Law Commons^™

11th Hour Option Discounting: The Significance Of Ipo Prognostications In Fixing Equity Compensation, Sven Riethmueller

UC Law Journal

This article examines the pervasive practice by pre-IPO firms of granting stock options as compensation while preparing to go public. These last-minute option grants, which are typically not contingent upon initial public offering (IPO) completion, feature substantially lower exercise prices relative to the IPO price, thus producing a windfall potential to executives and other option recipients once these firms consummate their IPOs shortly after having made these discounted option awards. I present empirical evidence to the effect that this 11th hour option discounting practice is common. I scrutinized the option grant practices of a hand-collected dataset comprising U.S. preclinical and …

Expanding Health Insurance For Formerly Incarcerated People, Benjamin Barsky, James R. Jolin, Meredith B. Rosenthal

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Community Integration Of People With Disabilities A Quarter Century After Olmstead V. L.C., Michael Ashley Stein, Benjamin Barsky, Lisa I. Iezzoni

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Trina L. Thompson

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Masthead

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

‘Cruel And Unusual’ In 1689, 1791, And 1868: Shifts In Incorporation, Gregory Velloze

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Recently, the Supreme Court has acknowledged the scholarly debate over whether to apply the historical understanding of the Bill of Rights as ratified in 1791 or as incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. This acknowledgment raises two important issues with regards to the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. First, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause was copied from the English Bill of Rights in 1689, generating a third, additional time period relevant to its historical understanding. Second, the more textualist framework of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause allows for more relatively bounded language and interpretation, which could remain …

Editor-In-Chief’S Foreword, Megan Stupi

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

Editorial Forward, Emily C. Taing

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

No abstract provided.

The Ivf Exception: Strengthening Free Exercise Challenges To Abortion Bans, Io Jones

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The fallout of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision has included two seemingly distinct but critically related dynamics. First, religiously motivated plaintiffs are filing lawsuits challenging abortion bans on free exercise grounds. These lawsuits argue, in accordance with current free exercise doctrine, that a state’s compelling interest in protecting “fetal life” is undermined by secular exceptions to abortion bans. Second, state lawmakers have been forced to confirm that their state abortion bans do not apply to in vitro fertilization (IVF), a fertility treatment that regularly requires the discarding of embryos. This confluence of factors raises a critical question …

Standing And Prosecutorial Discretion: Why The Doctrine Of Standing Precludes Challenges To Categorical Non-Enforcement, Michael Diamandakis

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

The Federal Government Cannot Prohibit The Exercise Of A Core State Sovereign Function: Haaland V. Brackeen And Expanding The Anticommandeering Doctrine, George Bach

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The Tenth Amendment’s anticommandeering doctrine limits the ability of the federal government to issue directives to state legislative bodies and executive officials. While the Supreme Court’s path through the Tenth Amendment has been less than direct, New York v. United States and United States v. Printz clarified that the federal government cannot “commandeer” state legislatures or executives to implement federal policy. While the core of the Court’s approach to anticommandeering remains focused on halting congressional efforts to press state agents into implementing federal regulatory programs, the Haaland v. Brackeen decision may be read to expand the anticommandeering principle. That is, …

Masthead

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

No abstract provided.

Targeted And Ticketed: Student Ticketing And The Perpetuation Of The School-To- Prison Pipeline, Jasmine Richardson-Rushin, Angelica Jimenez, Gwendolyn Walker, Hannah Benton Eidsath

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

The National Center for Youth Law (NCYL) is a non-profit organization working to end the harms of the juvenile, municipal and criminal legal systems, including by decriminalizing normal adolescent behavior, ending financial consequences, and improving children’s access to adequate developmentally appropriate treatment. Our work prioritizes eradicating the school-to-prison pipeline, and abolishing harmful fines, fees and economic sanctions through the Debt Free Justice Campaign (DFJ).

In school districts across the nation, students receive fees and fines as consequences for school-based behavior. Students are policed and ticketed for age-appropriate behaviors and disciplinary matters such as littering, truancy, and underage drinking and smoking. …

Taking The Name Brown In Vain: Separate But Equal, Brown And The Harvard Case, Matthew Coles

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

No abstract provided.

Remedies For Decades Of Hbcu Underfunding: Can Coalition V. Maryland Serve As A Model, Or Is Government “Persuasion” Needed?, John K. Pierre, Gail S. Stephenson

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

No abstract provided.

Black Migrants And Black Lives Matter: Voices Of Tension, Racism, Pan- Africanism, And Prospects For Collaboration, Bill Ong Hing

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

No abstract provided.

Racial Capitalism And The Proliferation Of Charter Schools In Oakland, Julie Mendoza

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

Over the last thirty years, charter schools have flooded the American public education system. The publicly funded and privately operated alternative to neighborhood district schools is often celebrated as a means for under-resourced students to receive a quality education. However, the effect of charter school growth on districts themselves and the students who remain at traditional district schools requires greater scrutiny. A case study of Oakland reveals that intermingling private enterprise with public education has led to a disparate impact on low-income families of color and students with disabilities.

Under theories of racial capitalism, racial exploitation is central to the …

“Prisoners Of The Union”: Emporium Capwell And The Decline Of Concerted Activity Against Racial Discrimination, Andrew Hull

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

This paper tracks the development of judicial understanding of labor unions’ status under Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act as the “exclusive representative” of employees for the purposes of bargaining with the employer, focusing on the how the Supreme Court case Emporium Capwell v. Western Community Addition has led to a gradual restriction of the scope of protected concerted activity by workers suffering discrimination. This ossification reveals how rigid, overly theoretical understanding of the law that is divorced from practical contexts often leads to reinforcing racial disparities in a capitalist mode of production. I further argue Emporium Capwell …

Personal Jurisdiction And Federalism, Scott Dodson

Faculty Scholarship

Personal jurisdiction has long professed to safeguard interstate federalism through the principle that good fences make good neighbors. Although this goal sits uncomfortably with the idea of personal jurisdiction as an individual right under the Due Process Clause, recent decisions from the Supreme Court have reinvigorated the federalism aspect of personal jurisdiction, offering a new opportunity to appraise its value and efficacy. This Article does so and concludes that personal jurisdiction fails to protect interstate federalism. States and private parties, it turns out, have too much authorization to expand state-court personal jurisdiction beyond state borders using the doctrine of consent …

Imperfect Access: Structural Barriers And External Threats To Preventive Care, Dorit Rubenstein Reiss, Richard H. Hughes Iv

Faculty Scholarship

Access to healthcare in the United States is often partial and inequitable. This is due in large part to a highly fragmented public-private system of providing health insurance coverage to its citizens. Yet, through incremental policy developments, the United States provides more comprehensive preventive care coverage across both public and private sources of coverage than in other areas of healthcare. Moreover, it has developed safety net programs intended to gap-fill access for those without insurance coverage. This is not surprising; like other countries, the United States realize that in addition to being just and equitable, broader access to prevention has …

Administrative Law: Major Questions About Presidentialism, Jodi L. Short

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure: Cy Pres In Federal Securities Class Actions, Scott Dodson

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Environmental Law: Sackett And The Rules Of Statutory Misinterpretation, Dave Owen

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Health Law: Internet Prescription, Federalism, And The Opioid Crisis, Benjamin A. Barsky

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law: First Amendment Disequilibrium, Christina Koningisor

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Refugee Law: Human Rights, Refugee Law, And Border Crossing, Moria Paz

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Betwixt And Between: Restorative Justice, Dei, And Education Carcerality, Thalia Gonzalez, Alyssa Faith Scott

Faculty Scholarship

American K-12 public education is at a critical anti-civil rights inflection point amidst a rapidly changing landscape of federal and state education law and policy. From local anti-literacy measures to state “three strikes” exclusionary school discipline legislation to punitive federal executive orders, new legal mechanisms are conjoining to produce public school climates marked by structural violence, and the erasure of students with multiple marginalized identities. Attending to these political and legal realities is a growing cluster of legal scholarship empirically categorizing, and theoretically challenging, the rise of such anti-education civil rights obstructions. Though diverse in scope, analyses prominently center the …

Table Of Contents

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Antitrust: Ai And Antitrust: “The Algorithm Made Me Do It”, Robin Feldman

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law: Felons, Firearms, And The “Federalization” Of Crime, Jonathan Abel

The Judges' Book

No abstract provided.