Law Commons^™

Civil Procedure: The Culture Of Forum Shopping In Civil Litigation, Scott Dodson

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure: When Does State Law Affect Federal Jurisdiction?, Scott Dodson

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Immigration Law: Decisionmaking In U.S. Immigration Courts, Karen Musalo

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Overcoming Judicial Innumeracy: A Proposal To Bring The Venerable Process Of Peer Review To The Enduring Problem Of Courts’ Scientific Illiteracy, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

Lawyers are not known for their proficiency in math and science. Most of us who went to law school reached a point in our math and science studies when we realized that neither medicine nor engineering were likely to be successful career paths. It is these lawyers who become judges. Yet, the United States Supreme Court has increasingly put the burden for deciding complex scientific and technical questions in the hands of judges. This Article explores this trend of putting greater responsibility for deciding scientific and technical issues on judges, particularly in the areas of evidence law, administrative law, and …

Incremental Innovation, George Horvath

Faculty Scholarship

Transformative innovations—the ones that use new technologies to disrupt the world—command our attention. But most new products are the result of a more mundane process of incremental iterative innovation, evolving through a long series of small modifications of existing technologies. Although both kinds of innovation can result in improved safety and utility, both can also create new dangers. We tend to be more aware of this in transformative innovations (as current worries over artificial intelligence show); by contrast, dangers created by incremental iterative innovation often go unrecognized, because the process itself is easy to overlook. Policymakers and regulators need to …

The Complexities Of Consent To Personal Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson

Faculty Scholarship

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., decided in June 2023, held that consent remains a method of establishing personal jurisdiction independent of the “minimum contacts” test established by International Shoe Co. v. Washington. To many, the decision resolved ambiguity in personal jurisdiction doctrine and represented a straightforward way of establishing personal jurisdiction. But Mallory failed to consider the many complexities underlying consent. In this Article, I showcase those complexities and demonstrate that Mallory is just the tip of the iceberg: A host of questions, some fundamental to both consent theory and personal-jurisdiction doctrine, lurk beneath the surface. I argue that …

Criminal Procedure Without Consent, Kate Weisburd

Faculty Scholarship

Scholars and advocates have long argued that a person’s consent to a warrantless police search is often so inherently coerced, uninformed, and shaped by race, class, gender, citizenship status, and disability that to call it a “choice” is fiction. This critique is not limited to police searches based on consent. Waiving rights and consenting to otherwise unconstitutional state action permeates criminal procedure. The definition of a seizure, the third-party doctrine, custodial confessions, plea bargains, and agreements to alternatives to incarceration (such as GPS ankle monitoring) all hinge on the idea of voluntary choices—choices that are often just as coerced and …

Masthead

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Artificial Authorship On The Big Screen: Regulating Ai In Scriptwriting, Cassie Larson

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

While the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) offers exciting, new creative possibilities for the entertainment industry, it also threatens to replace or undercompensate the humans who have been at the backbone of the industry since its inception. AI’s increasing ability to generate human-quality content raises concerns about job displacement and copyright ownership for scriptwriters. While the recent Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike secured several protections, the unique and rapidly evolving nature of AI requires that further legal safeguards be created. This Note argues for additional regulations to ensure that AI remains a collaborative tool for scriptwriters and not a …

Toxic Minimalism On The “Yolo” Court: The Supreme Court’S Dangerous Muddle In First Amendment And Speech-Adjacent Law, Matthew D. Bunker, Emily Erickson

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Impossibility Of Artificial Inventors, Matt Blaszczyk

UC Law Science and Technology Journal

Recently, the United Kingdom Supreme Court decided that only natural persons can be considered inventors. A year before, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a similar decision. In fact, so have many of the courts all over the world. This Article analyzes these decisions, argues that the courts got it right, and finds that artificial inventorship is at odds with patent law doctrine, theory, and philosophy. This Article challenges the intellectual property (IP) post-humanists, exposing the analytical and normative perils of their argumentation, and recommends against getting rid of the nominally central place of humans …

Facial Recognition Technology In The Market: What Consumers Need To Know To Protect Their Rights, Liubov Kirzhakova

UC Law Science and Technology Journal

Facial recognition technology (FRT) has rapidly expanded in consumer products over the last decade, offering convenience, but raising significant privacy concerns. This article examines the implications of FRT on consumer privacy, emphasizing the unique risks associated with biometric data. Unlike other personal data, biometrics are biologically unique and irreplaceable, making unauthorized access and misuse particularly harmful. Despite the growing consumer awareness and concern about data privacy, current legal protections are fragmented and insufficient. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of how FRT is integrated into products and services and highlights the privacy risks associated with each. It reviews existing federal …

Re(De)Fining Patent Eligibility, Lauren Hong

UC Law Science and Technology Journal

The patent system is at the heart of America’s innovation scene, serving as the lifeline for America’s status as an industrial titan as it seeks to inspire inventors worldwide to innovate and discover. The confines of patent-eligible subject matter were set out by Congress through the power vested by the Constitution, and these boundaries have been re(de)fined as the Supreme Court has carved out exceptions to these standards including: laws of nature, abstract ideas, and natural phenomena being excluded from patentability. In response to criticisms of legal uncertainty surrounding patent-eligibility under the current regime, two senators have introduced The Patent …

Pack Your Bags…We’Re Moving To The Public Domain: The Expiration Of Copyright Terms And Its Implications On Future Protection, Sophie Ganion

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The following Note addresses the expiration of copyright terms for a multitude of creative works and the various implications of that expiration for their future IP protection. It explores the conflicting perspectives of stakeholders, from the excitement of artists and everyday creatives versus the concerns of industry leaders about the potential erosion of their copyright monopolies. Drawing from landmark cases like Baker v. Selden and Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., this Note highlights the complex questions surrounding copyright expiration and the strategic use of trademark protection. The Note emphasizes the necessity for coherent legal frameworks to ensure …

Masthead

UC Law Science and Technology Journal

No abstract provided.

The Federal Rules Of Constitutional Procedure, Ramon Feldbrin

UC Law Journal

Judicial review has distinct purposes, difficulties, and modalities, but there are no guideposts as to how these features ought to be addressed in procedural terms. The reason is a deep-seated, but largely unarticulated, assumption that constitutional litigation is simply governed by the same rules as other civil litigation in the federal courts. Yet the premise is fundamentally false. This Article draws new attention to rules and practices that have historically regulated constitutional cases and set them apart from the typical way all other cases make their way through the judicial system. These procedures include, among other things, the requirement to …

Masthead

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Working From 10 To 5, What A Way To Make A Livin’: The Sec’S Most Recent Amendments To Promote Corporate Governance And Curb Exploitative Hedge Fund Activism, Richard Young

UC Law Journal

This Note investigates the evolving regulatory landscape following the 2023 SEC amendments regarding beneficial ownership reporting. It begins by analyzing the rise of hedge fund activism and its influence on corporate governance strategies, addressing benefits, controversies, and criticisms associated with this form of shareholder activism. This Note then traces the historical development of the regulatory requirements for beneficial ownership reporting such the Williams Act and now nearly forty years later, the 2023 SEC amendments to Schedule 13(d) and Schedule 13(g). Lastly, this Note analyzes the ongoing limitations and challenges in balancing market transparency with market competition, gleaning into the future …

Artificial Intelligence And Cracks In The Foundation Of Intellectual Property, Robin Feldman

UC Law Journal

Our implicit image of progress and the standards we use to calibrate human contribution to progress are quietly at risk from the onslaught of artificial intelligence (AI). AI has the potential to significantly shrink the pool of creative work that is protectable by intellectual property (IP) law and the range of information that is protectable, as well as shrinking the value proposition of IP regimes themselves.

As society faces this changing landscape, we must tread carefully to distinguish fears about AI from the task of defining the boundaries of intellectual property, whose theoretic concepts aren’t designed to bear such weighty …

Free The Market: How We Can Save Capitalism From The Capitalists, Mark A. Lemley

UC Law Journal

The free market works because no one person or company is making the decisions. In a competitive market, businesspeople make the wrong decisions all the time, just as central planners do. But the consequences of those decisions don’t infect the market as a whole. Businesses that guess wrong lose money or go out of business. But as long as there is a competitor out there who guesses right, the market provides people what they want.

But it turns out that the very last thing capitalists want is a free market. Capitalism may thrive under conditions of robust market competition, but …

Patent Infringement, Private Law, And Liability Standards, Robert P. Merges

UC Law Journal

Private law governs interactions among private parties. A large body of private law theory holds that private law is aimed at corrective justice: doing justice as between the two parties to a private interaction (the private law dyad). This in contrast to public law, the law of state-citizen interactions, whose purpose is usually said to be the pursuit of society-wide fairness, often understood as distributive justice. Torts, contracts and property are the three classic areas of private law in common law jurisdictions. A sizeable literature now concerns itself with classic private law topics as they apply to intellectual property (IP). …

Debt End: The “Texas Two-Step” And The Constitution, Kirk Rider

UC Law Journal

The “Texas Two-Step” is a novel means of forcing a settlement agreement on mass-tort claimants. Corporations utilize the Two-Step bankruptcy strategy using a state law merger statute to split itself in two. One half of the corporation retains all the value, and the other half retains all the liabilities associated with the mass tort claims. The shell-company, which inherits the liabilities and then files a bankruptcy petition, uses the Bankruptcy Code’s powers to attempt a forced settlement on all current and future litigants and shield its financially healthy parent company in the process. Throughout this Note, I will survey the …

Masthead

UC Law Business Journal

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Jonathan Luciano, Ju Lee

UC Law Business Journal

No abstract provided.

The “Wholesale Failure” Of The Sec’S Approach To Chief Compliance Officer Liability, David B. Lourie

UC Law Business Journal

No abstract provided.

Fallout And Fiduciary Duty, Russell Powell

UC Law Business Journal

No abstract provided.

When Debt Gets A Makeover, Taxes Follow, Doron Narotzki

UC Law Business Journal

The taxation of debt modifications is a complex and crucial area of tax law, significantly impacting both corporate finance and the broader economy. This article explores the complex legal and economic implications of modifying debt instruments, focusing on the key provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and covers the foundational principle of “realization,” which governs the recognition of income, gain, or loss when a debt modification is deemed significant under Treasury Regulation § 1.1001-3. The article delves into the tax consequences for both debtors and creditors, highlighting the potential for Cancellation of Debt Income and the challenges of managing …

Repaving The Path For The Immigrant Investor, Nathan Quach

UC Law Business Journal

No abstract provided.

Pop Culture Depictions Of Diversity In Business – Mad Men, Super Store, And Barbie, Akshaya Kamalnath

UC Law Business Journal

We have come a long way from only having women in the secretarial pool (as depicted in M ad Men), to having women and racial minorities in the workforce (as depicted in Super Store), to a company that creates a fictional world where women hold all the top positions (Barbie). Both Mad Men and Super Store are American TV shows – Mad Men was made in the present- day to depict life in the world of advertising agencies in New York in the 60s. Super Store is a series on Netflix about the issues workers face in a big company …

With Fear, Favor, And Flawed Analysis: Decision-Making In U.S. Immigration Courts, Karen B. Musalo Prof.

Faculty Scholarship

Immigration judges (IJs), housed within the Executive Office for Immigration Review within the Department of Justice (DOJ), make decisions in asylum and withholding claims, which are life or death matters. And although their title is “judge,” IJs are DOJ attorneys who lack independence and are particularly susceptible to political pressures. Federal court judges and scholars alike have criticized the quality and fairness of IJ decision-making, and many studies have been carried out to better understand the factors that impact it. The prior studies have relied principally on quantitative data because IJ decisions are not publicly available or searchable in any …