Law Commons^™

The Ten Precepts Of American Slavery Jurisprudence: Chief Justice Roger Taney's Defense And Justice Thurgood Marshall's Condemnation Of The Precept Of Black Inferiority, A. Leon Higginbotham Jr.

Cardozo Law Review

Approximately twenty-five years ago, a group of thoughtful scholars, under the tutelage of Stanley Katz and Owen Fiss, met at the University of Chicago to discuss slavery law. Stanley Katz has previously noted that the conference generated extraordinary academic inquiries, as well as many books and articles. In this Article, I will describe briefly the intellectual journey I have traveled which was, in no small part, shaped by the conference and the interrelationships I have had since then, with so many scholars, as we have tried to get better insights into the interrelated issues of bondage, freedom, and the Constitution.

Opening Address, Stanley N. Katz

Cardozo Law Review

I am more moved by this occasion than any of you other than Owen Fiss can imagine, for it takes me back to my first days teaching law at the University of Chicago in the fall of 1971. It was then and there that I began two of the most important friendships of my life with Harry Kalven and Owen Fiss. We agreed to begin a series of seminars on the law of slavery, which in the end carried on for three years.

The Hermeneutic Of Acceptance And The Discourse Of The Grotesque, With A Classroom Excercise On Vichy Law, Richard Weisberg

Cardozo Law Review

As a nonspecialist on the laws of slavery, I can best contribute to this discourse by suggesting some reflection on the comparative nature of racial discrimination in constitutionally based and seemingly enlightened legal systems. To the American system under close scrutiny in this Symposium, my recently completed work on Vichy law may lend some degree of further understanding. For the legalized persecution of Jews in France during the period 1940- 44 stands as a classic twentieth-century example of what I believe to have been at work in antebellum America: the elaboration through traditional patterns of legal reasoning of a discourse …

Are The Similarities Between A Woman's Right To Choose An Abortion And The Alleged Right To Assisted Suicide Really Compelling?, Marc Spindelman

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

In this Article, Marc Spindelman examines the relationship between abortion and assisted suicide. He begins his discussion with the constitutional framework within which courts should consider the assertion that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects an individual's decision to commit assisted suicide. The Author then considers and, based on relevant Supreme Court doctrine, rejects the conception of personal autonomy that undergirds the claimed constitutional right to assisted suicide. Finally, the Author points out some legal and cultural distinctions between abortion and assisted suicide, arguing that these distinctions offer courts good reasons for holding that the Fourteenth Amendment's …

The Influence Of The Arkansas Supreme Court's Opinions On Policy Made By The General Assembly: A Case Study, Chuck Smith

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Loss Of Protection As Injury In Fact: An Approach To Establishing Standing To Challenge Environmental Planning Decisions, Miles A. Yanick

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

As currently interpreted by the United States Supreme Court, Article III of the Constitution creates a significant hurdle for plaintiff citizen groups seeking standing to challenge environmental planning or management decisions. In particular, plaintiffs have had difficulty in making the required showing of an 'injury in fact" where an agency has not yet approved a site-specific action but has approved only a general plan for an area to govern future site-specific actions. The Supreme Court has not articulated a clear rule for standing to challenge the latter type of agency decision making, and the courts of appeals for the various …

Harmonization Of Antitrust And Antidumping Laws: An Opportunity For Creative Experimentation In The North American Free Trade Area, Harvey M. Applebaum

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Front Matter, United States-Mexico Law Journal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Lon Fuller, The Model Code, And The Model Rules, John M.A. Dipippa

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Highways And Byways Of Nafta Commercial Law: The Challenge To Develop A Best Practice In North American Trade, Boris Kozolchyk

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion Part 2: The U.S. And Mexican Companies Agree Upon Some Vertical Restraints Of Trade In Their Contract, Eleanor M. Fox, Gabriel Castaneda Gallardo, Harvey M. Applebaum

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Law And Order, Arthur J. Jacobson

Cardozo Law Review

Every jurisprudence offers a distinctive image of order. Any order-whether of action, logic, or material-describes the ongoing operation of a set of principles or criteria. Principles define an order as the cause of an operation; criteria define it as the effect of other operations. The operation of a set of principles or criteria constituting an order allows observers effectively to distinguish that order from other orders or from no order at all.

An order is static when it is possible for observers to describe operation of the set of principles or criteria constituting the order at a single moment, without …

The Retrieval Of The Democratic Ethos, Richard J. Bernstein

Cardozo Law Review

For over thirty years I have been a sympathetic although critical reader of Habermas. Initially, I was struck by his nuanced insight into the American pragmatic tradition and his appropriation of the radical democratic ethos of the pragmatic movement. I felt then, and still believe, that Habermas has a more profound and subtle understanding of what is best and most enduring in pragmatism-especially in the thought of Peirce, Dewey, and Mead-than many of my American colleagues. I was also attracted to Habermas for other reasons. He is a dialectical thinker who has the courage to buck fashionable trends-who refuses to …

Liberties And Popular Sovereignty: On Jurgen Habermas’S Reconstruction Of The System Of Rights, Ingeborg Maus

Cardozo Law Review

The justifications Jurgen Habermas gives for a system of rights bring together the central intentions of his theory of law. The chapter of his book which provides these justifications is devoted in part to developing the underlying tension between "facticity and validity" as the basic structure of law taking the extreme and, for that reason, illuminating aspect of the guarantee of liberty through coercion. It also elucidates the motives for reestablishing the centuries-old connection between legal theory and social theory in the context of the most topical social problems. Whereas all subsectors of contemporary society have been juridified on a …

Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks On Jurgen Habermas’S Legal Theory, Niklas Luhmann

Cardozo Law Review

Quod omnes tangit, omnibus tractari et approbari debet. The Middle Ages found this rule in Roman law. It had to do with the circumstance of a plurality of legal guardians over the same ward. In the typical case, one guardian's approval was legally sufficient authorization in legal transactions. Since every other rule had seriously damaged business dealings, the business partner's confidence had to be protected. On the other hand, this consideration-that one guardian's approval is legally sufficient authorization for an emancipation-could not have led to a fully realized emancipation of a ward. Nor could it have led to the …

Habermas And The Counterfactual Imagination, Michael K. Power

Cardozo Law Review

The epistemological problem of critical theories is easy to state but hard to resolve. On the one hand, if the theories are too descriptive and draw their conceptual resources from the ideas and institutions which currently exist, they lose their critical force. While they may provide elaborate reconstructions of the structure of social practices, they remain internal to these practices, part of a field of knowledge in which, at worst, theory is merely a form of public relations. On the other hand, if they articulate forms of critique that are entirely external to the systems of knowledge and practice that …

Law And Undecidability: A New Vision Of The Proceduralization Of Law, Jacques Lenoble

Cardozo Law Review

As a leading citizen of the Age of Reason, Pierre Simon Laplace liked to remark that there never could have been two Isaac Newtons for there was but a single world to be discovered. Laplace's aphorism neatly captured a fundamental assumption that has underlain the classical unity of science and reason under modernity. Today, in the wake of challenges posed by intellectual developments such as unstable systems and chaotic structures, the classical presupposition of a stable, objective, and physical world that serves as the horizon of scientific knowledge has begun to teeter. New cracks in the grand edifice of modem …

Jurgen Habermas’S Theory Of Legal Discourse, Robert Alexy

Cardozo Law Review

Jurgen Habermas's discourse theory of law attempts to show that the ideal contents of the discourse principle can be realized within the institutional frame of a legal system. The result is a theory of the democratic constitutional state whose basic idea is the association and self-determination of free and equal consociates under the law. This theory is far more than a mere application of discourse theory to the law. Discourse theory, on the one hand, demands the institutionalization of a legal system for reasons internal to the theory. On the other hand, the positive law remains dependent on discourse theory …

Jurisprudence And Validity, David M. Rasmussen

Cardozo Law Review

The relationship between law and philosophy and their respective discourses has never been harmonious. Just as Plato wanted to throw the poets out of his Republic on the basis of their tendency to corrupt, the law as a discipline has not been overwhelmed by those whose Platonic fervor would purify their enterprise and set them straight. The difference between legal procedure and philosophical-political reflection has not been easy to reconcile. Hobbes argued for the virtues of sovereignty against the self-regulating legal discipline that Lord Coke represented as having confidence in the practical orientation of "Juris prudentia," Blackstone tried …

Legitimacy And Diversity: Dialectical Reflections On Analytical Distinctions, Thomas Mccarthy

Cardozo Law Review

Jurgen Habermas's discourse theory of democracy has repeatedly been criticized for placing too much emphasis on consensus and not enough on conflict. He wants, it seems, to defend a discourse-theoretical version of the "general will" as the key to democratic legitimacy, whatever the cost. The costs are usually reckoned in terms of the theory's tenuous relation to the hurly-burly of democratic practice, where disagreement is the rule and unanimity is in short supply. Many of these criticisms miss their target, for they are often based on superficial readings and serious misunderstandings. But enough of them hit the mark to indicate …

Family Quarrel, Frank I. Michelman

Cardozo Law Review

In Chapter 6 of Between Facts and Norms, Jurgen Habermas examines what he calls the republican conception of lawmaking. He draws this conception, which he also styles "communitarian," partly from writings of this author that have in turn been much inspired by the works of Professor Habermas.

Communicative Power And The Concept Of Law, Ulrich K. Preub

Cardozo Law Review

The idea that the law was founded on the self-interest and the will of rational individuals was first developed and proven in the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. These theorists reacted-admittedly, in extremely different ways-to the problem of finding a collective basis in a world which had lost its common religious fundaments and the economic basis of feudal communal life. The European world of the seventeenth century had fallen apart. The universalism of the catholic world had been replaced by a plurality of subjective worldviews championed by individuals, groups, sects, and new social entities. How could one …

The Dynamics Of Constitutional Adjudication, Bernhard Schlink

Cardozo Law Review

Habermas determines the role and legitimacy of constitutional adjudication through three confrontations. First, he confronts both the liberal and the welfare-state paradigms of law, seeing constitutional adjudication move from the former to the latter. Habermas wants this move to arrive at a procedural paradigm of law. Second, he confronts a norm- and a value-oriented understanding of the constitution. Habermas indicates the dangers of the former and the merits of the latter, and attempts to show that principles, understood as norms, should guide constitutional adjudication. Third, he confronts the liberal and the republican views of the political and constitutional process, developing …

Why Care? The Trouble With Social Rights, Günter Frankenberg

Cardozo Law Review

While not everybody will agree that social rights are good in general, the ranks of the "not-everybody" will fill when one wants to decide who needs which particular social rights. Even those who claim to be philosophically and practically supportive of the idea and the benefits of social rights find it difficult to come up with a strong argument for them and usually invoke vague or weak obligations to support the victims of capitalism or, if you will, the market society or the mere necessity to preserve social peace by a minimally redistributive social policy. Social scientists have plausibly claimed …

Law And Philosophy: Some Consequences For The Law Deriving From The Sociological Reconstruction Of Philosophical Theory, Mark Gould

Cardozo Law Review

Jurgen Habermas wants to provide a (quasi) transcendental grounding for democracy. He believes that the constituent attribute of Homo Sapiens is ordinary speech and that embedded in speech is a set of "validity claims" that are redeemable-asymptotically-only in an ideal speech situation. This ideal serves as a regulative fiction for our everyday world of social institutions. While it may not actually be present in institutional form, it serves as a ground for the normative critique of the actual social world in which we live.

Reply To Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, Jürgen Habermas

Cardozo Law Review

Every author owes a debt to his readers. This is especially true when an author presents a wide-ranging and complex investigation that draws the critical attention of outstanding colleagues. I have profited a great deal from my colleagues' thoughtful commentaries, as will be evident from this Reply which is a token of my appreciation.

Panel Discussion Part 5: A Serious Accident Occurs In The Mexican Plant: Problems Of Corporate And Product Liability, Keith Harvey, Ted Occhialino, Boris Kozolchyk, Ignacio Gomez-Palacio

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Masthead, United States-Mexico Law Journal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

The Antitrust Laws Of The United States And The Ley De Competencia Of Mexico: A Comparative Review, 1992-1994, Eleanor M. Fox

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.

Antitrust Enforcement In Mexico 1993-1995 And Its Prospects, Gabriel Castaneda Gallardo

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.