Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 481 - 510 of 3957

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

From Helmets To Savings And Inheritance Taxes: Regulatory Intensity, Information Revelation, And Internalities, Saul Levmore Jan 2014

From Helmets To Savings And Inheritance Taxes: Regulatory Intensity, Information Revelation, And Internalities, Saul Levmore

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Quadratic Voting As Efficient Corporate Governance, Eric A. Posner, E. Glen Weyl Jan 2014

Quadratic Voting As Efficient Corporate Governance, Eric A. Posner, E. Glen Weyl

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Libertarian Paternalism, Path Dependence, And Temporary Law, Tom Ginsburg, Jonathan S. Masur, Richard H. Mcadams Jan 2014

Libertarian Paternalism, Path Dependence, And Temporary Law, Tom Ginsburg, Jonathan S. Masur, Richard H. Mcadams

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Too Late To Stipulate: Reconciling Rule 68 With Summary Judgments, Channing J. Turner Jan 2014

Too Late To Stipulate: Reconciling Rule 68 With Summary Judgments, Channing J. Turner

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Common Good And Common Ground: The Inevitability Of Fundamental Disagreement (Reviewing Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, And Virtues By James E. Fleming, Linda C. Mcclain), Rebecca L. Brown Jan 2014

Common Good And Common Ground: The Inevitability Of Fundamental Disagreement (Reviewing Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, And Virtues By James E. Fleming, Linda C. Mcclain), Rebecca L. Brown

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Renegotiation Design By Contract, Richard Holden, Anup Malani Jan 2014

Renegotiation Design By Contract, Richard Holden, Anup Malani

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Governing Communities By Auction, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky Jan 2014

Governing Communities By Auction, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Partition And Revelation, Yun-Chien Chang, Lee Anne Fennell Jan 2014

Partition And Revelation, Yun-Chien Chang, Lee Anne Fennell

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Having Their Cake And Eating It Too? Post-Emancipation Child Support As A Valid Judicial Option, Lauren C. Barnett Sep 2013

Having Their Cake And Eating It Too? Post-Emancipation Child Support As A Valid Judicial Option, Lauren C. Barnett

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Equal Opportunity: Federal Employees' Right To Sue On Title Vii And Tort Claims, Kristin Sommers Czubkowski Sep 2013

Equal Opportunity: Federal Employees' Right To Sue On Title Vii And Tort Claims, Kristin Sommers Czubkowski

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Francis Lieber And The Modern Law Of War (Reviewing Lincoln's Code: The Laws Of War In American History By John Fabian Witt), Paul Finkelman Sep 2013

Francis Lieber And The Modern Law Of War (Reviewing Lincoln's Code: The Laws Of War In American History By John Fabian Witt), Paul Finkelman

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Impeaching Precedent, Charles L. Barzun Sep 2013

Impeaching Precedent, Charles L. Barzun

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article is about the nature and scope of legal argument. It considers the question of whether a court, when determining the precedential weight of one of its prior decisions, should consider historical evidence indicating that the decision was decided on the basis of improper motivations or as the result of political pressure. In a common law system in which courts pervasively rely on precedents as a source of law, that question is of obvious practical and theoretical importance. Yet courts and scholars have hardly even raised the question, let alone provided a satisfactory answer to it. Instead, they have …


Inside Or Outside The System?, Eric Posner, Adrian Vermeule Sep 2013

Inside Or Outside The System?, Eric Posner, Adrian Vermeule

University of Chicago Law Review

In a typical pattern in the literature on public law, the diagnostic sections of a paper draw upon political science, economics, or other disciplines to offer deeply pessimistic accounts of the motivations of relevant actors in the legal system. The prescriptive sections of the paper, however, then issue an optimistic proposal that the same actors should supply public-spirited solutions. Where the analyst makes inconsistent assumptions about the motivations of actors within the legal system, equivocating between external and internal perspectives, an inside/outside fallacy arises. We identify the fallacy, connect it to an economics literature on the "determinacy paradox," and elicit …


"Super Contacts": Invoking Aiding-And-Abetting Jurisdiction To Hold Foreign Nonparties In Contempt Of Court, Julia K. Schwartz Sep 2013

"Super Contacts": Invoking Aiding-And-Abetting Jurisdiction To Hold Foreign Nonparties In Contempt Of Court, Julia K. Schwartz

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Using Severability Doctrine To Solve The Retroactivity Unit-Of-Analysis Puzzle: A Dodd-Frank Case Study, Hannah Garden-Monheit Sep 2013

Using Severability Doctrine To Solve The Retroactivity Unit-Of-Analysis Puzzle: A Dodd-Frank Case Study, Hannah Garden-Monheit

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Disability Claims, Guidance Documents, And The Problem Of Nonlegislative Rules, Frederick W. Watson Sep 2013

Disability Claims, Guidance Documents, And The Problem Of Nonlegislative Rules, Frederick W. Watson

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Taking Leases, Nicholas Spear Sep 2013

Taking Leases, Nicholas Spear

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Bankruptcy Law As A Liquidity Provider, Kenneth Ayotte, David A. Skeel Jr Sep 2013

Bankruptcy Law As A Liquidity Provider, Kenneth Ayotte, David A. Skeel Jr

University of Chicago Law Review

Since the outset of the recent financial crisis, liquidity problems have been cited as the cause behind the bankruptcies and near bankruptcies of numerous firms, ranging from Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers in 2008 to Kodak more recently. This Article expands the prevailing normative theory of corporate bankruptcy—the Creditors' Bargain theory—to include a role for bankruptcy as a provider of liquidity. The Creditors' Bargain theory argues that bankruptcy law should be limited to solving problems caused by multiple, uncoordinated creditors, but focuses almost exclusively on the problem of creditor runs. We argue that two well-known problems that cause illiquidity—debt overhang …


Unbundling Constitutionality, Richard Primus Jun 2013

Unbundling Constitutionality, Richard Primus

University of Chicago Law Review

Constitutional theory features a persistent controversy over the source or sources of constitutional status, that is, over the criteria that qualify some rules as constitutional rules. This Article contends that no single criterion characterizes all of the rules that American law treats as constitutional, such that it is a mistake to think of constitutionality as a status with necessary conditions. It is better to think of constitutionality on a bundle-of-sticks model: different attributes associated with constitutionality might or might not be present in any constitutional rule. Analysts should often direct their attention more to the separate substantive properties that are …


The Availability Of Discovery Sanctions For Violations Of Protective Orders, Adam M. Josephs Jun 2013

The Availability Of Discovery Sanctions For Violations Of Protective Orders, Adam M. Josephs

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Extra Venues For Extraterritorial Crimes? 18 Usc § 3238 And Cross-Border Criminal Activity, Megan O'Neill Jun 2013

Extra Venues For Extraterritorial Crimes? 18 Usc § 3238 And Cross-Border Criminal Activity, Megan O'Neill

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Historical Approach To Negligent Misrepresentation And Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 9(B), Kimball Dean Parker Jun 2013

A Historical Approach To Negligent Misrepresentation And Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 9(B), Kimball Dean Parker

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults, Lauren E. Willis Jun 2013

When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults, Lauren E. Willis

University of Chicago Law Review

Inspired by the success of "automatic enrollment" in increasing participation in defined contribution retirement savings plans, policymakers have put similar policy defaults in place in a variety of other contexts, from checking account overdraft coverage to home-mortgage escrows. Internet privacy appears poised to be the next arena. But how broadly applicable are the results obtained in the retirement-savings context? Evidence from other contexts indicates two problems with this approach: the defaults put in place by the law are not always sticky, and the people who opt out may be those who would benefit the most from the default. Examining the …


The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights Into Felon Gun Rights, Frederick C. Benson Jun 2013

The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights Into Felon Gun Rights, Frederick C. Benson

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Judging The Flood Of Litigation, Marin K. Levy Jun 2013

Judging The Flood Of Litigation, Marin K. Levy

University of Chicago Law Review

The Supreme Court has increasingly considered a particular kind of argument: that it should avoid reaching decisions that would "open the floodgates of litigation." Despite its frequent invocation, there has been little scholarly exploration of what a floodgates argument truly means, and even less discussion of its normative basis. This Article addresses both subjects, demonstrating for the first time the scope and surprising variation of floodgates arguments, as well as uncovering their sometimes-shaky foundations. Relying on in-depth case studies from a wide array of issue areas, the Article shows that floodgates arguments primarily have been used to protect three institutions: …


Pleading In Technicolor: When Can Litigants Incorporate Audiovisual Works Into Their Complaints?, Aimee Woodward Brown Jun 2013

Pleading In Technicolor: When Can Litigants Incorporate Audiovisual Works Into Their Complaints?, Aimee Woodward Brown

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fun With Numbers: Gall's Mixed Message Regarding Variance Calculations, Nicholas A. Deuschle Jun 2013

Fun With Numbers: Gall's Mixed Message Regarding Variance Calculations, Nicholas A. Deuschle

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Corruption Clarified: Defining The Reach Of "Agent" In 18 Usc § 666, Rohit D. Nath Jun 2013

Corruption Clarified: Defining The Reach Of "Agent" In 18 Usc § 666, Rohit D. Nath

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tiers Of Scrutiny In Enumerated Powers Jurisprudence, Aziz Z. Huq Mar 2013

Tiers Of Scrutiny In Enumerated Powers Jurisprudence, Aziz Z. Huq

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article identifies and analyzes the recent emergence of a "tiers of scrutiny" system in Supreme Court jurisprudence respecting the boundaries of Congress's enumerated powers. The inquiry is motivated by the Court's recent ruling on the federal healthcare law, which demonstrated that the national legislature's election among its diverse textual sources of authority in Article I can have large, outcome-determinative consequences in constitutional challenges to federal laws. This is so because the Court not only delineates each power's substantive boundaries differently but also applies distinct standards of review to the various legislative powers enumerated in Article I and elsewhere in …


State And Federal Models Of The Interaction Between Statutes And Unwritten Law, Caleb Nelson Mar 2013

State And Federal Models Of The Interaction Between Statutes And Unwritten Law, Caleb Nelson

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to encompass more issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many questions that regularly arise in the implementation of statutes but that the typical statute does not say anything about. When a state statute is silent on such questions, state courts often conclude that the questions lie beyond the statute's domain and that the answers therefore come from the state's version of the common law. But when a federal statute is silent on the same sorts of questions, courts often act as if answers …