Digital Commons Network^™

Nh 4-H Horse Quiz Bowl Packet, Unh Cooperative Extension

UNH Cooperative Extension

No abstract provided.

4-H Kindness Matters Scholarship, Kristen Lyons

UNH Cooperative Extension

No abstract provided.

Ai Bots As Law Teachers: What Is Left For Human Professors To Do?, Harold I. Abramson

Scholarly Works

This article considers what bots can do as AI law teachers, how students are already using bots for learning, how to integrate the use of AI into law courses, and what faculty can do to stay ahead of the bots in their classrooms. During this discussion, the article confronts the existential question of what is left for human law professors to do in an AI world. It concludes that there is a future for humans for now, and one that might make us better teachers.

Is There Really Too Much Housing?, Michael Lewyn

Scholarly Works

This essay seeks to both explain and critique Lynn Ellsworth’s critique of YIMBYism. Part I of this review focuses on Ellsworth’s primary concern: a fear of the alleged destructive effect of dense neighborhoods and tall buildings. Part II addresses her attempts to deny the link between increased housing construction and lower housing costs. Part III addresses her alternative solutions to New York’s housing crisis.

Excavating Miranda, Samuel J. Levine

Scholarly Works

Sixty years after it was decided, Miranda v. Arizona remains one of the most significant and renowned cases—as well as, arguably, one of the most controversial cases—in the history of the United States. Chief Justice Earl Warren’s majority opinion, establishing the eponymous Miranda warnings for custodial interrogation of criminal suspects, has prompted voluminous and continuing commentary, among both critics and supporters. This Article is part of an ongoing project exploring a particular aspect of Chief Justice Warren’s majority opinion: a footnote referencing Jewish legal sources, documenting an important passage at the start of a pivotal section of the opinion.

Building …

Cutting The Gordian Knot Of Civil Liability: Cross-Deputization Agreements As A Remedy To Jurisdiction And Liability Concerns For Indian Country In Oklahoma, K. Mekko Factor

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Unethical Business Practices Plague Native American Cultures And Economies – Solutions To The Ineffectiveness Of The Indian Arts And Crafts Act, Benjamin Amoroso Sinder

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Survivor's Tale: How The Northern And Eastern Districts Of Oklahoma Survived The Tidal Wave Collision Of Mcgirt V. Oklahoma, Darbi E. Robertson

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2024 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Molly Gunther, Kevin Burdet

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Front Pages

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Bad Man’S Hourglass: Extending The Clock On Justice, Liv G. Cummins

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

With Religious Freedom Came Religious Authority: Apache Stronghold V. United States And The Exclusion Of Native American Religion Within The Legal Understanding Of Religious Freedom, Cassidy Beck

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

“Discovered!”: Plaintiff’S Brief To The United States Supreme Court In Johnson & Graham’S Lessee V. M‘Intosh (1823), Mark Savage

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abrogation Without Mention: A Note On Lac Du Flambeau Band Of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians V. Coughlin, Taya Maxson

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tulsa V. O’Brien: A City Adds To The Battle Over Jurisdiction In Indian Country, Fatima D. Jaime

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2025 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Baylee Ogle, Madison Bailey

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Front Pages

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

When Tribal Sovereign Immunity And The Americans With Disabilities Act Collide, Who Wins?, Baylee M. Ogle

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Native Gifts In An Electric Universe: Exploring Tribal Sovereignty Through Digital Data, Spectrum, And Technological Imaginings, Michael Johnson

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Pursuit Of Federal Recognition: A Legal And Historical Analysis Of The Duwamish Tribe’S Fight For Federal Tribal Recognition, Gabrielle Gollihar

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Becerra V. San Carlos Apache Tribe And The Indian Self Determination & Education Assistance Act: Keeping Indian Health Services Responsible In The Wake Of Forced Sterilizations, Alexis K. O’Brien

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tribal Civil Jurisdiction: Lexington V. Smith And The Evolution Of The Montana Framework, Will Speed

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rapid Electrochemical Biosensor With Enhanced Accuracy And Repeatability Using Pyrene Nhs Ester Modified 3d Graphene Electrodes, S. Nazir, D. Jenkins, G. Pan

School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics

A consistent and reproducible chemical modification of the transducer interface is essential to ensure effectiveimmobilization of bioreceptors, thereby improving the sensitivity and reproducibility of biosensors. Althoughnotable progress has been made in fabricating graphene-based biosensors, the effects of surface biofunctionalization on sensing performance remain not fully understood. This study shows that combining threedimensional (3D) graphene foam electrodes with a straightforward, single-step surface biofunctionalizationmethod is key to enhancing the performance of graphene-based biosensors. Specifically, it presents a single-stepapproach to functionalize the 3D graphene foam (Gii-Sens) with 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimideester (Pyrene-NHS ester). Electrochemical techniques, including cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulsevoltammetry (DPV), confirmed …

Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 Transcriptionally Represses Sirtuin 1 To Regulate Osteoclastogenesis And Tooth Eruption, Jie Li, Changqing Yan, Xinyi Sun, Chenying Zhang, Xiaozhe Wang, Yang Liu, Shuguo Zheng

Journal of Dental Sciences

Background/purpose: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD), caused by Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) haploinsufficiency, features delayed tooth eruption. Although impaired osteoclastogenesis contributes to eruption failure, the direct molecular mechanisms linking RUNX2 deficiency to osteoclast dysfunction remain elusive. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is a critical regulator of osteoclastogenesis; however, whether it serves as a downstream effector of RUNX2 remains unexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanistic link between RUNX2 and SIRT1 in regulating osteoclast differentiation and tooth eruption.

Materials and methods: Tooth eruption and osteoclast differentiation were assessed by micro-computed tomography and histological analysis in Runx2^+/- mice. Chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain …

Ansys Discovery And Fluent Files For Modeling A Hydrocyclone With Scco2 And Coal Fly Ash, Isaiah Morones, Catherine Brewer

Chemical & Materials Engineering: Datasets

No abstract provided.

Variable Temperature And Moisture Requirements For Germination Within Populations Of Kochia (Bassia Scoparia) In Field Margins, Brian Schutte, Rebecca Creamer

Entomology, Plant Pathology, & Weed Science: Datasets

No abstract provided.

The Trademark Bargain: Registration As Disclosure, Dustin Marlan

Faculty Publications

This Article highlights the central—and under-theorized—role that disclosure plays within trademark law. By loose analogy, the patent disclosure requirement is a cornerstone of patent law, embodying the “patent bargain” where an inventor must disclose their invention in exchange for a twenty-year monopoly. This quid pro quo is believed to stimulate the progress of science and technology, making patent disclosure the very pulse of the patent regime. However, the fundamental importance of disclosure in trademark law remains underexplored. Like patents, trademark law imposes a rigorous bargain—to obtain the enhanced rights granted by federal registration, trademark owners must first make significant disclosures …

A First Amendment Right To Know, David S. Ardia

Faculty Publications

This Article tackles an increasingly important question: Can police round up people on American streets and keep secret the names of those they detain without violating the First Amendment? Alarmingly, the government made this very argument in the summer of 2020 when it sought to break up Black Lives Matter protests occurring in cities across the country. Based in part on a Supreme Court decision from the 1970s involving access to prisons, the government argued that the First Amendment imposes no constraints on government secrecy. If it is true that the government can shield its exercise of police power from …

Tradition Without Text?, Daniel B. Rice

Faculty Publications

This Essay critiques the Supreme Court’s emerging “history and tradition” methodology, as articulated in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, arguing that its reliance on affirmative textual recognition in historical positive law fundamentally misrepresents the nature of American liberty traditions. By insisting that unenumerated rights are constitutionally cognizable only when earlier legal sources explicitly identified them as rights, the Court adopts a truncated evidentiary framework that privileges written enactments while disregarding lived experience, social practice, and the normative assumptions that shaped earlier understandings of permissible state power. The result, the Essay contends, is a mechanized and impoverished account of …

Desperation Finance: Merchant Cash Advances In Bankruptcy And Beyond, Kara J. Bruce

Faculty Publications

Over the last several years, Merchant Cash Advances (“MCAs”) have risen in prominence as a form of short-term financing for distressed small businesses. MCA transactions are distinct from most small-business lending because they are not structured as loans at all. Rather, in exchange for a lump sum of cash, the merchant purports to sell to the funder an unidentified percentage of its future receipts or receivables. This structure allows funders to sidestep the application of lending regulations and usury protections, but it strains the foundations of commercial law and generates a host of interpretive challenges.

Bankruptcy, district, and circuit courts …