Law Commons^™

Informal Closing Of The Bypass: Minors' Petitions To Bypass Parental Consent For Abortion In An Age Of Increasing Judicial Refusals, Lauren Treadwell

UC Law Journal

The presence of an effective judicial bypass mechanism for minors seeking an abortion is fundamental to the validity of parental consent statutes. Following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bellotti v. Baird H, states now have the flexibility to restrict minors' access to abortion by requiring parental consent for the procedure, provided an effective judicial bypass mechanism exists to handle situations where the minor does not want to involve her parents. Under Bellotti II, the minor must have the opportunity to petition the court for a waiver of the relevant parental consent law, which if granted, would allow her …

An Oracle Without Foresight - Plaintiffs' Arduous Burdens Under U.S. V. Oracle, Amanda J. Parkison Hassid

UC Law Journal

The decision in United States v. Oracle Corp. has the potential to obliterate the government's ability to successfully block certain mergers. The unique set of circumstances in Oracle created little binding precedent on Judge Vaughn Walker, who did not shy away from using this freedom. The court set forth requirements for the government that differed drastically from those proposed in Merger Guidelines promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice -requirements that effectively .increased the burden of proof for the government. In addition, the Oracle court disregarded volumes of the government's evidence, requesting instead evidence that would …

Informed Consent: Requiring Doctors To Disclose Off-Label Prescriptions And Conflicts Of Interest, Margaret Z. Johns

UC Law Journal

The doctrine of informed consent should be expanded to require doctors to disclose: (i) off-label prescriptions; and (2) conflicts of interest created by drug-company marketing. Off-label prescriptions are those which do not comply with the FDAapproved use for the drug. While they are perfectly legal and a significant part of mainstream medicine, accounting for more than half of all prescriptions written today, in many instances they are not supported by scientific evidence, drive up the cost of health care, and expose patients to unnecessary risks. Conflicts of interest arise because drug companies provide free continuing medical education, pay speakers' and …

Creative Judicial Misunderstanding: Misapplication Of The Public Trust Doctrine In Michigan, Carl Shadi Paganelli

UC Law Journal

A candid but rational inquiry into the history of the public trust doctrine is essential to understanding a recent Michigan Supreme Court decision that suddenly and unexpectedly took private property for public use without just compensation.

Despite the Latinate allure of its terms-jus publicum and jus privatum-the public trust doctrine has no Roman law origins. It is a creature of the common law. It arose in England to explain the Crown's rights to tidelands and navigable waters. It followed English dominion across the Atlantic, where the fertile imagination of American lawyers unearthed the doctrine's supposed ancient Roman roots.

This Note …

Duress: A Perplexing Barrier To Relief From Joint And Several Liability, M. Meghan Kerns

UC Law Journal

The majority of married taxpayers do not fully appreciate the legal ramifications of executing a joint tax return. Regardless of the actual division of combined income, upon filing a joint return, each spouse is responsible for the accuracy of the entire return and liable for the full amount of any tax deficiency arising from the return. To avoid joint and several liability, a couple could file separate returns; however, this often results in a greater total tax liability. Alternatively, a spouse who qualifies as "innocent" of the erroneous items reported by his or her spouse may claim relief under Internal …

Sharing The Short Bus: Eligibility And Identity Under The Idea, Wendy F. Hensel

UC Law Journal

This Article examines the issue of eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), that is, what kind of disability a child must have to qualify for protection and services under the statute. The author explores whether the current legislative approach to disability and eligibility enhances the integration and advancement of children with impairments or reinforces the stigma of difference and inequality. Part I of the Article examines the legislative evolution of eligibility since the passage of the statute, then known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, in 1975. This Part also explores the legal and social …

Beyond Disability Civil Rights, Michael Ashley Stein, Penelope J. S. Stein

UC Law Journal

This Article examines the history of disability law in the United States and the future of disability rights domestically and globally. The author describes the origins, moral salience, and limitations of the current social model of disability rights, and advocates for a human rights-based approach to disability rights. Specifically, the author notes the social model's laudable achievement in promulgating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 199o (ADA). Further, the author emphasizes the positive effects of the ADA on disability rights legislation internationally. However, this Article also presents the weaknesses of the current social model; the author suggests that due to …

A Loophole To Repair: "Repair And Maintenance" As A Way Around The Coastal Act's Prohibition Against Seawalls, Jenni Khuu

UC Law Journal

Seawalls and other shoreline protective devices alter natural shoreline conditions and result in dramatic beach loss. For this reason, the California Coastal Act of 1976 promulgated a series of prohibitions and requirements, forbidding coastal development that would require shoreline protection. On January 15, 2004, the California Coastal Commission approved commercial and residential development of promontories. The area, a landslide complex, cannot naturally sustain development. The existing seawall in its current state cannot support proposed development either. Nevertheless, the Coastal Commission approved the project, along with a new seawall to stabilize it. How did the proposal get past the Coastal Act's …

The Politics Of Deference And Inclusion: Toward A Uniform Framework For The Analysis Of Fundamental Alteration Under The Ada, Kerri Lynn Stone

UC Law Journal

This Article discusses a number of federal court opinions which have dealt with the "fundamental alteration" query, posed by Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, in the five years after the Supreme Court decision in PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin. The author identifies problems inherent in the approach taken in Martin and discusses the Court's lack of clear guidance on the issue. She then sets forth a proposed framework and suggested considerations for courts undertaking the fundamental alteration query. The Article declares that only after establishing such a framework may a court distinguish between compelling a …

Generalized Grievances And Judicial Discretion, Mark Gabel

UC Law Journal

Few scholars have questioned the common assumption that the generalized grievances doctrine is simply a prohibition on obtaining federal court standing based on one's status as a taxpayer or a citizen. This Note attempts to show that the current doctrine is actually somewhat broader than that, although the Supreme Court has refused to define its outer limits precisely.

This Note traces the history of the generalized grievances principle from its origins in the 1920s to today, arguing that the concept was not originally intended to be a stand-alone limitation on federal court standing. Rather, it was simply a facet of …

The Play's The Thing: A Theory Of Taxing Virtual Worlds, Bryan T. Camp

UC Law Journal

This Article looks at the potential tax issues arising from a new life activity: online role-playing games in virtual worlds. Currently, some thirty million people regularly play such games and the number is growing. Exploring the reach of the Tax Code into virtual world transactions not only responds to the potentially practical needs of millions of U.S. taxpayers, it also permits a reevaluation of core principles of income tax as they interplay with life activities in the context of twenty-first century American culture.

This Article's central thesis is that while player activity in virtual worlds undoubtedly produces measurable economic value …

Default Production Of Electronically Stored Information Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: The Requirements Of Rule 34(B), Vlad J. Kroll

UC Law Journal

This Note explains what parties have to do to meet the requirements for default production of electronic discovery under Rule 34(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the author analyzes the meanings of "ordinarily maintained" and "reasonably usable" as used in Rule 34(b). After laying out the background of electronic discovery under the Federal Rules, the author interprets the rule's requirements for default production. First, the author analyzes the rule's language to determine its plain meaning. Then, the author examines the rule's position in the overall scheme of the Federal Rules. Finally, the author examines the rule's drafting …

Initiative Funding Through Targeted Taxes: Proposition 63, Mental Health, And The Crossroads Of Direct Democracy, Andrew M. Holmes

UC Law Journal

It took over forty-one years, but on November 2, 2004, President John F. Kennedy's vision of mental health care became a reality in California when 53.8% of the voters of California ratified Proposition 63. Proposition 63 (the Proposition) was criticized, however, the proponents of sought to bring relief to California's mental health system after decades of broken promises. The controversy surrounding Proposition 63 is not whether treatment for the mentally ill is a priority of the State but whether the novel funding structure is abusive.

The Note will first trace the roots of the controversy through a historical analysis of …

Authentically Innocent: Juries And Federal Regulatory Crimes, Jeffrey A. Meyer

UC Law Journal

Few ideals reign more supreme than the jury as conscience of our community and moral arbiter of a criminal defendant's conduct. These ideals are no more than myth for most federal criminal cases today. For a wide range of the most commonly charged federal crimes, judges routinely instruct juries to convict defendants regardless of their moral culpability. This issue arises with regulatory or public order crimes, which include drug trafficking, weapons, immigration, and environmental offenses. They are usually general intent crimes, defined by Congress without identifying precisely what the prosecution must prove a defendant knew or intended. General intent crimes …

Private Rights And Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working, Andrea K. Bjorklund

UC Law Journal

This Article discusses the problematic consequences that result from individuals having multiple international economic tribunals available to redress grievances. The Article describes the proliferation of international courts and tribunals, and discusses the jurisdictional and subject matter authorities of the International Court of Justice, the World Trade Organization Settlement Body, and various regional dispute settlement bodies and municipal courts. The author notes the most problematic consequences of utilizing a system involving multiple forums are the promotion of fragmentation and duplication of tribunal and court authority. In addition, the author discusses the effect of public and private law principles on fragmentation and …

Letting Katz Out Of The Bag: Cognitive Freedom And Fourth Amendment Fidelity, Christian M. Halliburton

UC Law Journal

What would life be like if it became impossible to keep a secret? We may find out with the advent of a new technology called "Brain Fingerprinting" and other technologies that allow access to our very thoughts. This Article first discusses the advent of technology like Brain Fingerprinting and its kin, and their impact on cognitive autonomy. The Article then posits the question, what would the Constitution have to say about evidentiary inquiries into the mind through the use of such technology? The author argues that current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, including Katz v. United States, is inadequate to address such …

Culture, Self-Determination And Colonialism: Issues Around The Revitalization Of Indigenous Legal Traditions, Gordon Christie

All Faculty Publications

This paper works from the assumption that the power of the state to determine and regulate debate around the reinvigoration of Indigenous legal traditions must be set aside, and that the path forward must be laid out by Indigenous peoples. Working out the implications of this assumption leads to ruminations on the roles that identity, colonialism, culture and self- determination must play in structuring debate around the rebuilding of these legal traditions. The position that begins to emerge from these ruminations focuses attention on the need to control processes of identity formation. Given the historical and ongoing impacts of colonial …

Writing The Circle: Judicially Convened Sentencing Circles And The Textual Organization Of Criminal Justice, Emma Cunliffe, Angela Cameron

All Faculty Publications

Trial court judges who work in remote Northern Canadian Aboriginal communities use judicially convened sentencing circles to gather information and develop sentencing recommendations in some intimate violence cases. Proponents claim that judicially convened sentencing circles are a restorative justice practice that heals the offender, his community, and the survivor of the violence. Proponents also look to sentencing circles as a tool to find a just outcome that minimizes Aboriginal men's incarceration. We use a methodology developed by feminist sociologist Dorothy Smith to consider whether the institutional priorities being established and approved by courts in sentencing circle cases provide adequate protection …

Anywhere But Here: Race And Empire In The Mabo Decision, Emma Cunliffe

All Faculty Publications

The High Court of Australia's decision in Mabo v. Queensland (No.2) is among the most widely known and controversial decisions the Court has yet delivered. In Mabo, a majority of the Court recognised a common law right to native title subject to certain criteria. In this article, I explore the competing visions of legal history that are implicit within Brennan J's leading judgment and Dawson J's dissent. In particular, I discuss the ways in which both of these judgments render an incomplete and contradictory documentary record more coherent than it really is. Suggesting that neither judgment manages to escape the …

The New Religion, Michael J. Gerhardt

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Marriage And The Elephant: The Liberal Democratic State's Regulation Of Intimate Relationships Between Adults, Maxine Eichner

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Fact & Fiction In The Law Of Property, John V. Orth

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Personal Is Political--And Economic: Rethinking Domestic Violence, Deborah M. Weissman

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Charles Reich's Journey From The Yale Law Journal To The New York Times Best-Seller List: The Personal History Of The Greening Of America, Rodger D. Citron

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Emerging Applications Of Jewish Law In American Legal Scholarship: An Introduction, Samuel J. Levine

Scholarly Works

In recent years, the field of Jewish law has gained increasing prominence in American law schools and legal scholarship. At the same time, in the realm of scholarship, a substantial body of literature has developed considering the relevance of Jewish legal thought to a variety of issues in the American legal system. As the substance, scope, and volume of this scholarship demonstrate, an analysis of Jewish law may prove helpful in providing comparisons and contrasts to both controversial and seemingly settled areas of American law. At the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools, the Section on …

Illuminating The Dark: The Stories Of Lowell B. Komie And The Pursuit Of Meaningful Work, Louise Harmon

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Other Civil Rights Decisions In The October 2005 Term: Title Vii, Idea, And Section 1981(Eighteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Eileen Kaufman

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Death Penalty And Right To Counsel Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Richard Klein

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Bruce Ledewitz, American Religious Democracy: Coming To Terms With The End Of Secular Politics, Thomas A. Schweitzer

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Why Not A Justice School? On The Role Of Justice In Legal Education And The Construction Of A Pedagogy Of Justice, Peter L. Davis

Scholarly Works

Why are law schools not named schools of justice, or, at least, schools of law and justice? Of course, virtually every law school will reply that this is nit-picking; all claim to be devoted to the study of justice. But our concern is not so easily dismissed. The names of institutions carry great significance; they deliver a political, social, or economic message. . . This Article contends that not only do law schools virtually ignore justice – a concept that is supposed to be the goal of all legal systems – they go so far as to denigrate it and …