Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (388)
- Criminal Law (147)
- Criminal Procedure (85)
- Constitutional Law (76)
- Evidence (33)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (30)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (20)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (19)
- First Amendment (19)
- Courts (13)
- Law and Society (13)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (13)
- Environmental Law (12)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Fourth Amendment (11)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Law and Psychology (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- Juvenile Law (9)
- Military, War, and Peace (9)
- International Law (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Legal Remedies (7)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Torts (6)
- Education Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Criminal Law (37)
- Criminal Procedure (30)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (17)
- Due Process (16)
-
- Drug traffic (12)
- Evidence (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Equal Protection (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Professional Ethics (9)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Courts (8)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Corrections (7)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Sentencing guidelines (Criminal procedure) (7)
- Criminal law (6)
- Pennsylvania (6)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Habeas Corpus (5)
- Self-incrimination (5)
- Arrest Information (4)
- Attorneys (4)
- Computerization of Information (4)
- Criminals -- Rehabilitation (4)
- Drug Addicts (4)
- Drugs (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (288)
- The Gavel Gazette (54)
- Faculty Publications (45)
- 2009 Decisions (30)
- 2011 Decisions (29)
-
- 2008 Decisions (28)
- 2010 Decisions (27)
- Working Paper Series (27)
- 2014 Decisions (26)
- 2017 Decisions (26)
- 2007 Decisions (25)
- The Docket (25)
- 2018 Decisions (23)
- 2006 Decisions (22)
- 2024 Decisions (22)
- 2005 Decisions (21)
- 2019 Decisions (21)
- 2015 Decisions (20)
- 2012 Decisions (19)
- 2021 Decisions (19)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (19)
- 2003 Decisions (18)
- 2016 Decisions (18)
- 2002 Decisions (16)
- 2004 Decisions (16)
- 2020 Decisions (16)
- 2013 Decisions (15)
- 2001 Decisions (14)
- 1995 Decisions (13)
- 2026 Decisions (13)
- Publication Type
Articles 721 - 750 of 1163
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
July 30, 2005 (Pages 4167-4290), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
July 30, 2005 (Pages 4167-4290), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 35 (2005)
No abstract provided.
July 2, 2005 (Pages 3647-3798), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
July 2, 2005 (Pages 3647-3798), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 35 (2005)
No abstract provided.
Willow Inn Inc V. Pub Ser Mutl Ins Co
Willow Inn Inc V. Pub Ser Mutl Ins Co
2005 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
What Do Juvenile Offenders Know About Being Tried As Adults? Implications For Deterrence , Richard E. Redding
What Do Juvenile Offenders Know About Being Tried As Adults? Implications For Deterrence , Richard E. Redding
Working Paper Series
An underlying assumption in the nationwide policy shift toward transferring more juveniles to criminal court has been the belief that stricter, adult sentences will act as either a specific or general deterrent to juvenile crime. With respect to general deterrence - whether transfer laws deter would-be offenders from committing crimes - it is important to examine whether juveniles know about transfer laws, whether this knowledge deters criminal behavior, and whether juveniles believe the laws will be enforced against them. The current study is one of the first to examine juveniles' knowledge and perceptions of transfer laws and criminal sanctions. We …
Toward An Ethic Of Teaching: Class, Race And The Promise Of Community Engagement, Roberto L. Corrada
Toward An Ethic Of Teaching: Class, Race And The Promise Of Community Engagement, Roberto L. Corrada
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Going On-Line With Justice Pedagogy: Four Ways Of Looking At A Website, Fran Ansley, Cathy Cochran
Going On-Line With Justice Pedagogy: Four Ways Of Looking At A Website, Fran Ansley, Cathy Cochran
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Revisiting Novel Approaches To Combating The Financing Of Crime: A Brave New World Revisited, Bruce Zagaris
Revisiting Novel Approaches To Combating The Financing Of Crime: A Brave New World Revisited, Bruce Zagaris
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Saving Federal Sentencing Reform After Apprendi, Blakely And Booker, David Yellen
Saving Federal Sentencing Reform After Apprendi, Blakely And Booker, David Yellen
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Bad Children Or A Bad System: Problems In Federal Interpretation Of A Delinquent's Prior Record In Determining The Appropriateness Of A Discretionary Judicial Waiver, Jessica L. Anders
Bad Children Or A Bad System: Problems In Federal Interpretation Of A Delinquent's Prior Record In Determining The Appropriateness Of A Discretionary Judicial Waiver, Jessica L. Anders
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Is Open Voir Dire A Good Thing - Abc, Inc. V. Martha Stewart: The Second Circuit's Interpretation Of First Amendment Rights During Jury Selection In High-Profile Celebrity Trials, Catherine Stehlin
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Human Rights, Terrorism And International Law, David P. Stewart
Human Rights, Terrorism And International Law, David P. Stewart
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Next Era Of Sentencing Reform, Steven L. Chanenson
The Next Era Of Sentencing Reform, Steven L. Chanenson
Working Paper Series
This article charts a path for criminal sentencing in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent bombshell decision in Blakely v. Washington. Blakely has thrust sentencing systems across the country into turmoil. But Justice O’Connor was fundamentally wrong when, in her Blakely dissent, she exclaimed that “Over 20 years of sentencing reform are all but lost.” All is most assuredly not lost. Blakely, properly viewed, is an opportunity – albeit a disruptive one – to re-think and improve our sentencing systems.
The Blakely court interpreted the Sixth Amendment to require that any fact, other than the fact of prior conviction, …
Hoist With Their Own Petard?, Steven L. Chanenson
Hoist With Their Own Petard?, Steven L. Chanenson
Working Paper Series
In 2003, Congress and the Department of Justice tried to increase their control over the United States Sentencing Commission and federal sentencing generally. Congress appeared to have achieved this goal when it passed the Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (“PROTECT Act”), which resulted in reduced grounds for downward departures, Congressionally-revised text of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and a constrained Sentencing Commission potentially devoid of judges. Yet pro-government interpretations of the PROTECT Act may have been premature because the Supreme Court has now struck down parts of Washington State’s legislatively-enacted sentencing guidelines in …
August 21, 2004 (Pages 4541-4672), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
August 21, 2004 (Pages 4541-4672), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 34 (2004)
No abstract provided.
The Legacy Of The Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, And Cautionary Instructions On Campus Sexual Assault, Michelle J. Anderson
The Legacy Of The Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, And Cautionary Instructions On Campus Sexual Assault, Michelle J. Anderson
Working Paper Series
No abstract provided.