Law Commons^™

Ricci V. Destefano: End Of The Line Or Just Another Turn On The Disparate Impact Road?, Charles A. Sullivan

NULR Online

Reports of the death of Title VII’s disparate impact theory of discrimination in the wake of Ricci v. DeStefano may be exaggerated. Widely praised and widely criticized in the newspapers and the blogosphere, Ricci is the latest, but not the last, chapter in a long-running feud between Congress and the Supreme Court regarding disparate impact.

As the Supreme Court summarized the theory in International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States,disparate impact discrimination is the use of “employment practices that are facially neutral in their treatment of different groups but that in fact fall more harshly on one group than …

Health Care And The Un Disability Rights Convention, Michael Ashley Stein, Penelope J S Stein, Dorothy Weiss, Raymond Lang

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Flipping The Bird, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

November 25, 2009: Happy Thanksgiving Everyone, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Happy Thanksgiving Everyone“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Lenz V. Universal Music Corp. And The Potential Effect Of Fair Use Analysis Under The Takedown Procedures Of §512 Of The Dmca, Kathleen O’Donnell

Duke Law & Technology Review

The notice and takedown/putback procedures in §512 of the Digital Millennium Act fail to adequately protect the rights of individuals who post content on the internet. This iBrief examines the notice and takedown/putback procedures and Judge Fogel's decision in Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., which requires a copyright owner to conduct a fair use evaluation prior to issuing a takedown notice. This iBrief concludes such a requirement is an appropriate first step towards creating adequate protection for user-generated content on the Internet.

Vol. 60, No. 3, November 24, 2009, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Football Observations By The Unqualified •Letter to the Editor: LRAP •Justice At All Costs •The Fast and the Furious •This is Water •Ye Olde Issue Spotter •The Beer Guy •The Food Court •"Best" of LawOpen •Crossword •Kicking it Old School

November 23, 2009: A Serious Man, A Serious Movie, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “A Serious Man, A Serious Movie“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Vol. 37, No. 12 (November 23, 2009)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

Foreign Contacts And The First Amendment, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Constitutional Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago, No. 08-1521 (U.S. Nov. 23, 2009)., Richard L. Aynes, Jack M. Balkin, Randy E. Barnett, Steven G. Calabresi, Michael Kent Curtis, Michael A. Lawrence, William Van Alstyne, Adam Winkler

Con Law Center Amicus Briefs

The question in this case is whether the individual right to keep and bear arms recently recognized in District of Columbia v. Heller, and held applicable to the federal government, must also be protected against state infringement. The textually and historically accurate way to determine if the states must respect an individual right to keep and bear arms is to examine the meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Amici submit to the Court that the original meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause protected substantive, fundamental rights against state infringement, including the constitutional right of …

November 21, 2009: The Young Don’T Read The Bible, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Young Don’t Read the Bible“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Objecting In The Open: Why Occupy Wall Street Chose Public Spaces, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Academic Center Of Law And Business V. Minister Of Finance, Dorit Beinisch, Edna Arbel, Asher Grunis, Eliezer Rivlin, Ayala Procaccia, Esther Hayut, Salim Joubran, Miriam Naor, Edmond E. Levy

Translated Opinions

Facts: The Knesset enacted the Prisons Ordinance Amendment Law (no. 28), 5764-2004 (‘amendment 28’), which provides that the State of Israel will establish, for the first time, a (single) prison that will be operated and managed by a private corporation rather than by the state. The constitutionality of this law was challenged by the petitioners, who argued that amendment 28 disproportionately violated the rights of prison inmates as a result of the actual transfer of imprisonment powers to a private enterprise, and as a result of the concern that human rights in a private prison would be violated to a …

Fifth Avenue Freeze-Out, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Fierle V. Perez, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 36, Mark Hesiak

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

2009-11-19

November 18, 2009: The Yale Press Decision Not To Publish The Cartoons Of Muhammad, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Yale Press Decision Not to Publish the Cartoons of Muhammad“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Unsex Cedaw: What's Wrong With "Women's Rights", Darren Rosenblum

International & Comparative Law Colloquium Papers

Although the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (“CEDAW” or the “Convention”) has succeeded in some respects, even its supporters acknowledge broad failures. CEDAW’s weakness draws on the titular mistaken diagnosis: “women” are not the issue&#;gender disparities are. The 1970’s drafting of CEDAW focused on bringing women to their place at the international law table. What’s wrong with women’s rights? In the international context, CEDAW attempts to empower women but fails to respect other gender inequality. As the preeminent treaty on gender inequality, CEDAW cannot succeed in creating gender equality if its scope remains limited …

Rfk And The Jfk Assassination: Bobby Never Bought The Lone-Gunman Theory, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.

Popular Media

One of the myths propagated by defenders of the Warren Commission and the Warren Commission Report is the canard that President John F. Kennedy's brother Robert accepted the commission's conclusion, embodied in its Report, that JFK's assassination was committed by a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, and that there was no conspiracy behind the president's murder.

From Choice To Reproductive Justice: De-Constitutionalizing Abortion Rights, Robin West

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The Essay argues that the right to abortion constitutionalized in Roe v. Wade is by some measure at odds with a capacious understanding of the demands of reproductive justice. No matter its rationale, the constitutional right to abortion is fundamentally a negative right that rhetorically keeps the state out of the domain of family life. As such, the decision privatizes not only the abortion decision, but also parenting, by rendering the decision to carry a pregnancy to term a choice. It thereby legitimates a minimalist state response to the problems of pregnant women who carry their pregnancies to term and …

Jones V. Harris Associates: Shareholder Requirements For Proving A Mutual Fund Adviser’S Breach Of Fiduciary Duty, Matthew Rinegar

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar

No abstract provided.

Nebraska Mcle Rules Leave Some Lawyers Behind, John Wiltse

Nebraska Law Bulletin (Selected Issues)

Active members of the Nebraska bar should be given at least some MCLE credit for successful completion of post-J.D. courses offered by ABA-approved law schools. A majority of jurisdictions in the United States that require mandatory continuing legal education have such provisions, and this also appears to be the prevalent rule in Australia, Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom, under their system of “continuing professional development.”

A rule change can be requested of the supreme court under Neb. Ct. R. § 1-103 or from the Nebraska Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission under Neb. Ct. R. § 3‑402.1(B). Who knows, the …

On Writs Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Holder V. Humanitarian Law Project, Nos. 08-1298, 09-89 (U.S. Nov. 16, 2009), David Cole

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

No abstract provided.

Vol. 37, No. 11 (November 16, 2009)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

James L. Norris V. Festus Fisher, Et Al., Frank Pommersheim

Tribal Court Opinions Authored by Emeritus Professor of Law Frank Pommersheim

No abstract provided.

Free Speech And Civil Liability, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

November 15, 2009: When Scientists Speak Of God, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “When Scientists Speak of God“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Cityland – Vol. 6, No. 10, Center For New York City Law

CityLand - 2009

The November 2009 issue of CityLand covers major land use and preservation developments in New York City. The City Council approved a modified version of Hines’s proposed MoMA tower, capping its height at 1,050 feet and reducing its hotel component. New legislation was passed to preserve permits for stalled construction sites. The Council also debated the FRESH program to incentivize grocery stores in underserved neighborhoods and approved residential developments on City Island and in Carroll Gardens. The City Planning Commission approved the Kingsbridge Armory redevelopment and heard testimony on the Sunset Park 197-a Plan. BSA granted a special permit for …

Introduction (Excerpt) In Justice Bertha Wilson: One Woman's Difference, Kim Brooks

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Bertha Wilson was the first woman to be appointed to Canada's Supreme Court in 1982. Her appointment capped off a career of firsts. She had been the first woman lawyer and partner at a prominent Toronto law firm and the first woman appointed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. Her career and passing in 2007 have provoked reflection on her contributions to Canadian society and caused many to reflect on the question she herself posed: what difference do women judges make? What follows is an excerpt from the introduction to the book. The chapters of the book explore a broad …

Estate Planning For 2010 And Beyond, Ronald D. Aucutt

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

The Virginia Historic Tax Credit Funds Case And The Uncertain Federal Income Tax Treatment Of State Tax Credits, William F. Machen

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.