Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Continental Philosophy (3)
- Epistemology (3)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (3)
- Communication (2)
- History of Philosophy (2)
-
- Philosophy of Science (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Political Theory (2)
- Social Influence and Political Communication (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Metaphysics (1)
- Philosophy of Mind (1)
- Politics and Social Change (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Sociology of Culture (1)
- Speech and Rhetorical Studies (1)
- Keyword
-
- Critical theory (2)
- Aesthetics (1)
- American Pragmatism (1)
- C.S. Peirce (1)
- Enlightenment (1)
-
- Foucault (1)
- Frankfurt School (1)
- G. H. Mead (1)
- Habermas (1)
- Hegel (1)
- Hermeneutics (1)
- Isaiah Berlin (1)
- John Dewey (1)
- Karl Popper (1)
- Language (1)
- Logical Positivism (1)
- Ludwig Wittgenstein (1)
- Myth (1)
- Philosophy of history (1)
- Pippin (1)
- Positivismusstreit (1)
- Practical reason (1)
- Rationality (1)
- Reason (1)
- Recognition (1)
- Rudolf Carnap (1)
- Vico (1)
- Virtue ethics (1)
- W.V.O. Quine (1)
- Wilfred Sellars (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy of Language
Recognition Within The Limits Of Reason: Remarks On Pippin’S Hegel’S Practical Philosophy, David Ingram
Recognition Within The Limits Of Reason: Remarks On Pippin’S Hegel’S Practical Philosophy, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
Since the publication of Charles Taylor’s Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition in 1989,[1] the concept of recognition has re-emerged as a central if not dominant category of moral and political philosophy.
[1] C. Taylor, “The Politics of Recognition,” in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 25-73.
Late Pragmatism, Logical Positivism, And Their Aftermath, David Ingram
Late Pragmatism, Logical Positivism, And Their Aftermath, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
Developments in Anglo-American philosophy during the first half of the 20th Century closely tracked developments that were occurring in continental philosophy during this period. This should not surprise us. Aside from the fertile communication between these ostensibly separate traditions, both were responding to problems associated with the rise of mass society. Rabid nationalism, corporate statism, and totalitarianism (Left and Right) posed a profound challenge to the idealistic rationalism of neo-Kantian and neo-Hegelian philosophies. The decline of the individual – classically conceived by the 18th-century Enlightenment as a self-determining agent – provoked strong reactions. While some philosophical tendencies sought to …
Vico’S New Science Of Interpretation: Beyond Philosophical Hermeneutics And The Hermeneutics Of Suspicion, David Ingram
Vico’S New Science Of Interpretation: Beyond Philosophical Hermeneutics And The Hermeneutics Of Suspicion, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
The article situates Vico's hermeneutical science of history between a hermeneutics of suspicion (Ricoeur, Habermas, Freud) and a redemptive hermeneutics (Gadamer, Benjamin). It discusses Vico's early writings and his ambivalent trajectory from Cartesian rationalism to counter-enlightenment historicist and critic of natural law reasoning. The complexity of Vico's thinking belies some of the popular treatments of his thought developed by Isaiah Berlin and others.
Foucault And Habermas, David Ingram
Foucault And Habermas, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
The article is a comprehensive comparison of Foucault and Habermas which focuses on their distinctive styles of critical theory. The article maintains that Foucault's virtue ethical understanding of aesthetic self-realization as a form of resistance to normalizing practices provides counterpoint to Habermas's more juridical approach to institutional justice and the critique of ideology. The article contains an extensive discussion of their respective treatments of speech action, both strategic and communicative, and concludes by addressing Foucault's understanding of parrhesia as a non-discursive form of truth-telling.