Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 8581 - 8610 of 9010

Full-Text Articles in Law

Torts - Civil Damage Statutes - Proximate Cause Dec 1932

Torts - Civil Damage Statutes - Proximate Cause

Michigan Law Review

Defendant Campion purchased "moonshine" liquor from defendants Wrabek and wife, and gave three drinks to plaintiff's husband who shortly thereafter became unconscious, was exposed to sub-zero weather on the street during the night, and froze his hands and feet which, as a result, were amputated. Plaintiff sued for loss of support under sec. 3239 Mason's Minn. Statutes 1927 (the "civil damage" act) which provided for such action by the wife against "any person, who shall by illegally selling, bartering, or giving intoxicating liquors, have caused the intoxication of such person." On an appeal from the court's judgment for defendants Wrabek …

Go to article

Torts - Due Care By Rescuer Dec 1932

Torts - Due Care By Rescuer

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a woman about sixty years of age, described as "considerably overweight for her size and age," and her companion were swimming in a club pool. The companion went beyond her depth, called for help, and plaintiff went to her rescue. The lifeguard, believing plaintiff to be in difficulty, went to her rescue and, in pulling her over the bank of the pool, injured her arm, side, and back. From an award in favor of the plaintiff for $7,500, defendant, the lifeguard's employer, appealed. Held, the lifeguard owed the patron the duty of exercising ordinary care; judgment for plaintiff …

Go to article

Torts-Liability For Innocent Misrepresentation-Plaintiffs Reliance Nov 1932

Torts-Liability For Innocent Misrepresentation-Plaintiffs Reliance

Michigan Law Review

Defendant's agent innocently misrepresented the amount of special tax assessments on property purchased by plaintiff. Before purchase plaintiff searched the records at the office of the commissioner of finance. The records confirmed the agent's statement. However, after purchase, an error was discovered and the unpaid assessments were found to be greater than supposed. Plaintiff brought an action for damages. Held, in Moulton v. Norton that, as the representation was false in fact, plaintiff could recover though the representation had been made honestly.

Go to article

Torts-Malicious Prosecution-Advice Of Counsel Nov 1932

Torts-Malicious Prosecution-Advice Of Counsel

Michigan Law Review

Defendant, a practicing lawyer, lodged a complaint charging plaintiff with larceny. A criminal warrant was issued; plaintiff was arrested, but the action was dismissed when the complaining witness failed to appear at the trial. Plaintiff then brought this action for malicious prosecution. One of the grounds of defense pleaded was that which is commonly called "advice of counsel," defendant pleading that, in his judgment, the plaintiff was guilty as charged. Held, in Mawhinney v. Morrissey, that, under the facts of this case, the defense fails because the attorney-defendant was not a disinterested party.

Go to article

Torts--Liability In Damages For Obtaining Annulment Of Marriage By Fraud, Henry P. Snyder Jun 1932

Torts--Liability In Damages For Obtaining Annulment Of Marriage By Fraud, Henry P. Snyder

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Injunctions--Airports--Nuisance, Jack C. Burdett Jun 1932

Injunctions--Airports--Nuisance, Jack C. Burdett

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Torts - Release Of One Responsible For Injury As Bar To Action Against Physician For Malpractice - Splitting Cause Of Action Jun 1932

Torts - Release Of One Responsible For Injury As Bar To Action Against Physician For Malpractice - Splitting Cause Of Action

Michigan Law Review

In an action brought for damages arising out of alleged negligent treatment of an injury, defendant pleaded a general release of the city of Minneapolis and other alleged joint tort-feasors whom plaintiff had first sued for damages resulting from the injury. In affirming the judgment for defendant on the pleadings, held, that the release barred the cause of action. Smith v. Mann (Minn. 1931) 239 N. W. 223.

Go to article

Agency- Liability Of Principal For Torts Of Agent-Apparent Authority Jun 1932

Agency- Liability Of Principal For Torts Of Agent-Apparent Authority

Michigan Law Review

Defendant regularly delivered goods to plaintiff C. O. D. Lambert was employed by defendant to deliver such goods and collect for them, and for this purpose he was given blank re6eipts which he was authorized to fill out and sign upon being paid for the goods. The usual course of business was for Lambert to deliver to plaintiff's shipping clerk who signed the delivery bill, and then collect from plaintiff's cashier who was stationed in another room. Plaintiff's cashier never asked to see this delivery bill, but always took Lambert's word as to the amount due. For a period of …

Go to article

Torts - Recklessness - Liability Of Driver Under "Host-Guest" Statute Jun 1932

Torts - Recklessness - Liability Of Driver Under "Host-Guest" Statute

Michigan Law Review

Iowa Code, 1927, sec. 5026-b1, provides that no automobile owner or operator shall be liable for injuries received by a gratuitous occupant therein, except those caused by the driver's intoxication or reckless operation. Defendant, a rather inexperienced driver, became excited upon coming to a hill and pressed the accelerator instead of the brake, causing an accident which injured plaintiff, a gratuitous passenger in the car. The jury found that defendant had been driving recklessly. In reversing for error in instruction, the court held that recklessness may or may not include wilfulness or wantonness, but always implies no care, coupled with …

Go to article

Pleading-Actions For Death Of Minor Child-Damages May 1932

Pleading-Actions For Death Of Minor Child-Damages

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Pleading - Last Clear Chance May 1932

Pleading - Last Clear Chance

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff was riding a bicycle on a bridge. Defendant, towing a truck, sounded his horn and plaintiff drove to the left while defendant passed, but was struck by the truck. The judge charged that if defendant was travelling at an excessive rate of speed, and injury resulted from that cause, plaintiff could recover although negligent. Held, reversed, on the ground, among others, that the instruction as to least clear chance was not supported by any pleading. Steele v. Brada et al. (Iowa 1931) 239 N. W. 538.

Go to article

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper May 1932

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper

Michigan Law Review

As a logical matter there seem to be two possible schemes of legal liability. The first one may be stated as follows: One may be liable for all consequences of all of his acts. While it has been suggested that this was the principle of the mediaeval law, it has been pointed out by Professor Winfield that such was never literally the case. Under this principle, as he has shown, everyone would be in jail except for these reasons: no one could legally put anyone else in jail, no one could legally keep anyone else in jail, and no one …

Go to article

Corporations - Rights And Remedies Of Dissenting Stockholders Upon Consolidation And Merger May 1932

Corporations - Rights And Remedies Of Dissenting Stockholders Upon Consolidation And Merger

Michigan Law Review

Consolidation or merger of private corporations in recent years has been more and more frequent. One of the most engrossing problems when such unions take place is that of the rights and remedies of dissenting shareholders. The question which arises most frequently in cases of consolidation or merger, and that in the solution of which, paradoxicaIIy, our courts tend to expend the least amount of legal acumen, is whether the consolidation or merger of corporations operates to dissolve the constituent corporations in such a manner as materially to affect the rights of the shareholders in those corporations.

Go to article

Bailments - Innkeepers - Liability For Loss Of Baggage May 1932

Bailments - Innkeepers - Liability For Loss Of Baggage

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a guest at defendant's hotel, on his arrival there gave his trunk check to the head porter who, in turn, gave the check to a licensed expressman. Due to the expressman's negligence the trunk was stolen. At the trial it was shown that it was customary for the defendant to make a separate charge for trunk delivery. Held, defendant was liable for the negligent performance of the contractual duties by the expressman. Davidson v. Madison Corp. (N. Y. 1931) 177 N. E. 393.

Go to article

Negligence - Amusements - Assumption Of Risk By Football Spectators May 1932

Negligence - Amusements - Assumption Of Risk By Football Spectators

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff, a woman who had paid to witness a football game played on defendant's field, stood near the boundaries of the playing field and was hurt when hit by a player tackled at the side-line. The evidence disclosed that the field was not roped off for the minor games, that there was no policing except that done by a few school officials, and that the spectators were not required to occupy seats in the stands. Reversing the lower court, the appellate tribunal held that, under these circumstances, there was no negligence, the opinion of the majority indicating that, if …

Go to article

Negligence-Res Ipsa Loquitur Apr 1932

Negligence-Res Ipsa Loquitur

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Torts - Federal Employers Liability Act - Misrepresentation To Gain Employment Mar 1932

Torts - Federal Employers Liability Act - Misrepresentation To Gain Employment

Michigan Law Review

P applied for a position as switchman with the defendant company. Defendant company had a rule that no one should be employed over the age of 45. Employees who had reached the age of 65 were pensioned but this limit was extended in some cases to 70. To gain employment, P, who was 49, represented that he was 38. He was accepted, and worked for 7 years when he was injured through defendant's negligence while engaged in interstate commerce. Held, his misrepresentation to gain employment did not bar recovery under the Federal Employers Liability Act, it not appearing that …

Go to article

Negligence - Contribution Between Concurrent Tort Feasors - Subrogation Mar 1932

Negligence - Contribution Between Concurrent Tort Feasors - Subrogation

Michigan Law Review

A truck owner parked his truck on a public street at night knowing that the rear light was not burning. A Minnesota statute made it illegal to park a car at night without a light. The defendant negligently ran into the truck, whereby one of his companions was injured. The plaintiff, as insurer of the truck owner, paid for the injury, becoming subrogated to any right of contribution which the truck owner might have against the defendant. Held, that if the truck driver were guilty of negligence only, recovery could be had, but where there is an intentional wrong …

Go to article

Master And Servant - "Respondeat Superior" - Responsibility Of Master For The Malicious Act Of Servant Mar 1932

Master And Servant - "Respondeat Superior" - Responsibility Of Master For The Malicious Act Of Servant

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff and defendant were competitors in the laundry business. While plaintiff was collecting laundry a dispute arose between him and defendant's driver over the right to certain laundry of which plaintiff had taken possession. The driver undertook to obtain it from plaintiff by force and assaulted him. Suit was brought against the laundry company as principal. Held, though arising out of the business, the assault was outside the scope of employment so defendant was not liable. Morin v. Wet Wash Laundry Company (N. H. 1931) 156 Atl. 499.

Go to article

Negligence - Proximate Cause - Intervening Criminal Act Mar 1932

Negligence - Proximate Cause - Intervening Criminal Act

Michigan Law Review

Defendant railroad company, having suffered heavily from depredations committed by a dangerous gang of train robbers, employed plaintiff's intestate as a train guard. Defendant also employed X, a member of the gang, to act as an informer and to forewarn defendant of the gang's activities. X, on one occasion, negligently failed to inform defendant of the gang's plans and plaintiff's intestate was killed by one of the robbers. Plaintiff brought action under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, as next of kin, on the theory that defendant was guilty of negligence in failing to warn the train guard, and that this …

Go to article

Torts - Negligence - Recent Acquisition Of Driver's License Mar 1932

Torts - Negligence - Recent Acquisition Of Driver's License

Michigan Law Review

In a suit for damages for injuries allegedly negligently inflicted upon the occupant of an automobile, plaintiff testified that defendant was driving at a high rate of speed when his car began to zigzag and finally overturned, injuring plaintiff. Defendant testified that he was driving moderately when, upon their sudden application, the brakes locked, causing the car to zigzag and overturn. There was evidence to the effect that "defendant was an inexperienced driver, having just obtained his driver's license." Defendant's motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict were refused. Held, that the question of defendant's negligence was for …

Go to article

Governmental Liability For Tort In West Virginia, T. Brooke Price Feb 1932

Governmental Liability For Tort In West Virginia, T. Brooke Price

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Province Of The Law Of Tort, Edmund C. Dickinson Feb 1932

The Province Of The Law Of Tort, Edmund C. Dickinson

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Bailments - Parking Lots Feb 1932

Bailments - Parking Lots

Michigan Law Review

The defendant operated a parking lot in the business section of the city. There were two entrances and exits, the balance of the lot being enclosed by barriers. B parked his car on the lot, paying twenty-five cents and receiving a ticket which stated: "This ticket must be surrendered when car is taken from lot." Attendants were on duty at all times. It was the custom to leave all cars unlocked and at night to move them near a shack which was occupied by the attendants. The car was stolen, and in a suit against the defendant corporation it was …

Go to article

Conflict Of Laws-Admiralty -Torts In Territorial Waters Feb 1932

Conflict Of Laws-Admiralty -Torts In Territorial Waters

Michigan Law Review

A civil wrong having been committed on board a vessel in foreign territorial waters, the tort by hypothesis being maritime and the court having jurisdiction, the problem then arises as to what law governs the disposition of the case. Stated more specifically, does the nature of admiralty jurisdiction demand that a court, in determining liability for civil wrongs committed in foreign territorial waters, should ignore or modify well-settled principles of the conflict of laws as applied to delictual obligations? This is the point of departure for the discussion to follow.

Go to article

Torts - Malpractice - Master And Servant Feb 1932

Torts - Malpractice - Master And Servant

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff, on threat of discharge from employ of defendant in case of refusal, submitted to a physical examination by a physician retained by the defendant. In making the examination the physician negligently caused a hernia. Held, the suit was not barred by the one year period of limitation on actions for malpractice because no physician-patient relation had been established, there having been nothing more than an examination, and that for the sole benefit of the defendant. Defendant was liable for the acts of the physician on the basis of respondeat superior. New York Central R.R. v. Wiler …

Go to article

Torts - Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur As Applied To Foreign Matter In Foods Feb 1932

Torts - Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur As Applied To Foreign Matter In Foods

Michigan Law Review

The defendant manufactured and sold through a retailer a loaf of bread to the plaintiff's mother. The plaintiff, while eating the bread, saw a larva, five-eighths of an inch long in a slice she was about to eat, as a result of which she became sick. Held, on appeal, there was no error by the lower court in directing a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff gave no sufficient proof of negligence, which was the basis of her action, and that negligence could not be presumed from the circumstances stated. Swenson v. Purity Baking Co. …

Go to article

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper Jan 1932

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Proximate Cause, W. H. Dysard Jan 1932

Proximate Cause, W. H. Dysard

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Torts--Duty Of Storekeeper To Provide A Safe Place For Customers, James C. Lyne Jan 1932

Torts--Duty Of Storekeeper To Provide A Safe Place For Customers, James C. Lyne

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

First Prev Next Last