Digital Commons Network^™

The Lawyer With The Adr Tattoo, Jennifer W. Reynolds

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article considers whether ADR presents a branding problem for legal professionals and, if so, how those professionals can reclaim the brand in productive, career-affirming ways. Whether one should self-identify as proponent, practitioner, or scholar of alternative practices implicates broad tensions not only around assimilating with integrity into any longstanding change-resistant profession, but also around the shortcomings of the adversarial system and the legitimacy of ADR.

Increasing Referrals To Small Claims Mediation Programs: Models To Improve Access To Justice, Heather Scheiwe Kulp

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The justice system is in crisis. In 2011, 85% of Connecticut's family court cases had at least one self-represented litigant. In Massachusetts, 92% of parties appearing in housing cases are selfrepresented. New York saw self-representation in 97% of child support cases. Although judges and attorneys are learning to adapt to this new reality, the strain is felt strongly by bench and bar alike.

This article explores a service that many courts already offer-small claims mediation-and studies how courts may more effectively refer parties to such services. Specifically, this article identifies six primary models courts use to refer parties to small …

The Curious Case Of Transformative Dispute Resolution: An Unfortunate Marriage Of Intransigence, Exclusivity, And Hype, Robert J. Condlin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Why do proponents of Transformative Dispute Resolution ("TDR") defend the Theory in such intransigent, exclusivist, and grandiose terms? TDR is a mature theory, and a relatively sophisticated one, and qualities of this sort usually go hand in hand with a balanced, refined, and well-modulated sense of self, but TDR proponents will have none of that. They make ambitious (some would say outlandish) assertions about the Theory's capacity to develop moral and political character, reform deliberative government, and resolve ethno-political conflict, while simultaneously rejecting overtures from sympathetic outsiders to rein in the overstated aspects of these claims, and craft a more …

No Longer Left To Their Own Devices: Utilizing And Facilitating Mediation To Give Students Access To Assistive Technology, Eric Slepak

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note seeks to fill that void by examining the unique role AT plays in a student's development and how mediation succeeds (and fails) in helping the student secure desired equipment and services. Part II of this Note examines the background law and facts governing the dissemination of AT devices and services and the mechanisms for resolving disputes surrounding that dissemination. Part III provides an illustrative example to demonstrate the complex legal issues that arise in the determination of technology appropriate for students with disabilities.

Part IV then examines why mediation offers a superior mode of resolution to both parents …

Annotated Legal Bibliography On Gender

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

The Goldilocks Principle And Informed Consent In Joint-Spouse Representation, Madison Kaplan

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note explores the complexities of joint legal representation of spouses, emphasizing the need for balanced and clear informed consent. It highlights the challenges posed by conflicting legal guidelines and the necessity of detailed Joint Representation Agreements (JRAs) to navigate confidentiality and communication duties effectively.

Accessing Justice Ii: A Model For Providing Counsel To New York Immigrants In Removal Proceedings, Stacy Caplow, Peter L. Markowitz, Claudia Slovinsky, Jojo Annobil, Peter Cobb, Amy L. Kenepaske, Nancy Morawetz, Lindsay Nash, Raluca Oncioiu, Oren Root, Maribel Hernández Rivera, Jane Stern, Isaac Wheeler, Marianne Yang

Online Publications

The New York Immigrant Representation Study (“NYIR Study”) is a two-year project of the Study Group on Immigrant Representation to analyze and ameliorate the immigrant representation crisis—the acute shortage of qualified attorneys willing and able to represent indigent immigrants facing deportation. The crisis has reached epic proportions in New York and shows no signs of abating.

In its year-one report (issued in the fall of 2011), the NYIR Study analyzed the empirical evidence regarding the nature and scope of the immigrant representation crisis. In that report, we documented how many New Yorkers—27 percent of those not detained and 60 percent …

2012 Cardozo Life (Fall), Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Life Magazine

Table of Contents:

Campus News, page 3

Working for New Jobs, page 16

Faculty Briefs, page 18

Teaching Law Now, page 23

Alumni News & Advancement, Class Notes, page 34

Practicing Law Now, page 37

Studying Law Now, page 48

The White House … The Supreme Court … Guantanamo Bay, page 70

Looking Back, page 72

Masthead - Cardozo Public Law, Policy, And Ethics Journal, Vol. 11 (2012-13)

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Reevaluating Administrative Evidence Policy: The Case For Two Exclusionary Rules At Social Security Administrative Hearings, Max Bookman

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note advocates for the adoption of two specific exclusionary rules in Social Security Administration (SSA) disability hearings to address fairness concerns while maintaining efficiency. It argues that the current process, which prioritizes efficiency over the ability to cross-examine evidence, can lead to unfair outcomes for claimants. The proposed rules aim to ensure claimants can challenge evidence, promoting a fairer process without overly burdening the system. The note challenges the traditional view that exclusionary rules are unnecessary in administrative hearings, emphasizing the need for a balance between efficiency and fairness.

Procedure In Eclipse: Group-Based Adjudication In A Post-Conception Era, Myriam E. Gilles

Articles

No abstract provided.

2012 Commencement Exercises, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Commencement

Order of Exercises

Processional:

Herbert C. Dobrinsky, Vice President for University Affairs, Yeshiva University; Herald

Presiding:

Morton Lowengrub, Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, Yeshiva University; Chief Marshal

Richard M. Joel, President, Yeshiva University

National Anthem:

Cantor Ira W. Heller, Class of 2008

Invocation:

Rabbi Ozer Glickman, Adjunct Professor, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Welcome:

Leslie E. Payson, Chair, Cardozo Board of Overseers, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; Class of 1991

Remarks:

Matthew Diller, Dean, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Commencement Address:

Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals

Presentation of …

Administrative Justice: Using Agency Declaratory Orders In The Fight To Staunch The Financing Of Terrorism, J. David Pollock

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Judge And Extrajudicial Conduct: Challenges, Lessons Learned, And A Proposed Framework For Assessing The Propriety Of Pursuing Activities Beyond The Bench, Jonathan Lippman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Client Confidentiality And The External Regulation Of The Legal Profession: Reporting Requirements In The United States And United Kingdom, Maria Castilla

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note examines the dual role of lawyers as both zealous advocates for their clients and guardians of justice, highlighting the tension this creates, particularly in the context of corporate scandals. It critiques the notion that lawyers should solely serve their clients and suggests a more active role in preventing misconduct. The analysis compares regulatory approaches in the U.S. and the U.K., noting that the U.S. relies more on self-regulation while the U.K. emphasizes external oversight, reflecting differing societal perceptions of lawyers' roles.

Exile Without Process: The New York City Housing Authority's Unconstitutional Trespass Notice Program, Lauren J. Zimmerman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Guardianship In New York: Developing An Agenda For Change, The Guardianship Clinic

Bet Tzedek Writings

Cardozo Law School hosted a conference on November 15, 2011 to coincide with the launch of its new Guardianship Clinic. “Guardianship in New York: Developing an Agenda for Change” was a day-long convening of attorneys, advocates, court personnel, judges, and service providers, designed to foster dialogue and develop consensus about the next wave of guardianship reform in the state. The conference focused primarily on Article 81 but some of the recommendations bear on Article 17-A guardianships as well. The day began with a morning plenary that offered a variety of perspectives on guardianship, including an overview of national developments, discussion …

2012-2013, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Student Handbooks

No abstract provided.

To Kill A Mockingbird Mediator?: Assessing The Need For Third-Party Neutrals In Federal Bankruptcy Courts' Home Foreclosure Avoidance Programs, Lancelot L. Esteibar

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note proceeds in four parts. First, Part I provides background information on the mortgage crisis, the loss mitigation processes, and current federal, state, and bankruptcy court programs aimed towards preventing foreclosure. Second, Part II describes the role of a mediator and the process of mediation. Third, Part III examines barriers to effective negotiation and why mediators can assist in overcoming those obstacles in the bankruptcy courts' loss mitigation programs. Finally, Part IV offers an alternative to the direct negotiation model prescribed by the S.D.N.Y., E.D.N.Y., and D.R.I. loss mitigation programs.

Masthead - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 31 (2012)

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"U" Stands For Underutilization: The U Visa's Vulnerability For Underuse In The Sex Trafficking Context, Erin Bistricer

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The U Visa, established in 2000 under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) reauthorization, was designed to provide legal status to victims of certain crimes, including sex trafficking, without fear of deportation. However, its implementation has been hindered by significant challenges, including delayed regulations, confusion among applicants, and reliance on law enforcement cooperation, which can be a barrier for traumatized victims. While the U Visa offers more flexibility than the T Visa by covering a broader range of crimes and requiring a lower standard of proof, its effectiveness is limited by factors such as annual caps, inadequate state anti-trafficking laws, …

Tnuva Central Cooperative V. Raabi Estate, Esther Hayut, Isaac Amit, Uzi Vogelman

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

An appeal and cross appeal challenging the decision of the Tel Aviv District Court (Partial Judgment and Supplementary Judgment,) where the court partially granted a consumer class action suit, which was granted leave to be submitted in CC 10085/080 (hereinafter: Tnuva). The class action suit revolved around the misleading of the consumer public and the production of a milk product in violation of binding …

Constitutionalizing Immigration Law On Its Own Path, Anne R. Traum

Cardozo Law Review

Courts should insist on heightened procedural protections in immigration adjudication. They should do so under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause rather than by importing Sixth Amendment protections from the criminal context. Traditional judicial oversight and the Due Process Clause provide a better basis than the Sixth Amendment to interpose heightened procedural protections in immigration proceedings, especially those involving removal for a serious criminal conviction. The Supreme Court's immigration jurisprudence in recent years lends support for this approach. The Court has guarded the availability of judicial review of immigration decisions. It has affirmed that courts are the arbiters of constitutional …

The Asylum Representation Project And The Leon Levy Fellowship At Human Rights First: An Innovative Partnership To Increase Pro Bono Representation For Indigent Asylum-Seekers, Lori Adams, Alida Y. Lasker

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foreword: The Study Group On Immigrant Representation Symposium Innovative Approaches To Immigrant Representation: Exploring New Partnerships, Robert A. Katzmann

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Accessing Justice: The Availability And Adequacy Of Counsel In Removal Proceedings (New York Immigrant Representation Study Report: Part 1), Peter L. Markowitz, Jojo Annobil, Stacy Caplow, Peter V.Z Cobb, Nancy Morawetz, Oren Root, Claudia Slovinsky, Zhifen Cheng, Lindsay Nash

Cardozo Law Review

The article addresses the immigrant representation crisis in U.S. immigration courts, highlighting a severe shortage of competent legal representation for individuals in removal proceedings. This crisis is marked by both a lack of quantity and quality of representation, exacerbated by rising deportation rates, detention practices, and resource constraints faced by removal defense providers (RDPs). The study underscores the critical role of legal representation in achieving successful outcomes, with stark disparities in success rates between represented and unrepresented individuals. It advocates for systemic solutions, including expanded funding, improved coordination among providers, and policy reforms to ensure fair and competent representation for …

To License Or Not To License? A Look At Differing Approaches To Policing The Activities Of Nonlawyer Immigration Service Providers, Careen Shannon

Cardozo Law Review

State (and some local) governments have struggled to find ways to protect immigrants from exploitation by persons falsely holding themselves out as immigration lawyers or claiming expertise as notarios or immigration consultants. Existing legislation ranges from attempts to regulate the activities of nonlawyer immigration service providers (ISPs) by delineating prohibited practices; to requiring ISPs to post a bond or register with the state; to specifically restricting the provision of immigration assistance for compensation by any nonlawyer who is not accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals to transcription, translation, document procurement and related clerical tasks. A comparative look at the …

Illegal Aid: Legal Assistance To Immigrants In The United States, Geoffrey Heeren

Cardozo Law Review

There is an enormous unmet need for immigrant legal aid in the United States. This is partly due to regulations that bar federally funded legal services organizations from representing many types of immigrants. The possible repeal of these restrictions is rarely discussed as a means to expand immigrant access to counsel. Federal funding for immigrant legal aid appears to have become taboo, despite the fact that for much of its history, legal aid was deeply connected to immigration. This forgotten history reveals that there was once broad national consensus in favor of immigrant legal aid; it became contentious and faced …

Representation Of The Immigrant Poor: Upstate New York, Denny Chin

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

What Is Wrong About Wrongdoing, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

This short article, which was prepared for a conference on civil recourse theory at Florida State University School of Law, asks whether Blackstone’s rejection of maintenance is inconsistent with the theoretical commitments of modern civil recourse theory. Blackstone strongly believed that third parties should not help victims of wrongdoing discover that they have been wronged, this article asks whether modern civil recourse theory is committed to the position (now in retreat throughout common law nations) that third parties who help strangers’ lawsuits are acting against the public interest (or, as Blackstone put it, are “pests of society . . . …