Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Evolution (6)
- Book Reviews and Review Essays (4)
- Darwin and Darwinism (3)
- Biology (2)
- Cosmic evolution (2)
-
- Creationism (2)
- Ernest Everett Just (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Evolutionary bioethics (2)
- Reciprocity (2)
- Stellar evolution (2)
- Absurdity (1)
- Academic Works (1)
- Aesthetic altruism (1)
- Affection for Advantage (1)
- Affection for Justice (1)
- Altruism (1)
- Analogies (1)
- Analytical Marxis (1)
- Animal suicide (1)
- Antireductionism (1)
- Astrobiology (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Biological altruism (1)
- Biomimicry (1)
- C.S. Lewis (1)
- Cellular evolution (1)
- Challenges to Contemporary Evolutionary Theory (1)
- Chandra Wickramasinghe (1)
- Collective entities (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy of Science
Natural Selection And Self-Organization: Dynamical Models As Clues To A New Evolutionary Synthesis, Bruce Weber, David Depew
Natural Selection And Self-Organization: Dynamical Models As Clues To A New Evolutionary Synthesis, Bruce Weber, David Depew
David J Depew
The Darwinian concept of natural selection was conceived within a set of Newtonianbackground assumptions about systems dynamics. Mendelian genetics at first did not sit well with the gradualist assumptions of the Darwinian theory. Eventually, however. Mendelism and Darwinism were fused by reformulating natural selection in statistical terms. This reflected a shift to a more probabilistic set of background assumptions based upon Boltzmannian systems dynamics. Recent developments in molecular genetics and paleontology have put pressure on Darwinism once again. Current work on self-organizing systems may provide a stimulus not only for increased problem solving within the Darwinian tradition, especially with respect …
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A number of (present or former) analytical Marxists, such as Jon Elster, have argued that functional explanation has almost no place in the social sciences. (Although the discussion is framed in terms of a debate among analytical Marxists, the point is quite general, and Marxism is used for illustrative purposes.) Functional explanation accounts for what is to be explained by reference to its function; thus, sighted organism have eyes because eyes enable them to see. Elster and other critics of functional explanation argue that this pattern of explanation is inconsistent with "methodological individualism," the idea, as they understand it, that …