Law Commons^™

Brief Of Exonerees As Amici Curiae In Support Of Appellant, Derrick Hamilton

Perlmutter Center Briefs

Amici includes a group of wrongfully convicted individuals who spent years ( for most, decades) in prison for crimes they did not commit. They submit this brief in support of Damien Echols' appeal to the Supreme Court of Arkansas out of concern that, left uncorrected, the decision below would undermine the fundamental right to prove one's innocence and as such suffer the consequences left. Additionally, exonerees suffer beyond anyone's imagination and this Court should not ignore the voices of those who have been similarly situated to that of Damien Echols.

Amici understands all too well the importance of such safeguards. …

Brief Of The Petitioners-Taxpayers Edward A. And Doris Zelinsky, Edward A. Zelinsky

Amicus Briefs

As a matter of state law, New York’s own regulations and case law do not permit taxation of Professor Zelinsky’s income earned at home in Connecticut for the COVID-19 period starting on March 15, 2020. Even if New York law permitted the taxation of Professor Zelinsky’s Cardozo salary during this COVID-19 period, as a matter of federal constitutional law, the Due Process and dormant Commerce Clauses do not permit New York’s taxation of this salary earned in Connecticut. In addition, Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals Tribunal, 1 N.Y. 3d 85 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1009 (2004), does not apply to …

Cardozo Law News Brief: June 9, 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2023

Featured Faculty:

• Dmytro Vovk
• Kate Shaw
• Matthew Wansley
• Samuel Weinstein
• Emmanuel Arnaud
• Rebecca Ingber
• Kate Levine
• Michel Rosenfeld
• Anthony Sebok

Campus News:

• Cardozo Celebrates the Class of 2023
• The Class of 2023’s Achievements Celebrated at Pre-Commencement Awards Ceremony
• Nargis Baran Flees Afghanistan and Starts a New Chapter at Cardozo

Nargis Baran Flees Afghanistan And Starts A New Chapter At Cardozo, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo News 2023

After a harrowing escape from her war-torn homeland, Nargis Baran, an Afghan legal professional, started a new journey this spring with help from Cardozo, Brooklyn Law School and Fordham Law School.

Cardozo Celebrates The Class Of 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo News 2023

Cardozo School of Law celebrated the Class of 2023, whose graduates embarked upon their academic journey in the midst of the pandemic, during its graduation ceremony at Lincoln Center on June 5.

Memorandum On Reopening The Dodd-Frank Act Section 956 Incentive Compensation Rule, Michael E. Herz, Ronald Levin, Nina A. Mendelson, Peter M. Shane, Peter L. Strauss

Online Publications

Professor Michael Herz, along with four other administrative law professors, sent a letter to six agencies about legal options regarding a long-delayed rule aimed at executive compensation.

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Scott Semaya, Class Of 2023, Scott Semaya

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Scott Semaya discusses his Note, Name, Image and Likeness: Giving College Athletes the Clearest Guidance to Best Profit off Their NIL, which was published in Volume 41, Issue 2.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on June 6, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Cardozo Law News Brief: June 2, 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2023

Featured Faculty:

• Andrea Kupfer Schneider
• Kathryn Miller
• Edward Stein

Campus News:

• Cardozo Welcomes the 2023 May-Entry Class
• Cardozo Celebrates Public Service at 31st Annual Inspire! Awards

Events:

• Class of 2023 Commencement

Disclosure Of Agency Legal Materials, Bernard W. Bell, Cary Coglianese, Michael E. Herz, Margaret B. Kwoka, Orly Lobel

Online Publications

This proposed recommendation identifies statutory reforms that, if enacted by Congress, would provide clear standards as to what legal materials agencies must publish and where they must publish them (whether in the Federal Register, on their websites, or elsewhere). The amendments would also account for technological developments and correct certain statutory ambiguities and drafting errors. The objective of these amendments would be to ensure that agencies provide ready public access to important legal materials in the most efficient way possible.

Professor Bernard W. Bell (Rutgers Law School), Professor Cary Coglianese (University of Pennsylvania Law School), Professor Michael Eric Herz (Benjamin …

2022-2023 Annual Report, Heyman Center On Corporate Governance

Heyman Center Reports

The 2022-2023 Annual Report of The Samuel & Ronnie Heyman Center on Corporate Governance at Cardozo Law School highlights key events, the Heyman Scholars Program, and the diverse curriculum offerings. Featuring insights from industry experts and faculty, the report showcases the Center's commitment to excellence in business and corporate law education.

Copyright’S Law Of Dissemination, Jacob Noti-Victor

Cardozo Law Review

Intellectual property law generally rests on the assumption that markets will bring about an ideal allocation of resources. Nonetheless, United States copyright law remains riddled with regimes that bypass or restructure normal market licensing between copyright owners and distributors such as streaming services, radio stations, and libraries. This Article provides the first comprehensive account of this “law of dissemination,” examining how a range of seemingly unrelated judicial doctrines, statutory safe harbors, and regulatory institutions together affect the relationship between copyright owners and the entities that disseminate creative works to the public.

While these regimes are often treated as unintelligible historical …

Inventing Deportation Arrests, Lindsay Nash

Articles

At the dawn of the federal deportation system, the nation’s top immigration official proclaimed the power to authorize deportation arrests “an extraordinary one” to vest in administrative officers. He reassured the nation that this immense power—then wielded by a cabinet secretary, the only executive officer empowered to authorize these arrests—was exercised with “great care and deliberation.” A century later, this extraordinary power is legally trivial and systemically exercised by low-level enforcement officers alone. Consequently, thousands of these officers—the police and jailors of the immigration system— now have the power to solely determine whether deportation arrests are justified and, therefore, whether …

Beyond Offense: Why The First Amendment Does Not Protect Deliberate Misgendering, Molly Dower

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Survival Homicide, Michal Buchhandler-Raphael

Cardozo Law Review

A significant number of women who are incarcerated in American prisons for homicide offenses have been subjected to various forms of domestic abuse, including physical, sexual, and psychological abuse. This Article coins the term “survival homicide” to refer to cases where survivors of substantial and repeated domestic abuse kill abusive intimate partners or other abusive family members in circumstances where the abuse significantly contributed to their act. Abuse survivors are often prosecuted for murder and are over-punished by the criminal legal system.

Existing legal frameworks underlying survival homicide rest on exercising considerable discretion by various institutional actors, including prosecutors, juries, …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Law Review, Volume 44, Issue 5

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Proportionality Analysis Should Govern Home Rule Disputes, Darien Shanske, David A. Carrillo

Cardozo Law Review

Despite more than a century of reform, state constitutional law governing the state–local relationship remains unsatisfactory. Current doctrine governing intrastate federalism struggles with the same issues as the more familiar interstate federalism doctrine does: in both contexts courts have failed to choose between categorization and balancing. Two recent trends highlight this unsatisfactory pocket of state constitutional jurisprudence. One is hyperpreemption, where punitive state laws override local regulations and invade traditional zones of local police power. The other pressure point is the nationwide housing crisis, which provokes intrastate conflict when state governments act to preempt local zoning to permit more, denser, …

The End Of Government Speech, G. Alex Sinha

Cardozo Law Review

Thirty years ago, the Supreme Court created the government-speech doctrine to protect certain forms of government action against First Amendment challenges. The government must speak to govern, the thinking goes, and the First Amendment regulates private rather than governmental speech. Therefore, government action that is classified as “government speech” should not be vulnerable to free-speech claims. The doctrine has since been used accordingly, vaccinating certain government programs against the First Amendment. For example, the doctrine has insulated regulations banning federally funded medical providers from counseling patients about abortion; advertising campaigns spearheaded by the federal government; state-level choices about which specialty …

A No Man’S Land Of Fair Use: Marano V. The Metropolitan Museum Of Art, Sarah Landry

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Forgotten Jurisprudence Of Parole And State Constitutional Doctrines Of Vagueness, Kristen Bell

Cardozo Law Review

The majority of carceral sentences in the United States include the possibility of discretionary release on parole. Most such sentences, however, are unconstitutionally vague. Their unconstitutionality has gone unnoticed because contemporary scholarship and litigation about vague laws have focused on the U.S. Constitution in lieu of state constitutions. This Article unearths historic state court decisions holding that sentences that end through the discretionary judgment of a parole board are “void for uncertainty.” Although state void for uncertainty doctrines share some similarity with the federal vagueness doctrine, they are far more demanding as applied to criminal punishment. By urging revival of …

How To Alleviate The Repercussions Of Wrongful Convictions: Holistically Righting The Wrongs Of Inadequate Compensation Statutes, Marissa Cohen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cardozo Celebrates Public Service At 31st Annual Inspire! Awards, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo News 2023

Cardozo’s Center for Public Service Law celebrated the Inspire! Awards on May 23, a yearly event that honors students, alumni and community leaders who have made strides in public service over the past year. This year’s ceremony celebrated those who work to protect and advance the rights of marginalized communities in the public and private sectors.

Phr & Clihhr Submission To Icc Otp (May 2023), Physicians For Human Rights (Phr), Cardozo Law Institute In Holocaust And Human Rights (Clihhr)

CLIHHR Reports & Policy Submissions

This report was submitted by the Cardozo Law Institute in Holocaust and Human Rights (CLIHHR) and Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) in May 2023 to the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It provides legal and strategic recommendations on investigating and prosecuting crimes of sexual and gender-based violence, with an emphasis on survivor-centered approaches and international legal standards. The submission highlights the importance of addressing such crimes within the framework of international justice.

Cardozo Welcomes The 2023 May-Entry Class, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo News 2023

The first members of Cardozo’s Class of 2026, the “May class,” began their law school journey last week.

There are 41 students in this year’s May class, with most hailing from New York, New Jersey or Connecticut. The class also features students from Arizona, California, Washington D.C., Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin. In addition to domestic students, Cardozo welcomed international students born in China, the Dominican Republic, France, Germany, India and Iran.

Cardozo Law News Brief: May 19, 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2023

Featured Faculty:

• Alexander Reinert
• Jessica Roth
• Saurabh Vishnubhakat
• Gaia Bernstein
• Young Ran (Christine) Kim
• Rachel Landy
• Lindsay Nash
• Richard Weisberg

Events:

• Class of 2023 Commencement

Cardozo Law News Brief: May 12, 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2023

Featured Faculty:

• Jessica Roth
• Pamela Foohey
• Young Ran (Christine) Kim
• Luis Calderon Gomez
• Michael Pollack
• Edward Zelinsky
• Gaia Bernstein
• Kathryn Miller

Events:

• Class of 2023 Commencement

Law Librarians, Let’S Talk About Book Banning, Olivia Smith Schlinck

Library Staff Online Writings

As seems to be the new normal, there is a lot happening in the news (*gestures vaguely around*). It’s easy to focus on a few issues at the expense of others or to get overwhelmed and check out entirely. But there is one issue that keeping tabs on feels like a professional obligation: book banning.

Environmental Law Society Presents: The Power Of Internships, Cardozo Environmental Law Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Cjcr Publishes Volume 24, Issue 2 (Spring 2023), Halle Jaffe

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution—the country’s preeminent legal journal of arbitration, negotiation, mediation, settlement, and restorative justice—today published the web edition of Volume 24, Issue 2 (Spring 2023). The print edition of the issue has also been released.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution website on May 10, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Why The Political Peace Process Failed Between The Afghanistan Central Government And The Taliban And How Using Negotiation Could Help Resolve The Conflict, Ross Herman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The central government of Afghanistan and the Taliban reached a deadly stalemate, taking around one hundred lives a day from each side between 2018 and 2021. Their failure to reach a peace agreement may be due to the United States’ involvement and conflicting interests between the different Afghan groups.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution website on May 7, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

California’S Proposed Ban On Mandatory Arbitration Agreements As A Condition Of Employment, Samuel Silverman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

California is casting uncertainty on the employer’s ability to implement mandatory arbitration agreements on employees. In October 2019, Governor Newson signed Assembly Bill No. 51, which would apply to employment contracts entered, modified, or extended on or after January 1, 2020. This bill created Labor Code Section 432.6, banning mandatory arbitration agreements as a condition of employment in California. This would work around the Federal Arbitration Act, which requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements, preempting the state laws that stood in its way. Critics argue that the process favors employers and discourages prospective employees from bringing legal claims. On the …