Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Elections (7)
- Separation of powers (5)
- United States Congress (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Filibuster (3)
-
- Racism (3)
- 1972-1974 (2)
- Article III (2)
- Barack Obama (2)
- Bush v. Gore (2)
- Cloture (2)
- Democracy (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Great Britain (2)
- Implicit racial bias (2)
- Parliament (2)
- Political patronage (2)
- Public confidence in the Supreme Court (2)
- Senate (2)
- Sovereignty (2)
- Supreme Court decisionmaking (2)
- Supreme Court nominees (2)
- Watergate Affair (2)
- 2016 U.S. Presidential election (1)
- ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (1)
- ALI (1)
- Abraham Lincoln (1)
- Access to courts (1)
- Administrative Procedures (1)
- Administrative State (1)
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, Roger C. Cramton
On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Crisis In Legal Services For The Poor, Roger C. Cramton
Crisis In Legal Services For The Poor, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Screening Judicial Candidates For Election, W. David Curtiss
Screening Judicial Candidates For Election, W. David Curtiss
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Lessons Of Watergate, Roger C. Cramton
Lessons Of Watergate, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Reapportionment Cases: Cognitive Lag, The Malady And Its Cure, E. F. Roberts, Paul T. Shultz Iii
The Reapportionment Cases: Cognitive Lag, The Malady And Its Cure, E. F. Roberts, Paul T. Shultz Iii
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The reapportionment cases have been considered by many to be the product of a liberal, activist Court which is endeavoring to reshape America’s political life according to its own views. The authors of this article assert that, to the contrary, the Court actually is reacting to the incontrovertible fact of the modern predominance of urban complexities which have rendered inappropriate our older political boundaries. In this sense, they consider the Court’s decisions conservative rather than liberal- because the Court’s purpose is to maintain a version of federalism along state boundaries which may have become outmoded even before the Court entered …
Paradoxes In Law Enforcement, E. F. Roberts
Paradoxes In Law Enforcement, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.