Digital Commons Network^™

Six Conservatives In Search Of The First Amendment: The Revealing Case Of Nude Dancing, Vincent A. Blasi

Faculty Scholarship

The future of political freedom in the United States hardly turns on whether women have a First Amendment right to dance in the nude in bars and peep shows. The future of artistic freedom is perhaps implicated by this question, but only if the law's demand for general principle prohibits judges from treating expressive nudity in those environments as fundamentally different from expressive nudity in ballet performances, museum exhibitions, and films. Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. is an interesting and potentially important case not because of the significance of the specific issue it decided, but because it provoked a lively …

A Constitutional Right Of Religious Exemption: An Historical Perspective, Philip A. Hamburger

Faculty Scholarship

Did late eighteenth-century Americans understand the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution to provide individuals a right of exemption from civil laws to which they had religious objections? Claims of exemption based on the Free Exercise Clause have prompted some of the Supreme Court's most prominent free exercise decisions, and therefore this historical inquiry about a right of exemption may have implications for our constitutional jurisprudence. Even if the Court does not adopt late eighteenth-century ideas about the free exercise of religion, we may, nonetheless, find that the history of such ideas can contribute to our contemporary analysis. …

Corporate Law: What Is The Impact Of New Ali Proposals On Shareholder Litigation, John C. Coffee Jr., Michael P. Dooley

Faculty Scholarship

When the American Law Institute's Corporate Governance Project meets this month, one of the most hotly debated agenda items is likely to be its new rules governing shareholder litigation, which are now up for final approval.

The proposed change means that corporate boards will now have to prove in court that a decision to dismiss a shareholder claim alleging self-dealing was in the corporation's best interest. In addition, the requirement for a formal "demand" on the board by shareholders will be uniform, rather than subject to excuse, as it is under Delaware law and in the majority of states.

Drafters …

Paradigms Lost: The Blurring Of The Criminal And Civil Law Models – And What Can Be Done About It, John C. Coffee Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

Ken Mann's professed goal is to "shrink" the criminal law. To realize this worthy end, he advocates punitive civil sanctions that would largely parallel criminal sanctions, thereby reducing the need to use criminal law in order to achieve punitive purposes. I agree (heartily) with the end he seeks and even more with his general precept that "the criminal law should be reserved for the most damaging wrongs and the most culpable defendants." But I believe that the means he proposes would be counterproductive – and would probably expand, rather than contract, the operative scope of the criminal law as an …

Does Treasury Have Authority To Index Basis For Inflation?, Lawrence A. Zelenak

Faculty Scholarship

In this article he examines the claim, which has been publicized in recent months, that the Treasury Department could unilaterally index the capital gains tax for inflation by a new regulation interpreting code section 1012. He concludes, in light of more than seven decades of administrative, judicial and legislative history, that such unilateral action would be invalid.

What Can You Say, Where Can You Say It, And To Whom?: A Guide To Understanding And Preventing Unlawful Sexual Harassment, David Allen Larson

Faculty Scholarship

After an increase in visibility for sexual harassment cases in 1991, employers have had to treat allegations of sexual misconduct more seriously now that juries have the authority to award both compensatory and punitive damages. Many employers and employees remain confused, however, as to what conduct is considered unlawful sexual harassment. This article explains how courts have analyzed allegations of unlawful sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discussing what a court must find before it will impose liability. In response to the very real and immediate demand for a straightforward discussion of the …

The Seven Virtues Of Judging: Alvin Rubin's Civil Rights Opinions, David I. Levine

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The New Wave Of Hearsay Reform Scholarship, Roger C. Park

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Rorty, Radicalism, Romanticism: The Politics Of The Gaze, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Doing The Right Thing, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Qualitative Theory Of The Dead Hand, William K.S. Wang, Adam J. Hirsch

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Decisions By And For People With Mental Retardation: Balancing Considerations Of Autonomy And Protection, James W. Ellis

Faculty Scholarship

This Article will attempt to analyze some of the considerations that should inform enlightened and compassionate public policy in this area. Section I will describe briefly the definition of mental retardation and common attributes of people who have the disability and the social and political world in which they live within our society. Section II will sketch some of the contexts in which legal issues about decision-making arise in the lives of people with mental retardation. Section III will discuss the generic legal doctrines of consent which form the backdrop for legal analysis of these problems, with particular attention to …

Limits On The State's Power To Confine 'Dangerous' Persons: Constitutional Implications Of Foucha V. Louisiana, James W. Ellis

Faculty Scholarship

This Article does not attempt a complete analysis of all the constitutional implications of Foucha,nor does it attempt to provide a definitive answer to the question of the constitutionality of Washington's sexual predator statute. Rather, because Foucha addressed important due process and equal protection questions relevant to the Washington statute, the Article is an attempt to analyze the case's basic constitutional holdings and discussion on the issue of state deprivation of physical liberty.

500 Years After Columbus: Promoting And Protecting Multiculturalism In The Arts, Sherri L. Burr

Faculty Scholarship

In 1992, the San Antonio Museum of Art hosted a panel which addressed a number of issues, including: what arts institutions can do to better represent the cultures of the communities they serve; what the United States is doing to protect Native American art and culture; what the international community is doing to address the flow of art and cultural objects across national boundaries; and what should be the plan to protect and to promote multiculturalism in the arts for the next 500 years. This article summarizes and highlights this event.

Corporate Culpability Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Jennifer Moore

Faculty Scholarship

This Article examines the use of corporate culpability in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and addresses three major questions: In light of the traditional unimportance of culpability in corporate criminal law, is corporate culpability an appropriate concern of the Guidelines? If so, how is corporate culpability best conceptualized? Finally, how do the Guidelines understand corporate culpability, and how close do they come to embodying this most satisfying theory? Part I of the Article discusses the principal reasons why culpability has been important at the trial and sentencing of individual criminals, and argues that similar reasons justify concern with culpability in the …

Keeping The Practice In Clinical Education And Scholarship, Richard A. Boswell

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Struggling To Stop The Flood Of Unreliable Expert Testimony, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Contract, Tort, And Individual Responsibility: An Analytic Framework, Joseph R. Grodin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Introduction To The Problems Of Acquiring Properties From Partnerships, Corporations, Estates, And Trusts, William T. Hutton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Juror Decision Making And The Evaluation Of Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Peter Miene, Eugene Borgida

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Jurors' Perceptions Of Eyewitness And Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Margaret Bull Kovera, Steven D. Penrod

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Precaution, Participation And The "Greening" Of International Trade Law, Naomi Roht-Arriaza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Trade And Environment: An Environmentalist View, Naomi Roht-Arriaza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Faith Healers, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Democracy's Dawn American Judges And The Rule Of Law Abroad, William W. Schwarzer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Sentencing Guidelines And Mandatory Minimums: Mixing Apples And Oranges, William W. Schwarzer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Fee-Shifting Offers Of Judgment–An Approach To Reducing The Cost Of Litigation, William W. Schwarzer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Law And Literature: Representing Lesbians, Anne B. Goldstein

Faculty Scholarship

What is involved in representing a lesbian in law or in literature? The premise of this Article is that the work of novelists is enough like the work of lawyers that useful insights can be drawn in at least one direction. That is, lawyers can learn how to represent lesbian clients better by studying books with lesbian characters.

"An Introduction To The European Economic Community And Intellectual Properties, Beryl R. Jones-Woodin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Free Speech In The United States And Canada, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

This comparison of freedom of speech in the United States and Canada concentrates on Supreme Court decisions in the two countries and on kinds of speech mainly engaged in by extreme dissenters and political outsiders. After brief comments about constitutional language and general approaches, I discuss subversive speech and other speech that encourages criminal acts, hate speech, symbolic speech, and public demonstrations.

In both countries, a major premise of modern adjudication is that freedom of expression is a central feature of liberal democracy. Government "by the people," even in the extended sense of government by representatives, requires that citizens openly …