Law Commons^™

Book Notes, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Law of Torts By Fowler V. Harper and Fleming James, Jr. Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1956. Pp. xiv, 2062. $60.00.

This treatise is a valuable and significant contribution to Tort law.It is composed of two volumes of text and a third volume containing tables of cases, statutes and articles, and an index.

========================================

Management Rights and the Arbitration Process

Edited by Jean T. McKelvey. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 1956. Pp. viii,237. $3.50. This is a collection of the papers delivered at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Arbitrators held in January,1956. They include treatments …

Torts - Federal Tort Claims Act - Liability Of United States For Negligence Of Government Firemen, James M. Porter S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States for damages resulting from the negligence of the United States Forest Service in combating a fire that destroyed plaintiff's property. The Forest Service had entered into an agreement with the State of Washington to prevent and suppress any fires in the area in which plaintiff's land was situated. The federal district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and the court of appeals affirmed. On certiorari, to the United States Supreme Court, held, judgment vacated and case remanded to the district …

Required Joinder Of Claims, Dieter L. Hoegen

Michigan Law Review

In review we can say that within a comparatively broad field of the American law required joinder of claims is the rule. There are some exceptions. The German law has no rule of compulsory joinder of claims. Here, there are some exceptions, too. In this sense and within a field which is marked out by the American rule and the German exceptions, the relationship of rule and exceptions is reversed in the two systems.

Regulation Of Business - Robinson-Patman Act - Injury To Competition Between Buyers Of Auto Parts, A. Duncan Whitaker S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner manufactured and sold automobile parts to distributors who resold them to jobbers in interstate commerce. The products were classified into three lines: leaf spring line, coil action line, and piston ring line. A progressive, cumulative discount was given in each line, based upon the aggregate yearly purchases of either a single buyer or a group-buying organization. The Federal Trade Commission charged petitioner with price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Every customer who testified at the hearing denied that he had been injured competitively by the petitioner's pricing practices. Nevertheless, in view of the substantial price differentials, the …

Defamation Via Television Ad Lib; Libel And Slander Distinctions, Harold M. Halpern

Buffalo Law Review

Shor v. Billingsley, 158 N. Y. S. 2d 476 (Sup. Ct. 1957).

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

RECENT CASES

AGENCY--INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR--"ONE WAY LEASE" EFFECTIVE TO TERMINATE RELATIONSHIP

====================================

COURTS--CIVIL RIGHTS ACT--IMMUNITY OF JUDGE FOR ACTS COMMITTED IN THE EXERCISE OF A JUDICIAL FUNCTION

====================================

COURTS--CONTEMPT--VIOLATION OF COURT RULE BANNING PHOTOGRAPHY

====================================

CRIMINAL LAW--ENTRAPMENT BY STATE OFFICIAL AS A DEFENSE TO FEDERAL PROSECUTION

====================================

DAMAGES--BREACH OF WARRANTY--RECOVERY FOR LOSS OF PROFITS

====================================

FEDERAL COURTS--CHOICE OF LAW--APPLICATION OF ERIE DOCTRINE TO DIVERSITY CASES INVOLVING FEDERAL COMMERCIAL PAPER

====================================

TORTS--BATTERY--CONSENT OF MINOR TO SIMPLE OPERATION AS A DEFENSE

====================================

TORTS--DUTY TO ACT--EMPLOYER'S ASSUMPTION OF A DUTY BY GIVING MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS TO EMPLOYEES

====================================

Contributory Negligence--Instructions, L. L. P.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Negligence--Res Ipsa Loquitor--Use Denied Gratuitous Guest Passenger In Action Against Driver Of Motor Vehicle, C. H. B. Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Required Joinder Of Claims, Dieter L. Hoegen

Michigan Law Review

This comparative study is confined to the situation of one claimant against one claimee. The principles which will be considered seem to be rather well settled both in the American and the German law. The fact, however, that besides many a common result we shall find fundamental differences in the pertinent basic concepts of the American and German systems makes the discussion worthwhile. It may, at least, promote a reconsideration of the propriety of those concepts.

Aviation Law - Tort Liability For Damage To Persons Or Property On The Ground - Res Ipsa Loquitur, Allan L. Bioff

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff's fishing vessel was struck and sunk by a practice bomb released from a Marine Corps aircraft. An action was brought against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Plaintiff could produce no proof of negligence on the part of the government. Held, recovery allowed. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable. Goodwin v. United States, (E.D. N.C. 1956) 141 F. Supp. 445.

Civil Procedure - Joinder Of Statutory Causes Of Action With Common Law Negligence Where There Are Different Parties Defendant, George W. Marti

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for injuries received in an automobile accident caused by defendant's negligence in driving while intoxicated. She sought to join with this claim actions against several bar owners under a statute providing for liability of bar owners for injuries caused by one to whom they had unlawfully sold alcoholic beverages. One of the defendant bar owners moved to dismiss for misjoinder or to compel an election of causes on the ground that since only compensatory damages could be recovered against the defendant-consumer upon common law negligence, and both exemplary and compensatory damages could be recovered …

Evaluation And Settlement Of A Personal Injury Claim For Damages, George E. Allen

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Personal Injury Litigation: Settlement Or Trial, From The Defense Point Of View, J. A. Gooch

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Admirality - Jurisdiction - Action For Wrongful Death On The High Seas Limited To Admiralty, Robert Knauss S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff as widow and administratrix seeks damages from the United States for the alleged wrongful death of her husband on the high seas. Action was brought at law under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Government's motion to dismiss was sustained. There is no common law cause of action for wrongful death on the high seas. The federal Death on the High Seas Act gives a remedy to the representative only "in Admiralty," and thus jurisdiction is lacking at law in the district court. Kunkel v. United States, (S.D. Cal. 1956) 140 F. Supp. 591.

Husband And Wife - Right Of Wife To Sue For Loss Of Consortium Due To Negligent Injury To Husband, James M. Porter S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought an action for loss of consortium with her husband, allegedly due to defendant's negligent injury of the husband. In a prior suit the husband's cause of action against the defendant had been settled and dismissed with prejudice. The trial court dismissed the present suit for failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, held, reversed. The wife has a valuable property right of consortium. Iowa statutes pertaining to the rights of married women clearly indicate the intent of the legislature to remove the common law bar of coverture that prevented a wife from maintaining an action …

Master And Servant - Independent Contractor - Inherent Danger Exception, Jerome K. Walsh, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was a home-owner whose home was fumigated by an independent contractor. Plaintiff was the administrator of the estate of a water softener service man, who entered the home and was overcome by the cyanide gas used in the operation. It was agreed by the parties that the contractor was negligent in failing to lock all entrances to the home, and in not posting warnings at all entrances. Plaintiffs request to charge the jury that the work was inherently dangerous was refused. The court instructed the jury to determine whether or not the defendant had used due care in selecting …

Torts - Unauthorized Autopsy - Non-Survival Of Action, Lee H. Snyder

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff's husband was struck and killed by a motorbus owned and operated by defendant municipality. The body was removed to a hospital maintained by defendant. Subsequently, at the request and direction of a physician employed by defendant, an autopsy was performed, apparently to determine whether the deceased had been drinking. During the examination certain organs were removed and destroyed. Plaintiff brought an action for damages on the ground that the mutilation was done without her consent and in violation of her legal right to the possession of the body. Plaintiff died while the action was pending, and her administrator continued …

Admiralty - Collision - Duty Of Third Vessel To Give Warning, Michael Scott

Michigan Law Review

Washington, a private merchantman proceeding north at night through a large United States Navy formation steaming west, received no warning from formation commanders that Ruchamkin, an escort, was rejoining from the east. Uninformed of Washington's presence and ordered to resume station expeditiously, Ruchamkin entered the formation at high speed. Despite late radical maneuvers upon discovery of Washington close aboard, Ruchamkin was struck by the latter's bow with resulting damage to both ships. On reciprocal libels, held, decree for Washington's owner. In addition to Ruchamkin's failure to anticipate Washington, the United States was negligent in that the …

Negligence - Duty Of Care - Liability Of Builder And Architect To Third Party, Raymond J. Dittrich

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff, an infant, fell from the back porch of an apartment leased by his parents from a housing authority. The plaintiff brought actions for negligence against the architect who designed the dwelling, the builder who constructed it, and the housing authority which leased it, alleging that the back porch was so designed and constructed as to create a dangerous condition for the users thereof. The trial court dismissed the complaints against the builder and the architect. On appeal, held, reversed. Despite the lack of privity between the builder and the architect and the plaintiff, a good cause of …

Torts—Testamentary Libel, Hugh Russ Jr.

Buffalo Law Review

Brown v. Dufrey, 1 N. Y. 2d 190, 134 N. E. 2d 469 (1956).

Torts—False Arrest, Hugh Russ Jr.

Buffalo Law Review

Squadrito v. Griebsch, 1 N. Y. 2d. 471, 136 N. E. 2d. 504 (1956).

Torts—Instructions To Jury, Tamara Pasichniak

Buffalo Law Review

Cosby v. City of Rochester, 1 N. Y. 2d 396, 135 N. E. 2d 706 (1956).

Medical-Legal Relations - The Brighter Side, C. Joseph Stetler

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Torts—Hospital Immunity From Tort Liability, Hugh Russ Jr.

Buffalo Law Review

Berg v. N. Y. Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled, 1 N. Y. 2d 499, 136 N. E. 2d 523 (1956).

Comparative Negligence: The Pennsylvania Proposal, Thomas J. O'Toole

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Torts - Charitable Immunity As A Screen To Insurer's Liability - Gorman V. St. Paul Fire Ins. Co., Carl A. Durkee

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nuisance Based On Aesthetic Considerations - Feldstein V. Kammauf, Roy Dragone

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Respondeat Superior In "Shoplifting" Cases - Safeway Stores V. Barrack, David R. Stambaugh

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Torts - Guest Statute - Carpools, Ross Kipka S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a passenger, and defendant's decedent, the driver on the day in question, were two of six members of a carpool, each of whom drove every six.th day from the town where they all lived to the place of their common employment, thereby effecting a saving to each of approximately five dollars per week. As a result of a collision due to ordinary negligence of the driver, plaintiff was injured and sued for damages, alleging that he was not a guest passenger. The court submitted to the jury the question of whether plaintiff was a passenger for hire or a …

Property Torts Between Spouses And Use During Marriage Of The Matrimonial Home Owned By The Other, William E. Mccurdy

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.