Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (7636)
- Constitutional Law (1311)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (954)
- Jurisprudence (765)
- Intellectual Property Law (753)
-
- Criminal Law (737)
- Criminal Procedure (681)
- International Law (663)
- Law and Gender (632)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (601)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (525)
- Law and Society (511)
- Courts (480)
- Human Rights Law (443)
- Communications Law (374)
- First Amendment (374)
- Legal History (369)
- Legislation (353)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (352)
- Science and Technology Law (321)
- Torts (318)
- Legal Education (313)
- Administrative Law (300)
- Evidence (292)
- Sexuality and the Law (286)
- Judges (284)
- Contracts (269)
- Legal Profession (262)
- Labor and Employment Law (250)
- Education Law (241)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (221)
- Jurisprudence (185)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (143)
- Politics (General) (129)
- Courts (116)
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (110)
- Business and the Law (96)
- Law and Society (91)
- Legal History (91)
- Judges (89)
- Bankruptcy (84)
- First Amendment (82)
- Legislation (80)
- Constitutional Law -- Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (77)
- Evidence (71)
- Administrative Law -- Discretion (68)
- Civil Rights (64)
- Torts (64)
- Intellectual Property Law (63)
- Religion and the Law (63)
- Government (General) (62)
- Penology (59)
- Contracts (58)
- Human Rights Law (58)
- Bankruptcy Law (56)
- Remedies (55)
- Property--Personal and Real (53)
- International Law (51)
- Race and Ethnicity Issues (51)
- Domestic Relations (49)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (2597)
- Articles (910)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (859)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (616)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (390)
-
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (383)
- Translated Opinions (381)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (277)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (172)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog (122)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (92)
- Women's Annotated Legal Bibliography (88)
- Online Publications (54)
- Cardozo Life Magazine (50)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog (48)
- Amicus Briefs (45)
- Commencement (42)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog (36)
- Student Handbooks (25)
- Cardozo Law News Briefs (23)
- Cardozo Law News Brief 2021 (22)
- Cardozo News 2019 (22)
- Cardozo Law News Brief 2019 (20)
- Cardozo Law News Brief 2024 (20)
- The Cardozo Law Forum (20)
- Cardozo Law Bulletin (19)
- Today at Cardozo 2019 (19)
- Cardozo Law News Brief 2020 (18)
- 2017 Event Invitations (17)
- 2019 Event Invitations (17)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 7835
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Incorporating Alternative Dispute Resolution At The United Nations: Establishing And Implementing And Arbitration Panel To Determine Whether A Permanent Member Of The Security Council Can Or Cannot Veto Proposed Resolutions Potentially Involving Human Rights Violations And Mass Atrocities, Jillian Leavey
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
No abstract provided.
Dance Like Everyone Is Watching: Why Tiktok Choreography And Copyright Aren't In Sync, Roseanne Planker
Dance Like Everyone Is Watching: Why Tiktok Choreography And Copyright Aren't In Sync, Roseanne Planker
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note argues that viral dances on platforms like TikTok should not be protected under the U.S. Copyright Act due to their ephemeral nature, social functionality, and the incompatibility of copyright's exclusivity with the viral dissemination process. It advocates for statutory reforms to ensure fair compensation and attribution for creators, proposing that platforms like TikTok be held accountable for these protections, similar to the EU's Copyright Directive. The analysis emphasizes the need for new legal frameworks to address the unique challenges of viral choreography, balancing artistic progress and creator rights.
Holocaust Denial Legislation In The United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, And The United States: How The Law Presently Addresses The Issue And Proposals For Reform, Madeline Epstein
Holocaust Denial Legislation In The United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, And The United States: How The Law Presently Addresses The Issue And Proposals For Reform, Madeline Epstein
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note examines the legal frameworks addressing Holocaust denial in the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and the United States, highlighting the need for more robust legislation to combat Holocaust denial effectively. It argues that while countries like Germany and Austria have stringent laws criminalizing Holocaust denial, jurisdictions like the U.S. and U.K. rely on civil remedies, which may be insufficient. The analysis advocates for adopting legal measures that balance free speech with the protection of historical truth and human dignity.
Taxing Wealth: A Comparative Analysis Of National Wealth Taxes And How A Federal Wealth Tax Can Overcome Administrative Challenges, Jason Nadboy
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note advocates for the implementation of a progressive federal wealth tax in the United States to address wealth inequality and generate revenue for social programs. It argues that while administrative challenges exist, they can be overcome by learning from international examples and implementing robust enforcement mechanisms.
Drug Addiction, Insanity, And Competency: How The Halimi Case Galvanizes A U.S.-Inspired Reform Of France's Criminal Responsibility System, Ruben Attia
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The Halimi case, culminating in a verdict from the Court of Cassation in April 2021, has ignited intense and contentious debates on criminal responsibility, leading to a profound erosion of public trust in the French judicial system. This Note delves into the urgency of addressing the issues presented by Halimi and emphasizes the necessity for innovative approaches within the French legislative framework. Striking a delicate balance between permitting the trial of controversial cases and upholding the age-old moral duty of excluding the mentally insane from guilty verdicts, this Note compares the intricacies of criminal responsibility in France with those in …
Tackling The Thicket: A Comparative Analysis Of Biologic Drugs And Biosimilars In The United States And Abroad, Lauren Cutler
Tackling The Thicket: A Comparative Analysis Of Biologic Drugs And Biosimilars In The United States And Abroad, Lauren Cutler
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note examines the legal and regulatory landscape surrounding biologic drugs and biosimilars in the United States and Europe, focusing on patent protections, litigation trends, and the impact of biosimilar competition on drug pricing. It highlights the challenges posed by patent thickets and evergreening strategies employed by brand-name biologic manufacturers, which delay biosimilar market entry and maintain high drug prices. The analysis underscores the differences in regulatory frameworks and market dynamics between the U.S. and Europe, emphasizing the need for policy reforms to enhance competition and affordability in the biologic market.
Always A Suspect: Law Enforcement's Violative Use Of Geofence Warrants And Geolocation Data In Criminal Investigations And Proceedings, Aaron A. Bengart
Always A Suspect: Law Enforcement's Violative Use Of Geofence Warrants And Geolocation Data In Criminal Investigations And Proceedings, Aaron A. Bengart
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note argues that geofence warrants, used by law enforcement to obtain location data from tech companies, pose significant Fourth Amendment concerns. It advocates for U.S. legislation similar to the U.K.'s to balance privacy rights with law enforcement needs, emphasizing the need for checks to prevent abuse and protect citizens from unreasonable searches.
Against The Current: Charting A New Course For Human Rights In Sustainable Fisheries Management, James H. Stitt
Against The Current: Charting A New Course For Human Rights In Sustainable Fisheries Management, James H. Stitt
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note advocates for a paradigm shift in fisheries management, moving beyond Western-centric regulatory frameworks to a holistic, human rights-based approach that integrates sustainable development, biodiversity conservation, and social justice. It emphasizes the critical role of small-scale fisheries and Indigenous communities in achieving ecological and economic sustainability, arguing that their traditional knowledge and practices are essential for effective resource management. The analysis highlights the limitations of existing international frameworks, such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF), in addressing the needs of small-scale and Indigenous fishers. …
"Those Were Just Demos And Never Intended To Be Heard By The Public", Ryan Whyte
"Those Were Just Demos And Never Intended To Be Heard By The Public", Ryan Whyte
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Beat It: A Proposal To End Masturbation Bans In Prisons, Madison Dougherty
Beat It: A Proposal To End Masturbation Bans In Prisons, Madison Dougherty
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that bans on masturbation in prisons are unconstitutional under the Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments. It contends that such bans infringe upon prisoners' rights to privacy, bodily autonomy, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment. The author proposes reforms to prison policies to allow private masturbation while prohibiting assaultive behavior, advocating for a shift towards rehabilitation over punishment.
(In)Dependence Day: Why The Modern Streaming Industry Requires Modern Antitrust Enforcement, Samuel Kahn
(In)Dependence Day: Why The Modern Streaming Industry Requires Modern Antitrust Enforcement, Samuel Kahn
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note argues that the contemporary streaming industry, dominated by a few major platforms, mirrors the pre-Paramount era's anticompetitive practices, necessitating a reexamination of antitrust laws to address oligopolistic structures, protect independent creators, and ensure consumer access to diverse content. It contends that the repeal of the Paramount Decrees and the failure of current antitrust frameworks to adapt to the streaming industry's unique challenges have allowed media giants to grow unchecked, stifling competition and innovation.
Sports Sanctions Against Russia Through The Lens Of The Court Of Arbitration For Sport, Ilias Bantekas
Sports Sanctions Against Russia Through The Lens Of The Court Of Arbitration For Sport, Ilias Bantekas
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The Russian invasion of Ukraine prompted the vast majority of international sports federations to adopt some kind of coercive measures against Russian and Belarusian clubs and athletes. While athletes in individual sports were generally allowed to participate without representing their country of nationality, international sports federations hosting team-based events suspended teams from sanctioned states from participating therein. Pertinent decisions were driven not by the sanctions imposed unilaterally or multilaterally. Rather, they were precipitated by logistical and safety factors, as well as the likelihood offinancial harm to the competitions under their aegis. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) sided with …
Deceptive By Nature: A Model For Regulating Native And Embedded Advertising In The Contexts Of Children's Audiences, Zach Cihlar
Deceptive By Nature: A Model For Regulating Native And Embedded Advertising In The Contexts Of Children's Audiences, Zach Cihlar
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note advocates for enhanced regulatory measures to protect children from deceptive native and embedded advertising in digital media. It emphasizes the need for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to expand its regulatory framework to classify such advertising as deceptive, leveraging existing laws like the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The proposed model suggests a combination of stricter regulations, parental involvement through technology, and strengthened self-regulatory mechanisms to address the challenges posed by modern advertising formats.
Can Chatgpt And The Like Be Your Co-Authors?, Hadar Y. Jabotinsky, Michal Lavi
Can Chatgpt And The Like Be Your Co-Authors?, Hadar Y. Jabotinsky, Michal Lavi
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
On November 30, 2022, OpenAI released an AI based chatbot called ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer). This AI system uses natural language processing (NLP) techniques to generate written text by learning the patterns and structures of natural language. ChatGPT is a versatile chatbot with the ability to write speeches, news articles, and essays either wholly or partially. Some users acknowledge ChatGPT as a co-author of the generated text, while others only acknowledge its use in writing the document. In fact, this issue became so pressing in academia that Springer Nature, the world's largest academic publisher, announced that software like ChatGPT cannot …
Service Of Process Via Nft Airdrops: The Pathway To Private Litigation For Injured Web3 Plaintiffs, Sophia Dudgeon
Service Of Process Via Nft Airdrops: The Pathway To Private Litigation For Injured Web3 Plaintiffs, Sophia Dudgeon
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note explores the evolving landscape of legal process in the digital age, focusing on the use of blockchain technology and NFTs for serving legal notices. It argues that courts are increasingly adapting traditional due process principles, such as those established in Mullane v. Alabama, to accommodate emerging technologies. The analysis highlights the landmark case LCX AG v. 1.274M U.S. Dollar Coin, where a court approved serving process via NFT airdrop, demonstrating how technological innovations can enhance access to justice in digital asset disputes. The author advocates for courts to embrace expansive interpretations of alternative service methods to …
Panel 2: Trademark Law, Stacey Dogan, Christine Haight Farley, Jessica Silbey, Rebecca Tushnet, Felix Wu
Panel 2: Trademark Law, Stacey Dogan, Christine Haight Farley, Jessica Silbey, Rebecca Tushnet, Felix Wu
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Why Courts Should Not Interpret The Meaning Of Art, Amy Adler
Why Courts Should Not Interpret The Meaning Of Art, Amy Adler
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The article argues that courts are ill-equipped to interpret the meaning of art, particularly in fair use cases, as seen in the Supreme Court's decision in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith. The Court's reliance on determining the meaning of art exacerbates confusion and inconsistency in fair use jurisprudence, highlighting the need for alternative approaches that avoid judicial interpretation of artistic meaning.
Why The Supreme Court Rejected The Prospect Theory Of Copyright Scope, Michael W. Carroll
Why The Supreme Court Rejected The Prospect Theory Of Copyright Scope, Michael W. Carroll
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
In Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. ("Google v. Oracle"), and again in Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith ("Warhol"), the parties and various amici presented the Court with a variety of arguments about the relationship between a copyright owner's right to make derivative works from a protected work and a user's right to make fair uses of that same work. At bottom, these arguments were about the proper, or even optimal, scope of copyright.
This Essay argues that these arguments were instead grounded in a form of "prospect theory" of copyright scope that …
Masthead, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 43 (2024-25)
Masthead, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 43 (2024-25)
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Law Of The New Musical Author, Eyal Brook
The Law Of The New Musical Author, Eyal Brook
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The process of musical creation has been transformed materially in the Digital Age due to technological developments, both regarding the technologies for making music and regarding novel stylistic developments. New musical practices, based on novel technology, afford entirely new modes of creative authorship. The effects of such shifts have redefined the nature of music and the role of musicians in fundamental ways. This article opens a new debate regarding the identity ofthe new musical author and the changes to the musical creative process.
As such changes have impacted the musical creative process, there are necessary changes required to adapt the …
Satire And Actual Malice: Expanding The Reasonable Reader Analysis For The Modem Era, Cory Crystal
Satire And Actual Malice: Expanding The Reasonable Reader Analysis For The Modem Era, Cory Crystal
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Bias Notification Duty, Eldar Haber, Shai Stern
Bias Notification Duty, Eldar Haber, Shai Stern
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
Algorithms are often tainted with bias that could negatively affect subjects' lives in many aspects. But while policymakers and scholars tend to focus their attention on methods to fix the bias within the algorithm or its output, they neglect a crucial piece of the puzzle: when companies discover bias and fix it in the algorithmic output, they do so behind the scenes. While such a move might debias the output, society remains in the dark about its existence or how it might have affected the outcome. Society thus misses a unique opportunity to study social and cognitive biases that shape …
What Happens When The Conflicts Of Interest Board Does Not Prevent Conflicts? Examining New York City Charter Chapter 68, Abigail Damsky
What Happens When The Conflicts Of Interest Board Does Not Prevent Conflicts? Examining New York City Charter Chapter 68, Abigail Damsky
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note critiques the New York Board's advisory opinion on elected officials' use of personal social media accounts, arguing that it contravenes Chapter 68 and Board Rule Section 113 by allowing the use of city resources for political gain, undermining government integrity, and creating transparency issues under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL). The analysis advocates for revising the advisory opinion to align with existing ethical standards and ensure accountability.
Trademark Fair Use Is No Joke, Christine Haight Farley
Trademark Fair Use Is No Joke, Christine Haight Farley
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products, arguing that the Court missed an opportunity to clarify the relationship between trademark law and the First Amendment. While the Court acknowledged the importance of protecting parodies, it failed to develop a comprehensive framework for balancing trademark rights with free speech. Instead, it introduced a narrow rule that limits the application of the Rogers test, potentially undermining speech protections in trademark disputes. The article contends that the Court's reliance on the likelihood of confusion test is insufficient to address the broader First Amendment implications of …
What Recent Scrutiny Surrounding New Jersey's Newborn Screening Program Is Missing: Comment On The Reproductive And Social Justice Issues The Program Illuminates, Dylan Blanchard
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note critiques New Jersey's Newborn Screening Program, highlighting its constitutional and social justice implications. While the program is a vital public health measure, its retention of newborn blood samples without informed consent and subsequent use by law enforcement raises significant Fourth Amendment concerns. The analysis argues that the program disproportionately impacts minorities and perpetuates systemic racism in the criminal legal system, as biometric data from these samples can be used to bypass probable cause requirements.
Incentivizing Innovation In The Realm Of Social Goods: Patent Law's Unintended Inhibiting Effect On Environmental Technological Advancement, Ethan Graham
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note argues that while Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology holds significant potential to address climate change by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, its development and deployment are hindered by the gatekeeping mechanism of patents. These patents, though intended to incentivize innovation, often stifle progress by restricting access to critical technologies. The analysis highlights the urgency of climate action, the limitations of current legal frameworks, and the need for policy reforms to accelerate DAC innovation and mitigate global warming.
Annotated Legal Bibliography
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Dobbs And Democracy, Melissa Murray, Katherine A. Shaw
Dobbs And Democracy, Melissa Murray, Katherine A. Shaw
Articles
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Alito justified the decision to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey with an appeal to democracy. He insisted that it was “time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” This invocation of democracy had undeniable rhetorical power: it allowed the Dobbs majority to lay waste to decades’ worth of precedent, while rebutting charges of judicial imperialism and purporting to restore the people’s voices. This Article interrogates Dobbs’s claim to vindicate principles of democracy, examining both the intellectual pedigree …
Antitrust Regulation Of Copyright Markets, Jacob Noti-Victor, Xiyin Tang
Antitrust Regulation Of Copyright Markets, Jacob Noti-Victor, Xiyin Tang
Articles
Late last year, a federal court sided with the Department of Justice and blocked the planned merger of book publishers Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random House. The decision was a rare collision between antitrust law and the deeply consolidated copyright content industries. Over the course of the past decade, acquisitions and mergers in the recording, music publishing, and audiovisual space have left just a handful of juggernaut content producers in their wake. Moreover, new technology companies that have entered the content-creation and distribution markets have begun to leverage their scale to further their own industry consolidation.
This Article examines …
Situating The Modern Public Trust Doctrine In Trust Law: The Duty Of Loyalty And The Case For Bifurcated, De Novo Judicial Review, Edward A. Zelinsky
Situating The Modern Public Trust Doctrine In Trust Law: The Duty Of Loyalty And The Case For Bifurcated, De Novo Judicial Review, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
This article situates the modern public trust doctrine (PTD) in contemporary trust law. Grounding the PTD in trust law leads to two important corollaries. First, the PTD planted in trust law imposes upon government actors and agencies trust law’s fiduciary duty of loyalty. In the context of the PTD, that duty of loyalty runs to the public as the beneficiary of the PTD. Second, faced with plausible claims that this fiduciary duty of loyalty to the public has been violated, courts should apply trust law’s de novo standard of review to those administrative and legislative decisions alleged to impair public …