Digital Commons Network^™

Reconciling Individual Rights And Government Interests: Madisonian Principles Versus Supreme Court Practice, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Juror Decision Making And The Evaluation Of Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Peter Miene, Eugene Borgida

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Jurors' Perceptions Of Eyewitness And Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Margaret Bull Kovera, Steven D. Penrod

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Qualitative Theory Of The Dead Hand, William K.S. Wang, Adam J. Hirsch

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Violence Of Privacy, Elizabeth M. Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Half Century Of The Maryland Law Review, William L. Reynolds

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Feminist Jurisprudence - The 1990 Myra Bradwell Day Panel, Elizabeth M. Schneider, Lucinda Finley, Carin Clauss, Joan Bertin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Duty To Warn: One American View Of The Ec Products Liability Directive, Anita Bernstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Good Legal Writing: A Guide For The Perplexed, Samuel K. Murumba

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Love Makes A Family--Nothing More, Nothing Less: How The Judicial System Has Refused To Protect Nonlegal Parents In Alternative Families, Barbara Cox

Faculty Scholarship

Part I of this article discusses the legal system's recognition of parental rights and enumerates the possible constitutional, statutory, and equitable theories available for protecting the parental rights of nonlegal parents. Part II considers the cases that have rejected the attempts by members of alternative families to use these theories to obtain this protection. Part III discusses the barriers to political power that will make it extremely difficult and time-consuming to achieve legislative change in these areas, and argues that the courts should use the means available to them currently to protect these nonlegal parents and their children while the …

Mental Health Malpractice In The 1990s, Steven R. Smith

Faculty Scholarship

This article analyzes the current levels and kinds of mental health malpractice claims. It also discusses the direction of individual and institutional malpractice in the 1990s and considers potential reforms. Finally, the article argues that the current system is inadequate to deal with many mental health injuries and that patient plaintiffs should have the option of pursuing malpractice claims in a private, less threatening forum.

Note, Sex(Ual Orientation) And Title Vii, I. Bennett Capers

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Title Vii Compensation Issues Affecting Bilingual Hispanic Employees, David Allen Larson

Faculty Scholarship

This article deals the workers who are bilingual and their accompanying compensation on the job. The article covers compensation, classification, Bilingual Hispanic employees required to speak both Spanish and English on the job may, in certain circumstances, be entitled to greater compensation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than employees who do the same job exclusively in English. It is unlikely, however, that a court will conclude that bilingual Hispanic employees required to speak both Spanish and English are for that reason alone entitled to increased compensation. Yet bilingual Hispanic employees required to use both languages …

Credal Probability, David H. Kaye

Faculty Scholarship

This article responds to Paul Bergman and Al Moore's doubt that ideal triers of facts would be Bayesians. They argue that Bayes' rule, and probability theory in general, fails as a theoretical factfinding model. While probability has long been an accepted measure of belief in empirical propositions and the validity of inductive arguments, this articles addresses Bergman and Moore's doubts directly. It shows how their examples demonstrating the "frequentist" character of Bayesian methodology or the fallacies in Bayesian analysis are easily handled without a frequentist interpretation of probability. Then it shows that an ideal juror's partial beliefs will conform to …

Evidence Engendered, Kit Kinports

Faculty Scholarship

Part I of this article briefly describes feminist legal theory and its evolution. Part II then discusses the extent to which evidence as a whole is a gendered topic that reflects predominantly male traits and ideals, and Part III analyzes various specific evidentiary doctrines from a feminist perspective. Finally, Part IV examines way of incorporating feminist theories in teaching an evidence course.

Saddam Hussein: Master Air Strategist, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Boarder Baby And Foster Care Crises In New York City: Problems Of Policy And Poverty, James S. Bowen, Madeline Morris, Jose M. Rivera

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Whole Truth?: How Rules Of Evidence Make Lawyers Deceitful, Bruce A. Green

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Evidence Scholarship, Old And New, Roger C. Park

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Power Not Reason: Justice Marshall's Valedictory And The Fourth Amendment In The Supreme Court's 1990 Term , Bruce A. Green

Faculty Scholarship

In its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court heard five cases involving the Fourth Amendment. In this article, Professor Bruce Green analyzes these five search-and-seizure decisions in light of Justice Marshall's criticism that '[Plower, not reason, is the new currency of this Court's decision-making." He examines the various considerations the Court advances in its Fourth Amendment analysis-interpretive principle, policy, and precedent--and discovers inconsistencies in the importance assigned to each of these considerations in a series of cases decided very close together by virtually the same Justices. Each approach controlled, Professor Green argues, only when it could be said to …

Gender, Legal Education And Legal Careers, Antoinette M. Sedillo Lopez, Lee Teitelbaum, Jeffrey Jenkins

Faculty Scholarship

Much of the literature on the careers of women generally-as well as the smaller literature on the experiences of women in legal education and legal practice-supposes that women will follow different paths and have different experiences than men, and that this is and will be true because they are women. Some commentators on the relation between gender and the experience of legal professionals believe that women have distinctive modes of cognition or value orientations that shape their experience in the workplace, while others believe that social and cultural assumptions (held not only by employers but often by women themselves) are …

Dissolving The Sameness/Difference Debate: A Post-Modern Path Beyond Essentialism In Feminist And Critical Race Theory, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

"Normative Constitutional Fact-Finding": Exploring The Empirical Component Of Constitutional Interpretation, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Trouble With Legal Ethics, William H. Simon

Faculty Scholarship

Legal ethics is a disappointing subject. From afar, it seems exciting; it promises to engage the central normative commitments that make lawyering a profession and that account for much of the nonpecuniary appeal of the lawyer's role. Thus, when people see public spirit among lawyers threatened by commercial self-seeking, they often prescribe increased attention to the teaching and -discussion of legal ethics as a remedy.

But close up, legal ethics usually turns out to be dull and dispiriting. At most law schools, students find the course in legal ethics or professional responsibility boring and insubstantial, and faculty dread having to …

Lawyer Advice And Client Autonomy: Mrs. Jones's Case, William H. Simon

Faculty Scholarship

In one influential view, the lawyer's most basic function is to enhance the autonomy of the client. The lawyer does this by providing the information that maximizes the client's understanding of his situation and minimizes the influence of the lawyer's personal views.

This autonomy or "informed consent" view is often contrasted with a paternalist or "best interest" view most strongly associated with official decisions about children and the mentally disabled. Here the professional's role is to make decisions for the client based on the professional's view of the client's interests.

I am going to argue against the autonomy view that …

Voice, Not Choice, James S. Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

In John Chubb and Terry Moe's book, choice is hot; voice is not. As influential as their book has become in current policy debates, however, its data and reasoning may support policies the reverse of those that the authors and their "New Paradigm" disciples propose. In this review, voice is hot; choice is not.

Sword Or Shield: The Past And Future Impact Of Western Legal Thought On American Indian Sovereignty (Reviewing Robert A. Williams Jr., The American Indian In Western Legal Thought (1990)), Kevin J. Worthen

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Religious, The Secular, And The Antithetical, Frederick Mark Gedicks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Gestational Surrogacy And The Health Care Provider: Put Part Of The "Ivf Genie" Back Into The Bottle, Karen H. Rothenberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Professional Decisions And Ethical Values In Medical And Law Students, Robert L. Schwartz, Agnes G. Rezler, Pamela Lambert, S. Scott Obenshain, Joan Mciver Gibson, David A. Bennahum

Faculty Scholarship

The purpose of this project is to evaluate and compare the values used by medical and law students when dealing with ethical dilemmas in the professional practice of law and medicine. It is assumed that conflict between doctors and lawyers often arises out of the different values that members of each profession apply to similar dilemmas.