Law Commons^™

Incentives To Spoliate Evidence In Civil Litigation: The Need For Vigorous Judicial Action, Charles R. Nesson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment On Professor Nesson’S Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Comment On Wasserman’S “The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability”, L. Jonathan Cohen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reply To Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Distribution Of Damages In Car Accidents Through The Use Of Neural Networks, Lothar Philipps

Cardozo Law Review

After a traffic accident the damage has to be fairly divided among the parties involved, and a ratio has to be determined. There are many precedents for this, and judges have developed catalogues suggesting ratios for common types of accidents.

The problem that "every case is different," however, remains. Many cases have familiar aspects, but also unfamiliar ones. Even if a case is composed of several familiar aspects with established ratios, the question remains as to how these are to be figured into one ratio. The first thought would be to invent a mathematical formula, but such formulae are rigid …

Influence Diagrams, Bayesian Imperialism, And The Collins Case: An Appeal To Reason, Ward Edwards

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abduction From The Seraglio: Feminist Methodologies And The Logic Of Imagination, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Articles

The article critiques the "different voice" theory in feminist jurisprudence, arguing that it risks reinforcing gender stereotypes and lacks a normative framework to challenge dominant masculinist perspectives. It also examines MacKinnon's contributions to feminist legal theory, highlighting both her strengths, such as her recognition of the need for a comprehensive alternative to masculinist theories, and her limitations, particularly her failure to develop a robust methodology for hypothesis verification. The article emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between hypothesis formation and proof in jurisprudence and advocates for a more nuanced approach to gender jurisprudence that avoids essentialism and integrates psychological insights without …

What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard Lempert

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mistrial By Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets The F-Word, Paul Bergman, Al Moore

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

1991 Cslife (Fall), Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Life Magazine

Table of Contents:

Cardozo’s New Dean: Frank J. Macchiarola, page 1

Associate Deans Named, page 2

Faculty News, page 2

LEX = Innovation, page 3

International Placements, page 4

Law Careers Day at Cardozo, page 4

International Institutes, page 4

A Summer of Practice and Study, page 5

Prosecutor Practicum, page 5

Two-Day Conference on Comparative Constitutionalism Planned for Oct 13, 14, page 6

Alumni News, page 7

Cardozo Students Excel, page 7

Scholarship Fund Established for Work with the Aged, page 7

Nationwide Service Of Process In State Courts, David Carlebach

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Fall And Rise Of The Criminal Contingent Fee, Peter Lushing

Articles

The article argues that the ban on contingent fees for criminal defense attorneys, established by the American Bar Association in 1969, is outdated and should be repealed. It contends that the ban is rooted in historical prejudice and unfounded concerns about conflicts of interest, rather than empirical evidence. The author suggests that the Supreme Court's 1989 decision implicitly approving contingent fees in certain criminal cases presents an opportunity to reconsider this prohibition. Repealing the ban could benefit middle-class defendants and allow for regulation and data collection to address potential issues.

Qualified Plans And Identifying Tax Expenditures: A Rejoinder To Professor Stein, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

No abstract provided.

Status, Contract, And History: A Dialectical View, Matthew P. Bergman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Volume 13 (1991-1992)

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Law Review, Volume 13, Issue 1

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Developments In Trading Claims And Taking Control Of Corporations In Chapter 11, Chaim J. Fortgang, Thomas Moers Mayer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Claims And Control In Chapter 11 Cases: A Call For Neutrality, Herbert P. Minkel Jr., Cynthia A. Baker

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Freeing Literary And Artistic Expression During The Sixties: The Role Of Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Edward De Grazia

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

United States V. United States: When Can The Federal Government Sue Itself?, Michael E. Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

1991 Commencement Exercises, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Commencement

Order of Exercises

Processional:

Herbert C. Dobrinsky, Vice President for University Affairs; Herald

Egon Brenner, Executive Vice President; Chief Marshal

Presiding:

Norman Lamm, President

Israel Miller, Senior Vice President

The National Anthem:

Cantor Ira W. Heller

Invocation:

Rabbi Elchanan Dulitz, Class of 1991

Welcome:

Monroe E. Price, Dean

Commencement Address:

Mark Green, Commissioner, Department of Consumer Affairs, City of New York

Remarks:

Dr. Miller

Jacob Burns, Chairman, Board of Directors, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Alumni Greetings:

Noah J. Gordon, Class of 1986

Remarks:

David F. Wertheim, Class of 1991

Conferring of Degrees:

Dean Price

Awards and Honors:

Dean …

Foreword, David Rudenstine

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Social Security Administration’S Representative Payee Program: An Act Of Benevolence Or Cruelty?, Melissa Reiner Greener

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.