Law Commons^™

Table Of Contents

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Masthead

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Sandra H. Johnson

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Starting Property, Joseph William Singer

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Teaching Property Law: Some Lessons Learned, Steven Friedland

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reunifying Property, Peter S. Menell, John P. Dwyer

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Using The Pervasive Method Of Teaching Legal Ethics In A Property Course, Thomas L. Shaffer

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Teaching About Inequality, Race, And Property, Florence Wagman Roisman

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Contemplating When Equitable Servitudes Run With The Land, Alfred L. Brophy

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Phenomenon Of Substitution And The Statute Quia Emptores, Ronald Benton Brown

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Tools Of Law And The Rule Of Law: Teaching Regulatory Takings After Palazzolo, Daniel J. Hulsebosch

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Using Property To Teach Students How To “Think Like A Lawyer:” Whetting Their Appetites And Aptitudes, Peter T. Wendel

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Teaching Fundamental Learning Techniques With Moore V. Regents Of The University Of California, Keith Sealing

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Teaching The Amistad, Brant T. Lee

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Johnson V. M’Intosh And The South Dakota Fossil Cases, Dana G. Jim

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Suggested Reading For Pleasure And Property, Alan M. Weinberger

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Theory And Praxis: Advice To Those Learning Property And A Request To Those Who Teach It, Jay Zych

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Can The Government Do That?! Teaching Takings And Eminent Domain To Skeptical Students, Kevin J. Rejent

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Everything I Needed To Know About Being A Lawyer I Learned In Property, Amanda G. Altman

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Who Owns America?, Kelly M. Plummer

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Trying To Halt The Procedural Merry-Go-Round: The Ripeness Of Regulatory Takings Claims After Palazzolo V. Rhode Island, William M. Hof

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Practicing Law Across Geographic And Professional Borders: What Does The Future Hold?, Gary A. Munneke

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

A new global business reality is transforming the practice of law. Nowhere is this transformation more apparent than in the areas of multijurisdictional and multidisciplinary practice. These two trends, toward practice across jurisdictional boundaries on the one hand and across professional boundaries on the other, are engaging the attention of lawyers everywhere. Recent events involving Enron Corporation and the Arthur Andersen accounting firm have raised new questions about the efficacy of these emerging trends and remind lawyers that these issues retain their currency.

An Efficiency Analysis Of Contracts For The Provision Of Telephone Services To Prisons, Justin Carver

Federal Communications Law Journal

As the numbers of prisons and prisoners continue to increase, so does the market for prison services. One of the more lucrative segments of this industry is the telephone market. To the extent that the services are provided to the prisoners, the relationship resembles a third party beneficiary contract, but due to the perverse financial incentives and the political climate surrounding prisons and prisoners, neither the state nor the private entity acts in the best interests of the consumers in particular or of society in general. This Article will analyze the efficiency of these contracts, introduce alternate arrangements, and compare …

Why Adco? Why Now? An Econmic Exploration Of Industry Structure For The "Last Mile" In Local Telecommunications Markets, T. Randolph Beard, George S. Ford, Lawrence J. Spiwak

Federal Communications Law Journal

This Article discusses important economic characteristics of local exchange markets. First, this Article explains that entry into the market requires large fixed and sunk costs, making entry risky and necessitating scale economies. Consequently, only a few local access networks can supply the market. These networks cannot be small, however, because a large market share is required to realize sufficient scale economies to effectively compete with the ILEC and survive. Secondly, acquiring the needed market share may be difficult for entrants who either attempt to purchase unbundled network elements from the incumbent or attempt to build their own network from the …

The Concrete Barrier At The End Of The Information Superhighway: Why Lack Of Local Rights-Of-Way Access Is Killing Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, Christopher R. Day

Federal Communications Law Journal

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 contained the promise of a deregulated national telecommunications market with unfettered competition in both the local and long-distance telecommunications markets. Unfortunately, five years after the Act was signed, competition in local telephony is still not a reality in many areas. While some of the blame may be placed on failed business models and the withdrawal of venture capital from the market, a series of regulatory failures have also served to create an inhospitable environment for competitive local exchange carriers. One of the areas where this failure has been most evident is in governmental failure to …

Editor's Note, Tom W. Brummett

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Carnivore, The Fbi’S E-Mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy, Griffin S. Dunham

Federal Communications Law Journal

On July 11, 2000, the FBI intorduced Carnivore, an Internet monitoring system. It was designed, and is used exclusively, to carry out court-ordered surveillance of electronic communications. It is a tangible, portable device, tantamount to a phone tap, that allows the FBI to intercept and collect criminal suspects' e-mail without their knowledge or consent. This Note addresses competing and parallel interests between the government and society to determine the legitimacy and necessity of Carnivore. The purpose of this Note is twofold: first, to demonstrate the need for Carnivore to enable law enforcement to keep up with criminals who utilize cyberspace …

Protecting The E-Marketplace Of Ideas By Protecting Employers: Immunity For Employers Under Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act, Eric M.D. Zion

Federal Communications Law Journal

While we credit employers that provide employees with free Internet access, such access comes at a price to the public because employers are one of the traditional defendents in defamation suits. Complicating matters, Congress enacted the Communications Decency Act. Its section 230 provides broad federal immunity for ISPs when defamatory material of a third party is published using their services. With the passage of section 230, Congress rendered employers immune for the same tort which they are so closely associated. Some argue that employers should not be capable of invoking the immunity because it would allow employers to defame with …

Masthead Vol.54 No.3 (2002)

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Digital Divide And Courtroom Technology: Can David Keep Up With Goliath?, Michael E. Heintz

Federal Communications Law Journal

The federal judiciary recently embraced the technological revolution. Select courts are now equipped with state-of-the-art technology to aid in trial presentations. Before the judiciary made the improvements, litigants had to keep pace with the technological advancements themselves, often at a great cost. One might think that the recent technological improvements made to federal courtrooms would have widened the gap between large and small firms where the available resources are vastly different, but that is not the case. In fact, the installation of new technology into courtrooms serves to equalize what would otherwise be a "digital divide."

Part II of this …