But judges’ internal …

The Constitutionality Of Negotiated Criminal Judgments In Germany, Thomas Weigend, Jenia I. Turner

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

In a long-awaited judgment, the German Constitutional Court in 2013 upheld the constitutionality of the 2009 German law authorizing the negotiation of criminal judgments between the court and the parties. In this Article, we provide background on recent developments in “plea bargaining” law and practice in Germany and offer a critique of the Court’s decision.

The Court attempted to rein in negotiated judgments by giving the statute a literal reading, emphasizing the limitations it places on negotiations, and strictly prohibiting any consensual disposition outside the statutory framework. The Court builds its judgment on the notion that the search for truth, …

Interstate Conflict And Cooperation In Criminal Cases: An American Perspective, Jenia I. Turner

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Over the last decade, the European Union has adopted legislation that calls for the mutual recognition of arrest warrants, investigation orders, and penal judgments. These laws have aimed to strengthen the Union’s response to transnational crime, and EU policymakers are currently considering legislation to further harmonize the Union's law enforcement efforts. This Article compares these developments within the EU to the U.S. legal framework on mutual recognition in criminal matters. It examines the individual, state and systemic interests that U.S. state courts have considered in deciding whether to recognize other states' judgments, warrants, or investigative actions. These competing interests have …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 32, Iss. 2

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Examining The § 271(E)(1) Safe Harbor Of The Hatch-Waxman Act: A Legislative Proposal Granting Mandatory Post-Marketing Exceptions, Jessica Chao

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

White Paper: A Proposal To Reform U.S. Law And Policy Relating To The International Exchange Of Cultural Property, William G. Pearlstein

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Lo And Behold!: Does Tolerated Use Give An Incentive To Plagiarize? An Example Through The Music Of Bob Dylan, Julie Levine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Israeli Anti-Boycott Law: Should Artists Be Worried?, Arie Peled

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Though much has been written about the economic dimension of Arab boycotts against Israel, much less attention has been paid to the implications of wider calls for a cultural boycott against Israel. Part I of this note will outline the scope of Israel's boycott problem by looking to the history of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions ("BDS") movement, while focusing in particular on the cultural aspects of this boycott. It will then discuss the current dimensions of the domestic and international cultural boycott campaigns Israel faces. Part II will analyze the Israeli legislative response to the BDS movement through …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 32, Iss. 3

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel I: Disclosure And Notice Practices In Private Data Collection, Lorrie Cranor, Brett Frischmann, Ryan Harkins, Helen Nissenbaum

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Ii: Balancing National Security And Transparency In Government Data Collection, Nate Cardozo, Mariko Hirose, Jonathan Manes, Ira Rubinstein, Christopher Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Borrowed Fiction And The Rightful Copyright Position, Viva R. Moffat

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Works of "borrowed fiction"-unauthorized sequels or retellings of literary works-have long prompted legal, cultural, and social backlash. With respect to copyright disputes, this is because borrowed fiction entails a range of legitimate but conflicting interests. Copyright law has historically elevated the interests of the "original" author over those of other writers and the reading public. Scholars have offered a range of proposals to counter this tendency, but these reforms have focused on the infringement analysis and the fair use doctrine. Each of those, however, involves a binary decision, one that is not amenable to accommodating the conflicting interests at stake. …

The "Dot" Times They Are A-Changin': How New Generic Top Level Domains (Gtlds) Will Change Consumer Perception About The Internet, Eric J. Shimanoff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Fair Or Foul? Major League Baseball's Use Of A Tortious Interference Lawsuit As A Means Of Investigation, Michael S. Beck

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Corporate Governance And Executive Compensation: Evidence From Japan, Robert J. Jackson Jr., Curtis J. Milhaupt

Faculty Scholarship

Lawmakers around the world are now urging corporations to adopt governance and executive pay standards drawn largely from the American corporate law context. Yet little is known about how corporate governance actually influences executive compensation decisions outside of the United States-and whether adoption of these standards is likely to be desirable for investors abroad.

In this Article, we take advantage of a recent change in Japanese law to provide the first direct empirical evidence on executive pay in Japan. The evidence provides striking detail on the amount and structure of Japanese executive compensation. The data point to a previously unappreciated …

A Tribute To The Work Of Patricia Williams, Katherine M. Franke

Faculty Scholarship

The task of selecting an honoree is not an easy one – as we aim to take up a corpus of work that is at once deep enough and broad enough to sustain a full day of conversation. To be honest, most legal scholars tend to be more hedgehogs than foxes, burrowing down deep into an area of law over the course of a career rather than bringing their intellectual talents to bear on a range of social problems or diverse disciplinary locations. One person, without question, stands out as an exception to this tendency in the legal academy, and …

State-Specific, Racial And Ethnic Heterogeneity In Trends Of Firearm-Related Fatality Rates In The Usa From 2000 To 2010, Bindu Kalesan, Sowmya Vasan, Matthew E. Mobily, Marcos D. Villareal, Patrick Hlavacek, Sheldon Teperman, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Sandro Galea

Faculty Scholarship

To document overall, racial, ethnic and intent-specific spatiotemporal trends of firearm-related fatality rates (FRF rates) in the USA.

Three Proposals For Regulating The Distribution Of Home Equity, Ian Ayres, Joshua Mitts

Faculty Scholarship

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s recently-released “qualified mortgage” rules effectively discourage predatory lending but miss an equally important source of systemic risk: low-equity clustering. Specific “volatility-inducing” mortgage terms, when present in a substantial cluster of mortgage contracts, exacerbate macroeconomic risk by increasing the chance that the housing and lending markets will have to absorb a wave of simultaneous defaults after a downturn in housing prices. This Article shows that these terms became prevalent in a substantial proportion of residential mortgages in the years leading up to the home mortgage crisis. In contrast, during the earlier “amortization era” (when mortgagors were …