Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (887)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (399)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (343)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- University of Richmond (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (230)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (202)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (141)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (114)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (546)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (466)
- Criminal Procedure (391)
- Evidence (351)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Fourth Amendment (270)
- Sixth Amendment (270)
- Criminal justice (269)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (224)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (206)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Jury (136)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Punishment (133)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (760)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (729)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (262)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- University of Richmond Law Review (178)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (132)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (126)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11491 - 11520 of 12070
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law - Criminal Procedure - Successive State Prosecutions For Same Activity, Robert L. Bombaugh
Constitutional Law - Criminal Procedure - Successive State Prosecutions For Same Activity, Robert L. Bombaugh
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for the robbery of three of them. His sole defense was alibi and he was acquitted when only one of the five victims identified him as the robber. Petitioner was then tried under an indictment for the robbery of a fourth victim. Petitioner interposed the same defense but was convicted at this second trial. The New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, affirmed, three justices dissenting. Neither the successive trials nor the failure of the court to …
Recent Decision Note, Thomas L. Shaffer
Recent Decision Note, Thomas L. Shaffer
Journal Articles
Petitioner was arrested without a warrant by a federal narcotics agent. Sole justification for the arrest, pursuant to the Narcotics Control Act of 1956, was information from a paid informer of the Narcotics Bureau who had proved reliable during six months of association with arresting officers. The informer's description of the petitioner, including dress, baggage, and manner of walking, and his prediction of the petitioner's time of arrival at the point of arrest, were detailed and accurate. The arresting officers searched petitioner immediately after the arrest and seized narcotics and implements used in narcotics addiction. At trial petitioner moved to …
Book Review, Lee E. Skeel
Book Review, Lee E. Skeel
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Equal Justice for the Accused, Doubleday and Company, 1959
Capital Punishment Reconsidered, William O. Reichert
Capital Punishment Reconsidered, William O. Reichert
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Change Of Venue And Venire In Kentucky, Jerry Fuller
Change Of Venue And Venire In Kentucky, Jerry Fuller
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Discovery And Production Of Grand Jury Proceedings - United States V. The Proctor And Gamble Company Et Al., Joseph A. Matera
The Discovery And Production Of Grand Jury Proceedings - United States V. The Proctor And Gamble Company Et Al., Joseph A. Matera
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Grand Jury Necessary?, James P. Whyte Jr.
Is The Grand Jury Necessary?, James P. Whyte Jr.
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure--Right To Counsel Prior To Trial, G. D. G.
Criminal Procedure--Right To Counsel Prior To Trial, G. D. G.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, A. G. H.
Constitutional Law - Right To Jury Trial In Indirect Criminal Contempts In Federal Courts, Denis T. Rice S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Right To Jury Trial In Indirect Criminal Contempts In Federal Courts, Denis T. Rice S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Should constitutional provisions for jury trial apply to contempts committed outside the physical presence of a federal court? The United States Supreme Court, in the recent case of Green v. United States, reviewed this long disputed question. The case involved two Communist Party leaders who had been convicted of Smith Act violations and then had "jumped bail" when they disappeared in violation of surrender orders requiring their presence in court for sentencing. After four and a half years as fugitives they surrendered in 1956 and were charged with criminal contempt of court. Following a so-called "summary" hearing (without the …
Criminal Procedure On The American Frontier: A Study Of The Statutes And Court Records Of Michigan Territory 1805-1825, William Wirt Blume
Criminal Procedure On The American Frontier: A Study Of The Statutes And Court Records Of Michigan Territory 1805-1825, William Wirt Blume
Michigan Law Review
The area north and east of Lake Michigan, organized in 1805 as Michigan Territory, was first organized in 1796 as Wayne County of the Northwest Territory. In 1800 the western half of the county, and in 1803 the eastern half, became parts of Indiana Territory, and so remained until July 1805. In 1818 Michigan Territory was expanded westward so as to include all of the area north of Illinois to the Mississippi River.
Former Jeopardy On Retrial, Lawrence M. Ross
Former Jeopardy On Retrial, Lawrence M. Ross
Washington Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States, in Green v. United States, was for the first time squarely presented with a much-debated and much-litigated question involving former jeopardy. Defendant Green was indicted on two counts, the first alleging arson and the second, the death of a woman resulting from that arson. If the defendant were guilty of arson and the arson caused the death of the woman, it would clearly amount to murder in the first degree under the felony-murder doctrine, as provided in Washington, D.C., Code 22-2401. The trial court, mistakenly believing that second degree murder was a lesser-included …
Scientific Investigation And Defendants' Rights, B. J. George Jr.
Scientific Investigation And Defendants' Rights, B. J. George Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Advances in science, medicine and industry have made much of the world a more pleasant place in which to live. In general more men are living a physically more satisfying life in more comfortable surroundings than preceding generations. But with this has come a parallel increase in criminality to the point that the term "crime wave" is heard with increasing frequency. Many crimes are facilitated in their commission by adaption or application of new scientific discoveries by criminal elements. A natural consequence is that already overburdened police departments turn as quickly as is financially possible to new scientific techniques in …
Criminal Law—Reindictment After Reversal Of Conviction Not Double Jeopardy, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Reindictment After Reversal Of Conviction Not Double Jeopardy, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Ercole, 4 N.Y.2d 617, 176 N.Y.S.2d 649 (1958).
Criminal Law—Power Of Parole Board To Suspend Sentence, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Power Of Parole Board To Suspend Sentence, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People ex. rel. Kenny v. Jackson, 4 N.Y.2d 229, 173 N.Y.S.2d 591 (1958).
Criminal Law—Insufficiency Of Information Which Did Not State Sources And Grounds Of Belief, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Insufficiency Of Information Which Did Not State Sources And Grounds Of Belief, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. James, 4 N.Y.2d 482, 176 N.Y.S.2d 323 (1958).
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Lieberman, 3 N.Y.2d 649, 171 N.Y.S.2d 73 (1958).
Criminal Law—Validity Of Plea Made On Sunday, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Validity Of Plea Made On Sunday, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Reedy, 4 N.Y.2d 123, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1 (1958).
Criminal Law—Personal Summation By Defendant Not Allowed When Represented By Attorney, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Personal Summation By Defendant Not Allowed When Represented By Attorney, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Richardson, 4 N.Y.2d 224, 173 N.Y.S.2d 587 (1958).
Criminal Law—Right To Counsel—Burden Of Proof Of Deprivation, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Right To Counsel—Burden Of Proof Of Deprivation, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Prior, 4 N.Y.2d 70, 172 N.Y.S.2d 155 (1958).
Criminal Law—Testimony Of Accomplice Not Corroborating Evidence For Conviction, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Testimony Of Accomplice Not Corroborating Evidence For Conviction, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Malizia, 4 N.Y.2d 22, 171 N.Y.S.2d 844 (1958).
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Kirkup, 4 N.Y.2d 209, 173 N.Y.S.2d 574 (1958).
Criminal Law—Waiver Of Jury Trial, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Waiver Of Jury Trial, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Carroll, 3 N.Y.2d 686, 171 N.Y.S.2d 812 (1958).
Criminal Law—Coram Nobis, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Coram Nobis, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Sullivan, 4 N.Y.2d 472, 176 N.Y.S.2d 316 (1958); People v. Picciotti, 4 N.Y.2d 340, 175 N.Y.S.2d 32 (1958).
Criminal Law—Power Of Grand Jury, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Power Of Grand Jury, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Ryback, 3 N.Y.2d 467, 168 N.Y.S.2d 945 (1957); People v. Stern, 3 N.Y.2d 658, 171 N.Y.S.2d 265 (1957).
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment Based Upon Coerced Confession, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment Based Upon Coerced Confession, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S.2d 799 (1958).
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment—Motion To Inspect, Buffalo Law Review
Criminal Law—Sufficiency Of Indictment—Motion To Inspect, Buffalo Law Review
Buffalo Law Review
People v. Howell, 3 N.Y.2d 672, 171 N.Y.S.2d 801 (1958).
A Double Jeopardy Dilemma In The Federal Courts
A Double Jeopardy Dilemma In The Federal Courts
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extent Of Washington Criminal Jurisdiction Over Indians, Allen Lane Carr, Stanley M. Johanson
Extent Of Washington Criminal Jurisdiction Over Indians, Allen Lane Carr, Stanley M. Johanson
Washington Law Review
The case of In re Andy, a 1956 decision of the Washington Supreme Court, demonstrated that there are approximately 15,000 persons in the state of Washington who are not amenable to criminal prosecution under state law in certain situations, and in many instances are not amenable to either state or federal prosecution. These 15,000 persons are the Indians who live in our state but who reside in "Indian country" and have retained their status as wards of the federal government. The problem of investigating and prosecuting crimes committed by these Indians has confronted and frustrated both state and federal law …
Federal Habeas Corpus And Incompetence Of Counsel In State Prosecutions, Mary Ellen Hanley
Federal Habeas Corpus And Incompetence Of Counsel In State Prosecutions, Mary Ellen Hanley
Washington Law Review
The purpose of this comment is to examine and analyze a group of recent decisions wherein persons convicted by state courts have sought writs of habeas corpus in federal district courts on the ground that the incompetence of counsel representing them at trial worked a deprivation of rights secured by the United States Constitution.