Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 7831 - 7835 of 7835

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Shibli V. Shibli, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Moshe Smoira, Simha Assaf Jan 1950

Shibli V. Shibli, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Moshe Smoira, Simha Assaf

Translated Opinions

Under the Palestine Order in Council, 1922, a number of Christian "communities", including the Greek Catholic community but not including the Protestant community, were recognised and given the right to hold courts of their own with jurisdiction (which in some cases required the consent of the parties) in matters of personal status over members of their own community.

The petitioner was a Protestant and had married the first respondent, a member of the recognised Greek Catholic community, in a Greek Catholic church. There was one child of the marriage. The parties quarreled soon after the marriage and their disagreements led …


Bejerano V. Police Minister, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Simha Assaf, Moshe Silberg Feb 1949

Bejerano V. Police Minister, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Simha Assaf, Moshe Silberg

Translated Opinions

A judgment upon the Respondents’ objection to an order nisi requiring that they refrain from forbidding petition writers from appearing and acting as agents of their clients in the offices of the Tel Aviv District Traffic Department. In making the order absolute, Justice S.Z. Cheshin, writing for the Court, held:

The High Court of Justice cannot grant a request unless it is persuaded that a right of the Petitioners themselves has been infringed – In requesting an order mandamus, the Petitioner must show the existence of a law that requires the public official to do that which he is being …


Zeev V. Acting District Commissioner Of The Urban Area Of Tel Aviv, Moshe Smoira, Yitzhak Olshan, Shneor Zalman Cheshin Dec 1948

Zeev V. Acting District Commissioner Of The Urban Area Of Tel Aviv, Moshe Smoira, Yitzhak Olshan, Shneor Zalman Cheshin

Translated Opinions

The Acting District Commissioner of Tel Aviv purporting to act as the Competent Authority under Mandatory regulations requisitioned an apartment in Tel Aviv for the use of a government official His action was challenged on the grounds, first, that the Mandatory regulations in question had been impliedly repealed by s. 9 of the Law and Administration Oridnance of 19481) which empowered the Provisional Council to make regulations of the same kind, and secondly, that the appointment of the Acting District Commissioner as Competent Authority, being an act having legislative effect within the meaning of s.20 of the Interpretation Ordinance, 1945, …


Leon V. Acting District Commissioner Of Tel-Aviv (Yehoshua Gobernik), Moshe Smoira, Yitzhak Olshan, Simha Assaf Oct 1948

Leon V. Acting District Commissioner Of Tel-Aviv (Yehoshua Gobernik), Moshe Smoira, Yitzhak Olshan, Simha Assaf

Translated Opinions

The Law and Administration Ordinance 1948, provides that the law which existed in Palestine on May 14, 1948, "shall remain in force... subject to such modifications as may result from the establishment of the State and its authorities".

The Acting District Commissioner of Tel Aviv, as the competent authority under the Defence Regulations of 1939, made pursuant to the (English) Emergency Powers (Defence) Act 1939, requisitioned a flat situated at no. 3, Chen Boulevard, Tel Aviv, by order dated 6 September 1948. The requisition was for the benefit of the Attorney-General who, previously to his then recent appointment to that …


Neiman V. Military Governor Of The Occupied Area Of Jerusalem, Moshe Smoira, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Yitzhak Olshan Sep 1948

Neiman V. Military Governor Of The Occupied Area Of Jerusalem, Moshe Smoira, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Yitzhak Olshan

Translated Opinions

The Petitioner, while employed by the Army as a civilian employee, assaulted a soldier and committed other acts constituting criminal offences under both military and civil law. After he had ceased to be so employed, the Petitioner was charged before a military court. He sought an order restraining the military court from proceeding with the charges on the grounds that he was not at the relevant time a soldier within the meaning of the Army Code, or alternatively that he had ceased to be a soldier when charged and that a military court therefore had no jurisdiction in the matter. …