Digital Commons Network^™

Seasonal Report, Ray Hannikman, Dwight Chasar, Kevin Metcalf, Clyde E. Witt

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Sean T. Zadar, Dwight Chasar, Haans Petruschke, Bill Whan, Judy Semroc

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, The Cleveland Bird Calendar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Kevin E. Metcalf, Cathy Priebe, Ann Chasar, Dwight Chasar, Carl Sadowski

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Ben Winger, Dwight Chasar, Ann Chasar, Dick Rickard, Bob Finkelstein

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Leo Deininger, Dick Rickard, Dwight Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Brenda Kovalsky, Dwight Chasar, Ann Edwards, John Edwards, Stanley Stine, Kevin Metcalf

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

The Weather, Dwight A. Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Linda Gilbert, Phyllis Schnell, Dwight Chasar, Ann Chasar, Stanley Stine, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Linda Gilbert, Brad Stemen, Bob Finkelstein, Dwight Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Larry Rosche, Tom Barber, Dwight A. Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Norman J. Kotesovec Jr., Dwight Chasar, Ann Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, Larry Rosche

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Jennifer Brumfield, Thomas Leiden, Robert Harlan

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Bruce Mclean, Carol Tveekrem, Paula J. Lozano, Jean Hoffman, Dwight Chasar, Ann Chasar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, The Cleveland Bird Calendar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

The Weather, William A. Klamm

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Noteworthy Records, The Cleveland Bird Calendar

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

The Weather, William A. Klamm

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Field Notes, Robert Ball, Raymond Hannikman, James Heflich, Drew Rolik

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

The Weather, William A. Klamm

Cleveland Bird Calendar

No abstract provided.

Eco-Assisted Ultrasonic Synthesis, Characterization, And Electrical Conductivity Study Of Polyaniline/ Silica@Fe3o4 Q1 Nanocomposites, Ali Salim Shaway, Kholoud Dham Khamkheem, Jawad Kadhim Abaies, Athra G. Sager

Karbala International Journal of Modern Science

وفي هذه الدراسة الصوتية، أصبحت السيليكا المُنتجة بأكسيد الحديد (Fe₃O₄) ومركبات نانوية قائمة على البولي أنيلين مُطعّم بنسبة 5-15% من السيليكا المُعزز للحديد (Fe₃O₄). وأكملت نهائيا ماء أنيلين والمركبات العلمية المتنوعة الارتباط باستخدام تقنيات FT-IR وUV-Vis وXRD وSEM وTEM. وأحدثت نتائج XRD أن حجم جسيمات البولينج أنيلين الناي (PANI) يبلغ 55.5. مكثف هذا الحجم إلى 45.2 عند تطعيم بولي أنيلين بنسبة 15% وزناً من السيليكا المُغلفة بأكسيد الحديد (Fe₃O₄) مُحضّرة بطريقة جيدة بشكل جيد، مما يميل إلى التمدد بشكل ثابت في تشكيل المركب المتباين المنظم. ضاقت النطاق البصري من 3.2 إلى 2.5 إلكترون فولت مع زيادة نسبة المطعّم، مما يشير …

The Varieties Of Substantive Due Process Experience: Obergefell, Dobbs And A State Constitutional Alternative, Lawrence Friedman

Mercer Law Review

As a guide to understanding—and applying—the doctrine of substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, Obergefell v. Hodges seems to have enjoyed a relatively short reign. Less than ten years after the Supreme Court of the United States held that individuals enjoy a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment to marry a person of the same sex, the Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization turned to a different approach to the task of identifying and enforcing unenumerated constitutional rights. Dobbs, like Obergefell, is not without its problems: where the substantive due process analysis articulated in Obergefell lacks rigor, …

Pronouns On The Clock: The Eleventh Circuit’S Broad Limitation Of Teacher Speech In Wood V. Florida Department Of Education, Carter E. Pannell

Mercer Law Review

Few settings test the limits of free speech more sharply than public schools, where questions of personal identity, government authority, and constitutional rights often intersect. Because the government has an interest in regulating what its employees do and say, First Amendment protections afforded to government employees are diluted in comparison to those afforded to private citizens. A contemporary example of this tension is the question of whether the government may regulate a public-school teacher’s use of pronouns or titles in their own classroom.

In 2023, Florida enacted a statute forbidding teachers from using pronouns or titles that differ from the …

The Troll On The Bridge: The Eleventh Circuit’S Ugly New Threshold Test Halts Substantive Due Process Claims In Their Tracks, Christopher C. Stiles Jr.

Mercer Law Review

The Bill of Rights established a series of fundamental American individual rights, from the freedom of speech to the right to a fair trial, that the federal government cannot violate. Yet, across a conceptual divide lies a landscape of other crucial rights the Framers never enumerated. Substantive due process is one legal mechanism that bridges that gap: extending the Constitution’s protection to these other fundamental rights. Grounded in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, substantive due process enables plaintiffs to sue for government violations of rights that, though unenumerated in the Constitution, are long-recognized by common law and essential for American …

Delusions Of Judicial Grandeur: State V. Wierson And The Return To Statutory Sanity, Max Jordan Katz

Mercer Law Review

Georgia’s insanity defenses have long reflected tension between accountability and mental illness. The State’s statutory framework, which preserves both a “mental incapacity” and “delusional compulsion” defense, reflects this tension. Yet for decades, the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Bailey v. State imposed a judicial limitation: a defendant who “brought about” her own delusion through voluntary acts or omissions could not claim insanity. The court’s recent decision in State v. Wierson marks a turning point. In Wierson, the court considered whether noncompliance with psychiatric medication preempts the defendant from invoking statutory insanity defenses. Rejecting Bailey, the court reasserted the primacy …