Law Commons^™

Attempting The Impossible: The Emerging Consensus, Ira Robbins

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Impossible attempts are situations in which an actor fails to consummate a substantive crime because he is mistaken about attendant circumstances. Professor Robbins divides mistakes regarding circumstances into three categories: mistakes of fact, mistakes of law, and mistakes of mixed fact and law. Courts and commentators disagree primarily over the identification and treatment of mixed fact law cases. Professor Robbins surveys each category of mistake. He then examines the objective, subjective, and hybrid approaches to dealing with the mixed fact/law category. The objective approach requires an objective manifestation of the actor's intent before conviction is allowed. The subjective approach permits …

Fish V. Fish Or, Some Realism About Idealism, David Luban

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Vertical And Horizontal Aspects Of Takings Jurisprudence: Is Airspace Property?, Mary B. Spector

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Searching For The Status Quo, Jeremy Paul

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Arbitration In The Resolution Of Patent Disputes, Mark A. Farley

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Teaching Philosophy Of Law In Law Schools: Some Cautionary Remarks, Patricia D. White

Articles

No abstract provided.

Free Speech And Public Education: An Overview Of Legal, Social, And Political Issues Symposium On Education Law., Ralph D. Mawdsley, Steven Permuth

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Education - Title Ix - Receipt By Private College Students Of Basic Educational Opportunity Grants Constitutes Federal Financial Assistance To The Specific Program Benefited Thereby Requiring Compliance With Title Ix Symposium On Education Law - Case Note., John F. Carroll

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Renaissance In American Education: The New Role Of The Federal Government - Foreword Symposium On Education Law - Foreword., T.H. Bell

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Interrelationship Of Tort Liability, Governmental Immunity, And The Civil Rights Statutes Symposium On Education Law., Kelly Frels, Jeffrey J. Horner

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Student Competency Testing In Texas Symposium On Education Law., Ellen Smith Pryor

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Issues In School Asbestos Hazard Abatement Litigation Symposium On Education Law - Comment., John P. Kincade

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Introduction To Education Symposium Symposium On Education Law - Introduction., Mark G. Yudof

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Teacher Termination And Nonrenewal In Texas Public Schools Symposium On Education Law., William T. Armstrong, Rosemary L. Hollan

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

New Jersey V. T.L.O.: The Supreme Court's Lesson On School Searches Symposium On Education Law., Gerald S. Reamey

St. Mary's Law Journal

Considerable disagreement persists as to the fourth amendment rights of students within schools. Particularly, this disagreement regards the extent to which fourth amendment rights possessed by students may frustrate reasonable attempts by educators to maintain the order necessary to preserve an educational environment. In New Jersey v. T.L.O., the Supreme Court considered an argument advanced by the State of New Jersey that the “pervasive supervision” of school children diminishes the legitimate expectation of privacy a child may have in property “unnecessarily” brought to school. The Court concluded that the necessity of maintaining security and order in the educational environment was …

The University Interscholastic League Of Texas: Who Are These Guys And What Can They Do Symposium On Education Law - Comment., Stephen S. Goodman Iv

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

A Survey Of The Texas Reform Package: House Bill No. 72 Symposium On Education Law., William C. Bednar Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Beyond Bok: Historical Jurisprudence In Replacement Of The Enlightment Project, Stephen B. Young

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Why Professor Redish Is Wrong About Abstention, Michael Wells

Scholarly Works

Most critics of the Supreme Court's abstention doctrines have attacked the substantive merits of rules that channel constitutional litigation away from federal courts and into state courts instead. In a recent article, Martin Redish raises an interesting objection to abstention from a different perspective. He addresses the institutional legitimacy of the rules and contends that whatever their merits, rules like these should be made only by Congress and not the Supreme Court, for they contravene Congress' intent to grant federal courts jurisdiction over constitutional claims against state actors. Part I of this article describes the context in which the choice …

Penumbras And Privacy: A Study Of The Use Of Fictions In Constitutional Decision-Making, James B. Stoneking

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trials And The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Roger J. Miner '56

Bar Associations

No abstract provided.

Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley

Michigan Law Review

Fourth amendment critics rank in rows, and it has been repeatedly pointed out that individual cases are inconsistent with each other or that whole chunks of doctrine, such as the automobile exception or the plain view exception, are either misconceived, too broad, or too narrow. But these critics all play the Court on its own field, simply arguing as tenth Justices that the doctrines should be tinkered with in different ways than the Court has done. This Article, in contrast, suggests that current fourth amendment law, complete with the constant tinkering which it necessarily entails, should be abandoned altogether. Instead, …

The Reluctant Witness For The Prosecution: Grand Jury Subpoenas To Defense Counsel, Stacy Caplow

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Formal Justice And Judicial Precedent, David Lyons

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Article concerns an argument which, if sound, would sup-port a doctrine of precedent with unlimited scope-one that would provide some justification, though not overwhelming justification,for following all precedents, however regrettable they may be. The argument holds that respect for precedent is required by the principle that like cases should be treated alike.Although that argument is challenged here, no claim is made that a practice of precedent cannot be justified. The larger purpose of this Article is to clear the way for a systematic inquiry into the sound reasons for, as well as the legitimate scope of, such a practice.

Law In A Reign Of Terror, Alan Watson

Scholarly Works

A few years ago I published a book, The Nature of Law, which was activated primarily by three long held beliefs. First, law is a means, not an end in itself; and legal rules, principles, decisions do not come into being without some purpose. The end envisaged for a legal rule or decision may be immediate -- to give financial compensation to a particular victim of negligence, for instance -- or more remote -- to promote general happiness or bolster the economic dominance of the ruling class, for example -- but that does not concern us here. What, in …

Institutionalized Conflicts Between Law And Policy, Joseph P. Tomain

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

Law and policy do not mix well. The legal system is a significant force which contributes to the splintering of substantive policies. While this argument is made with specific reference to energy law and policy, it also has a general application to other classes of complex cases.

The "signs" that law and policy do not interact neatly manifest themselves in the form of conflicts of two different categories. In the first category are conflicts between the ends and purposes of law and policy. These are addressed in Section 11 of this article. In the second category are conflicts within the …

Uncertainty In Law And Its Negation: Reflections, Gordon A. Christenson

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

For this issue of the Review, the editors invited me to reflection. In response, I wish to consider some aspects of a problem that has bothered me over the past quarter-century. This problem arises from radical subjectivism and its effect on the legal order. I believe that something is radically subjective in law when one norm is considered as valid as any other, or when one perception of facts is thought as valid as any other, for the reason that any objective principles for determining validity are either inadequate or considered meaningless tautologies, masking the subjective preference of those with …

Whither Jurisprudence?, Anthony D'Amato

Faculty Working Papers

After considering the side road of critical legal studies, I shall try to indicate the major signposts to a more complete jurisprudence. These signposts take the form of questions or anomalies in our present understanding of law. I will conclude that only by following these signposts, by exploring these questions and anomalies, will we begin to uncover the nature of law and justice.

Practical Reasoning And Judicial Justification: Toward An Adequate Theory, Vincent A. Wellman

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.