Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Estates and Trusts (19)
- Torts (19)
- Civil Procedure (17)
- Tax Law (17)
- Common Law (16)
-
- Constitutional Law (15)
- Property Law and Real Estate (15)
- Securities Law (14)
- Business Organizations Law (13)
- Courts (13)
- Jurisdiction (13)
- Legal History (12)
- Legislation (12)
- State and Local Government Law (12)
- Evidence (11)
- Litigation (11)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Military, War, and Peace (10)
- Conflict of Laws (9)
- Family Law (9)
- Transportation Law (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (8)
- Contracts (7)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Insurance Law (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Taxation-Federal (5)
- Admiralty (4)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (7)
- Book reviews (5)
- Damages (5)
- Fraud (5)
- New York (5)
-
- Automobile accident (4)
- California (4)
- Divorce (4)
- Husband (4)
- Liquidation (4)
- Michigan (4)
- Recovery (4)
- Wife (4)
- World War II (4)
- African Americans (3)
- Cases (3)
- Fair market value (3)
- Good faith (3)
- Public interest (3)
- Revenue Act of 1942 (3)
- Transfer (3)
- Widow (3)
- Charities (2)
- Chattel (2)
- Circuit courts (2)
- Civil War (2)
- Collective bargaining (2)
- Control (2)
- Delaware (2)
- Dividends (2)
Articles 151 - 155 of 155
Full-Text Articles in Law
Property-Mechanics' Lien-Validity Against Non-Contracting Co-Owner, Howard Van Antwerp S.Ed.
Property-Mechanics' Lien-Validity Against Non-Contracting Co-Owner, Howard Van Antwerp S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
A and B were tenants in common of a tract of land. Plaintiff contracted with A to build a house thereon, B not being a party. Plaintiff sued A and B to enforce a mechanics' lien for money due on the contract, and was successful against both in the lower court. On appeal, held, reversed. Only A, who contracted to have the house built, was subject to a mechanics' lien. Dente v. Bullis, (Md. 1950) 76 A. (2d) 158.
Real Property--Adverse Possession--What Constitutes Adverse Possession Of Land Used Periodically, George D. Miller Jr.
Real Property--Adverse Possession--What Constitutes Adverse Possession Of Land Used Periodically, George D. Miller Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff in an ejectment action claimed under a chain of title tracing back to a government patent. Defendants asserted title in themselves by adverse possession. The land in question was wild, undeveloped, and not suitable for farming, but was desirable for hunting and fishing, for which purpose the defendants had used the premises every year since their entry. In 1926 some of the defendants built a cabin on the land, and replaced it in 1932 by the present one, which they built on a cement foundation, painted, and planted grass around. They also erected a sign at the crossroads bearing …
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a minor child, brought a tort action against defendant for enticing her mother to desert her, thereby depriving plaintiff of support, maintenance, and maternal care and affection. The trial court sustained defendant's demurrer. On appeal, held, affirmed. The statutes of the state provide other means of support of the child, and he has no right of action for the deprivation of a parent's love and affection. Nelson v. Richwagen, (Mass. 1950) 95 N.E. (2d) 545.
Corporations-Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Measure Of Shortswing Profits Under Section 16(B), Harry T. Baumann
Corporations-Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Measure Of Shortswing Profits Under Section 16(B), Harry T. Baumann
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff stockholder brought a derivative action against the defendant officer for profits made in violation of section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the purchase and sale, within six months, of securities issued by the corporation under an "incentive" option agreement. The contract provided that on or after the first accrual date, until a fixed termination date, a stated number of shares could be purchased at a set price; the same privilege accrued with the identical termination date in each of the next two years. There was no dispute of fact; the question thus centered on the …
Regulation Of Business-Trade Restraints-Business Price And Use Restrictions Accompanying Sale Of Land, Jean Engstrom S.Ed.
Regulation Of Business-Trade Restraints-Business Price And Use Restrictions Accompanying Sale Of Land, Jean Engstrom S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a wholesale and retail dealer in "Marathon" products, and the smallest wholesale distributor of gasoline in Ann Arbor, sought to enjoin defendant from selling Marathon gasoline at less than the price set under the provisions of the standard dealer's contract. Defendant bad acquired his station by a deed containing a covenant expressly intended to run with the land, providing for the operation of a filling station on the land, and a ten-year agreement that aII petroleum products sold on the premises were to be supplied by plaintiff "at such prices and on such terms as are customarily furnished to …