Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1226)
- Criminal Procedure (228)
- Criminal Law (188)
- Constitutional Law (126)
- Law and Society (117)
-
- Courts (108)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (96)
- Supreme Court of the United States (96)
- Law and Race (89)
- Evidence (80)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (60)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (38)
- Human Rights Law (38)
- Legal History (38)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (36)
- Legal Profession (36)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- International Law (35)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (35)
- Jurisprudence (33)
- Law and Gender (33)
- Judges (31)
- Legal Education (30)
- Immigration Law (29)
- Legislation (29)
- Litigation (27)
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Juvenile Law (24)
- Science and Technology Law (23)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Institution
-
- University of Chicago Law School (303)
- University of Michigan Law School (281)
- University of Miami Law School (180)
- University of Minnesota Law School (179)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (122)
-
- University of Alabama School of Law (102)
- University of Washington School of Law (102)
- UIdaho Law (35)
- Technological University Dublin (34)
- Mercer University School of Law (19)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (12)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Police (50)
- Criminal justice (41)
- Sixth Amendment (40)
- Admissibility (38)
-
- Lawyers (31)
- Law reform (30)
- Testimony (28)
- Sentencing (27)
- Empirical studies (26)
- Witnesses (26)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (23)
- Death penalty (23)
- Searches (23)
- Trials (23)
- Capital punishment (22)
- Race and law (22)
- Confessions (21)
- Confrontation Clause (21)
- Miranda v. Arizona (21)
- Punishment (21)
- Seizures (21)
- Cross-examination (20)
- Exclusionary rule (20)
- Crimes (19)
- Custodial interrogations (19)
- Evidence (19)
- Hearsay (19)
- History (19)
- Juries (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 751 - 780 of 1378
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Promoting Equality After Genocide, Sheri P. Rosenberg
Promoting Equality After Genocide, Sheri P. Rosenberg
Articles
The value of equality has little currency after genocide and ethnic cleansing. Restoring that value is no easy feat. Paramount, though not singular, in this struggle for equality is the role of the law A State establishes its common legal rights and duties through its legal institutions, which define the values and character of the nation. Legal institutions mediate these values and norms and through legal pronouncements provide a template for future civic engagement and social interaction. Equality and antidiscrimination jurisprudence is particularly important during the delicate period of transition alter genocide, because it grounds within society the normative shift …
Failed Lawyers And The Sources Of Satire, Charles M. Yablon
Failed Lawyers And The Sources Of Satire, Charles M. Yablon
Articles
Most of those reading this Essay have ample reason to appreciate the benefits of a good legal education. There is pride in becoming a member of an ancient and learned profession, intellectual challenge in wrestling with complex questions of equity, power and social justice, and satisfaction in the sense of superiority you feel towards your loser friends who did not get into a decent law school.
The Experience Of Young People Remanded In Custody: A Case For Bail Support And Supervision Schemes, Sinead Freeman
The Experience Of Young People Remanded In Custody: A Case For Bail Support And Supervision Schemes, Sinead Freeman
Articles
This article focuses on the potential role and benefits bail support and supervision(BSS) schemes may have for young people in the Irish context. This article is based on a wider Ph.D study examining the issue of coping on remand. The research used court observation and semi-structured interviews conducted with young prisoners aged 16 to 21 years in remand custody. The findings indicate that young people often end up in remand custody as a result of non-compliance with bail. The case is made arising from the research, that the operation of bail support and supervision (BSS) schemes may benefit these young …
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
Articles
From parole prediction instruments and violent sexual predator scores to racial profiling on the highways, instruments to predict future dangerousness, drug-courier profiles, and IRS computer algorithms to detect tax evaders, the rise of actuarial methods in the field of crime and punishment presents a number of challenging issues at the intersection of economic theory, sociology, history, race studies, criminology, social theory, and law. The three review articles of Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age by Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, and Yoav Sapir, raise these challenges in their very best light. Ranging from the heights of poststructuralist …
Privacy Versus Antidiscrimination, Lior Strahilevitz
Plea Bargaining And The Death Penalty, Albert Alschuler
Plea Bargaining And The Death Penalty, Albert Alschuler
Articles
No abstract provided.
Reputation Nation: Law In An Era Of Ubiquitous Personal Information, Lior Strahilevitz
Reputation Nation: Law In An Era Of Ubiquitous Personal Information, Lior Strahilevitz
Articles
No abstract provided.
Studying The Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Classic, Albert Alschuler
Studying The Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Classic, Albert Alschuler
Articles
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Courts In East Asia: Understanding Variation, Tom Ginsburg
Constitutional Courts In East Asia: Understanding Variation, Tom Ginsburg
Articles
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting The Jena Six, Anthony V. Alfieri
Jessica Gonzales V. United States: An Emerging Model For Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy In The United States, Caroline Bettinger-López
Jessica Gonzales V. United States: An Emerging Model For Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy In The United States, Caroline Bettinger-López
Articles
No abstract provided.
Limiting Excessive Prison Sentences Under Federal And State Constitutions, Richard Frase
Limiting Excessive Prison Sentences Under Federal And State Constitutions, Richard Frase
Articles
No abstract provided.
Combating The Color-Coded Confinement Of Kids: An Equal Protection Remedy, Perry L. Moriearty
Combating The Color-Coded Confinement Of Kids: An Equal Protection Remedy, Perry L. Moriearty
Articles
This Article considers the viability of a constitutional challenge to the disproportionate confinement of juveniles of color – a phenomenon known as “disproportionate minority contact” or “DMC.” Specifically, I ask whether, in the wake of McCleskey v. Kemp and its progeny, it is possible bring an Equal Protection claim based on statistical evidence that juveniles of color are significantly more likely to be detained by juvenile court judges than similarly-situated white youth. I argue that the nature of the juvenile detention decision places it squarely within the contours of the types of administrative decisions for which the Supreme Court has …
Learning From The Limitations Of Deterrence Research, Michael Tonry
Learning From The Limitations Of Deterrence Research, Michael Tonry
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Malign Effects Of Drug And Crime Control Policies On Black Americans, Michael Tonry, Matthew Melewski
The Malign Effects Of Drug And Crime Control Policies On Black Americans, Michael Tonry, Matthew Melewski
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Slower Form Of Death: Implications Of Roper V. Simmons For Juveniles Sentenced To Life Without Parole, Barry C. Feld
A Slower Form Of Death: Implications Of Roper V. Simmons For Juveniles Sentenced To Life Without Parole, Barry C. Feld
Articles
The Supreme Court in Roper v. Simmons 1 interpreted the Eighth Amendment to prohibit states from executing offenders for crimes they committed when younger than eighteen years of age. The Court relied on objective indicators of "evolving standards of decency," such as state statutes and jury decisions to support its judgment that a national consensus existed against executing adolescents. The Justices also conducted an independent proportionality analysis of youths' criminal responsibility and concluded that their reduced culpability warranted a categorical prohibition of execution. Juveniles' immature judgment, susceptibility to negative peer influences, and transitory personality development diminished their criminal responsibility. Because …
Terror Conflated?, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
Terror Conflated?, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
Articles
This review of Eric Posner & Adrian Vermeule's book Terror in the Balance Security, Liberty and the Courts is constructed in part as a response not only to this scholarly work but also to recent executive and policy directions which suggest that substantial deference should be given to the executive in times of crisis, that courts should defer competence and that any harms inflicted upon civil liberties by executive action are overstated by interests with little competence in the core arena of security.
Horizontal Federalism, Allan Erbsen
Horizontal Federalism, Allan Erbsen
Articles
This Article constructs frameworks for analyzing federalism's undertheorized horizontal dimension. Discussions of federalism generally focus on the hierarchical (or vertical) allocation of power between the national and state governments while overlooking the horizontal allocation of power among coequal states. Models of federal-state relations tend to treat the fifty states as a single aggregate unit, obscuring the fact that individual states often cannot concurrently exercise their powers without infringing the other states' autonomy, frustrating the others' legitimate interests, or burdening the others' citizens. Preserving interstate harmony and protecting citizens from excessive burdens therefore requires limits on how states may wield their …
What's Wrong With Litigation-Driven Science? An Essay In Legal Epistemology, Susan Haack
What's Wrong With Litigation-Driven Science? An Essay In Legal Epistemology, Susan Haack
Articles
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Indivisibility: Towards A Theory Of Supporting Relations Between Human Rights, James W. Nickel
Rethinking Indivisibility: Towards A Theory Of Supporting Relations Between Human Rights, James W. Nickel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Frequency And Predictors Of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, And New Data On Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross, Barbara O'Brien
Frequency And Predictors Of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, And New Data On Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross, Barbara O'Brien
Articles
In the first part of this article, we address the problems inherent in studying wrongful convictions: our pervasive ignorance and the extreme difficulty of obtaining the data that we need to answer even basic questions. The main reason that we know so little about false convictions is that, by definition, they are hidden from view. As a result, it is nearly impossible to gather reliable data on the characteristics or even the frequency of false convictions. In addition, we have very limited data on criminal investigations and prosecutions in general, so even if we could somehow obtain data on cases …
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
Articles
Although sometimes described as war, the fight against transnational jihadi groups (referred to for shorthand as the "fight against terrorism") largely takes place away from any recognizable battlefield. Terrorism suspects are captured in houses, on street comers, and at border crossings around the globe. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the high-level Qaeda operative who planned the September 11 attacks, was captured by the Pakistani government in a residence in Pakistan. Abu Omar, a radical Muslim imam, was apparently abducted by U.S. and Italian agents off the streets of Milan. And Abu Baker Bashir, the spiritual leader of the Qaeda-affiliated group responsible for …
The Human Rights Quagmire Of 'Human Trafficking', James C. Hathaway
The Human Rights Quagmire Of 'Human Trafficking', James C. Hathaway
Articles
Support for the international fight against "human trafficking" evolved quickly and comprehensively. The campaign launched by the UN General Assembly in December 19981 led to adoption just two years later of the Trafficking Protocol to the UN Convention against Organized Crime.2 U.S. President George W. Bush was among those particularly committed to the cause, calling for collective effort to eradicate the "special evil" of human trafficking, said by him to have become a "humanitarian crisis."3 One hundred and twenty-two countries have now ratified the Trafficking Protocol, agreeing in particular to criminalize trafficking and to cooperate in investigating and prosecuting allegations …
The Impact Of Traumatic Stress And Alcohol Exposure On Youth: Implications For Lawyers, Judges, And Courts, Frank E. Vandervort
The Impact Of Traumatic Stress And Alcohol Exposure On Youth: Implications For Lawyers, Judges, And Courts, Frank E. Vandervort
Articles
Since its inception in the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court has been concerned with the legal problems of children and their families. From the court’s earliest days, it has sought to address child abuse and neglect and juvenile delinquency as social problems that result from familial and community breakdown. Over the decades, researchers from various disciplines have provided varying explanations of how and why family systems break down, why some parents fail to nurture their children, why some physically or sexually abuse their children, and why some children become delinquent.
Human Rights At Home: Domestic Violence As A Human Rights Violation, Caroline Bettinger-López
Human Rights At Home: Domestic Violence As A Human Rights Violation, Caroline Bettinger-López
Articles
No abstract provided.
The California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Decision And Agency Interpretation: A Response To Galle And Seidenfeld, Nina A. Mendelson
The California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Decision And Agency Interpretation: A Response To Galle And Seidenfeld, Nina A. Mendelson
Articles
Professors Brian Galle and Mark Seidenfeld add some important strands to the debate on agency preemption, particularly in their detailed documentation of the potential advantages agencies may possess in deliberating on preemption compared with Congress and the courts. As they note, the quality of agency deliberation matters to two different debates. First, should an agency interpretation of statutory language to preempt state law receive Chevron deference in the courts, as other agency interpretations may, or should some lesser form of deference be given? Second, should a general statutory authorization to an agency to administer a program and to issue rules …
Sentencing: Where Case Theory And The Client Meet, Kimberly A. Thomas
Sentencing: Where Case Theory And The Client Meet, Kimberly A. Thomas
Articles
Criminal sentencing hearings provide unique opportunities for teaching and learning case theory. These hearings allow attorneys to develop a case theory in a context that both permits understanding of the concept and, at the same time, provides a window into the difficulties case theory can pose. Some features of sentencing hearings, such as relaxed rules of evidence and stock sentencing stories, provide a manageable application of case theory practice. Other features of sentencing hearings, such as the defendant's allocution, require an attorney to contend with competing "case theories," and as a result, to face the ethical and counseling challenge of …
Waiting For The Other Shoe: Hudson And The Precarious State Of Mapp, David A. Moran
Waiting For The Other Shoe: Hudson And The Precarious State Of Mapp, David A. Moran
Articles
I have no idea whether my death will be noted in the New York Times. But if it is, I fear the headline of my obituary will look something like: "Professor Dies; Lost Hudson v. Michigan' in Supreme Court, Leading to Abolition of Exclusionary Rule." The very existence of this Symposium panel shows, I think, that my fear is well-grounded. On the other hand, I am not quite as fearful that Hudson foreshadows the complete overruling of Mapp v. Ohio2 and Weeks v. United States3 as I was when I published an article just three months after the Hudson decision …
Preserving The Rule Of Law In America's Jails And Prisons: The Case For Amending The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Margo Schlanger, Giovanna Shay
Preserving The Rule Of Law In America's Jails And Prisons: The Case For Amending The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Margo Schlanger, Giovanna Shay
Articles
Prisons and jails pose a significant challenge to the rule of law within American boundaries. As a nation, we are committed to constitutional regulation of governmental treatment of even those who have broken society’s rules. And accordingly, most of our prisons and jails are run by committed professionals who care about prisoner welfare and constitutional compliance. At the same time, for prisons—closed institutions holding an ever-growing disempowered population—most of the methods by which we, as a polity, foster government accountability and equality among citizens are unavailable or at least not currently practiced. In the absence of other levers by which …
Advocating For The Constitutional Rights Of Nonresident Fathers, Vivek Sankaran
Advocating For The Constitutional Rights Of Nonresident Fathers, Vivek Sankaran
Articles
Months after a child welaare case is petitioned, a nonresident father appears in court and requests custody of his children who are living in foster care. Little is known about the father, and immediately, the system-judge, caseworkers, and attorneys view him with suspicion and caution, inquiring about his whereabouts and his prior involvement in the children's lives. Those doubts, in turn, raise complicated questions about his legal rights to his children. As a practioner working in the child welfare system, you're likely to face this scenario. The largest percentage of child victims of abuse and neglect come from households headed …