Law Commons^™

Compensation Reform: Accident Costs, And Traffic Safety: Toward A Unified Motor Transport Policy, Phillip C. Thorpe

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"Substantial Compliance" With Municipal Tort Notice Requirements: Galbreath V. City Of Indianapolis, H. Andrew Sonneborn

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

An Action Based On Strict Tort Liability Is Maintainable Against The Hospital That Furnished Blood Contaminated With Hepatitis To Patient., Jerry G. Duterroil

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Civil Liability For Causing Suicide: A Synthesis Of Law And Psychiatry, Victor E. Schwartz

Vanderbilt Law Review

If suicide is a deliberate, intentional act by an individual, how can one person be "civilly liable for causing the suicide of another"? The paradox suggested by this question has caused many courts to shy away from imposing civil liability for causing suicide.' In certain situations,however, a growing number of courts are permitting recovery. Since suicide is on the increase both in numerical terms and in rank as a cause of death in the United States it can be expected that even more tort claims will be brought by parties attempting to fix civil responsibility on someone other than their …

The Statute Of Limitations Does Not Begin To Run Against The Right To Recover From A Treating Physician For Malpractice Involving A Misdiagnosis Until The Injured Patient Knows Or Should Have Known Of The Physician's Negligence., Gary B. Weiser

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Intended Use Doctrine: Cautionary Labeling Is Both Permitted And Required By The Statute And Prohibition Of Sales In Toy Stores Or Store Departments Dealing Predominantly In Toys Or Children's Articles Is A Reasonable Method To Assure Against Use By Children Not Likely To Heed Warnings For Safe Use., Robert Morrison

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Torts--Application Of Last Clear Judgement

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Torts - Emotional Distress, Eric Pearson

Duquesne Law Review

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a cause of action exists for mental distress resulting from the wanton and wilful conduct of causing indignities to a corpse.

Papieves v. Kelly, 437 Pa. 373, 263 A.2d 118 (1970).

Illinois School Tort Immunity: 1959 To The Present, Michael A. Cotteleer

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Products Liability - Hospitals Held Strictly Liable In Tort For The Transfusion Of Hepatitis Infected Blood, David L. Tomchin

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Admiralty - Unseaworthiness - An Isolated Act Of Operational Negligence Does Not Constitute An Unseaworthy Condition And Cannot Render A Ship Instantaneously Unseaworthy, N.R. Powers

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Negligence And Liability Without Fault In Tort Law, Cornelius J. Peck

Washington Law Review

Though negligence is emphasized as a basis for determining liability in tort law, Professor Peck points out that liability without fault has always played a major role in that area and, in fact, underlies most torts which are recognized today. After examining these types of torts and distilling some general principles governing the application of liability without fault, he concludes that these principles are also applicable to automobile accident litigation, thus predicting the demise of negligence as a principle of liability in that field.

Damages From Slip And Fall Injuries, Gibson B. Witherspoon

Cleveland State Law Review

The doctrine of assumption of risk as applied to icy sidewalks and store entrances contain the following elements: (1) Knowledge and appreciation of the danger, (2) The existence of a reasonable alternative route; (3) A voluntary election to encounter danger.

Punitive Damages In Wrongful Death, Gary N. Holthus

Cleveland State Law Review

Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, smart money, or vindictive damages, are damages awarded to a plaintiff on a finding of malicious, fraudulent, willful, wanton, or reckless conduct by a defendant, indifferent to the rights and safety of others. The purpose of exemplary damages is to protect the public from reckless, willful acts and to punish the wrongdoer

Wife's Action For Loss Of Consortium, Fred Weisman

Cleveland State Law Review

The recent Ohio Supreme Court ruling in Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac Inc. reversed a rule which had existed in Ohio for over fifty years. Ohio has now been added to the growing list of states which allow to a wife an action for damages for loss of consortium arising from negligent injury to her husband.

Abuse Of Process - A Misunderstood Concept, Charles G. Bretz Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

The courts of Ohio have said that there is no difference between an action for abuse of process and one for malicious prosecution. Other jurisdictions likewise have had trouble distinguishing the two torts. Apparently, this is because the term has been used to describe a variety of dissimilar situations which are alike only in that there has been actionable injury as a result of the improper use of a legal process. To a lesser extent, the confusion may also have resulted from the varying terms used to describe the two actions, coupled with the imprecise use of the terms by …

Automotive "Crashworthiness:" An Untenable Doctrine, Stephen J. Werber

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

It is the purpose of this article to review the decisional law of automobile crashworthiness and to place it in the context of important policy considerations which justify such judicial determinations. It will be shown that the great majority of these decisions are entirely consistent with the doctine of "strict tort liability" as enunciated in section 402A of the Restatement of Torts, Second; that the questions sought to be submitted to juries in these cases are properly the subject of highly technical and complex legislative and administrative action on both a state and federal level; and that the few decisions …

Tort Liability Of Teachers And Administrators For Negligent Conduct Toward Pupils, Reynolds C. Seitz

Cleveland State Law Review

The real reason for this article is found in the recognition that good law is generally a guide to good conduct. School people ought to know as much about what the law dictates in respect to conduct toward children under their supervision as they know about the teachings of psychology. Before getting directly into the discussion, it seems appropriate to stress that there is nothing in tort law which makes teachers or admin- istrators the insurers of the safety of children. Accidents will continue to happen which cause injury to children in school. If, however, the teacher or administrator has …

Automobile Crashworthiness: An Untenable Doctrine, Michael Hoenig, Stephen J. Werber

Cleveland State Law Review

Unobtrusively, but with increasing frequency, the courts are rejecting a theory of liability being vigorously advanced by some members of the plaintiffs' bar with the apparent intent of opening up a vast new source of contingent fee income. The theory, variously labelled as "crashworthiness" or the "second collision" doctrine seeks to impose common-law liability upon the automobile industry for injurious consequences- of automobile collisions despite the fact that no defect or mal- function in the vehicle causes the mishap.

Contributory Negligence Of Very Young Children, James B. Wilkens

Cleveland State Law Review

If in backing your car out of a driveway you look to only one side as you approach the sidewalk, and strike and injure a pedestrian approaching from the other side, who had been so engrossed in conversation with a companion as not to have cast even a glance up the driveway, your liability for his injuries might well depend upon his age. The standard of care required (in most circumstances) of normal adults (and corporations) for the protection of themselves and of others is that they take such care as ordinary prudent persons would take in the circumstances. Little, …

Impact Trauma As Legal Cause Of Cancer, Donald J. Ladanyi

Cleveland State Law Review

Consider the following hypothetical situation: A voluptuous blonde is window shopping along New York's fashionable Fifth Avenue. Her trek brings her to a corner street intersection which she begins to cross. A recklessly driven automobile careens around the corner and strikes the defenseless blonde pedestrian amidships, causing her to be hurled against a utility pole. Her breast strikes the pole and absorbs the full effect of the impact. A local hospital determines that her injuries consist of only a black and blue bruise spot on her breast. The swelling, due to the injury, subsides and the discoloration disappears within a …

Duty To Light Exterior Of Premises, Ralph J. Rosenthal

Cleveland State Law Review

This paper will discuss the impact of lighting upon crime and crime prevention; and propose that there be recognized a general common law duty upon landowners to exercise reasonable care to maintain the means of ingress and egress to their property, over which they retain control, adequately lighted; and be liable for personal injuries due to inadequate lighting. For the purposes of this paper, distinctions among the various classes of entrants upon land, i.e., trespassers, licensees, invitees, etc., will not be considered as material. In part it is beyond the scope of this paper, and in part it is due …

Limitless Horizons Of Limited Policies Of Insurance, Harry H. Lipsig

Cleveland State Law Review

Limited policies have limitless horizons due to the selfishness of insurers. Why should insurers accept settlement offers that are close to the policy limits? After all, in most instances the insurers have nothing to lose except the insureds' money. Gambling with insureds' funds has led many to suggest that insurers be absolutely liable for all excess judgments subsequent to a rejection of settlement.

Delay In Notice Of Tort Claim Against A Government Agency, William P. Farrall

Cleveland State Law Review

Despite an onslaught of criticism and a rationale predicated on the discredited doctrine of Divine Right of Kings, the rule of sovereign immunity still exists in many states. As a result of this anachronism, municipalities and other subdivisions of state government have continued to escape liability for the tortious conduct of their agents. This situation has persisted despite a tendency by the courts to restrict rather than extend the principle of immunity. Statutory enactments such as short term notice provisions applied against potential plaintiffs by states and their subdivisions, when strictly construed by the courts, have had the effect of …

Malpractice Actions Without Expert Medical Testimony, William P. Gibbons

Cleveland State Law Review

Fear of malpractice actions against them is causing physicians to "run scared." Some physicians now say that they feel that the threat of legal action has materially altered the practice of medicine. Defensively, some medical doctors say that they are ordering additional X-rays and lab tests, just to have them on record. Others say they are just plain afraid to try new techniques and diagnostic treatments because of the specter of a malpractice action. Innovative techniques carry additional risks, and some doctors admit that in some risky situations they merely do what will keep them out of trouble rather than …

Set-Off Under Uninsured Motorist's Coverage, Leon M. Plevin

Cleveland State Law Review

The limits of liability under uninsured motorist coverage are fixed either by policy provisions or by statute. ... These various indemnity provisions were created so as to effectively limit any payments made by the insurance carrier under the uninsured motorist endorsement in combination with any other sources of indemnification to the maximum limit of the uninsured motorist coverage. The intent of the insurance underwriter is to limit its payment under the uninsured motorist coverage to the minimum amount where the insured is indemnified or partially indemnified from more than one source. The scope of this paper will specifically be concerned …

Chiropractors As Expert Medical Witnesses, Ronald J. Zele

Cleveland State Law Review

This paper examines the rules of evidence concerning the admissibility of testimony of chiropractors as expert medical witnesses.

The Federal Tort Claims Act: A Substantive Survey, Robert N. Johnson

University of Richmond Law Review

The enactment of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) on August 2, 1946, provided the most comprehensive waiver of sovereign immunity encountered in the Federal Claims System.

The Erosion Of Lex Loci Delicti: Toward A More Rational Choice Of Tort Law

University of Richmond Law Review

Man is a gregarious animal. As such, he has historically sought the company of other men. He has organized his world into innumerable units-each with its own boundaries, each with its own laws. Once, when immobility and relative isolation characterized his existence, few legal complications arose from the policy differences that had been translated into the laws of his governments. His choice of law rules were relatively simple, predictable, and rigid. But as technology made Cairo as accessible as California-made international communication almost as practical as local conversation-the consequences of human interaction involved in- creasing interstate and international elements.

Imprisonment Of Indigent Defendants For Nonpayment Of Fines

University of Richmond Law Review

The use of fines as a criminal sanction has been a part of Anglo-American law for over six hundred years. From the inception of this penalty, however, law making bodies have had to deal with the convicted criminal who fails or refuses to pay the fine imposed upon him. The early non-paying offender faced being sold into slavery unless the necessary funds could be produced by family or friends. From such early remedies for default our present more civilized alternative of imprisonment arose.