Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (885)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (858)
- University of Michigan Law School (385)
- Seattle University School of Law (309)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (309)
-
- UIC School of Law (290)
- University of New Mexico (255)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (226)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (226)
- University of Colorado Law School (212)
- Georgetown University Law Center (204)
- American University Washington College of Law (176)
- BLR (175)
- Pepperdine University (167)
- Barry University School of Law (166)
- Notre Dame Law School (165)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (158)
- University of Georgia School of Law (138)
- Universitas Indonesia (132)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (125)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (122)
- University of Miami Law School (116)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (116)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (108)
- New York Law School (105)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (104)
- Brooklyn Law School (103)
- Fordham Law School (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (97)
- Cornell University Law School (96)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (1406)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (397)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- Supreme Court (268)
- Constitutional law (223)
-
- Constitution (208)
- Constitutional Law (208)
- Judges (190)
- Law (186)
- United States Supreme Court (182)
- Courts (143)
- First Amendment (132)
- Judicial review (126)
- Law and Society (113)
- Legislation (111)
- Legal History (102)
- Legal theory (97)
- Statutory interpretation (96)
- Inc. (87)
- Justice (87)
- Criminal law (84)
- Due process (83)
- Federalism (82)
- Originalism (81)
- Evidence (80)
- Fourteenth Amendment (76)
- Legal history (76)
- International Law (75)
- Federal courts (72)
- Discrimination (71)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (856)
- Cardozo Law Review (483)
- Faculty Scholarship (406)
- Articles (300)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (297)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (294)
- UIC Law Review (277)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (253)
- Michigan Law Review (247)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (198)
- Publications (198)
- Touro Law Review (171)
- ExpressO (170)
- Scholarly Works (159)
- Journal Articles (128)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (122)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (118)
- Barry Law Review (109)
- Faculty Publications (99)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (95)
- Journal of Legal Education (91)
- Pepperdine Law Review (86)
- UAEU Law Journal (80)
- Akron Law Review (79)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (74)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (72)
- Northwestern University Law Review (72)
- Maine Law Review (70)
- Publication Type
Articles 8641 - 8670 of 9249
Full-Text Articles in Law
Authority And Autonomy: The State, The Individual And The Family, M. David Gelfand
Authority And Autonomy: The State, The Individual And The Family, M. David Gelfand
University of Miami Law Review
This commentary focuses primarily upon the views expressed by Justice Rehnquist in his de Hirsch Meyer lecture. The author argues that a corollary to Justice Rehnquist's view that the judiciary should defer to the authority of private institutions over the individual, to protect those institutions, would be to adopt a judicial attitude of supporting private institutions against legislative interference. An examination of Justice Rehnquist's judicial opinions in the area of constitutional family law reveals exactly the opposite position. The author concludes that Justice Rehnquist's position of judicial deference to legislative decisions over the family may lead to destruction of the …
The Judging Class, Kenneth M. Casebeer
The Judging Class, Kenneth M. Casebeer
University of Miami Law Review
The author traces the common thread running through the analysis of judicial review by the symposium speakers. He posits that while all three speakers support equally activist positions, their allegiance to divergent values and political theories results in their opposed statements on the activist debate. He compares the dialogue in this symposium to that of the Justices in the 1940's, which discourse explicitly was grounded in a struggle over values. The author concludes that courts must structure the form of their opinions in a manner which clearly demonstrates the relationship between the chosen social values and the resulting decision.
The Adversary Society: Keynote Address Of The Third Annual Baron De Hirsch Meyer Lecture Series, William H. Rehnquist
The Adversary Society: Keynote Address Of The Third Annual Baron De Hirsch Meyer Lecture Series, William H. Rehnquist
University of Miami Law Review
In recent years litigants have pressed the courts to resolve disputes which were formerly regulated by other social and political institutions. Mr. Justice Rehnquist stresses the crucial importance of nongovernmental institutions in our society. He discusses the need to evaluate the disruptive effect of an adversary proceeding between parties who must continue in an ongoing relationship after their dispute has been settled. The author then suggests that in order to preserve certain social institutions, limits must be placed on the use of adversary proceedings.
Seven Pluralist Fallacies: In Defense Of The Adversary Process-A Reply To Justice Rehnquist, Laurence H. Tribe
Seven Pluralist Fallacies: In Defense Of The Adversary Process-A Reply To Justice Rehnquist, Laurence H. Tribe
University of Miami Law Review
The author analyzes the role of litigation in a pluralistic society through his discussion of the "pluralist's fallacies," seven characteristic errors underlying much opposition to judicial activism. He advocates a large and active role for the adversary process in order to ensure that less established groups have a forum in which to protect their interests.
The Right To Counsel In Police Interrogation Cases: Miranda And Williams, Mitchell Leibson Chyette
The Right To Counsel In Police Interrogation Cases: Miranda And Williams, Mitchell Leibson Chyette
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article will consider some of the theoretical and practical ramifications of the Williams decision and compare its protections to the protections offered by Miranda. The article, focussing on the right to counsel, discusses the nature of the police conduct which is prohibited by each decision, the time at which the protections involved become effective, and the standard by which a waiver of the rights will be measured. The article concludes that there may be significant differences in the application of the two cases and that a uniform rule based on the sixth amendment may be superior to the …
Glosses On Dworkin: Rights, Principles, And Policies, Donald H. Regan
Glosses On Dworkin: Rights, Principles, And Policies, Donald H. Regan
Articles
A great many people have attempted to explain what is wrong with the views of Ronald Dworkin. So many, indeed, that one who read only the critics might wonder why views so widely rejected have received so much attention. One reason is that, whatever may be wrong in Dworkin's theories, there is a good deal that is right in them. But what is right is not always clear. Important passages in Dworkin can be distressingly obscure, or tantalizingly incomplete. This essay is a set of loosely connected observations on themes from Dworkin. While I shall add some criticisms of my …
Reflections On A Unified Theory Of Motive, Theodore Eisenberg
Reflections On A Unified Theory Of Motive, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This report should be viewed as a beginning. It explores from one perspective the operation of the federal rules governing discovery as revealed in more than 7,000 docketed requests appearing in more than 3,000 terminated cases in six United States district courts, (A survey of practitioners in the six districts suggests that the docketed requests cover the great bulk of discovery activity.) The report is a continuation of the Center's District court studies Project, the first report of which (Case Management and Court Management in United States District Court) appeared several months ago.
The Implications Of "Resegregation" For Judicially Imposed School Segregation Remedies, Charles T. Clotfelter
The Implications Of "Resegregation" For Judicially Imposed School Segregation Remedies, Charles T. Clotfelter
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article examines the implications of changing racial patterns--particularly those tending to resegregate schools--as they bear on the formulation of judicial remedies for school segregation. The Article considers both the effect of changing residential racial patterns upon racial patterns in schools and the effect of school desegregation upon the level of white enrollment. A third question that also may be relevant in this connection concerns the extent to which the possible existence of such resegregation constitutes a legitimate consideration in school desegregation cases. For example,fourteenth amendment requirements may render white flight a wholly irrelevant factor in some desegregation cases. This …
The Eighteenth-Century Background Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, William E. Nelson
The Eighteenth-Century Background Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, William E. Nelson
Michigan Law Review
This analysis of Marshall's constitutional jurisprudence avoids the pitfalls of previous theories. It does not see the Federalist political program as the source of Marshall's constitutional doctrines and thus does not need to explain how Marshall qualified his political principles or how he convinced non-Federalist judges to accept them. Instead, this essay argues that legal, not political, principles underlay Marshall's jurisprudence, but it attempts to understand those principles in a manner consistent with the unavoidable twentieth-century assumption that law is a body of flexible rules responsive to social reality rather than a series of immutable, unambiguous doctrines derived from a …
Hardin And Medvid: A Change In Indiana's Entrapment Law, Michael Hyatte
Hardin And Medvid: A Change In Indiana's Entrapment Law, Michael Hyatte
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Toward Freedom From Value, Richard Stith
Toward Freedom From Value, Richard Stith
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Confessions Of Judgement In Illinois: The Need For Change Persists, Cindy F. Wile
Confessions Of Judgement In Illinois: The Need For Change Persists, Cindy F. Wile
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Irvin C. Rutter, Gordon A. Christenson
Irvin C. Rutter, Gordon A. Christenson
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Tribute to legal scholar, Irvin Rutter.
Truthfulness And Tragedy (Book Review), Thomas L. Shaffer
Truthfulness And Tragedy (Book Review), Thomas L. Shaffer
Journal Articles
This is the third book in which Professor Stanley Hauerwas has developed his "story" approach to Christian ethics. It is a collection of essays, almost all of which appeared in periodicals, written while he was developing his theory more systematically in Vision and Virtue (1974), and in Character and the Christian Life (1975). One of the chapters here, on suicide and euthanasia, was written with Dr. Richard Bondi; two others, on story theology and on Albert Speer's Inside the Third Reich, were written with Father David B. Burrell. The essays are arranged so that they explain and defend Hauerwas' thought …
Of Men And Laws: Murphy, Cornford, Arnold, Potter, Parkinson, Peter, Maccoby, And Gall, Melvin J. Sykes
Of Men And Laws: Murphy, Cornford, Arnold, Potter, Parkinson, Peter, Maccoby, And Gall, Melvin J. Sykes
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Televised Trials: Constitutional Constraints, Practical Implications, And State Experimentation, Shelly Byron Kulwin
Televised Trials: Constitutional Constraints, Practical Implications, And State Experimentation, Shelly Byron Kulwin
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Remarks On Probability In Law: Mostly, A Casenote And A Book Review, Robert Birmingham
Remarks On Probability In Law: Mostly, A Casenote And A Book Review, Robert Birmingham
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
The Jurisprudence Of Judge Hardy Cross Dillard, Charles E.M. Kolb
The Jurisprudence Of Judge Hardy Cross Dillard, Charles E.M. Kolb
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The purpose of this article is to provide a critical assessment of Judge Dillard's performance during his tenure on the International Court of Justice. Much of this article will be "jurisprudential" in scope, endeavoring to examine developments in international legal theory and international organizations during the past two decades and to assess recent decisions written by the Court. The approach will in part be an institutional one, taking into consideration the ability of an individual member of the Court to shape decisional outcomes of an international body which must resolve contentious litigation and render advisory opinions within the structure of …
Book Review, Igor I. Kavass
Book Review, Igor I. Kavass
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The limited use of American case law in the Commonwealth countries should not be surprising. With the exception of English cases, the decisions of other Commonwealth countries receive the same indifferent treatment in all Commonwealth jurisdictions; the English courts studiously ignore the decisions of other Commonwealth countries. For that matter, American courts do not consult the case law of English and other Commonwealth countries all too frequently. Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co. is a recent example in point. In that case, the Supreme Court was asked to interpret the meaning of the terms "nationality" and "national origin" as used. in …
On Teaching Natural Law, David F. Forte
On Teaching Natural Law, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
With the materials at hand which this appendix has listed, an instructor can better sort and choose from all categories, so as to concentrate more effectively, on those aspects of natural law legal theory and practice which he deems valuable for his students.
The Theory Of Judicial Reasoning--Toward A Reconstruction, Peter W. Gross
The Theory Of Judicial Reasoning--Toward A Reconstruction, Peter W. Gross
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
The Meek Shall Inherit A Global Bill Of Rights, Lung-Chu Chen
The Meek Shall Inherit A Global Bill Of Rights, Lung-Chu Chen
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Assumption Of Risk In A Comparative Negligence System-- Doctrinal, Practical, And Policy Issues, Daniel O. Conkle
Assumption Of Risk In A Comparative Negligence System-- Doctrinal, Practical, And Policy Issues, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The adoption of a new principle of law invariably impinges upon related legal concepts, raising issue that were not considered when the law was changed. The adoption of comparative negligence, a drastic departure from the long-held principle of contributory negligence, has forced courts to consider how the related concept of assumption of risk is affected by the change. Because there are different types of assumption of risk, and various doctrinal, practical, and policy issues, a proper determination of the role for assumption of risk in a comparative negligence system depends upon a thorough examination of many relevant considerations. Unfortunately, two …
Jurisprudence "Under-Mind": The Case Of The Atheistic Solipsist, Ira Robbins
Jurisprudence "Under-Mind": The Case Of The Atheistic Solipsist, Ira Robbins
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Nearly thirty years have passed since the publication of Professor Lon L. Fuller's The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, in which a fictional court expounded upon the manifold ways in which certain harsh necessities, externally imposed upon common people, can test the rules of the criminal law. The instant case is not in- tended to parody the Speluncean Explorers, but rather to complement it with the inverse theme: the singular defendant is a psychologically extraordinary individual existing in a relatively mundane environment. The Atheistic Solipsist provides the opportunity for consideration of the ways internal forces of great intensity can shape …
The Restoration Of In Re Winship: A Comment On Burdens Of Persuasion In Criminal Cases After Patterson V. New York, Ronald J. Allen
The Restoration Of In Re Winship: A Comment On Burdens Of Persuasion In Criminal Cases After Patterson V. New York, Ronald J. Allen
Michigan Law Review
At the conclusion of its last term, the Supreme Court rendered what should have been a most unremarkable decision. In Patterson v. New York, the Court upheld New York's affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance, which requires a defendant who seeks to reduce his offense from murder to manslaughter to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted under extreme emotional disturbance. Had the case come before the Court seven years earlier, it could have been swiftly dispatched with a brief opinion upholding the New York statute on the grounds that the issue of extreme emotional disturbance …
Justiciability And Theories Of Judicial Review: A Remote Relationship, Lee A. Albert
Justiciability And Theories Of Judicial Review: A Remote Relationship, Lee A. Albert
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure As Defined By The Tennessee Supreme Court, Julian L. Bibb, Walter S. Weems
Criminal Procedure As Defined By The Tennessee Supreme Court, Julian L. Bibb, Walter S. Weems
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Tennessee Supreme Court, elected simultaneously for the first time since the early 1900's, assumed office in September 1974 amid speculation concerning future judicial policy. The court, com-posed of Chief Justice William H. D. Fones and Justices Ray L.Brock, Jr., Robert E. Cooper, William J. Harbison, and Joe W.Henry, immediately indicated the importance of a uniform judicial policy governing criminal procedure by creating a special commission to revise the state rules of criminal procedure. Additionally,during its present term the court has decided numerous cases directed toward the formation of well-defined rules under which criminal allegations can be adjudged. This Special …
Can/Should Computers Replace Judges?, Anthony D'Amato
Can/Should Computers Replace Judges?, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Speculates concerning judicial decision-making to test, at least theoretically, what some of the implications of jurisprudential advances might be. Proposes as the means of making this test a consideration of whether a computer may be so programmed as to replace the judicial function of judges.