Law Commons^™

Internet Service Provider Liability For Contributory Trademark Infringement After Gucci, Gregory C. Walsh

Duke Law & Technology Review

[I]f a manufacturer or distributor intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark, or if it continues to supply its product to one whom it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement, the manufacturer or distributor is contributorially responsible for any harm done as a result of the deceit.

Vol. 53, No. 6, December 3, 2002, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Clothing Drive Succeeds Again •Faculty Profile: Andy Buchsbaum •Asst. AG, Former Prof. Returns to Speak at UMLS •Law School to Build Big •CrimLaw Society Career Panel •Veteran Defender Gives Talk on Post-9/11 Detainees •Affirmative Action Insider Speaks •Crossword

Oral Argument In Meyer V. Holley (No. 01-1120), Robert G. Schwemm, Douglas G. Benedon, Malcolm L. Stewart

Law Faculty Advocacy

The matter of Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280 (2003) was argued before the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 3, 2002. Professor Robert G. Schwemm argued on behalf of the Respondents. This document is a transcript of the oral argument.

Vol. 23, No. 14 (December 2, 2002)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

The Weekly December 2, 2002, North Carolina Central School Of Law

NCCU Law School Weekly

No abstract provided.

Justice And Reasonable Care In Negligence Law, Richard W. Wright

All Faculty Scholarship

The academic literature generally assumes that an aggregate-risk-utility test is employed to determine whether conduct was reasonable or negligent. This aggregate-risk-utility test is a transparent implementation of the basic impartiality and aggregation principles of utilitarianism and the most popular (Kaldor-Hicks) interpretation of economic efficiency. Thus, the test's assumed prevalence as the criterion of reasonableness in negligence law has been highlighted by legal economists as confirmation of the utilitarian efficiency foundations of tort law, while those, including Ronald Dworkin, who think that the law, including tort law, is or should be grounded on principles of justice have sought to demonstrate that, …

Negligence In The Courts: Introduction And Commentary, In Symposium, Negligence In The Courts: The Actual Practice, Richard W. Wright

All Faculty Scholarship

This article is an introduction to and commentary on the contributions to a "Symposium on Negligence in the Courts: the Actual Practice." The contributors all conclude that the tests of negligence that are actually employed by the courts differ from the aggregate-risk-utility test that is generally assumed in the academic literature, including the Restatement of Torts. Patrick Kelley and Laurel Wendt's survey of all the standard jury instructions on negligence in the United States finds only one instruction, in Louisiana, that mentions a risk-utility or cost-benefit test of negligence, and that instruction merely suggests, as a discretionary option, the weighing …

Museletter: December 2002, James Wirrell

Museletter

This Issue:

B.N.A Services Online: Easier Access to Useful B.N.A. Titles by James Wirrell

Winter Break Hours: Happy Holidays!

Website of the Month -- Finding Basic British Law on the Internet

Winter Closings

Holiday Humor

Sentencing Policies And Practices In International Criminal Tribunals, Mark A. Drumbl, Kenneth S. Gallant

Scholarly Articles

Not available.

Editor's Note, Deborah J. Salons

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Res Ipsa Loquitur, Seton Hall University School Of Law

Newspapers

No abstract provided.

From Sterne And Borges To Lost Storytellers: Cyberspace, Narrative, And Law, Shulamit Almog

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

School Vouchers: The Educational Silver Bullet, Or An Ideological Blank Round, Gary D. Allison

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Employment Rights And Wrongs: Ada Issues In The 2001-2002 Supreme Court Term, Barbara K. Bucholtz

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

The War On The Poor - News From The Front: Department Of Housing And Urban Development V. Rucker, Tamara R. Piety

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Picture Perfect: The First Amendment Trumps Congress In Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition, Paul Finkelman

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Seatbelt Defense: A Doctrine Based In Common Sense, Jesse N. Bomer

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prior Restraints And Intellectual Property: The Clash Between Intellectual Property And The First Amendment From An Economic Perspective, Andrew Beckerman-Rodau

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Cross-Ownershipís Last Stand? The Federal Communication Commissionís Proposal Concerning The Repeal Of The Newspaper/Broadcast Cross- Ownership Rule , Judith C. Aarons

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Revised Innocent Spouse Rules Offer Greater Tax Relief, Linda M. Johnson, A. Bruce Clements

Faculty Articles

When a married couple files a joint tax return, both spouses become jointly and severally liable for the income taxes due, including any additional taxes, interest, and penalties determined at a later date. In the event of an underpayment of income tax, the IRS can proceed against either spouse to collect the entire tax deficiency. This places a spouse in a precarious position in situations where the other spouse deliberately omits income or overstates deductions on a jointly filed income tax return, even if the spouse is totally unaware of the other's transgressions. Relief from joint and several liability is …

Bankruptcy And Federalism, Thomas E. Plank

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Walking Through The New Jersey Equine Activity Statute: A Look At Judicial Statutory Interpretation In Jurisdictions With Similar Limited Liability Laws, Loren Speziale

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Torts - Negligence In The Protection Of Third Parties During Youth Sports Programs - The Duty Of An Actor To Control The Conduct Of Another So As To Protect A Third Person From Attack Will Arise Only If There Is A Special Relationship Between The Actor And That Other Party Whose Conduct Requires Restraint - Hills V. Bridgeview Little League Association, 745 N.E.2d 1166 (Iii. 2000)., Daniela D'Amico

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law - Courts' Scope Of Review Of Arbitration Decisions - Supreme Court Overturns The Ninth Circuit's Rejection Of The Arbitration Panel's Decision That Found No Collusion Activities By The Baseball Owners - Major League Baseball Players Association V. Steve Garvey, 121 S. Ct. 1724 (2001)., Jeffrey Perron

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Hit Somebody: Hockey Violence, Economics, The Law, And The Twist And Mcsorley Decisions, J C.H. Jones, Kenneth G. Stewart

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Torts - Negligent Misrepresentation - High School Guidance Counselors Can Be Held Liable When Their Erroneous Advice Prevents A Student-Athlete From Obtaining An Athletic Scholarship - Sain V. Cedar Rapids Community School District, 626 N.W.2d 115 (Iowa 2001)., Timothy C. Bennett

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Student-Athletes Must Find New Ways To Pierce The Ncaa's Legal Armor, Lesley Chenoweth Estevao

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Girls In Sports: Love Of The Game Must Begin At An Early Age To Achieve Equality, Lynne Tatum

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Legal And Ethical Aspects Of Sports-Related Concussions: The Merril Hoge Story, Alexander N. Hecht

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.