Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (20)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (16)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (8)
- Social Justice (8)
- Political Science (5)
-
- African American Studies (4)
- Political Theory (4)
- Continental Philosophy (3)
- Feminist Philosophy (3)
- Other Philosophy (3)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (2)
- Education (2)
- Ethnic Studies (2)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Applied Ethics (1)
- Asian American Studies (1)
- Classics (1)
- Comparative Philosophy (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Geography (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies (1)
- Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Other Geography (1)
- Philosophy of Science (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (7)
- Race (6)
- Philosophy (4)
- Aesthetics (2)
- Anthropocene (2)
-
- Business ethics (2)
- Dignity (2)
- Embarrassment (2)
- Frederick Douglass (2)
- Free will (2)
- Integration (2)
- Moral responsibility (2)
- Place (2)
- Racism (2)
- Segregation (2)
- Shame (2)
- Virtue (2)
- 1770-1831 -- Works/Phänomenologie des Geistes (1)
- Abolitionists (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Advertising (1)
- Affective response (1)
- African American Philosophy (1)
- African American Political Theory (1)
- African philosophy (1)
- Alternatives (1)
- Analogy (1)
- Animal rights (1)
- Animal-euthanasia (1)
- Anti-racial (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 181 of 181
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy
Zeno’S First Argument Concerning Plurality, William J. Prior
Zeno’S First Argument Concerning Plurality, William J. Prior
Philosophy
Until quite recently, scholars have been nearly unanimous inaccepting as correct Plato's characterization of Zeno of Elea as a faithful disciple of Parmenides. They have also adopted a reconstruction of his first argument against plurality made by Fränkel2.Both this view of Zeno and the accepted Interpretation of thereconstructed argument, however, have lately been subjected to incisive criticism by Friedrich Solmsen3. Solmsen has claimed that Zeno was no Eleatic, but rather a dialectician without positive philosophical commitments; and he has used the argument reconstructed by Fränkel to support his Interpretation.
Solmsen's case rests on three Claims. First, …