Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (893)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (399)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (343)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- University of Richmond (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (230)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (202)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (141)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (114)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (546)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (466)
- Criminal Procedure (391)
- Evidence (351)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Fourth Amendment (270)
- Sixth Amendment (270)
- Criminal justice (269)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (224)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (206)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Jury (136)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Punishment (133)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (760)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (262)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- University of Richmond Law Review (178)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (132)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (126)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11191 - 11220 of 12077
Full-Text Articles in Law
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
No abstract provided.
Mistrials In Courts-Martial: A Study Of The Evolution Of The Judicial Character Of The Military Judge, Paul E. Wilson
Mistrials In Courts-Martial: A Study Of The Evolution Of The Judicial Character Of The Military Judge, Paul E. Wilson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sullivan, Hardin, Huston, Lacy, Murry & Pugh: The Administration Of Criminal Justice; And Hall & Kamisar: Modern Criminal Procedure: Cases, Comments & Questions, John Kaplan
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Administration of Criminal Justice by Francis C. Sullivan, Paul Hardin, III, John Huston, Frank R. Lacy, Daniel E. Murray, and George W. Pugh; and Modern Criminal Procedure: Cases, Comments & Questions by Livingston Hall and Yale Kamisar
Advisory Committee On Sentencing And Review: American Bar Association Project On Minimum Standards For Criminal Justice: Standards Relating To Post-Conviction Remedies, Daniel J. Meador
Michigan Law Review
A Review of American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice: Standards Relating to Post-Conviction Remedies (Tentative Draft) recommended by the Advisory Committee on Sentencing and Review
The Suspect And Society, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Criminal Procedure—Indictment—Evidence Inadmissible At Trial Is Inadmissible In Grand Jury Proceedings, Michael Nelson
Criminal Procedure—Indictment—Evidence Inadmissible At Trial Is Inadmissible In Grand Jury Proceedings, Michael Nelson
Buffalo Law Review
West v. United States, 359 F.2d 50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied mem., 87 Sup. Ct. 131 (1966).
Post-Conviction Relief For Federal Prisoners: A Survey And A Suggestion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255, Gerald F. Uelmen
Post-Conviction Relief For Federal Prisoners: A Survey And A Suggestion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255, Gerald F. Uelmen
West Virginia Law Review
In answer to the complaints of numerous federal judges that they were being engulfed by a flood of habeas corpus petitions, Congress in 1948 enacted a complete revision of the habeas corpus provisions of the Judicial Code. Part of this revision was title 28, section 2255, of the United States Code which "restates, clarifies and simplifies the procedure in the nature of the ancient writ of error coram nobis." Adopted upon the recommendation of the Judicial Conference of the United States, its declared purpose was to provide "an expeditious remedy for correcting erroneous sentences without resort to habeas corpus." The …
Habeas Corpus In West Virginia, Fred L. Fox Ii
Habeas Corpus In West Virginia, Fred L. Fox Ii
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Felony Information: Due Process And Preliminary Hearing On Probable Cause, Anon
Felony Information: Due Process And Preliminary Hearing On Probable Cause, Anon
Washington Law Review
Defendants were charged with manslaughter by an information filed directly in superior court. They made timely motion to dismiss, contending that the information was defective because not found before a grand jury, or alternatively that due process required a determination before either a grand jury or a committing magistrate that probable cause existed to hold the defendants for trial. The motion was granted. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court reversed. Held: Due process does not require persons charged with an infamous crime to be indicted by a grand jury or afforded a preliminary hearing on the issue of probable cause, …
Felony Information: Due Process And Preliminary Hearing On Probable Cause, Anon
Felony Information: Due Process And Preliminary Hearing On Probable Cause, Anon
Washington Law Review
Defendants were charged with manslaughter by an information filed directly in superior court. They made timely motion to dismiss, contending that the information was defective because not found before a grand jury, or alternatively that due process required a determination before either a grand jury or a committing magistrate that probable cause existed to hold the defendants for trial. The motion was granted. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court reversed. Held: Due process does not require persons charged with an infamous crime to be indicted by a grand jury or afforded a preliminary hearing on the issue of probable cause, …
Covert Contingencies In The Right To The Assistance Of Counsel, Abraham S. Blumberg
Covert Contingencies In The Right To The Assistance Of Counsel, Abraham S. Blumberg
Vanderbilt Law Review
On the basis of a sociological survey showing that a very large percentage of guilty pleas are induced by defense counsel, Professor Blumberg concludes that criminal justice is not structured on the adversary model which the Supreme Court's right to counsel decisions presuppose. He submits that the primary loyalty of defense counsel is to the criminal court "system," the informal organization of court officials on which they depend for their professional existence. He suggests further that the additional attorneys which will be required to implement the right to counsel decisions will simply serve to make the"system" more efficient in utilizing …
From Escobedo To Miranda: The Anatomy Of A Supreme Court Decision, By Richard J. Medalie
From Escobedo To Miranda: The Anatomy Of A Supreme Court Decision, By Richard J. Medalie
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conviction: The Determination Of Guilt Or Innocence Without Trial, By Donald J. Newman
Conviction: The Determination Of Guilt Or Innocence Without Trial, By Donald J. Newman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process In Extra-Judicial Identifications
Due Process In Extra-Judicial Identifications
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court And The Criminal, Robert J. Steamer
The Court And The Criminal, Robert J. Steamer
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Disclosure To Defense Of Presentence Reports In West Virginia, Willard D. Lorensen
The Disclosure To Defense Of Presentence Reports In West Virginia, Willard D. Lorensen
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Of The Common Law Rules Of Arrest: A Handcuffing Of Police?, Douglas D. Mcbroom
Enforcement Of The Common Law Rules Of Arrest: A Handcuffing Of Police?, Douglas D. Mcbroom
Duquesne Law Review
"In the streets, the only law is that at the end of the policeman's nightstick." The degree of truth in this statement has long been a subject of concern among civil libertarians. Nevertheless, police agencies were for many years left to their own devices in meeting the essential problem of keeping order on the streets; only a small portion of their actions were subject to judicial review.
Criminal Procedure—Miranda: The Application Of The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination To Confessions—A Change In Approach., Gary M. Cohen
Buffalo Law Review
Miranda v. Arizona (consolidated in a single opinion with three companion cases, Vignera v. New York, Westover v. United States and California v. Stewart), 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Buffalo Law Review
Matter of Williams, 49 Misc. 2d 154, 267 N.Y.S.2d 91 (Ulster County Family Ct. 1966).
Grounds For Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Suggested Standard, Patrick L. Baude
Grounds For Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Suggested Standard, Patrick L. Baude
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
In Re Gault: Understanding The Attorney's New Role, Glenn C. Equi, James D. Hutchinson, Barney B. Welsh
In Re Gault: Understanding The Attorney's New Role, Glenn C. Equi, James D. Hutchinson, Barney B. Welsh
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement States Its Views, John Edgar Hoover
Law Enforcement States Its Views, John Edgar Hoover
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Capacity To Stand Trial: The Amnesic Criminal Defendant - Commonwealth Ex Rel. - Cummins V. Price1 State V. Mcclendon
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Psychiatric Testimony And The Doctrine Of Diminished Responsibility - State V. Sikora
Psychiatric Testimony And The Doctrine Of Diminished Responsibility - State V. Sikora
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Tempia: The Questionable Application Of Miranda To The Military, James F. Falco
United States V. Tempia: The Questionable Application Of Miranda To The Military, James F. Falco
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Film Censorship: The American And British Experience, Robert J. Klein
Film Censorship: The American And British Experience, Robert J. Klein
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My first task is to explain to some degree the nature of the problem embodied in our title. This book has been designated as "Escobedo-The Second Round." What we will be discussing is a series of cases, decided in June, 1966, the most noteworthy of which is Miranda v. Arizona [384 U.S. 436 (1966)]. In these cases, the United States Supreme Court prescribed a new set of standards governing the introduction in evidence of statements obtained from the defendant through police interrogation. Actually, to a degree these standards were not entirely new. They had been suggested, at least in part, …
Book Review, Lawrence J. Rich
Book Review, Lawrence J. Rich
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Richard J. Medalie, From Escobedo to Miranda: The Anatomy of a Supreme Court Decision, Lerner Law Book Co., Inc., 1966
Legal Aspects Of Police Radar, William K. Mccarter
Legal Aspects Of Police Radar, William K. Mccarter
Cleveland State Law Review
As a vehicle approaches the radar unit, it enters its operating zone or "zone of influence." The length and width of the zone depends on such factors as the strength of the signal and the transmittor height above the ground. The unit will record the speed of only one vehicle at a time, determined by the vehicle presenting the best target by reason of reflecting surface, position, or speed. Based on this, many courts have pointed out possible defenses to proof of speed by radar. One court has stated in its opinion there are many more defenses that can be …