Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Aesthetics (2)
- Ancient Philosophy (2)
- Classics (2)
- Education (2)
- Epistemology (2)
-
- Metaphysics (2)
- Psychology (2)
- Religion (2)
- Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Economics (1)
- Epidemiology (1)
- Health Policy (1)
- International Economics (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Other Political Science (1)
- Other Psychology (1)
- Philosophy of Science (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Theory and Philosophy (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy of Mind
Method In Theology: Rahner And Lonergan On The 'Natural-Supernatural' Distinction, Richard Liddy
Method In Theology: Rahner And Lonergan On The 'Natural-Supernatural' Distinction, Richard Liddy
Department of Religion Publications
No abstract provided.
The Mind-Body Problem: A Tuberculosis/Tobacco Example, Ibpp Editor
The Mind-Body Problem: A Tuberculosis/Tobacco Example, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article illustrates two conflicts between what is, perhaps, best for the mind and best for the body.
Reading Well: The Key To The Core, Richard Liddy
Reading Well: The Key To The Core, Richard Liddy
Department of Religion Publications
No abstract provided.
Contextual Unanimity And The Units Of Selection Problem, Stuart M. Glennan
Contextual Unanimity And The Units Of Selection Problem, Stuart M. Glennan
Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS
Sober and Lewontin’s critique of genic selectionism is based upon the principle that a unit of selection should make a context‐independent contribution to fitness. Critics have effectively shown that this principle is flawed. In this paper I show that the context independence principle is an instance of a more general principle for characterizing causes,called the contextual unanimity principle. I argue that this latter principle, while widely accepted, is erroneous. What is needed is to replace the approach to causality characterized by the contextual unanimity criterion with an approach based on the concept of causal mechanism. After sketching such an approach, …