Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physics

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 871 - 900 of 1948

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Constraints On The Double-Parton Scattering Cross Section From Same-Sign W Boson Pair Production In Proton-Proton Collisions At S = 8 $$ \Sqrt{S}=8 $$ Tev, Cms Collaboration, J. G. Acosta, S. Oliveros Feb 2018

Constraints On The Double-Parton Scattering Cross Section From Same-Sign W Boson Pair Production In Proton-Proton Collisions At S = 8 $$ \Sqrt{S}=8 $$ Tev, Cms Collaboration, J. G. Acosta, S. Oliveros

Faculty and Student Publications (Open Access)

No abstract provided.


Combined Forward-Backward Asymmetry Measurements In Top-Antitop Quark Production At The Tevatron, Cdf Collaboration, D0 Collaboration, S. Bhatia, J. L. Holzbauer, J. Kraus, B. Quinn Jan 2018

Combined Forward-Backward Asymmetry Measurements In Top-Antitop Quark Production At The Tevatron, Cdf Collaboration, D0 Collaboration, S. Bhatia, J. L. Holzbauer, J. Kraus, B. Quinn

Faculty and Student Publications (Open Access)

No abstract provided.


First Search For Nontensorial Gravitational Waves From Known Pulsars, Ligo Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, M. Afrough, M. Cavaglià, C. Cocchieri, K. L. Dooley, D. Trifirò Jan 2018

First Search For Nontensorial Gravitational Waves From Known Pulsars, Ligo Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, M. Afrough, M. Cavaglià, C. Cocchieri, K. L. Dooley, D. Trifirò

Faculty and Student Publications (Open Access)

No abstract provided.


Search For The Pair Production Of Third-Generation Squarks With Two-Body Decays To A Bottom Or Charm Quark And A Neutralino In Proton–Proton Collisions At S=13tev, Cms Collaboration, J. G. Acosta, S. Oliveros Jan 2018

Search For The Pair Production Of Third-Generation Squarks With Two-Body Decays To A Bottom Or Charm Quark And A Neutralino In Proton–Proton Collisions At S=13tev, Cms Collaboration, J. G. Acosta, S. Oliveros

Faculty and Student Publications (Open Access)

No abstract provided.


Late History Graph, David Peak Jan 2018

Late History Graph, David Peak

Background

Late History graph image.


Background, 2, David Peak Jan 2018

Background, 2, David Peak

Background

Ordinary, everyday, Galilean/Newtonian relativity

An “event” is something that happens at a point in space, at an instant in time. In physics, relativity means the rules by which two observers can compare and make sense of measurements each makes of the positions and times of the same events. In physics, an observer is not a person or an individual measuring device. Such isolated “detectors” are plagued by experimental issues of parallax, delay times, and so forth. For our purposes, an observer will always mean an infinite collection of rigidly attached, perfect sensors and microprocessors whose internal clocks are perfectly synchronized. …


General Relativity, 5, David Peak Jan 2018

General Relativity, 5, David Peak

General Relativity

No abstract provided.


General Relativity, 9, David Peak Jan 2018

General Relativity, 9, David Peak

General Relativity

Cosmic development

As discussed in GR 8, the cosmic scale factor a in the FLWR s-t obeys the Friedmann equation


General Relativity, 7, David Peak Jan 2018

General Relativity, 7, David Peak

General Relativity

The expanding universe

The fact that the vast majority of galaxies have a spectral redshift can be interpreted as implying that the universe is expanding. This interpretation stems from the Doppler effect in which the relative motion of an emitter and a detector produces a frequency shift of the detected light with respect to the emitted light.


Rudiments Of Quantum Mechanics (Qm), David Peak Jan 2018

Rudiments Of Quantum Mechanics (Qm), David Peak

Structure of Matter

Rudiments of Quantum Mechanics (QM)


Structure Of Matter, 6, David Peak Jan 2018

Structure Of Matter, 6, David Peak

Structure of Matter

Quantum Flavor Dynamics (QFD), I

That each generation of the quark and lepton periodic tables (i.e., electron, muon, and tauon–see SM 1, p.1) has two members (a neutrino and a charged particle) that can be flipped into one another by emission or absorption of W bosons is reminiscent of how the angular momentum spin-1/2 component of a charged particle can be flipped between “up” and “down” orientations along some direction ( z ) in space by emission or absorption of photons. This analogy is made more graphic by labeling flavor rows by a new kind of “spin” (completely unrelated to …


Structure Of Matter, 9, David Peak Jan 2018

Structure Of Matter, 9, David Peak

Structure of Matter

Beyond the Standard Models

As noted in SM 8 there are problems with the standard model of particle physics that beg for resolution. Indeed, there are significant unknowns concerning the standard model of cosmology as well—for example, what really is “inflation” and what preceded it? The latter suggests the need for the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics. In addition, both models involve bizarre empirical parameters. Why are the elementary particle masses so wildly different? Why are the strengths of the interactions so different? What is dark matter? What is dark energy and why is its density so small? Why …


Structure Of Matter, 7, David Peak Jan 2018

Structure Of Matter, 7, David Peak

Structure of Matter

More about the matter with mass

To repeat, the basic premise of QED is that the physical world doesn’t care about the phase of the electron wavefunction; calculations and observations strongly support that idea. The basic premise of QCD is that the physical world doesn’t care about the color of the quark wavefunction; calculations and observations strongly support that idea. The basic premise of QFD is that the physical world doesn’t care about the flavor (isospin) of the quark or lepton wavefunctions. But that’s not true! For example, a “free” d quark can certainly emit a (virtual) W particle and …


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #2, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #2, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #2 Newtonian relativity

Problems 1-4 refer to: Sound travels at about 330 m/s in still air. Observer O is at rest with respect to still air, observer O′ travels with constant velocity +50 m/s in the common x, x′ direction. Event A is the emission of a sound pulse from a stationary source at the origin of O; it occurs at xA = 0 at tA = 0. Event B is the reflection of the pulse at xB = +100 m. Event C is the detection of the reflected pulse at x …


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #3, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #3, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #3 Relativistic kinematics, I


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #10, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #10, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #10 Relativistic gravity, III

Problems 1-3 refer to: The maximum measured z value for a galaxy is 11.1. As on page 1, GR7, z = λd − λe / λe.


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #6, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #6, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #6 Relativistic dynamics, II

Problems 1-5 refer to: The mass of the neutron is 1.008664 u and that of the proton is 1.007276 u, where 1 u = 931.5 MeV.


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #12, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #12, David Peak

Problems

Problem Set #12 Quarks and gluons

In the following solid lines represent quarks or antiquarks and dotted lines represent gluons. Time increases upward.


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #7, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #7, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #7 Newtonian gravity


Special Relativity, 4, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 4, David Peak

Special Relativity

More kinematic consequences of the Lorentz transformations

Light cones: A “light cone” is a set of world lines corresponding to light rays emanating from and/or entering into an event.


Special Relativity, 6, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 6, David Peak

Special Relativity

Energy-momentum vector


Special Relativity, 5, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 5, David Peak

Special Relativity

No abstract provided.


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #5, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #5, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #5 Relativistic dynamics, I

Problems 1-5 refer to: One mass, m1 = 1 (in some units), collides head-on with a second mass, m2 = 2 , and sticks to it, forming a composite body of mass M . There are no external forces. Observer O records m1 as initially moving with dimensionless velocity, u1 = +0.9 in the x - direction, while m2 is recorded to be at rest. Do not make unwarranted assumptions about M , please; that’s the point of this set of problems.


Structure Of Matter, 1, David Peak Jan 2018

Structure Of Matter, 1, David Peak

Structure of Matter

In the hot early universe, prior to the epoch of nucleosynthesis, even the most primitive nuclear material—i.e., protons and neutrons—could not have existed. Earlier than 10–5 s or so after t = 0 , the universe would have been a hot soup consisting of the most elementary of particles—photons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos, quarks, and gluons. We now turn to the,” “Standard Model of Particle Physics,” our current understanding of these elementary building blocks and their interactions. The Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP), developed in fits and starts over the past 50 years, is a quantitatively predictive theory of subatomic …


Structure Of Matter, 4, David Peak Jan 2018

Structure Of Matter, 4, David Peak

Structure of Matter

Antiscreening: The triumph of lattice QCD

QED is a phenomenally accurate theory of the interactions of electrically charged particles with photons. The way interactions are described in QED—by adding electromagnetic potential fields to the energy and momentum operators in the charged particle field equations— is essentially exactly correct given that the detailed calculations that can be made in QED agree so well with observation. These calculations are possible because simple processes (involving small numbers of interaction vertices) are significantly more important than complicated processes. That is, QED is a “perturbative” theory. Higher order QED effects, therefore, invariably consist of small …


Physics 3710 – Problem Set #8, David Peak Jan 2018

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #8, David Peak

Problems

Physics 3710 – Problem Set #8 Relativistic gravity, I


Special Relativity, 1, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 1, David Peak

Special Relativity

Newton and Maxwell

We have seen that simple magnetic forces are incompatible with Newtonian mechanics. There are far more profound incompatibilities between electromagnetism and Newton. In particular, Maxwell’s equations predict that an accelerating charge produces a time changing magnetic field, which, in turn, produces a time changing electric field, which, in turn, produces a time changing magnetic field, which, in turn, produces … . This self-sustaining production of magnetic and electric fields propagates away from the source charge at a finite speed given by 1 µ0ε 0 (in empty space), the numerical value of which is approximately 3x108 m/s. But, …


Special Relativity, 2, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 2, David Peak

Special Relativity

Events not connected by light propagation

Previously, we considered two events (A, with s-t coordinates (xA, yA,zA ,TA ) = (x′A, y′A,z′A,T ′A ) = (0,0,0,0) according to both O and Oʹ [moving relative to O with constant velocity β along the mutual x, x′ -axes], and B, with coordinates (xB,0,0,TB) and (x′B,0,0,T′B)) connected by a light pulse.


Special Relativity, 7, David Peak Jan 2018

Special Relativity, 7, David Peak

Special Relativity

Relativistic electromagnetism

Let’s return to the problem posed at the end of BK2.


General Relativity, 2, David Peak Jan 2018

General Relativity, 2, David Peak

General Relativity

Newton’s law of gravitostatics is incompatible with special relativity. To see this, suppose at time t in frame O m1 is at x1(t) and m2 is at x2(t). Newton’s gravitational force law says F1on 2(t) = Gm1m2 / [x2(t) − x1(t)]2 and relativistic dynamics says dp2 /dt = F1on 2. Transforming to another frame Oʹ moving relative to O leads to dp′2/dt′ = F′1on 2. But what is F′1on 2 ? If x1(t) and …