Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Cleveland State University (19)
- West Virginia University (13)
- University of Kentucky (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
-
- The University of Akron (8)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Selected Works (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- University of Missouri School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- West Virginia Law Review (13)
- Cleveland State Law Review (12)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (11)
- Villanova Law Review (10)
- Akron Law Review (8)
-
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (4)
- Journal of Law and Health (3)
- Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of Miami Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (2)
- Peter Zablotsky (2)
- San Diego Law Review (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- U.S. Supreme Court Briefs (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Andrew Popper (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- David Owen (1)
- Duquesne Law Review (1)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 130
Full-Text Articles in Law
Decoding U.S. Tort Liability In Healthcare's Black-Box Ai Era: Lessons From The European Union, Mindy Duffourc, Sara Gerke
Decoding U.S. Tort Liability In Healthcare's Black-Box Ai Era: Lessons From The European Union, Mindy Duffourc, Sara Gerke
Faculty Scholarly Works
The rapid development of sophisticated artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools in healthcare presents new possibilities for improving medical treatment and general health. Currently, such AI tools can perform a wide range of health-related tasks, from specialized autonomous systems that diagnose diabetic retinopathy to general-use generative models like ChatGPT that answer users’ health-related questions. On the other hand, significant liability concerns arise as medical professionals and consumers increasingly turn to AI for health information. This is particularly true for black-box AI because while potentially enhancing the AI’s capability and accuracy, these systems also operate without transparency, making it difficult or even impossible …
Fattening Food: Should Purveyors Of Fast Food Be Required To Warn? A Call For A New Tort, Charles E. Cantu
Fattening Food: Should Purveyors Of Fast Food Be Required To Warn? A Call For A New Tort, Charles E. Cantu
Journal of Food Law & Policy
Being overweight continues to be an important issue for many Americans. The latest diet fad is likely to include at least one title on the current bestseller list, and newspapers carry daily articles on the most recent study regarding risks related to obesity. Heeding these concerns, the federal government has added its own impetus by requiring the packaged food industry to list, not only nutritional information, but also calories. Individuals alleging injury and seeking recourse have made an attempt to place fault upon purveyors of fast food. To date, American jurisprudence has not helped. The courts have suggested that, from …
Strictly Speaking, What Needs To Change? A Review Of How Statutory Changes Could Bring Strict Products Liability To Virginia, Ryan C. Fowle
Strictly Speaking, What Needs To Change? A Review Of How Statutory Changes Could Bring Strict Products Liability To Virginia, Ryan C. Fowle
Law Student Publications
Virginia remains one of five states that refuse to adopt strict products liability. To date, the Supreme Court of Virginia has declined to follow the path Justice Traynor set out nearly a century ago, as its recent decisions confirm its resistance to strict liability. However, given the change in control of the General Assembly following the elections of 2017 and 2019, the General Assembly is in new hands and may remain that way for some time. This new legislative majority, among its plans for new policies, may soon consider establishing strict products liability by statute. In doing so, Virginia would …
Held Accountable: Should Gun Manufacturers Be Held Liable For The Criminal Use Of Their Products, Benjamin Caryan
Held Accountable: Should Gun Manufacturers Be Held Liable For The Criminal Use Of Their Products, Benjamin Caryan
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
This comment starts with a review of the most stringent laws currently enacted. After going over what is enacted, it will discuss the reasons given as to why gun manufacturers should be held liable and under what theories, including tort liability and public nuisance theories. Next, it will cover novel approaches to the strict liability, including arguments like negligent distribution, entrustment, and marketing. It will discuss similarities between the tobacco, automobile, and alcohol industry with the firearms industry. It will then go over how the recent push for gun legislation affected the sale and purchase of firearms. Lastly, to summarize, …
The Structure Of Torts, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
The Structure Of Torts, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Journal Articles
Tort law consists of a number of different causes of action which are seemingly unrelated except that all involve civil wrongs, other than mere breaches of contract. The various torts have different elements; some, like the nominate or intentional torts, very specific; others, like negligence, more general and vague. There is no apparent, coherent, or consistent structure applicable to all torts. This Article articulates just such a unified structure for all torts: one that arises out of and is based upon the elements of negligence. All torts involve the judicial delineation of the defendant's duty or legal obligation. All torts …
The Road To Autonomy, Michelle Sellwood
The Road To Autonomy, Michelle Sellwood
San Diego Law Review
[T]his Comment discusses the background of AI and robotics, the technology behind the autonomous vehicle, and the evolution of products liability laws. Part III examines current regulations, the benefits of autonomous technology, and the need for a definitive liability framework. Part IV discusses why current tort liability laws will be ineffective in governing autonomous vehicle liability by examining the shift in liability from the driver to the owner and manufacturer. Part V proposes a short-term solution by attributing liability to the programmer, while software is still hard-coded. Finally, Part VI explores legal personhood, and proposes that the autonomous vehicle be …
Mass Torts—Maturation Of Law And Practice, Paul D. Rheingold
Mass Torts—Maturation Of Law And Practice, Paul D. Rheingold
Pace Law Review
Mass tort litigation has been with us for about fifty years. This is dating the start from the MER/29 litigation in 1964. This field of law and practice has grown year after year, and it shows no sign of abating. At the same time, it can be said that this area of law and procedure has reached a mature stage; the practice is fairly standardized and earlier experiments have either become the model or have been abandoned.
The term “mass tort litigation” (MTL), as used in this article, confines itself to product liability personal injury cases involving similar injuries from …
Improving The Effectiveness Of South Korean Product Liability Including Punitive Damages: A Comparative Analysis Between The United States And South Korea, Minsung Kim
Maurer Theses and Dissertations
As South Korean Product Liability Act was revised to adopt the U.S. doctrine of punitive damages, there is a theoretical necessity of reviewing the relations between the theory of product liability and the U.S. doctrine of punitive damages. The theory of product liability is closely related to the strict liability but the doctrine of punitive damages has been developed to regulate malicious misconducts. Due to the different basic concepts, the strict liability and malicious misconducts, the theory of product liability might not include the doctrine of punitive damages. In addition to the compatibility issue, functions of the punitive damages are …
Taking A Second Look At Mdl Product Liability Settlements: Somebody Needs To Do It, Christopher B. Mueller
Taking A Second Look At Mdl Product Liability Settlements: Somebody Needs To Do It, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
This Article examines the forces that lead to the settlement of product liability cases gathered under the MDL statute for pretrial. The MDL procedure is ill-suited to this use, and does not envision the gathering of the underlying cases as a means of finally resolving them. Motivational factors affecting judges and lawyers have produced these settlements, and the conditions out of which they arise do not give confidence that they are fair or adequate. This Article concedes that MDL settlements are likely here to stay, and argues that we need a mechanism to check such settlements for fairness and adequacy. …
Discrimination And Business Regulation, Eileen Kaufman
Discrimination And Business Regulation, Eileen Kaufman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Product Liability Of Manufacturers: An Understanding And Exploration, Donald M. Jenkins
The Product Liability Of Manufacturers: An Understanding And Exploration, Donald M. Jenkins
Akron Law Review
The beginning point will be an examination of the existing theories of manufacturer's liability namely, negligence, contract warranty and strict liability. For example purposes, Ohio law will be used to illustrate the interpretative development of the law and its application. Ohio is a legitimate jurisdiction for this purpose. It has been a pace-setting jurisdiction in the development of the law and has arrived at the point of accepting the concept of strict liability for defective products. Furthermore, the evolution of product liability law in Ohio typifies the pattern that has occurred or is occurring in a majority of the other …
The Product Liability Of Manufacturers: An Understanding And Exploration, Donald M. Jenkins
The Product Liability Of Manufacturers: An Understanding And Exploration, Donald M. Jenkins
Akron Law Review
The evolution and application of product liability law in the past fifteen years represents one of the most dynamic developments in law.
The result of these rapid and violent developments has been to substantially increase the susceptibility of producers to suits by members of the public in direct actions. It was assumed the crest of the wave of expanded product liability was reached with the formulation of the legal principles set forth in Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of the Law of Torts. However, subsequent court actions proved this assumption to be invalid.
Manufacturer And Professional User's Liability For Defective Medical Equipment, Rosemary Rubin
Manufacturer And Professional User's Liability For Defective Medical Equipment, Rosemary Rubin
Akron Law Review
One particular area of product liability, however, has been slow to accept strict liability. In the field of medical devices and equipment the courts seem reluctant to find liability without a clear showing of negligence, whether the defendant is the doctor, the hospital, or the manufacturer of the product. In this paper the focus will be on the emerging law in this area regarding medical equipment made only for use by experts, including nurses, doctors, dentists, anesthesiologists, emergency personnel and hospitals. The discussion will exclude blood and drug cases for these lead to conclusions of their own. The concentration will …
A Case Of Judicial Chutzpah (The Judicial Adoption Of Strict Tort Products Liability Theory), Morris G. Shanker
A Case Of Judicial Chutzpah (The Judicial Adoption Of Strict Tort Products Liability Theory), Morris G. Shanker
Akron Law Review
[O]ur courts in discovering strict tort have indeed acted in rather unusual ways: ways which, I believe, can be explained only by realizing that we are dealing with those who have just discovered the gospel, who have just heard a message from on High. Let me give you some specific examples.
Liability For Product Design In Ohio - A First Step Toward Solution, Edgar A. Strause, James H. Hedden
Liability For Product Design In Ohio - A First Step Toward Solution, Edgar A. Strause, James H. Hedden
Akron Law Review
This article concerns an area of the law of strict liability in tort which is now emerging from an embryonic stage in Ohio - namely, a manufacturer's liability for conscious design choices in developing its product. It is the thesis of this article that in the recent case of Temple v. Wean United, Inc., the Ohio Supreme Court has taken a major step toward a solution to the inherent difficulties in passing judgment upon the reasonableness of a manufacturer's conscious design choices. In doing so, the court has simultaneously lessened the otherwise open-ended exposure of manufacturers to liability concerning …
Product Liability - Can It Kick The Smoking Habit?, William Kepko
Product Liability - Can It Kick The Smoking Habit?, William Kepko
Akron Law Review
This comment, divided into two major sections, will review the reasons for past inability to collect damages from the tobacco industry and explore possible theories of recovery that may be advanced in the new round of pending litigation.
A New Private Action In Products Liability: Swenson V. Emerson Electric Co., Stephen Griffin
A New Private Action In Products Liability: Swenson V. Emerson Electric Co., Stephen Griffin
Akron Law Review
By the late 1960's, statistics revealed that a total of twenty million people were injured or killed annually in consumer product-related accidents. Congress reacted by establishing a committee to investigate the adequacy of consumer protection against unreasonable risks caused by hazardous household products. This committee concluded that producers of hazardous products are in the best position to safeguard consumers against injury, but found that many producers lacked motivation to engage in meaningful self-regulation. Consequently, they recommended the creation of a federal regulatory agency.
Congress responded by enacting the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), and by establishing the Consumer Product Safety …
Cipollone V. Liggett Group, Inc.: A Preemptive Lucky Strike?, Christopher J. Gagin
Cipollone V. Liggett Group, Inc.: A Preemptive Lucky Strike?, Christopher J. Gagin
Akron Law Review
The gravamen of this casenote will focus on the Court's preemption analysis. Included in this examination will be the legislative and economic forces underlying the Court's conclusion that the 1965 Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act does not preempt all state common law tort actions against cigarette manufacturers.
Reflections On The Theory And Administration Of Strict Tort Liability For Defective Products, John Montgomery, David Owen
Reflections On The Theory And Administration Of Strict Tort Liability For Defective Products, John Montgomery, David Owen
David Owen
No abstract provided.
Requiem For A Remedy: The Law And Economics Of Mutual Pharmaceutical V. Bartlett’S Over-Preemption, Robert C. Baker Iii
Requiem For A Remedy: The Law And Economics Of Mutual Pharmaceutical V. Bartlett’S Over-Preemption, Robert C. Baker Iii
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Preemption Of State Law Claims Involving Medical Devices: Why Increasing Liability For Manufacturers Is A Perilous But Pivotal Proposition, Neil M. Issar
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
A circuit split regarding the preemptive scope of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA) has widened over the past several years. The split encompasses both the circumstances under which the MDA implicitly preempts state law claims and the scope of the MDA's express preemption provision. Manufacturers of medical devices regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enjoyed many years of favorable rulings on the issue of federal preemption and deference to the primacy of FDA jurisdiction on monitoring or enforcement actions. However, the circuit split is reshaping the litigation landscape, and injured plaintiffs may rely on certain Circuit …
"The Disorderly Conduct Of Words": Civil Liability For Injuries Caused By The Dissemination Of False Or Inaccurate Information, Richard C. Ausness
"The Disorderly Conduct Of Words": Civil Liability For Injuries Caused By The Dissemination Of False Or Inaccurate Information, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article is concerned with the potential liability of those who disseminate false or inaccurate information that causes physical injury or property damage to those who rely upon it. However, this Article will not address the question of whether those who advocate or depict violence or other antisocial activities should also be subject to liability. For the most part, such publications are considered to be a form of constitutionally protected speech, even when they directly cause physical harm to others. Although the issue of liability for the publication of factually inaccurate information is narrower in scope than liability for the …
Navigating Between Scylla And Charybdis: Preemption Of Medical Device “Parallel Claims”, Jean Eggen
Navigating Between Scylla And Charybdis: Preemption Of Medical Device “Parallel Claims”, Jean Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
The scope of federal preemption of state common law medical device claims has been vigorously debated since the Medical Device Amendments were enacted in 1976. Currently, a hot-button topic is the extent to which either express or implied preemption may bar state device claims that parallel duties imposed by the federal government’s Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The author analyzes a selection of recent lower court cases in light of Congressional intent and Supreme Court precedent. This article provides some guiding principles to achieve greater consistency and predictability in parallel claim preemption decisions. The author then concludes that preemption doctrine …
Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities Of Artificial Beings And Legal Fictions , Douglas S. Anderson
Corporate Homicide: The Stark Realities Of Artificial Beings And Legal Fictions , Douglas S. Anderson
Pepperdine Law Review
In the aftermath of one of the most highly publicized trials in product liability annals-the celebrated Pinto case-the legal question raised by that litigation remains unresolved. Controversy continues as to whether a corporation should be convicted of homicide when it knowingly markets an unsafe product that results in death. Today the answer is a resounding "no", in light of state statutes defining homicide as the killing of one human being by another, difficulties in finding the requisite criminal intent; and the practical problems of placing a legal fiction behind bars. However, there are recent indications that these present obstacles to …
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress, Andrew F. Popper
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress, Andrew F. Popper
Andrew Popper
Whatever happened to H.R. 4678, The Foreign Manufacturers Legal Accountability Act? While at first the bill looked like it would sail through, vocal and well-funded opposition from foreign manufacturers and their U.S. representatives placed its future in doubt – and ultimately killed the bill. Gross sales of foreign manufactured goods in the U.S. exceed two trillion dollars annually. Conservatively, there are tens of millions of defective, dangerous, and in some instances deadly goods produced abroad for sale in U.S. markets (e.g., Chinese dry-wall, toxic levels of lead paint on toys, contaminated pet food, allegedly lurching cars, infant cribs that to …
Does Product Liability Make Us Safer?, W. Kip Viscusi
Does Product Liability Make Us Safer?, W. Kip Viscusi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Product liability law is intended to create an environment that fosters safer products. However, this law often has adverse consequences. Some of the problems stem from the inherent nature of product risk decisions and the function of tort liability, while others may derive from individuals’ cognitive limitations and inability to think properly about balancing risk and cost. This paper examines both types of problems and summarizes relevant academic literature.
Limits On Preemption And Punitive Damages: Can They Be Related?, Peter Zablotsky
Limits On Preemption And Punitive Damages: Can They Be Related?, Peter Zablotsky
Peter Zablotsky
No abstract provided.
The Appropriate Role Of Plaintiff Misuse In Products Liability Causes Of Action, Peter Zablotsky
The Appropriate Role Of Plaintiff Misuse In Products Liability Causes Of Action, Peter Zablotsky
Peter Zablotsky
No abstract provided.
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress, Andrew F. Popper
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress, Andrew F. Popper
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Whatever happened to H.R. 4678, The Foreign Manufacturers Legal Accountability Act? While at first the bill looked like it would sail through, vocal and well-funded opposition from foreign manufacturers and their U.S. representatives placed its future in doubt – and ultimately killed the bill. Gross sales of foreign manufactured goods in the U.S. exceed two trillion dollars annually. Conservatively, there are tens of millions of defective, dangerous, and in some instances deadly goods produced abroad for sale in U.S. markets (e.g., Chinese dry-wall, toxic levels of lead paint on toys, contaminated pet food, allegedly lurching cars, infant cribs that to …
How Many Times Must The Question Be Answered? The Application Of The Learned Intermediary Doctrine In The Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, Stacey Leffler Ravetta
How Many Times Must The Question Be Answered? The Application Of The Learned Intermediary Doctrine In The Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, Stacey Leffler Ravetta
Golden Gate University Law Review
This Note begins with a general discussion of failure to warn causes of action and the application of the learned intermediary doctrine thereto. Further, Part II discusses cases essential to understanding the background of the Norplant Litigation. Next, Parts III and IV explain the facts and procedural history underlying the Norplant Litigation. Part V first examines the federal district court's analysis of the case. It then discusses the Fifth Circuit's analysis of the federal district court's summary judgment ruling in AHP's favor. Part VI examines the federal district court's pivotal decision to apply the learned intermediary doctrine to the plaintiffs' …