Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (885)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (858)
- University of Michigan Law School (385)
- Seattle University School of Law (309)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (309)
-
- UIC School of Law (290)
- University of New Mexico (255)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (226)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (226)
- University of Colorado Law School (212)
- Georgetown University Law Center (204)
- American University Washington College of Law (176)
- BLR (175)
- Pepperdine University (167)
- Barry University School of Law (166)
- Notre Dame Law School (165)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (158)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (149)
- University of Georgia School of Law (138)
- Universitas Indonesia (132)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (125)
- University of Miami Law School (116)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (116)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (109)
- New York Law School (105)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (104)
- Brooklyn Law School (103)
- Fordham Law School (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (97)
- Cornell University Law School (96)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (1406)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (397)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- Supreme Court (268)
- Constitutional law (223)
-
- Constitution (208)
- Constitutional Law (208)
- Judges (190)
- Law (186)
- United States Supreme Court (182)
- Courts (143)
- First Amendment (132)
- Judicial review (126)
- Law and Society (113)
- Legislation (111)
- Legal History (102)
- Legal theory (97)
- Statutory interpretation (96)
- Inc. (87)
- Justice (87)
- Criminal law (84)
- Due process (83)
- Federalism (82)
- Originalism (81)
- Evidence (80)
- Fourteenth Amendment (76)
- Legal history (76)
- International Law (75)
- Federal courts (72)
- Discrimination (71)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (856)
- Cardozo Law Review (483)
- Faculty Scholarship (407)
- Articles (301)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (297)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (294)
- UIC Law Review (277)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (253)
- Michigan Law Review (247)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (198)
- Publications (198)
- Touro Law Review (171)
- ExpressO (170)
- Scholarly Works (159)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (149)
- Journal Articles (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (118)
- Barry Law Review (109)
- Faculty Publications (99)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (95)
- Journal of Legal Education (91)
- Pepperdine Law Review (86)
- UAEU Law Journal (80)
- Akron Law Review (79)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (74)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (72)
- Northwestern University Law Review (72)
- Maine Law Review (70)
- Publication Type
Articles 7771 - 7800 of 9282
Full-Text Articles in Law
Postscript: In Budget Disputes Between Elected State Officials, Will The Rule Of Law Prevail., Gregory E. Maggs
Postscript: In Budget Disputes Between Elected State Officials, Will The Rule Of Law Prevail., Gregory E. Maggs
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
What's Left?, Guyora Binder
What's Left?, Guyora Binder
Journal Articles
Addressing the future of radical politics at the end of the cold war, this article offers a reconstruction of radical theory around the goal of enabling collaborative self-realization through participatory democratic politics. It offers an interpretation of the radical tradition as defined by a view of human nature as a cultural artifact, and a conception of liberation as the self-conscious transformation of human nature. It proceeds to critique radical theory’s traditional focus on revolution as the means of radical transformation. Distinguishing instrumental and self-expressive conceptions of transformation it critiques revolutionary processes as tending to reproduce instrumental culture. It offers democratic …
Feminist Jurisprudence: The 1990 Myra Bradwell Day Panel, Elizabeth M. Schneider, Lucinda M. Finley, Carin Clauss, Joan Bertin
Feminist Jurisprudence: The 1990 Myra Bradwell Day Panel, Elizabeth M. Schneider, Lucinda M. Finley, Carin Clauss, Joan Bertin
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Rights, Communities, And Tradition, Brian Slattery
Rights, Communities, And Tradition, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
This paper argues that there is a close connection between basic human rights and communal bonds. It criticizes the philosophical views of Alan Gewirth and Alasdair MacIntyre, which in differing ways deny this connection.
Toward Freer Trade And More Commerce Between The United States And Mexico., Barbara Bader Aldave
Toward Freer Trade And More Commerce Between The United States And Mexico., Barbara Bader Aldave
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Child Support For Adult Disabled Children: New Texas Legislation., Dan R. Price
Child Support For Adult Disabled Children: New Texas Legislation., Dan R. Price
St. Mary's Law Journal
In 1989, the Texas legislature modified the Texas Family Code by relaxing the criteria necessary to allow awards of support to adult disabled children. Texas has historically recognized, through both state and case law, that parents have both a moral and legal obligation to support minor unemancipated children, but only until the age of majority. An exception to the limitation of parental support only until the age of majority is the “disability exception.” Many jurisdictions recognize that when a minor child suffers from a disability and is incapable or unable to take care of themselves, parental support may extend past …
Pyrrhic Victories And Glorious Defeats: Why Defendants Are Winning And Plaintiffs Are Losing The Struggle Over Actual Malice And Fictionalized Quotations., Richard A. Gonzales
Pyrrhic Victories And Glorious Defeats: Why Defendants Are Winning And Plaintiffs Are Losing The Struggle Over Actual Malice And Fictionalized Quotations., Richard A. Gonzales
St. Mary's Law Journal
This article reviews Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, a case of fabricated quotations. The article looks first at the legal background and Supreme Court's development of the actual malice standard. An analysis of the problem through journalistic ethics and investigation of the difficulties confronting libel plaintiffs will follow. Finally, the comment explores the misquotation problem from both a legal and a journalistic perspective.
Oil In The Persian Gulf War: Legal Appraisal Of An Environmental Warfare., Margaret T. Okorodudu-Fubara
Oil In The Persian Gulf War: Legal Appraisal Of An Environmental Warfare., Margaret T. Okorodudu-Fubara
St. Mary's Law Journal
Oil, modern history’s most “powerful” natural economic resource stood at the epicenter of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and became the latest unconventional weapon of warfare. The objective of this Article is to assess the legal implications of this recent environmental warfare involving the “oil weapon,” the first of its kind in recorded history. The experiences from national and international wars demonstrate one sure victim of wars, even barring human losses, is the environment. The delicacy of mankind’s planetary ecosystem necessitates urgency addressed to protecting the environment in the international struggle for arms control and disarmament agreement. This Article indicates …
A Trial Court's Refusal To Question Prospective Jurors About The Specific Contents Of Pretrial Publicity Which They Had Read Or Heard Did Not Violate A Defendant's Sixth Amendment Right To An Impartial Jury, Or Fourteenth Amendment Right To Due Process., Karen A. Cusenbary
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Mu'Min v. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court held a defendant has no right to ask jurors about the potential influence of prejudicial pretrial publicity. A defendant may ask only if the jurors can remain impartial. The Court mandates that overturning a trial court’s jury selection is allowable only if manifest error renders the trial fundamentally unfair. The Court did not find that the case involved sufficient public passion to necessitate a more extensive jury examination by the trial court to include inquiries involving the effect of pretrial publicity. The ruling in Mu'Min leaves too much discretion to the …
Normativity And The Politics Of Form, Pierre Schlag
Normativity And The Politics Of Form, Pierre Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Exclusionary Rule And Confession Evidence: Some Perspectives On Evolving Practices And Policies In The United States And England And Wales, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
Justice O'Connor's Intellectual Property Opinions: Currents And Crosscurrents, Marci A. Hamilton
Justice O'Connor's Intellectual Property Opinions: Currents And Crosscurrents, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
Bats And Owls And The Insane Moon: The Search For The Republic's Unwritten Constitution, E. F. Roberts
Bats And Owls And The Insane Moon: The Search For The Republic's Unwritten Constitution, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Rehnquist Or Rorty?, Carl W. Tobias
Rehnquist Or Rorty?, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
A postmodern response to Gene Shreve, Eighteen Feet of Clay: Thoughts on Phantom Rule 4(m), 67 Ind. L.J. 85 (1991).
Tdhs V. E.B., The Coup De Grace For Special Issues., John J. Sampson
Tdhs V. E.B., The Coup De Grace For Special Issues., John J. Sampson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Although the bench and bar have been recalcitrant in recognition, the Texas Supreme Court has declared the special interest experiment a failure. For nearly eighty years Texas has engaged in an experiment requiring juries answer specific, factually detailed inquiries in various circumstances. The theoretical justifications of special issue inquiries were to ease appeals processes and add clarity to jury decisions. Although the goals were meritorious, the actual result was jury confusion, inefficiency, complexity, and too many retrials. The Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in TDHS v. EB signals the end of special issues and mandates the use of broad form submissions. …