Law Commons^™

The Standard That Should Be Used By The U.S. Coast Guard In Regard To Its Provision Of Boarding Vessels Arriving To The U.S. Coasts, Silvia Garcia Ausin

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Volume 39 (2015)

Canada-United States Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0856: City Of North Royalton, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2013-181; Mandatory Pooling (Callas #8HD Well; Cutter Oil Company)

Appeal No. 0867: M&R Investments Ohio Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-129, Chief's Orders 2014-130 (Alfman AP #1 Well and Ruth Porter #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0868: M&R Investments Ohio Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-129, Chief's Orders 2014-130 (Alfman AP #1 Well and Ruth Porter #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0861: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-43 & 2014-44; (Miller #1 Well; bond forfeiture; Cincinnati Insurance Co.)

Appeal No. 0860: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-43 & 2014-44; (Miller #1 Well; bond forfeiture; Cincinnati Insurance Co.)

Appeal No. 0888: Edco Drilling And Producing, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-254 (Hedrick #1A Well)

Appeal No. 0858: Fresh Water Accountability Project, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-08 (EnerGreen 360 Facility)

Case Global: A Growing Presence, Case Western Reserve University School Of Law, The Frederick K. Cox International Law Center

Case Global Newsletter

Vol. 6, #1 (2014)

• A Growing Presence
• Alum Is Appointed UN Special Representative for Darfur
• Case Global Talk Radio celebrates its second year on the air
• New Curriculum: Sequence to Success
• Case Western Reserve expands human rights program, adds clinic
• Alum leaders in the spotlight
• Case Western Reserve law students intern around the world
• Recent Graduate Profiles
• International Law Faculty Updates

Appeal No. 0869: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-127 (Crum-Shocking #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0866: Spring Industries, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-73, Chief's Orders 2014-74 (Straub #1 and #3 Wells)

Appeal No. 0865: Spring Industries, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-73, Chief's Orders 2014-74 (Straub #1 and #3 Wells)

Appeal No. 0855: Athens County Fracking Action Network, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Issuance of Injection Well Permit SWI! #10 (K & H Partners, LLC)

Appeal No. 0857: James M. Huebner, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2013-182; Mandatory Pooling (Sisko Unit #1 Well; Everflow Eastern Partners L.P. Inc.)

Appeal No. 0854: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-39 & 2013-40 (the Powelson #1 & #2 Wells)

Appeal No. 0853: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-39 & 2013-40 (the Powelson #1 & #2 Wells)

Appeal No. 0852: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Lorrie & Lori Accettola V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-37 & 2013-38 (Cutter Well #1 & Cutter Well #2)

Appeal No. 0851: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Lorrie & Lori Accettola V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-37 & 2013-38 (Cutter Well #1 & Cutter Well #2)

Review Of Global Coloniality And Power In Guatemala By Egla Martínez-Salazar, Andrew Crookston

Societies Without Borders

No abstract provided.

African American Women, Hiv/Aids, And Human Rights In The Us, Monica L. Melton

Societies Without Borders

In the US alone, 84 percent of women’s HIV infections are due to heterosexual contact (CDC 2013). Fifty percent of all people globally who are living with HIV/AIDS are women (UNAIDS 2009), yet, HIV-positive women’s perspectives on prevention are mostly missing from the trajectory of scholarly literature on HIV/AIDS. I thought it imperative to go to the source (women living with HIV/AIDS) to get an insiders perspective on HIV prevention. Thirty HIV-positive Black women were recruited to participate in the study, which lasted seven months. These women live in a Florida innercity and range in age from 21 to 60. …

Corporate Governance Without Shareholders: A Cautionary Lesson From Non-Profit Organizations, George W. Dent

Faculty Publications

A debate about corporate governance has long raged over the allocation of power between shareholders and directors. Proponents of “shareholder primacy” believe that the corporate board should be chosen by and accountable to the stockholders rather than dominated by the CEO, as they believe is common now. Advocates of “director primacy” want to limit shareholder power because they believe that shareholders have conflicting objectives, are uninformed, and pressure the directors to sacrifice the long-term health of the company to short-term share price.

The governance of non-profit organizations (“NPOs”) offers an example that illuminates the corporate governance debate. Directors of NPOs …

The Death Of Inference, Andrew S. Pollis

Faculty Publications

This Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prerogative to draw inferences from circumstantial evidence. Judges have arrogated to themselves the power to dismiss cases if they find the proffered inferenc

Filling The Gaps With Public Policy: The Application Of The Hague Convention Protocol In Us Courts In The Absence Of A Co-Signing State, Andrew A. Zashin, Christopher R. Reynolds, Amy M. Keating

Faculty Publications

This article will consider a possible avenue for filling 'gaps' when the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention or the 1996 Child Protection Convention do not apply in child custody/abduction cases. Specifically, it will explore utilizing internal US domestic relations law to facilitate the return of a child who has been abducted to the USA from a non-signatory country. To better illustrate the potential effects, the article will explore this 'gap filler' through the lens of a case study involving Japan, the most prominent first world country that is not yet a signatory to the Convention. The article also considers the implications …

The Nafta Alternative: Saving Korus Fta Dumping Appeals From The Dumps, Czarina Powell

Canada-United States Law Journal

Antidumping duties are a trade remedy often utilized against producers in the United States' own bilateral trading partners. Because of Chevron deference, foreign companies are at greater risk of being branded "dumpers" simply upon the onset of a petition. On March 15, 2013, the United States celebrated the one-year anniversary of the signing into force of the Korea-US (KORUS) Free Trade Agreement and its promise to eliminate barriers and tariffs.

Combating Maritime Piracy: Inter-Disciplinary Cooperation And Information Sharing, Yaron Gottlieb

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Investment Arbitration Under Nafta Chapter 11: A Threat To Sovereignty Of Member States?, William L. Owen

Canada-United States Law Journal

Critics of NAFTA Chapter 11's investor state dispute settlement mechanism are primarily concerned with its invocation by corporate entities and its potential to effectively overturn or significantly weaken NAFTA states' ability to legislate or regulate in the public interest. This article will address this central concern and demonstrate, by evaluating Chapter 11 arbitration results, that these criticisms have been overstated

Cusli Expert Roundtable Report: Ceta, Tpp, Ttip, And The Canada-U.S. Trade Relationship

Canada-United States Law Journal

An Expert Panel discusses Canada-U.S. trade issues in the context of emerging international trade deals, multilateral trade agreements such as Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

An Evaluation Of The Effects Of The Legalization Of Marijuana In Colorado And Washington From An International Law Perspective, Apama Bushan

Canada-United States Law Journal

The legalization of marijuana in the states of Colorado and Washington has raised issues that the international community has not previously been forced to consider. Through examining relevant state laws, current federal legislation and applicable international agreements, this Note will outline the legal ramifications that the legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington could have both nationally and internationally. This Note will further evaluate all reasonable alternatives available to the United States in meeting the requirements mandated of it by the international agreements it is party to.

The Boundary Water Treaty 1909 -- A Peace Treaty?, Gordon Walker Q.C.

Canada-United States Law Journal

A speech that discusses relations between the U.S. and Canada with the Boundary Waters Treaty (BWT) of 1909, peace treaty which resolve the conflict and water rights issues between the U.S. and Canada.