Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (11192)
- Constitutional Law (1622)
- State and Local Government Law (947)
- Torts (910)
- Courts (879)
-
- Contracts (846)
- Estates and Trusts (841)
- Supreme Court of the United States (837)
- Legislation (770)
- Property Law and Real Estate (747)
- Legal History (684)
- Legal Writing and Research (674)
- Criminal Law (636)
- Labor and Employment Law (625)
- Business Organizations Law (596)
- Evidence (542)
- Jurisdiction (541)
- Tax Law (500)
- Banking and Finance Law (475)
- Criminal Procedure (462)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (461)
- Securities Law (456)
- Litigation (446)
- Law and Society (423)
- Commercial Law (421)
- Civil Procedure (418)
- Administrative Law (404)
- Fourteenth Amendment (361)
- Common Law (358)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (353)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (404)
- Book reviews (279)
- Liability (266)
- Negligence (249)
- Michigan (245)
-
- History (241)
- Fraud (223)
- New York (205)
- Treatises (193)
- Due process (192)
- Publications (181)
- Constitution (166)
- Judicial review (157)
- Intent (149)
- Law reform (149)
- Regulation (143)
- Race and law (135)
- Fifth Amendment (133)
- Corporations (126)
- Lawyers (122)
- Law professors (120)
- State courts (120)
- Federal courts (112)
- England (109)
- Interstate commerce (108)
- University of Michigan Law School (107)
- California (96)
- Competition (96)
- Racism (96)
- Clayton Act (95)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 5971 - 6000 of 12807
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Compulsory Joinder Of Parties In Civil Actions, John W. Reed
Compulsory Joinder Of Parties In Civil Actions, John W. Reed
Michigan Law Review
Compulsory joinder cases involving interests in land display one peculiar and important characteristic: there is almost never any need in the state courts to wrestle with the question of whether a person is indispensable as distinguished from necessary. One hastens to add that this attribute of land cases appears to have gone largely unnoticed, but it exists none the less. It arises out of the fact that in a suit involving real property it is never impossible for the court to obtain jurisdiction over all persons interested therein to an extent which will enable the court to adjudicate controversies over …
Admiralty - Collision - Duty Of Third Vessel To Give Warning, Michael Scott
Admiralty - Collision - Duty Of Third Vessel To Give Warning, Michael Scott
Michigan Law Review
Washington, a private merchantman proceeding north at night through a large United States Navy formation steaming west, received no warning from formation commanders that Ruchamkin, an escort, was rejoining from the east. Uninformed of Washington's presence and ordered to resume station expeditiously, Ruchamkin entered the formation at high speed. Despite late radical maneuvers upon discovery of Washington close aboard, Ruchamkin was struck by the latter's bow with resulting damage to both ships. On reciprocal libels, held, decree for Washington's owner. In addition to Ruchamkin's failure to anticipate Washington, the United States was negligent in that the …
Business Associations - Uniform Limited Partnership Act - Corporation As A Limited Partner, Richard Singer
Business Associations - Uniform Limited Partnership Act - Corporation As A Limited Partner, Richard Singer
Michigan Law Review
The Port Arthur Trust Co., a Texas corporation, sought to enter into a limited partnership agreement as a limited partner. Its capital contribution was to be three trusts established by the prospective general partner wherein the trust company had been named trustee. The secretary of state refused to file the instrument creating the limited partnership on the grounds "that it was necessary for a corporation to have express charter powers" before it can, enter into a limited partnership, and that "a corporation is not a 'person' " within the meaning of the Texas Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The corporation then …
Corporations - Dividends - Date From Which Cumulative Dividends Accrue, Dudley Chapman
Corporations - Dividends - Date From Which Cumulative Dividends Accrue, Dudley Chapman
Michigan Law Review
Defendant corporation issued preferred stock in 1937 under a charter amendment which provided that such stock should " ... pay dividends at the rate of six percent ... , but when not so earned and paid, the dividends so provided shall be cumulative. Said dividends shall be paid annually beginning the Fifteenth (15th) day of March, 1938... " The plaintiff held 100 shares of defendant's preferred stock issued in 1945, and the above provision appeared on his certificate. During dissolution of the defendant in 1955, the plaintiff claimed cumulative dividends from 1938 as an innocent purchaser for value, basing his …
Corporations - Securities: Regulation - Parent Corporation As Insider Realizing Shortswing Profit, Allan L. Bioff
Corporations - Securities: Regulation - Parent Corporation As Insider Realizing Shortswing Profit, Allan L. Bioff
Michigan Law Review
Parent corporation, owning a majority of the outstanding voting securities of its subsidiary, sold 120,000 shares of the subsidiary's common stock. A substantial shortswing profit was realized on 4115 shares which had been purchased on the open market five months earlier. The sale, whereby the parent was to divest itself of control of its subsidiary, was made pursuant to an agreement between both companies and approved by a majority of the voting stock of each. Section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides that officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of any class …
Antitrust - Resale Price Maintenance - Legality Of Fair Trade Contracts Made By Integrated Firm, John A. Ziegler S.Ed.
Antitrust - Resale Price Maintenance - Legality Of Fair Trade Contracts Made By Integrated Firm, John A. Ziegler S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant-appellee manufactures its own brand-name line of drug products and is also the largest drug wholesaler in the United States. Its manufactured products are sold through appellee's own wholesale division and to independent wholesalers and retailers. In 1951 appellee entered into resale price maintenance contracts with these independent wholesalers, most of whom competed with appellee's wholesale divisions. The Government then brought an action for an injunction under section 4 of the Sherman Act, restraining the further use of resale price contracts by appellee on the ground that these contracts constituted illegal price fixing under section 1 of the act. The …
Corporations - Stockholders - Availability Of Federal Remedy As Basis For Denial Of Attorney Fees In Derivative Action, Jerome Prewoznik
Corporations - Stockholders - Availability Of Federal Remedy As Basis For Denial Of Attorney Fees In Derivative Action, Jerome Prewoznik
Michigan Law Review
Defendants were directors of Merritt, Chapman and Scott Corporation and of Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. simultaneously. Plaintiff, a stockholder in Merritt, instituted a derivative suit to compel the resignation of defendants from their positions with Ward on the ground that an interlocking directorate existed making Merritt subject to criminal and civil prosecution under federal law. Defendants resigned before judgment. Plaintiff, arguing that its suit was the cause of the resignations and that Merritt was thereby benefited, moved for an award of counsel fees to be assessed against Merritt. Held, application for counsel fee denied. Plaintiff could have achieved …
Federal Criminal Procedure - Venue Situs Of Crime Of Failing To Perform Statutory Duty, John C. Baity
Federal Criminal Procedure - Venue Situs Of Crime Of Failing To Perform Statutory Duty, John C. Baity
Michigan Law Review
Three defendants, classified conscientious objectors, were prosecuted for violations of the Military Training and Service Act. Defendants were ordered to report to their local boards for civilian work assignments in lieu of induction. They reported to their boards but refused to comply with instructions ordering them to report at hospitals located in judicial districts other than those of their boards. The Third Circuit held that the crime of "knowingly failing or neglecting to obey any such order" was committed in the district where the hospital was located and that venue was proper in such district. On similar facts the Tenth …
Income Tax - Non-Business Bad Debt Deduction - Deduction For Partially Secured Bad Debt Deferable Until Liquidation Of Collateral Regardless Of Tax Avoidance Motive, Robert H. Elliott Jr.
Income Tax - Non-Business Bad Debt Deduction - Deduction For Partially Secured Bad Debt Deferable Until Liquidation Of Collateral Regardless Of Tax Avoidance Motive, Robert H. Elliott Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In 1944 the taxpayer liquidated security held for a non-business debt and deducted the balance of the debt as worthless. The creditor had been insolvent for some time. The commissioner disallowed the deduction on the grounds that the taxpayer had held the security after the debt was worthless in order to obtain a larger tax benefit from the deduction. The district court upheld the Commissioner. On appeal, held, reversed. A partially secured debt is not worthless as long as security is available for its satisfaction. The taxpayer's intent is not a factor in determining worthlessness. Loewi v. Ryan, …
Negligence - Duty Of Care - Liability Of Builder And Architect To Third Party, Raymond J. Dittrich
Negligence - Duty Of Care - Liability Of Builder And Architect To Third Party, Raymond J. Dittrich
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, an infant, fell from the back porch of an apartment leased by his parents from a housing authority. The plaintiff brought actions for negligence against the architect who designed the dwelling, the builder who constructed it, and the housing authority which leased it, alleging that the back porch was so designed and constructed as to create a dangerous condition for the users thereof. The trial court dismissed the complaints against the builder and the architect. On appeal, held, reversed. Despite the lack of privity between the builder and the architect and the plaintiff, a good cause of …
Real Property - Landlord And Tenant - Need For Lessee Who Transfers Whole Term To Base Right Of Re-Entry On Condition Of "Substantial Advantage" To Him, John A. Beach S.Ed.
Real Property - Landlord And Tenant - Need For Lessee Who Transfers Whole Term To Base Right Of Re-Entry On Condition Of "Substantial Advantage" To Him, John A. Beach S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff lessee transferred his interest in the first floor and basement of certain commercial premises for the full remaining period of his own lease, retaining his interest in the second floor, where he lived. This transfer was in form a sublease, under which plaintiff as sublessor reserved power to cancel the sublease and take possession without notice if the premises were used for any purpose other than an off-sale liquor store. Plaintiff's transferee later assigned all his interest to defendant corporation, which immediately began converting the premises into an ice cream store. After defendant had spent over $10,000 in remodeling, …
Municipal Corporations - Zoning - Exclusion Of Churches From Residential Area, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Municipal Corporations - Zoning - Exclusion Of Churches From Residential Area, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In two recent New York cases churches sought permits to use residential property for church purposes, including worship, social gatherings, construction of an adjacent parking lot, and, in one case, establishment of a school and playground. In each case the zoning board denied the permit on grounds that a church would change the residential character of the neighborhood, decrease the enjoyment of neighboring property, depreciate property values, and that the contemplated use of the property for other than worship was prohibited by the ordinance. The lower court upheld the decisions of both zoning boards. On appeal to the New York …
Torts - Unauthorized Autopsy - Non-Survival Of Action, Lee H. Snyder
Torts - Unauthorized Autopsy - Non-Survival Of Action, Lee H. Snyder
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's husband was struck and killed by a motorbus owned and operated by defendant municipality. The body was removed to a hospital maintained by defendant. Subsequently, at the request and direction of a physician employed by defendant, an autopsy was performed, apparently to determine whether the deceased had been drinking. During the examination certain organs were removed and destroyed. Plaintiff brought an action for damages on the ground that the mutilation was done without her consent and in violation of her legal right to the possession of the body. Plaintiff died while the action was pending, and her administrator continued …
Recent Books, Michigan Law Review
Recent Books, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A List of Books Received by Michigan Law Review
Periodical Index, Michigan Law Review
Periodical Index, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This index includes articles, comments and some of the longer notes which have appeared in leading law reviews since the publication of the last issue of this Review.
Torts - Guest Statute - Carpools, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Torts - Guest Statute - Carpools, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a passenger, and defendant's decedent, the driver on the day in question, were two of six members of a carpool, each of whom drove every six.th day from the town where they all lived to the place of their common employment, thereby effecting a saving to each of approximately five dollars per week. As a result of a collision due to ordinary negligence of the driver, plaintiff was injured and sued for damages, alleging that he was not a guest passenger. The court submitted to the jury the question of whether plaintiff was a passenger for hire or a …
Torts - Parent And Child-Doctrine Of Parental Immunity, Julian J. Linde S.Ed.
Torts - Parent And Child-Doctrine Of Parental Immunity, Julian J. Linde S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a minor, sustained injuries in a collision which occurred while he was riding in a car owned and driven by defendant, his father. The complaint alleged that defendant was guilty of willful and wanton misconduct, consisting of speeding on a wet road on a foggy night and of running a stop light. A motion to dismiss on the ground that the suit was contrary to public policy was sustained. On appeal, held, reversed. The doctrine of parental immunity is inapplicable to cases of willful and wanton misconduct. Nudd v Matsoukas, (III. 1956) 131 N.E. (2d) 525.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Veterans Administration's Findings Of Law And Fact Are Not Conclusvie In Government's Suit To Recover Sums Allegedly Due From Veteran, James M. Porter S.Ed.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Veterans Administration's Findings Of Law And Fact Are Not Conclusvie In Government's Suit To Recover Sums Allegedly Due From Veteran, James M. Porter S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
An action was brought by the United States to recover sums of money paid to a veteran as an employment readjustment allowance. It was claimed that the defendant was not entitled to the money because of his misstatement of earnings. Prior to this action, an administrative finding that the defendant had knowingly received the allowance contrary to law and was obliged to return it was approved by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs. The government maintained that section 705 of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act required that the administrator's findings of law and fact be conclusive and binding on the court. The …
Administrative Law - Judicial Review - Ripeness For Revew Of An Interstate Commerce Commission Order, Robert Knauss
Administrative Law - Judicial Review - Ripeness For Revew Of An Interstate Commerce Commission Order, Robert Knauss
Michigan Law Review
In order to operate in interstate commerce, motor carriers must obtain a certificate of public necessity and convenience from the Interstate Commerce Commission and must obey the Interstate Commerce Act. However, motor vehicles used in carrying " . . . agricultural . . . commodities (not including manufactured goods) . . ." may operate free of the act. The commission on its own initiative investigated the meaning of the term "agricultural commodities," and after two years published a seventy-one page list classifying certain commodities as within or not within the exemption. Petitioner, an interstate trucker of various commodities listed as …
Legislation - Federal Criminal Procedure - Modification Of Jencks Decision, Raymond J. Dittrich, Jr. S.Ed.
Legislation - Federal Criminal Procedure - Modification Of Jencks Decision, Raymond J. Dittrich, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001. During the trial, the court denied defendant's motion to order the government to produce for defendant's inspection reports submitted by government witnesses to government agents. The reports dealt with the same subject about which these witnesses later testified. The court of appeals affirmed the decision. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, reversed, one justice dissenting. The government has a privilege to refuse to surrender statements made by its prospective witnesses, but it may claim the privilege only at the expense of a dismissal of its case …
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Front Matter for Volume 55, Issue 3 of Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Post-Conviction Due Process - Right Of Indigent To Review Of Non-Constitutional Trial Errors, Robert C. Casad S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Post-Conviction Due Process - Right Of Indigent To Review Of Non-Constitutional Trial Errors, Robert C. Casad S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this comment is to examine a new development. in post-conviction due process: Griffin v. Illinois. This case announces a new principle of constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment based on an almost indistinguishable combination of due process and equal protection elements.
Compelling The Testimony Of Political Deviants, O. John Rogge
Compelling The Testimony Of Political Deviants, O. John Rogge
Michigan Law Review
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes nonjudicial functions on federal courts, and whether it should, does and can protect against the substantial danger of state prosecution, there is a general objection that one can raise against it, and to other acts of the same type: they relate to the area of belief and opinion, the very area which was involved when the English people, spearheaded by the Puritans, engaged in the struggle with the Crown that finally resulted in the establishment of a right of silence. At least if we are …
Trusts - Jurisdiction - Trustee And Trust Assets Outside Jurisdiction Of Forum, Richard J. Riordan
Trusts - Jurisdiction - Trustee And Trust Assets Outside Jurisdiction Of Forum, Richard J. Riordan
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this comment is to examine these rationales and determine their validity--first as to testamentary trusts and then as to inter vivos trusts.
Agency - Apparent Authority - Liability Of Corporation On Unauthorized Note Of General Manager, Thomas A. Troyer
Agency - Apparent Authority - Liability Of Corporation On Unauthorized Note Of General Manager, Thomas A. Troyer
Michigan Law Review
Welch, the general manager, executive vice-president, treasurer, and director of petitioner corporation, requested that respondent, a salesman employed by the corporation, loan petitioner $25,000. Respondent complied, and Welch executed and delivered to respondent a note for the amount of the loan, signed by himself as vice-president and treasurer. After Welch had appropriated the money to his own uses, respondent obtained a judgment by confession against petitioner on the note. On trial of a petition to open the judgment, held, dismissed. Welch had acted with apparent authority in giving respondent petitioner's note, respondent had reasonably relied upon this appearance in …
Admiralty - Jurisdiction - Quasi -Contractual Remedy, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Admiralty - Jurisdiction - Quasi -Contractual Remedy, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioners paid money to respondent for prospective passage to Europe on his passenger vessel held out as a common carrier. When respondent failed to make the voyage or return the passage money, petitioners sued in admiralty for breach of contract. The libel was in the nature of indebitatus assumpsit for moneys had and received and wrongfully withheld by respondent. The district court held this an action based upon the breach of a maritime contract and therefore within the admiralty jurisdiction. The court of appeals reversed, on the ground that the action was in the nature of the common law indebitatus …
Corporations - Stockholder's Suit - Necessity Of Demand On Other Stockholders In Derivative Action, John C. Dowd
Corporations - Stockholder's Suit - Necessity Of Demand On Other Stockholders In Derivative Action, John C. Dowd
Michigan Law Review
In two related cases, a holder of common stock brought a derivative suit against the directors of his corporation claiming their illegal acts had deprived the corporation of assets. On defendants' motion to dismiss and for summary" judgment, held, judgment for the defendants. Plaintiff's failure to allege either that he had presented his claim to the stockholders at a stockholders' meeting or that a majority of the stockholders' votes were under the control of the directors defeated his action. Carroll v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R.; Glenmore v. Alpert, (D.C. Mass. 1956) 141 F. Supp. 456.
Corporations - Ultra Vires Act - Effectiveness Of Action By Informal Meeting Of Board Of Directors, Guy Maxfield
Corporations - Ultra Vires Act - Effectiveness Of Action By Informal Meeting Of Board Of Directors, Guy Maxfield
Michigan Law Review
Defendant insurance company issued a policy on the life of the president of plaintiff corporation with the corporation named as beneficiary. The president, his wife in the capacity of secretary-treasurer, and son were the sole stockholders of the corporation. Pursuant to a divorce agreement between the president and his wife, a part of the insurance policy was assigned to the wife at an informal board of directors' meeting with the concurrence of the wife and son. The president died and his stock was sold to the present stockholders. The corporation then sued the insurance company to collect the full amount …
Taxation - Federal Income Tax Deductibility Of Interest On Debentures Issues As A Dividend, Jules M. Perlberg
Taxation - Federal Income Tax Deductibility Of Interest On Debentures Issues As A Dividend, Jules M. Perlberg
Michigan Law Review
Taxpayer, a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation, had filed consolidated returns with its parent prior to 1934. When Congress abolished consolidated returns in that year, the subsidiary issued 6% debentures as a dividend to the parent company and subsequently deducted the interest paid on these bonds. The Commissioner claimed the interest payments were really dividends and were not deductible. The Tax Court upheld the Commissioner pointing out the tax-saving motive, absence of new investment, and parent-subsidiary relationship as factors indicating that no genuine debtor-creditor relationship existed. On appeal, held, reversed. The debentures involved were conventional in form and created a valid …
Torts - Misrepresentation - Knowledge Of Falsity Unnecessary, Gerald D. Rapp
Torts - Misrepresentation - Knowledge Of Falsity Unnecessary, Gerald D. Rapp
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, a real estate broker, while showing plaintiffs a house which they subsequently purchased told them that the walls of the house were of tile construction with imitation stone on the outside. Defendant reasonably believed this to be true, although the walls actually had been cleverly constructed of earth, clay, and straw with a plaster covering on the inside and a tarlike preparation on the outside covered with a thin veneer of imitation stone, completely concealing their true nature. Purchasers brought an action, on the theory of deceit, against the broker to recover damages. A jury verdict for plaintiffs was …